Types of Ideal Invention

I. ARCHIMEDES

LISTS STUDY LISTING LIST STRUCTURES ONTOLOGIC(A)

COA --> COOA

(LISCHT) --> L1ABC

L1ABC

LISTT

LIST(E)

BATTL(EE)

EULERE EXEEX (TXTE EE)

JOKOO

FRA A

KARCC

I333 3331515SISYNE "FIRE A BATTLL"

LIST(T) CONCA(Q)

SINCE I'VE WON BACKGAMMON CCL EL

(REQT)

The Perfect Formulation and Elemental Construction

(INVENTOR'S ELEMENTAL CONSTRUCTION)

NEW VERSION

1. Logic modified.

2. Generic permutation.

3. Variation on lists.

4. Ambition.

5. Truth.

6. New and valuable.

7. Magic.

...

PROCEDURE:

1. Adopt tools.

2. Quantify.

3. Format.

4. Measure.

5. Realize.

6. Results.

(1,2,3) Eff

+

(4) Diff

=

(5,6) Results?

....

Proper Format:

Diff

=

Results

-

Eff

...

It is now thought this list from a different writing may be more complete and clear. I get a feeing I was actually searching for this when I wrote the original Inventor's Construction:

NEW MORE HELPFUL INNOVATION APPROACH, LESS DRAMATIZED:

1. Someone experiments with materials or techniques, and finds a new material or technique, or?

2. Someone comes up with new scientific knowledge or a new philosophy, or (?) that explains something, embodied by an object.

3. Someone uses a heuristic or analytic method such as through computation (or?) to discover missing categories of invention, new functions, or something simpler or more complicated (or?).

4. Someone improves a traditional method of manufacture, design, function, thought (or?)

5. Someone does a work-for-hire, guided by a material need (or?) expressed by their employers.

6. Someone makes a new invention (or?) to fit an external or internal social need, like social media, or chya-pets.

7. Someone creates a pragmatic solution to a large-scale global problem like ocean litter, low oxygen levels, or global warming. This is more about orchestration (or?).

—The Technology Innovation Typology (…)

...

A REVIEW OF THE METHOD SHOWS...

1 = Arts (Ancient Chinese Method).

2 = Theoretical (Socratic Method).

3 = Computers (Ockham's Method).

4 = Manufacturing (American Method).

5 = Experts (Lamarckianism)

6 = Big Budget Solutions.

7 = Technocracy.

...

EXPANDED TRANSLATION:

Isolato / Arts = Real Arts / Trinkets

Manufacturing = Fake Arts / Luxury

Proceduro / computers = Mind / Cognition

Elemento Theory / General / Perpetual Constructo Technology = Classic Magic Socratic

...

EARLIER INVENTOR'S ELEMENTAL CONSTRUCTION:

...

BRIEF VERSION

Isolato: 1. Modification, 2. Generic, 3. Variation.

Proceduro: 1. Logical application, 2. Logical permutation, 3. Procedural list.

Elemento: 1. Impossible magic, 3. Future magic, 2. Empirical magic.

Constructo: 1. Ambitious quest, 2. Quest for truth, 3. New and valuable quest.

...

MAIN VERSION:

ISOLATO:

Examples:

1. People already know about the shoe. Imagine there is another example like a shoe... it is like a shoe, only better, so it has a roller-ball that protrudes from the heel, so it really adds nothing substantial... (It is basically a shoe, a shoe for walking like any other shoe)... It goes under the classification of 'shoe'.
2. Hume invented Hume's fork, The devil's fork is when the current life creates a future fork in  in which the future choice must be different from the present. It is like there is an invention like a fork... (The invention we already invented)... The invention is any one of these inventions.
3. There is something called the lever, invented by Archimedes. But the lever is not ideal, so we could aim to invent the ideal lever. To create an ideal lever we need a lever with better balance, so we must add weight to compensate for the weight of the long end. But since it is still a lever, basically, functionally, it is still a lever, only of the ideal kind. (It helps to consider it as simply an improvement on the lever), so it is classified as a lever.

...

PROCEDURO:

Examples:

1. We are seeking a logical method to describe the nature of the soul. The most obvious method is to refer to Socratic statements which define the soul in the Classical Greek fashion as being ironic. An authentic method is derived by applying exclusion to Socratic irony.
2. We are seeking a logical method to describe all great inventions. The obvious method is permutation derived from inspiration. It requires sufficient exclusive elements in the form of a list of properties for all great inventions. It is perfect and sufficient if those elements are the elements used in the permutation, and the permutation has been shown to reliably anticipate many of the greatest inventions.
3. We are seeking a logical method to describe the procedure of arriving at any truly great idea. The obvious method is a single-width concatenated list beginning with Occam's Razor. Occam's Razor is the perfect point of origin for a methodology, and the procedure has been shown to reliably create great ideas.

...

