Real Advice on Website Design / SEO

1. Don't lose money on a designer. This way you can edit your site.

2. Choose easy editing tools, for example, those provided by Yahoo Small Business (now unfortunately called Aabaco Small Business, but still linked from smallbusiness.yahoo.com).

3. Don't pay for advertising at first. It doesn't pay off unless your name is already out there.

4. Start out with a lot of keywords in your meta data, then get used to selecting the best ones, preferably ones you know from your site statistics have been used by people who find your site.

5. Choose good content for your page. Avoid illegal activity and generic, hyped-up content.

6. Update your site fairly frequently, unless you just don't care.

7. Watch your site patiently, and make strategic edits.

8. Be creative or professional or both.

9.  Don't just make one long page. Make a lot of shorter pages within your site, most of them (at first) linking from the main page or secondary menu page. This allows you to put keywords on every page (if you remember). But, to create a page you need to have a reason to put content on the page. So, choose a subject that has a form of organization.

10. Make sure your real name is on the page, because otherwise there is no way to work with your existing client base. Use your own name at least once or twice on every page if possible, to make sure people know its you.

11. Generate content for your page even when you're not directly working with web design. For example, you might include academic articles, creative artwork, travel photos, or your ideas about technology or history.

12. If web design is not the right thing, then try blogging with a similar idea. You can start a website too if you need more information displayed or if you want to promote your ideas and products.

A Well-Considered Argument About Relativity and Absoluteness

Relative relativity is absoluteness.
The only way to contain absoluteness is by
some greater relativity.
The world might be preferable if it is relative
and great,
because the greater world might be preferable.
If the world is great and relative,
we can still argue that it contains absoluteness,
Because absoluteness is the larger part of the
three dimensions of relativity.
In fact the only way to undo absoluteness
appears to be by introducing a double-
absoluteness.
QED

[This will be contained in a future book, which may be a ways off... about 18 printed pages so far]

The Logic of Millennials

The word "Millennial".

Assorted goodies.

A perverse feeling.

Justification.


(Really better than stuff before, so far as presentation, but with many shortcomings, amounting to an over-commitment to media over 'real life'. Of course, Generation Y was like this, too. Although a Millennial might say that any relation is a delusion.)


Anyway, don't feel bad, millennials! All you need is good feelings. And in many cases, they are widely available! Borrow a little authenticity from prior generations, and you're as good as gold!

(In fact many millennials are more mature than me at this point. They know how to drive a car or succeed in college. Some millennials may ask me, where are those people? Every generation fails by its own standard, even while the class above every level succeeds in surpassing the class beneath it, while failing at its own standard... I for one invented my own status in the world, but remain a loser by most standards... There are people in Generation Y who are more mature than me, too, obviously. I for one don't know how anyone holds a job or graduates in four years... The longest job I have had lasted 2 years... public library...)

190 followers on twitter for the first time!

http://www.twitter.com/nathancoppedge

• TWEETS2,800
• FOLLOWING199
• FOLLOWERS190

LINK TO IMPORTANT QUOTES FROM EARLY MARCH 2016

http://hypercubics.blogspot.com/2016/03/quotes-early-march-2016.html

Now A Most-Viewed Writer in 11 Categories

https://www.quora.com/profile/Nathan-Coppedge/highlights

I don't know what this means, but I came across this in my author profile...

I have published 72+ books, and the profiles are updated constantly, and I constantly look, so it might just be a coincidence. Not everyone believes in the number anyway...

My systems page features the Zen squiggly from the cover. Perhaps that's why I 'became master'. Or perhaps Amazon is cheating me out of millions.

And on the same day my YouTube channel showed guess which number of views from Feb - March? 666 again! This doesn't happen to me all the time, trust me!

Now A Most-Viewed Writer in the Theories of Everything Category

Quora:

Profile at: https://www.quora.com/profile/Nathan-Coppedge [127,000 views].

Babel, Babble, the Bible and God

https://hypercubics.blogspot.com/2015/08/things-ive-learned-from-german.html

GHOSTS DIE OF REINCARNATION

I have noticed that it seems what makes something bad when-it-has-not-before-been-judged is merely the quality of denying judgment. But this quality of denying judgment has nothing directly to do with the ultimate judgment of the organism in question.

Similarly, what makes a soul evil is the temptation to think evil is meaningful. Because if evil is not meaningful to the person, they must remain blameless. For example, if the person is dishonest about evil being meaningful, then lying is either good or evil. But if the person is honest about evil being meaningful, the person has established a relationship with evil. So, if the person thinks evil is meaningful, this is the only way to be tempted from good into evil.