ELEMENTO:

Examples:

1. An interesting case is the coin swallower machine. What can we observe? The principle that the middle of the coin may be higher than where the bottom was on the next rotation. What does this mean? It means impossible magic.
3. An interesting case is the history of technology. What do we observe? Technology is evolving towards information. If technology is like information, and information is like magic, then technology is like magic. What does this mean? The future of technology is magical.
2. An interesting case is the pants that stand up against a sink counter. What can we observe? They are largely unsupported, there is very little static. Apparently it's magic. What does this mean? If it is not physical, it must be mind over matter.
...

CONSTRUCTO:

Examples:

1. The archetype of the ambitious quest is to reach a formula for being more brilliant than brilliance. However, a formula for brilliance requires a formula. Everyone seems to believe the only universal formula is basic shit, so that is what is meant by formula. What is meant by brilliant must prove intelligent fools stupid. So, the formula for brilliance is basic shit about the impossibility about perpetual motion machines. However, a more brilliant formula, if there is one, involves either not-basic shit, or perpetual motion.
2. One of the oldest and most difficult quests is the search for truth. Truth is often equated with wisdom, which requires knowledge. The ideal form of knowledge would provide truth on all subjects. However, such has been impossible because no knowledge was seen as superior to any others. However, the new concept of exponential efficiency may mean knowledge advantage, implicating truth.
3. A new and valuable quest is the quest to make self-sufficient planets. A self-sufficient planet must also be a mobile planet. However, mobility of planets requires a near-unlimited supply of energy. Perpetual motion machines are one theory which could supply a near-unlimited supply of energy. The new theory of working perpetual motion machines indicates the possibility of mobile planets.

Ideal things,
Procedures for Ideas,
Magical Element,
Perpetual motion systems.

See also:

Inventor's Master Permutation

N-ary Secrets

(IF THERE) - (1FFF)

...

II.

CONCARTO (PPS)

II II II ALWAYS THOUGHT IT WAS

THOUGHT ALWAYS II II II

1. RIGHT 5501

1. LAB

1. THTHE <-- ST --> LE --> H686ANNBOLLY

OPTIOI II WOULD

...

First Improved and Simplified General Proof Theory for Perpetual Motion Machines

October 17, 2019.

I. Possibility of 'Cheating Nature'

1. It was thought as late as the 2010's  that there was nothing more efficient than a permutation or a turning wheel. However, if an exception presented itself, it would mean something important. However, no concept really existed to explain the possibility. The closest analogy was a perpetual motion machine, but perpetual motion machines were thought not to work.

2. In Feb and Nov 2013 Nathan Coppedge invented the theoretical concept of exponential efficiency in the process of finding examples of the same. Even without referring to the examples, the general idea of making an efficiency that is exponentially efficient suggests improving at least some kinds of efficiency to a point where there could be something more efficient than a wheel or permutation. All that were needed were examples, and this is what Nathan found in 2013. But dismissing great examples without understanding them is not a fair argument, the burden of proof now rested on the opposing scientists. And, in a way, that was all that needed to initially be proved as perpetual motion was thought to be impossible by the scientists.

II. Necessity of Proportionality

1. A version of close to 1/2 mass X distance follows from experiment (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMihSRllvZY&app=desktop) under low friction conditions, and when trigger mass is directed vertically rather than horizontally, and effected mass is always more horizontal than 45 degrees, usually by a huge margin (in rare cases 22.5 degrees rather than more like 1.1 - 9.9). Instances of the more vertical end tend to be rare, one example was found by Nathan Coppedge in 2010 while at a shopping mall, the simpler version involving a shallower angle was only proven in a simple satisfactory form in Oct 2019 as though a barrier had been lifted).

2. Given the existence of other combinable cheating methods such as leverage, balances, difference of mass, and pulleys, it follows from 1/2 mass X distance that since a larger mass csn be moved by a smaller mass and motion takes place from rest, perpetual motion can be created if proportionality can be overcome. This is in part because a working proportionality could be built physically and could incorporate multiple overlapping 'cheating' methods.

3. However, proportionality CAN be overcome by analogy to a circle. Completing a cycle of motion is clearly physically possible, even more so in three-dimensionality than two-.

III. Energy in Some Cases

1. Proving energy is as simple as proving two-directional natural momentum (from rest). However, this is not necessarily easy. I have found it can be done (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ao0pIBVKjDo&list=PLcttXCrYoAgP88CiJ3ibPqVl1FjlAAIdi&index=9&app=desktop).

2. Consider a 3X lever counterweighted on the short end may have 1X additional structural mass on the long end. If the leverage applied on the long end  to a ball by the mass on the short end is greater than 2.5X and less than 4X the mass of ball being moved, and the long end has the additional 1X structural mass, the 1X ball will begin to move by the force of the mass on the short end at 3X leverage distance if the 1X ball is positioned on a slotted track operated by the lever that is mostly horizontal but slightly upwards sloped (although under some conditions this is hard to prove). For example, 3 X leverage X 1 mass for ball / 2 for support is 1.5X mass + 1 for additional weight is 2.5 X effective mass. If counterweight is greater than 2.5X it may move ball under some conditions.

3. However, if ball is unsupported at the same amount of leverage, it has higher effective mass. 3 X leverage X 1X mass = 3X effective leversge + 1 additional structursl mass of lever means that if counterweight on short end is less than 4X mass of ball, then ball can lift counterweight when ball is supported by lever without the slotted track support (under some conditions).

4. Now we have proven there is two-directional motion in at least one case. And since the weight of the lever is accounted for and motion takes place from rest, it does not assume absolutely ideal physics, just fairly good conditions. Actual operation may depend on the size of the mass window and whether friction can be overcome in a case similar to a low-friction balance, which I suggest IS possible, although the practical window may be smaller than stated, and my example is one of the better cases.

Perpetual Motion Links

Improved Vertical Lever Perpetual Motion Concept

• Date of Invention: September 27, 2019.
• < 150% conventional Over-Unity.
• Leverage: 4:1 (looks like 8:1)
• Counterweight Mass: > 3X to < 5X
• Equation: Assuming ball = 1 with variable application, and long end has additional 1 constant application, and counterweight located on shorter end, and counterweight is designed to direct ball on opposite end up slight supporting incline before ball applies leverage, Unified Counterweight Mass Formula = Min Lvg + 1 > (Max Lvg / 2) + 1.

See also from the same day: Hapt Symmetric Vertical Lever

Materials Pre-Post Theory of Everything

E.g. post-coherence theory and eclectics

At one time there were questions like this: Is the theory of relativity the theory of everything?

This (type of) writing is trying to move past that...

Itemized Systems of Understanding

A Post-Unified Theory of Language

New Notes:

Pan-Function Spectrums (October 17, 2021):

• An idea of the moment: what if the Function Spectrum is not a unique theory. It might be that there are abstractions which are not knowledge, and energy which is not perpetual motion. Human knowledge might grow by eight times or more.

Disintegral (May 19, 2017):

• Advantages on Unified Theory of Quantum Plasma Physics: Title: “Unified Theory of Quantum Plasma Physics” Soul: If you [are coherent enough], [objective enough, cold enough, and abstract enough] you will discover the disintegral [is not mathematical enough] This refers to a specific insight I had that the mathematical description of nature called Pursuing the Disintegral is not quite as good as a Theory of Everything. A Theory of Everything is still required. —How could someone debunk the unified theory of cosmic plasma physics?

Quotes:

"Math defines categories before they become rules." ---Windows Chategory

An old general problem: “Completion might require advancement. [There might be a common language between unity modules and logical over-unity expressed in the quantity of sub-modules].” —Unity and Over-Unity with Submodules

...
1

THE BOOK OF HARDNESS

Possible.Origin of the Theory of Everything.

"Infinite efficiency portends.

A layer of difference fills the gap."

---The Book of Hardness

2

(Galileo → Newton → Cannonball theory) → Relativity → Loop quantum gravity → Antimatter → String Theory →Singularity (→String theoretical defense of relativity) →Unified quantum electrodynamics →Mass energy theory→ No energy information theory → Information event theory →Complexity-Creativity theory → Physical Constructor theory… (—The History of Gravity by Nathan Coppedge …)

HAWKINGESQUE:

A topic can be a special thing.

We select a preferred set.

Does it surprise us thst this relates with the calculus?

What items did we miss?

Was it physics?

Did it do anything rare?

Here we are now!

Time!

A bold manifestation!

--Hawkingesque by Nathan Coppedge

3

I guess you could say the souls of logic are:

Efficiency A = BCAD or DCAB.

Efficiency B = CDBA or ADBC

Difference C = DACB or BACD

Difference D = ABDC or CBDA

SO, TOE HAS ONLY SO MANY COMBINATIONS:

BCAD or DCAB AND (CDBA or ADBC) AND DACB or BACD AND (ABDC or CBDA)

BCAD or DCAB AND (ABDC or CBDA) AND DACB or BACD AND (CDBA or ADBC)

...

This may help:

Main scores as in diagram assuming Correctly Eff +/- 1, Diff +/- 1 or 0

Reactive Mechanisms (Eff + Eff + Eff + Eff + Eff + Diff) Max 6, Min 5

Antiforce Mechanisms (Eff + Eff + Eff + Eff + Diff) Max 5, Min 4

Supported Flying Machines (Eff + Eff + Eff + Diff) Max 4, Min 3

Self-Powered Flying Machines (Eff + Eff + Diff) Max 3, Min 2

Perpetual Motion (Eff + Diff) Max 2, Min 1

Zero (Eff)

Human Knowledge (Eff + Diff) Max 0, Min -1

Languages (Eff + Eff + Diff) Max -1, Min -2

Immortal Languages (Eff + Eff + Eff + Diff) Max -2, Min -3

Draconian Networks (Eff + Eff + Eff + Eff + Diff) Max -3, Min -4

Archaic Networks (Eff + Eff + Eff + Eff + Eff + Diff) Max -4, Min -5

...