And the temptation from good into evil is more often than not comes from spiritual authorities who think it is appropriate to convey the existence of a battle between good and evil. Additionally, evil is also war, because the concept of war has snuck into the temptation to consider good versus evil.

So, in what way does the philosopher or priest avoid the temptation of evil, if he must be judged, but if he already believes there is a 'war' between good and evil, a war in which he must 'fight' and therefore commit evil?

At what point does the metaphorical image of battling evil become too intolerable for a moral person? In this respect I suggest we are deceived, for not only would true spirituality not emphasize the true destruction of evil, but true spirituality must be good and pure enough that the priority to preconceive judgement would be enough in itself to serve as a temptation.

What is suggested is that true goodness depends on some concept of the will, some defense of the soul, some abeyance equivalent to a good condition, or some sort of pre-conceived forgiveness. For otherwise, as soon as someone comes under judgment, they are pre-conceived to be evil, simply because it must remain inappropriate to judge them.

Although Jesus may write that the innocent remain blameless of sin.

"Mark the blameless and behold the upright, for there is a future for the man of peace." Psalm 37:37

"That you may be blameless and innocent, children of God without blemish in the midst of a crooked and twisted generation, among whom you shine as lights in the world..." Philippians 2:15

"So that you may approve what is excellent, and so be pure and blameless..." Philippians 1:10


These expressions suggest that innocence and peace are what is blameless, but also being Jewish (those who are most adamant about being the people of God are Jewish, although I am not) and having good taste.

So, I guess I am right to say that good people should remain free of judgment from others or else be tempted to become evil.

This confirms my own theory that friendships and social conformity are basically a fool's game designed to test the strengths of one's pre-conceived modality and one's sense of goodness.

When the pre-conceived modality goes out the window, all that is left is goodness. Then if one is judged, the goodness disappears in a hazy cloud of pejority. One is no longer chosen by God or a person of good-taste. One is not even innocent, and by not being innocent, one becomes blameworthy.

On top of it all whatever God there is has given in to temptation by accepting original sin, and making those who have done the least harm most guilty of pure judgment.

If judgment is an engagement with the question of evil, isn't it a temptation involving 'the hands we wash are washed in sin'? It appears that if someone is blameless, any form of judgment is a sin, including the question of judgment!

But then, how are they judged to be blameless? The answer is that the activity of judgment must always adopt some of the blame. Without judgment the innocent person may not have any rancour which would lead to pride & prejudice. A very significant point.

If rancour is a symptom of evil, then how is evil to be opposed? Or are we supposed to conclude that evil opposes itself?

If evil opposes itself then two enemies must be the same person! But that is simply not the case!

We must conclude that pride and prejudice precede evil, and what comes before pride and prejudice is likely to be judgment.

The pre-conception of evil therefore seems a likely cause of evil in general, so long as the good remains desirable and some people remain blameless.

If no one is blameless then there is no point arguing from Job or the Messiah, because what is blameless becomes simply a gift from God.

Perpetual Motion Stock Market Prediction #17

17,006.77USD62.87 (0.37%)

For the first time, the machines believe in magic. That's what my divination says.

Of course, similar things were said around the time of the crash of the early 20th C. (?).

But the economy has grown considerably since that time, and it isn't all just hot air. Some of the growth comes from real industries, and much of the rest of it is 'money making money'.

The magic I'm referring to is the number 77, similar to Aleistar Crowley's book on magic called 777.

There is in fact another number '7' in the series, but it is separated by FOUR DIGITS. This shows optimism on the part of any AI that is controlling the system. For example, why not 776 instead? That would suggest a return to American independence, and thus a lack of evolution. 778 would be more nondescript---it doesn't really remind anybody of anything, except maybe a commercial aircraft.

006 on the other hand, sounds like James Bond, which just means 'killer market', right?

So, my conclusion is that 17,006.77 represents optimism on the part of the machines.

It's also a large number by traditional economic standards. So, if you put those together it means 'reason to feel optimism'.

Numerologically, 62.87 means 'above average' and 'leading to the 90's' which may just mean that the market believes my advice that there is potential for digital marketing type companies and corporations like Dell and Microsoft.

+0.37% means pessimism or a collect-them-all mentality about social media (there was a website called 43things), as well as optimism about perpetual motion (the inventor is said to be a 10 or 20 meaning the machines are thinking about major improvements in the 17 - 27 year range. I don't know what that means to a computer, but it might be exponents versus human pessimism. There's a suggestion that no one is getting the whole story. Reporters are missing the real news stories, such as one about free energy, objective knowledge, or the solution to paradoxes).