...

Preferred Limits

The Theory of Everything

Meta-Theory of Everything

The Epistemological Theory of Everything

OU Formula for TOEs

Absolute Dimensions

Selective Perpetual Motion Applications

Specialized Heuristic Combinations

History of Philosophy

Philosophical Statistics

"[The] concept that has come into determinate existence. It is fair to suppose... that we are referring to something familiar, that is, a commonplace of ordinary thinking. But the 'I' is in the first place purely self-referring unity... As such it is universality, a unity that is unity with itself only by virtue of its negative relating, which appears as abstraction, and because it contains all determinateness within itself is dissolved. In second place, the 'I' is just as immediately self-referring negativity, singularity, absolute determinateness..."
---Hegel, The Science of Logic (pp. 514), George Giovanni (ed, Trans.) (Incipient mini-translation: Hegel's Logic)

"Similarly, on the other hand, when his performance [an abstract element that emerges with the TOE] and his inner possibility [efficiency + difference], capacity or intention [relative difference or sub-efficiency] are contrasted, it is the former alone which is to be regarded as his true actuality [in the TOE], even if he deceives himself on this point, and turning away from his action into himself [having the wrong concept of TOE], fancies that in this inner self he is something else than what he is in this deed [e.g. other than a derivator or  individuator of a TOE]. Individuality [E.g. universal]..." ---Hegel, Phenomenology of Spirit (AV Miller trans), p. 194. Translation added in brackets by N. Coppedge.

"Under the applicationist paradigm, first, categories of usefulness are useful as categories, and the material function returns a new pragmatic value. Secondly, specific objects embody paradigms by exhibiting principles and other properties, and maximizing a principle becomes a means to find 'practical objects'. Third, the properties and principles of objects serve a logical function in which the material and abstract properties are interchangeable, and in this way the material properties of specific objects become pragmatic identities through the analogy between valuable functions and general usefulness. Fourthly, objects which share in the abstract properties show a characteristic unification (ala Hegel or Leibniz)." —Nathan Coppedge, Philosophy of Instrumentalism

"Sometimes the prophet is greater than what he prophecies." ---D.P. See: Theory of The Same Animal

A Theatre Game was found using categories of application in the Premier Intellectual Dialectic (the dialectic is used for coming up with big new ideas): 'This, Obvious, Do Noun, Later, Minimal significance, Do Adj, Finish, Quantity, Theory, Necessary'. It is possible these types of classifications are specific to perpetual motion, but they may indicate a metaphorical extension for certain parts of the Dialectic for any big idea, e.g. by using these classifications to find more specific classifications in the fourth blank of the Dialectic.

Notation I was getting to is that in this Theatre Game or use of the Dialectic, later in the Dialectic where it says 'higher applications', the case where higher applications are not exclusive binaries is the only case where exclusive binaries do not fulfill the criteria for each type of application, assuming the applications are a complete list. So, if approximate exclusive binaries can be found in every case for every set of ideas, which I have seen is a pattern, then every single combination for the first three blanks will include just exactly twenty ideas if we assume the fifth blank is constant or can be ignored as it is a function of the previous four blanks as is often the case. This suggests the number of big ideas equals 20 X Genera X Species X Functions.

...

"A tentative guess based on the (last part of the) Super-Inventor writing is that meta-inventions require special group behavior under one inventor, yielding logic analogous to how one advanced field may lead consistently to another that is equally advanced, yet which may yield more useful results. That assumes binary sets of inventions. Other analogues may be appropriare for standards of three or more inventions, but one (as shown in The Few) or two (as shown in Super-Inventor) may maximize usability."
—Meta-Invention

Above: Top Diagram is by Gunther, Gotthard which inspired the Knowledge of the Theory of Everything diagram, pictured below it (surprisingly, it is mostly symmetric, yet slightly asymmetric).

"There can be no such thing as linking two elementary contextures into a compound contexture, for this would require a minimum of three contextures. One of the three would have to mediate between the other two. In other words: we would be provided with a contexture describing the phenomenon of discontexturality. This is the point where dialectic logic starts." [Note: Gunther appears to be saying that a higher logic always ascribes to the fixed metalogical quality of categories, that the only way to reach beyond 3-point logic is to use 2-point logic, which is then the only alternative to 1-point logic, if 3-point logic is the only alternative to 1-point and 2-point logic. However, this may be a broad generalization, but it bears on the Theory of Everything, as indicated in the diagram used in the original article].
Gunther, Gotthard (Joachim Paul, ed) Life as Polycontexturality, p. 15
Life as Polycontexturality (Gotthold Gunther)