Additionally, in general it is good news we have reached the 17,000s, because if we reach the 18,000s we're in perpetual motion territory again. Again, this doesn't necessarily mean that it hasn't been invented. It might mean that a company (likely the government or a foreign government) is already making money on perpetual motion.

Even without perpetual motion, America is the richest nation in history, and there is reason to be optimistic, provided that there is a strong military or an optimistic global philosophy.

QUOTES EARLY MARCH 2016

"Here is a paradox: how do we explain the Fibonacci sequence exclusively in terms of pi (the circumference of a circle with the diameter 1)? The answer is that we can't, because as soon as Fibonacci is all about Pi, Pi no longer describes all of Fibonacci! So, how could a mathematical theory ever achieve a theory of everything? My answer is that there is more than one theory of everything, and many of them will not be mathematical." ---Nathan Coppedge, March 2016 (via Quora)



"Any theory of everything (TOE) will only be an application, because there are some things which are NOT theories of everything! Either there will be a new atomism that attempts to make everything out of theories of everything, or the project will embrace applicationism. On the other hand, not everything is a THEORY, so it is impossible to conclude that everything is a THEORY of everything. The rational result will simply be to measure universalism empirically. Perhaps that is what should be done right now. Why wouldn't it be measurable? Maybe only in a flat universe. Perhaps that provides some answers, although I suspect some of them will be random, rather than coherent. But one thing it does point to is that science is an endless or else limited pursuit of applicable measurements." ---Nathan Coppedge, March 2016 (via Quora)



"Math is puddle-jumping with its friend philosophy." ---Nathan Coppedge, March 2016 (via Quora)



"Exceptions are like philosophy or science, but not both simultaneously... On the other hand, it would not be such a bad thing if someone disagreed with me for the sake of science, philosophy, or both..." ---Nathan Coppedge, note on the science of exceptions, March 2016



"Natural technology is potentially the same thing as magic." ---Nathan Coppedge, March 2016 (via Quora)



"I want to be immortal so I can be a devil. See---that makes sense to people! Sometimes I think if it weren't for Babel I would be God. Maybe this is true of anyone, anywhere, anytime, and this makes up God's attributes! Perhaps the popular God is merely an exaggeration of our hopes and dreams. Or perhaps God is an idea that came from the future! If it is so political to talk about God, then maybe God is subject to ideas. Maybe God is not just his own God, but the memory and prophecy of those who care for him. But if I am God, then I am not God, for I have already taken the name Saint Devil to refer to my pursuits of perpetual motion. Perhaps the power of God is NOT TO BE God, just as the body of God must be a false God..." ---Saint Devil / Nathan Coppedge, March 2016




"It was so exciting that at first no one got excited. It was like hiccups. It happened in fits and starts." ---Nathan Coppedge, about the invention of perpetual motion.



"Believing in God is the evilest sin. Because belief in God is belief in EVERYTHING, including the worst sins. It is belief in the primitive version of the immortal world. There are subtle things that are more good than a moral conscience. Scientists know what they mean by science: tortured animals. At least subtle things, if good, may serve as a viable distraction from that type of morals. The morals of science, the morals of God." ---Nathan Coppedge, March 2016



“In a world full of problems, everything is solved by problems. When problems do not solve them, there begins a world of solutions. At that point, either what begins is a world of paradoxes, or a world of paradigms. The world of paradoxes for some time satisfies intellectuals, but if the world is to succeed, the mentality must be one of paradigms. If the paradigms are problematic, what begins is a world of exaggerations. What solves exaggerations is tools. What is required for successful tools is a good world. If tools do not succeed it becomes a world of work. Work succeeds when there is good information. If information has no machine, it becomes a world of toil. If there is a machine, there is a mechanical paradigm. With a mechanical paradigm, the success of the world becomes the success of machines. Still, if there were no toil or work, or no problems, or if there were other successful paradigms, it would be a different world. Therefore, amongst machines the success is not only to live, but to imagine other worlds. One of the worlds I imagine is a world in which machines perpetuate themselves, and therefore, a world in which machines do not require work.”



"They are so significant, and yet merely abstractions. They seem to be like the most important thing, and yet no cohesive theory even involves them. They are the 'dark matter' and 'dark energy' of pure theoretics." ---Nathan Coppedge, on mathematical anomalies at Quora.