“By interpreting transjunction as a logical act of rejection this type of operation acquires a specific cybernetic significance. We have already suggested, that transjunction isolates a system (by rejecting it). In doing so, it produces the distinction between a closed system and its environment. This is exactly what a two-valued logic can never do ... For this very purpose we require a value which transcends the scope of the system.” Gotthard Gunther (Bd.1, 318) http://www.thinkartlab.com/pkl/glossary/framed.htm

“We may consider the pyramid of protostructure as an ontological grid which describes the mutual positions of single contextures.” Gotthard Gunther (Bd.2, 298) http://www.thinkartlab.com/pkl/glossary/framed.htm

“First let us remember that we obtained proto-, deutero- and trito-structure by dealing only with empty places from which value occupancy has been removed.... we may reintroduce values into these configurations of empty places as their contents...The relation between place and occupying value corresponds to the distinction between form and matter.” Gotthard Gunther (Bd.2, 303) http://www.thinkartlab.com/pkl/glossary/framed.htm

“... the basic logical elements of transclassic logic... are not the values but the kenograms, i.e. empty places which merely indicate structure and which may or may not be occupied by values.” Gotthard Gunther (Bd.2, 255)  http://www.thinkartlab.com/pkl/glossary/framed.htm

...

Not to be frowned at…

DIMENSIONAL-MECHANICAL HYPOTHESIS

Main scores as in diagram assuming Correctly Eff +/- 1, Diff +/- 1 or 0

Reactive Mechanisms (Eff + Eff + Eff + Eff + Eff + Diff) Max 6, Min 5

Antiforce Mechanisms (Eff + Eff + Eff + Eff + Diff) Max 5, Min 4

Supported Flying Machines (Eff + Eff + Eff + Diff) Max 4, Min 3

Self-Powered Flying Machines (Eff + Eff + Diff) Max 3, Min 2

Perpetual Motion (Eff + Diff) Max 2, Min 1

Zero (Diff)

Human Knowledge (Eff + Diff) Max 0, Min -1

Languages (Eff + Eff + Diff) Max -1, Min -2

Immortal Languages (Eff + Eff + Eff + Diff) Max -2, Min -3

Draconian Networks (Eff + Eff + Eff + Eff + Diff) Max -3, Min -4

Archaic Networks (Eff + Eff + Eff + Eff + Eff + Diff) Max -4, Min -5

---Dimensional-Mechanical Theory (…)

Euler's Prepost:

I added rationality, says Euler. When you negate rationality, there isn’t a ghost in town.

...

Coherent Proof Theory

Research and study has led to the Theory of Everything As a Test of the device what question would you like answered?

https://www.quora.com/When-figuring-out-how-to-unify-QM-and-GR-are-scientists-trying-to-think-to-difficult-solutions-to-it-This-unification-might-be-simpler-than-they-think

For contact information for Joachim Paul (J. Paul), see: http://vordenker.de/impressum.htm

Ideal Development

August 2, 2019.

1. Occultish meaning.

2. Recognizing aesthetics.

3. Elevated existence.

4. Supernatural advantage.

...

Levels of Transcendence

A Complete Sensibility

Stages of the Integrated Intelligence

Best Metaphysical Ideas

Tractatus of Worlds

Explanation of Why The Universe Exists

History of Philosophy

Scientists May Have Verified Escher Machine!!!

Magic Angle in Graphene Verified by Scientists

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-07848-2
...
...

Impact on Wikipedia!

I'm seeing a clear impact on Wikipedia of my discussion of Frank Tatay's Device dating from 2005 - 2006. The device is now featured in a prominent window on Wikipedia's "perpetual motion" page.

Yay! By this estimate it takes a minimum of 13 years to make an impact on Wikipedia.

By this estimate there may be mention of perpetual motion by 26 years from now, which will be 2044, when I'm 62 y.o.

Quotable Quotes November 2018

"There are times when I think pure theory is actually less advanced than engineering." --Nathan Coppedge

"Real life is what you make of it, not what the news says it is... There is nothing making life unimportant except limited assumptions and limits on categories of function." --Nathan Coppedge

MORE QUOTES FROM NATHAN COPPEDGE:

https://www.poemhunter.com/quotations/famous.asp?people=Nathan%20Coppedge

Nathan Coppedge Quotable Quotes September - October 2018

"It’s an interesting fact that as much as I like developing philosophical systems, I am terrible at developing my own opinions." --Nathan Coppedge

“What’s genuinely new is always forthcoming.” —Nathan Coppedge, Sept 2018


"This is why I don't think it's bad to be poor; because I haven't lost everything." ---Nathan Coppedge

"Yes, great good dreams of practicality as I call them. When impossibility is possible, impossibility is impossible." ---Nathan Coppedge

“The point isn’t to be expensive if you think you’re worth infinite money.” —Nathan Coppedge


"Just like I support science, religious people support the devil." ---Nathan Coppedge


"I don’t yet have a perfect paradigm or a life of many dramas. My life is not a divine spectacle, but instead an attempt at intelligence. So, as it is, it is the things which have a lasting effect on myself as a person which seem most brilliant, like sanity, trying to be immortal, realizing my identity concept, and having stick-tuitiveness to make my biggest ideas into real things, which is quite ambitious." ---Nathan Coppedge


"People think I’m exaggerating just because my projects sound so extreme, then they are disappointed it isn’t made of technicolor mithril diamondstone. But give me a break, IT’S PERPETUAL MOTION!!!!" ---Nathan Coppedge


"Here are some of the most misunderstood things (about knowledge): 1. How much it depends on us: really, as far as we are concerned, there is no knowledge without US. Therefore, WE are important for knowledge. WE can be optimistic as far as knowledge, because OUR TRUE KNOWLEDGE CONCERNS US. 2. How difficult it is to create: knowledge is much easier to create than people think. Many things constitute sophisticated knowledge if treated correctly. Many things can be knowledge merely by adding careful respect and critical appreciation. 3. How much of it there is. Many people think there is infinite nihilistic knowledge, but it is more like there are infinite Fall day epiphanies. 4. How deep it is. Many of us assume knowledge that is deep is untranslatable, but in fact deepness is the first fact for communicating knowledge. Deepness is no more than a simple essence. 5. How captive we are to it. Actually, we are the agents of change that decide the knowledge. The knowledge is beholden to us more than we are to it. The biggest strides often happen in a short time by changing our minds." ---Nathan Coppedge

"Perpetual motion cars, self-running apartments, sculpture gardens, Rube Goldberg machines for eccentrics, toys lots of toys, luxury toys, luxury ‘archetypes’, perpetual motion jewelry, perpetual motion survival habitats, perpetual motion money-making devices, perpetual motion energy investments, perpetual motion defense contracts, perpetual transportation systems, ecological standalone cities, manufacturing, conceptual art, national monuments, urban design, occult playthings, the list goes endlessly on…" ---Nathan Coppedge, October 2018

MORE QUOTATIONS:

https://www.poemhunter.com/quotations/famous.asp?people=Nathan%20Coppedge

Quora Perpetual Motion Page

THE NATURAL TORQUE DEVICE

Modification of the Crescent Lever

Slanted Repeat Lever

THE 1ST OR 2ND SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF PERPETUAL MOTION

( The Short Proof of Perpetual Motion )

Single-Module Version of the First Fully Provable

Tilt Motor

NIBW4

Modular NIBW4

Reversed Triangle RL2

Repeat Leverage Apparatus, Modification 1

Resetting Moment Pendulum

NIBW 3

Double-Disk Device

Jer Ram’s Top-Heavy Conveyor

Escher Machine

Escher Delta

MMM

Spiral Cone Device

Pendulum 1

Miniwaterwheel Contraption

NIBW 6

Bezel Device

Parallaxial Slope Device

Grav-Motor

Earlier Swivel Device

NIBW 1 & 5

Vertical Lever

Wave / Cocked Wave Loop Device

Dual-Pendulum Snake Wheel and Dual Pendulum Spiral Vertical Wheel

Boxed Track Device

Resetting Ratchet

Pinch-Bar Device

Modular Perpetual Motion Experiment 4

Escher Lever

Coquette Device

Double-Offset Carousel Wheel

Slanted Pulley Wheel

NIBW 2

…

Perpetual Motion Links

YouTube Channel More Popular Now

100+ views three of the past 7 recordd days at YouTube.

Just look up:

Coppedgean on YouTube

Or, "Select Machines".

New! Device demonstrates upward torque with full recovery!

Free energy device (proof of concept)  from yesterday morning.

When the support is turned inwards and tilted backwards, natural torque is produced, an unexpected unusual phenomenon.

These contraptions will be sold on Etay in the next several months, wuthout the cardboard.

I've reached 800 Followers on Quora!

A small number considering I have 1.3 Million Views there... About 1600 views per follower...

https://www.quora.com/profile/Nathan-Coppedge

The YouTube Upvote balance has tipped

Tipped to 30 upvotes and 44 downvotes, from 23 and 33,

Or about 3:4 from 2:3.

2018-06-28: Tipped to 46 upvotes and 43 downvotes, more upvotes than downvotes for the first time.

2018-07-11: Tipped to 59 upvotes and 42 downvotes or about 3:2.

2018-08-02: 81 upvotes : 44 downvotes or almost 2 : 1. Yess!!

2019-01-16: 135 upvote : 59 downvotes, or over 2.5:1. Good!!!

Select Machines YouTube

Another Working Perpetual Motion Concept!

Rather ingenious. The swivel device finally perfected.

A counterweight acts on a slightly upward-and-downward left-right swiveling lever (mostly left and right 30+ degrees, or whatever preferred range).

Usual deal with support vs non-support. The returning motion is the rising motion, so the falling and rising motion is used to deflect the marble inward and outward onto two different track segments, as shown in a similar device the Not-If-But-When 4, a pretty much proven principle through two lengths of the cycle.