"One explanatory concept is that humans have not yet constructed a rational paradise." ---Nathan Coppedge, March 2016, via Quora


"Interpretation is a form of invention, the way philosophy is God. (This is one thing that comes from the study of paradoxes)." ---Nathan Coppedge, March 2016


"Relative relativity is absoluteness. The only way to contain absoluteness is by some greater relativity. The world might be preferable if it is relative and great, because the greater world might be preferable. If the world is great and relative, we can still argue that it contains absoluteness, because absoluteness is the larger part of the three dimensions of relativity. In fact the only way to undo absoluteness appears to be by introducing a double-absoluteness. QED" ---Nathan Coppedge, March 2016




More Quotes by Nathan Coppedge on POEMHUNTER

Fibonacci Philosophy by Nathan Coppedge

If the universe is infinite, does that mean the constituent parts of the universe, is infinite as well? Something made of something made of something?

Via Quora:

Here are some insights into your question:

1. There is no requirement for nature to obey the rules of language as humans understand them. Nature does not have to be rational, mathematical, or even physical in the way humans understand it.
2. Thus, the universe is not just logic or what we perceive, but deep structures beyond what we can know. Hence questions like those raised in philosophy of physics and phenomenology. What is the limit of knowledge? What do we really know? And it often returns to the Socratic 'We know nothing' or, 'We know nothing at best...'
3. In some way the universe is limited by its structures and even by the capacity to take a specific form. Thus, the-structures-that-we-do-not-know are likely to play a limited role in the expression we observe. But that limited role is larger than our capacity to understand. In general, there may be things that we do not know, even while not-knowing. In other words, we may have no idea how the universe works. We may be on an island, so to speak. We may not even know how we ARE on an island, or if an island is the relevant metaphor or not.
4. We know, however, that in an informational sense, it is possible to observe things similar to what we observe. Thus, 'FOR SOME BEING' e.g. the most real, or most perfect, or most lucky beings, etc. what we already observe can have real relevance. If that is the case, then we can extrapolate either that we are exceptionally lucky, or there is some other more real, more perfect, or more lucky existence beyond our own experience. We can also conclude that there are other beings like us, and that we are probably not unique in the universe, if there are other people on our own planet like us. We can conceive that there is logic, because logic exists on this planet, and then we can conclude that there is any conceivable kind of logic, to the extent that we are capable of conceiving of it. We don't know the precise limit, but we know that these things are possible to the extent that we have already experienced them. If we have experience with people then we know that that there is relevance for this knowledge we have of people. And the same for any other subject.
5. Ultimately, we may conclude that the idea of infinity is relative. What is infinity, we can ask? Isn't infinity just a word we use in language or mathematics? What if it only means something when we exist? Then it is not truly infinite, is it? What if the concept of infinite is not the most infinite concept? I have found this kind of logic appealing recently. 

In conclusion, infinity or absoluteness exists, certainly, in some form. But unless it is our experience that is infinite, then we don't know of it. And where we don't know of it, it doesn't have relevance for us. So, infinity is a language concept, and a concept from mathematics. Infinity has relevance for us when language and mathematics have relevance. Absoluteness is often a spiritual concept alienated from its actual meaning in nature, if there even is one. The relevance for infinity and absoluteness is largely human-created, and even if not, depends on human life for its expression in experience.

Perpetual Motion Stock Market Prediction #16

16,705.65USD189.15 (1.15%)

Stocks are up 1/5 of the way between 16,000 and 17,000 in one day.

This suggests that it is possible to gain 1000 points in 10 days conservatively.

That means that 18,000 could be reached in 12 days.

Obviously the market needs to reassess how quickly it makes gains and losses, yet focus on how money makes money when it sits there.

The fundamental principle appears to be 'not to DO anything with money' if you want to earn money.

But there are other principles too, like how to acquire attention for a business, which is often by spending money thriftily, much like choosing a free self-publisher for books instead of an exorbitant one.

The broader sense then, is on 'bang for the buck' and how to turn that into economic statistics.

The overall numbers once again show underestimates about the value of perpetual motion:

The computer may be assessing the following:

*There is a little devil.

*The little devil is trumped.

*The little devil lies, and this is good for the devil.

*The difference involves what a human would think is 50 cents, and there is a human called 50 Cent.

*Consequently, the little devil may be worth 50 cents.

*Consequently, what we already thought, that humans underestimate perpetual motion.

Profile Listed on Google for Some Users

This is approximately the second time my profile has been listed on Google. They tend to pick just one trait, and focus on the things that get media attention. But technically I'm more of a Quora writer than a poet in terms of views, and that concerns philosophy, perpetual motion, and physics (more perpetual motion).

Now a Top Writer in two new categories

QUORA.COM

Space-Time: https://www.quora.com/topic/Spacetime/writers

High-Dimensional Spaces: https://www.quora.com/topic/High-dimensional-spaces/writers