I know this device has two-directional motion by a proven principle from the Not-If-But-When 4.

Likely ratios are 1.5X effective ideal mass for the counterweight, right in the middle of the > 1X mass and < 2X mass necessary with 1 X marble abd 2 X long-end leverage (long-end leverage expressed as a ratio of short-end leverage measured to the midpoint of the counterweight).

Assuming deflection is designed properly, this is one of the easiest perpetual motion machines ever to build that I know of.

Consult diagram above if additional information needed.

--Nathan Coppedge 2018/05/04, 1am.

Quotable Quotes May 2018

"Actually, like philosophy, science is an ‘approach’ and thus lies in a domain that is independent of content: a void which ideas must fill, or else, after Ages, all that is left are empty concepts. It is the USE of an approach, rather than its name given to tools, which belie the intelligence of an age." ---Nathan Coppedge


"So here we are, time for Santa Claus. Learn to adapt." ---Nathan Coppedge



"Immortality exists now by necessity only, but in the future it will begin to exist by explanation, and even dimension. Sometimes it will even be a convenient excuse." ---Nathan Coppedge

"God is work. Summed in Peril." ---Nathan Coppedge

"I aim to raise the bar on conservative methods and be useful in practical contexts--that's always the most radical thing other than perspective." ---Nathan Coppedge

"Sometimes my theory is that physical manifestations are a ‘symptom’ that only emerges with an infinite foundation. In this way, degrees of manifestation are directly symptomatic of the infinite, or some other necessity." ---Nathan Coppedge


"The madness of everything is still everything." ---Nathan Coppedge


“Irrationality is so much of the rational is the kind of thought people wait and pine for. But why wait? Patience is just the value of something valuable.” —Nathan Coppedge, Wisdom of the New Ancients in the 3rd Dimension


"The difference between the 3-d and 4-d is the difference between non-living and living immortality." ---Nathan Coppedge


MORE QUOTATIONS:

https://www.poemhunter.com/quotations/famous.asp?people=Nathan%20Coppedge

Crossed 20,000 Views to Top Perpetual Motion Videos

https://www.quora.com/Is-the-free-energy-generator-not-true/answer/Nathan-Coppedge

Quotable Quotes April 2018

"We live in a golden age, but we no longer seem to believe in intellectual heroes. So I have tried to live the dream that the world is not the same as it seems." ---Nathan Coppedge

"Its odd... I'm incompatible with people, but I am very compatible with society." ---Nathan Coppedge

"I think I have evidence of this most practical of archetypes." ---Nathan Coppedge, on perpetual motion machines

"Isn't it a bit like a blowpop? The blowpop fallacy." --Nathan Coppedge, criticism of Velikovsky's General Systems Theory

"Science is a minimal criteria macro-discipline, and as such aims to maximize quantity at cost of quality. Philosophy is a maximal criteria macro-discipline, and as such aims to maximize quality at cost of quantity. In other words, philosophy usually fails to provide evidence of the most important things. Science usually succeeds to provide evidence of insignificant things. Many things are discovered between philosophy and science, but very little is discovered by pure philosophy or pure science." --Nathan Coppedge



"Sometimes I think my writing is perfect, and sometimes I think it is too dirty. Anyway, what people eventually learn is that there needs to be a balance between different talents and motives, and the only exception to that is total mastery, which requires total knowledge, and in my mind, philosophy as well as science (and art, literature, magic, immortality… if it comes to that)." ---Nathan Coppedge, message to Eugene Rubinstein


"There will not be a ‘next Gates’ unless America prospers. It is a widely held belief that Bill Gates somehow made it with one trillion-dollar patent for computers. Far to the contrary, it was more like he was a patent mega-lord who bought a lot of small businesses, and had about literally a million thousand-dollar patents, or a billion ten cent shares in a company that exploded. For America to prosper, we need to continue to grow and change our thinking, and frankly at this point given how much we have already tested the boundaries without changing the categories, some aspects of both science and religion may end up being an inhibitor." ---Nathan Coppedge


"Philosophers tend to be happy people who never believe assumptions, and are always honest about reality." ---Nathan Coppedge


"Art is original the way literature is comprehensive, and philosophy is analytic, and science is real, and math is intelligent, and languages are insightful, and magic is useful, and immortality is sufficient." ---Nathan Coppedge


"A lot of people think 2X is the max leverage. Its not the max." ---Nathan Coppedge


"If there are constants, they must secure variation, maybe even desirable variation." ---Nathan Coppedge


"You see, we could just say you're seeking a principled good nature, or a metaphysical standard (morality OR coherence primarily), so I don't know if it is fair to say we should try both first." ---Nathan Coppedge


"Humans should build perpetual motion machines, machines should build God. All else concerning race is past and future." ---Nathan Coppedge

"Always look for metaphors at physics confetences, and fundamental discoveries at poetry readings." ---Nathan Coppedge


"There is one secret Zurich doesn't know: that paradoxical intelligence is more coherent than finite problems. This secret is truly powerful. Knowing it is like owning half of philosophy."


"The secret of Vienna is it swallows men. This is my most profound knowledge of it, even though I've never gone there in my current life."


"Time is challenging, so to speak. Information accumulates, and better be high-quality." ---Nathan Coppedge


"The general advice is, if we are suffering from a physical problem, we need to improve our mind, and if we have a mental problem we need to improve our body. If we can’t improve our mind, we physically die. If we can’t improve our body, we go absolutely insane." ---Nathan Coppedge


"Consider it this way: if you were reincarnated and didn’t experience your next life, you would feel cheated, right? As soon as we deny early-life consciousness we are also denying reincarnation. So I completely support the idea that humans are conscious throughout their lives. It is simply that the amounts of time involved are so vast by adult standards. And there is a time before individual life called the 'great foolishness' or also 'baby toughness' in which babies fight a war against being aborted by their mothers. The experience of being a baby is actually much like being an adult at first: there are wise, conscientious decisions that are made, until people force you to act and think in a certain more restrictive way. Restrictive thinking emerges at just the time that babies have averted the evil outcome called abortion." ---Nathan Coppedge


"At this point we should know if we want a new approach we should have NEW IDEAS, NOT NEW 'ORGANIZATIONS' OR NEW COMING-TO-TERMS. When we do not have new ideas, we fail, and at this point what counts as a new idea has become somewhat radical. So, at this juncture it is impossible to reject radicalism. So, it may be a long while before these radical new ideas are accepted. Above all, the new theories have nothing to do with problems unless they can solve them… What is egalitarian about real knowledge is the capacity to accept alternate systems, but only if they work… And what is not a system is truly not a system, and so it is pointless to accept a critique that is not offering radical, practical, and paradigm-changing methods. Almost no one seems to know what a radical solution looks like… Has a radical solution ever existed? We should not mince words, but merely accept that ideas are ideas, and they are not just one thing… if what something is offering is that it is a system, it should define itself as such, and not as though there are no alternatives, but not as though it does nothing… Logic is necessary to solve abstract problems, and mechanics is necessary to solve practical problems… Active logic, active mechanics… not a mere coming-to-terms." ---Nathan Coppedge


"Pain is inhuman. It is a contradiction of humanity. It is the cheapest alternative to meaning. It is an infinite lack of value. The opposite of pain is the meaningful. The opposite of pleasure is the meaningless. The further lives and spirits progress in cognition and complexity, the easier it becomes to achieve pleasure. There are many exceptions to exceptional complexity, but insofar as there is complexity there is always something more valuable than pain. Pain is the definition of the useless. It is wasted time, self-destructive matters, un-divine problems. The only reason for pain is ignorance and poor strategy, but it is not automatically explained: it implies a lack of explanation. Where there are explanations there are desires for a life without pain. When life has meaning, pain is usually insignificant. Pleasure, or perhaps eventually something better, is part of the good life. And, ultimately pleasure is a cheap form of meaning, just as pain is an extremely cheap form of the meaningless. We have economic imperative to overcome pain, and where there is pain there is a desire to compensate with impossible wonders. Meaning is born of the death of the impossible (pleasure), whereas appreciation of the meaningless very often comes from pain. Pain is an exaggerated lesson that is useless wherever it is felt. No one has ever called pain useful while being true to the soul. Pain is a theory of theory-less meaning, the death of all possibility coming from the refusal of impossibility. Where there is no impossibility there is no theory, and no way to oppose the meaningless. And where the meaningless explanations exist, there is pain or something to replace it. The trace of primitive education goes infinite sacrifice → skepticism → pleasure → meaning. The infinite sacrifice is pain, and the skepticism is the meaningless. Meaning begins with pleasure, it is the minimum standard. For everything that is good has pleasure, and nothing is meaningful that is not good. Sometimes we deny that meaning is good when we are complex, but this is not in earnest. Only perversity gives the idea that meaning exists that is not pleasure, and if we think pain is a good teacher we are truly ignorant. All opportunity comes from pleasure, and if we lack wisdom on this it is not our responsibility. There is a wisdom born of desperation, and it has great intelligence compared with evil. When the great powers deny the fundamental meaning, which is meaningful pleasure, they have destroyed much of the potential of life. All potentials come from meaningful pleasure. Without pleasure there is not substance. Therefore, all strategies should define that life is meaningful, and no strategy should deny that pain destroys value. Therefore, life is a continuum of value, defined in meaning. And pain is its destroyer. Pain may as well be meaningless unless life has contradictions. Elsewhere I have proven conclusively that contradiction is evil, so there is no evidence that pain has value. And so, life should concern itself with meaningful pleasure." ---Nathan Coppedge


MORE QUOTATIONS:

https://www.poemhunter.com/quotations/famous.asp?people=Nathan%20Coppedge