Showing posts with label metaphysics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label metaphysics. Show all posts

Saturday, November 5, 2016

Forthcoming book, Analytic Possibilism

ANALYTIC POSSIBILISM

By Nathan Coppedge

BOOK DESCRIPTION

An optimistic philosophy granting powers to the critical faculty...Thoughts can have the properties of nature as a way of tasting nature...Metaphysical possibility exists in at least two senses...The view held roughly by Elias Canetti, Novalis, Lichtenberg, Alexius Meinong, Quentin Meillassoux, and Nathan Coppedge.



Wednesday, October 12, 2016

The Petri Dish Model

From Systems Theory:

Extending the concept of an observer or eye as the major definitive concept, perhaps there is a sophisticated instrument like a microscope between the source of reality and the physical matter.

In this case, existence (or at least our own limited experience) takes the form of a 'petri dish': A swarm of two-dimensional colors which ultimately mean nothing other than an explanation to the 'scientific eye' that lies beyond the microscope.

The scientist need not be a God. He might even be a human being. All of life is exaggerated to give the appearance of fairness, and to serve as an interesting explanation to the concealed scientist. It is the simplest principle: the explanation that 'explanation' is the only ultimate explanation, but has no inherent form. Beyond the petri dish, reality ends.

Indeed, any number of other realities might also be petri dishes, although they would also be equally simplistic. For example, an occult game might be played with words that in the end prove to be lies. And the words might be two-dimensional like a petri dish.

In this modality, the greatest transcendence is simply to make believe one is a child, and that the scientist-god has given birth to reason.  Life may be objective, but there is no immediate promise of a world beyond the petri dish.

Saturday, September 3, 2016

Way of the Sun

For Pinterest 'seems most like magic' images...


Wednesday, June 22, 2016

My supposed Quora rankings

Quora ratings currently:

2nd for modern philosophy.

2nd for philosophy of life.

3rd for 'logic'.

3rd for dimensions (goemetry).

3rd for philosophy (college major).

3rd for metaphysics.

3rd for modernism.

3rd for analytic philosophy.

4th for reasoning.

5th for analogies.

5th for continental philosophy.

5th for postmodernism (I reject post-modernism).

6th for high-dimensional spaces.

9th for logic (thinking).


https://www.quora.com/profile/Nathan-Coppedge/highlights



Sunday, June 12, 2016

Systems According to 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Order Questions

SYSTEMS ACCORDING TO 1ST, 2ND, AND 3RD ORDER QUESTIONS


The first (most basic) system is coherent math, and the last (most advanced) is coherent philosophy.


QUESTIONS

First-order questions: Rationality or Irrationality?

Second-order questions: Perfect and Complex!:
value or absoluteness or aesthetics or relativism
Half of relativism is absolute through relative-relativism.
Aesthetics is just a privileged value system.
Now it is between values and absolutes.
Absoluteness is one form of value.
Suggestion: absolute value or aesthetic value.

Imperfection is a return to graphic value failure.

Simplicity is a return to the non-linguistic.

Simplicity cannot be technical, and imperfection is informal.

Therefore, with formal systems, absolute value or aesthetic value.

Third-order questions: Exceptional or Coherent?

[Coherency is always the shortcut sometimes.
But it requires a standard].

A matter of perspective. A perfect system can be exceptional.

An exceptional system can be coherent.

If exceptions are defined as incoherent, they extend the system.

Unexceptional coherence is not coherence.

‘Exceptional’ must be used in a technical way, where it is
the unresolved coherency


SYSTEMS


Rational Only, Perfect Only, Coherent Only
Coherent math.

Rational Only, Perfect Only, Exceptional Only
Incoherent math.

Rational Only, Perfect Only, Coherent Exceptions
Paradoxical math.

Rational Only, Complex Only, Coherent Only
Coherent semantics.

Rational Only, Complex Only, Exceptional Only
Paradoxical semantics.

Rational Only, Complex Only, Coherent Exceptions
Purely theoretical coherence.

Rational Only, Complex and Perfect, Coherent Only
Formal coherence.

Rational Only, Complex and Perfect, Exceptional Only
Symbolic methodology.

Rational Only, Complex and Perfect, Coherent Exceptions
Archetypal philosophy.



Irrational Only, Perfect Only, Coherent Only
Affirmativism.

Irrational Only, Perfect Only, Exceptional Only
Ersatzism.

Irrational Only, Perfect Only, Coherent Exceptions
Monism.

Irrational Only, Complex Only, Coherent Only
Romanticism.

Irrational Only, Complex Only, Exceptional Only
Transcendentalism.

Irrational Only, Complex Only, Coherent Exceptions
Irrationalism.

Irrational Only, Complex & Perfect, Coherent Only
Fantacism.

Irrational Only, Complex & Perfect, Exceptional Only
Science fiction.

Irrational Only, Complex & Perfect, Coherent Exceptions
Philosophical constructivism.



Rat & Irrat., Perfect Only, Coherent Only
Coherent idealism.

Rat & Irrat., Perfect Only, Exceptional Only
Exceptionism.

Rat & Irrat., Perfect Only, Coherent Exceptions
Universal systems.

Rat & Irrat., Complex Only, Coherent Only
Typological semantics.

Rat & Irrat., Complex Only, Exceptional Only
Empiricism.

Rat & Irrat., Complex Only, Coherent Exceptions
Empirical idealism.

Rat & Irrat., Perfect & Complex, Coherent Only
Coherent games.

Rat & Irrat., Perfect & Complex, Exceptional Only
Ideal semantics.

Rat & Irrat., Perfect & Complex, Coherent Exceptions
Coherent systems, categorical deduction.

Sunday, February 28, 2016

HOW TO BUILD A 100-DIMENSIONAL UNIVERSE


NOTE: I cannot answer in mathematical terms, but I can venture a physical and philosophical answer. The fifth dimension involves extension into and beyond 4-d. Thus, it involves not just the possibility, but the guarantee of two time dimensions. A general way to extend dimensions is to think first of possibility, and then in the next dimension as reality.

For example,

1-d sometimes exists.

2-d is virtual but always exists.

3-d exists and is never virtual and is not fully aware of time.

4-d exists and is never virtual and controls time.

5-d exists and is never virtual and controls time and potentially has two fundamental types of matter.

6-d exists and is never virtual and controls time and always has two fundamental types of matter.

7-d exists and is never virtual and controls time and always has two fundamental types of matter, and potentially has two concepts of time.

8-d exists and is never virtual and controls time and always has two fundamental  types of matter, and always has two concepts of time, and potentially has some other thing.

9-d exists and is never virtual and controls time and always has two fundamental types of matter, and always has two concepts of time, and always has some other thing.

10-d exists and is never virtual and controls time and potentially has three concepts of matter, and always has two concepts of time, and always has some other thing.

11-d exists and is never virtual and controls time and always has three concepts of matter, and always has two concepts of time, and always has some other thing.

12-d exists, and is never virtual and controls time and always has three concepts of matter, and sometimes has three concepts of time, and always has some other thing.

13-d exists, and is never virtual, and controls time, and always has three concepts of matter, and always has three concepts of time, and always has some other thing.

14-d exists, and is never virtual, and controls time, and always has three concepts of matter, and always has three concepts of time, and sometimes has two other things.

15-d exists, and is never virtual, and controls time, and always has three concepts of matter, and always has three concepts of time, and always has two other things.

16-d might not exist, or is partly virtual, or partly chaotic, and always has three concepts of matter, and always has three concepts of time, and always has two other things.

17-d doesn't exist, or is virtual, or is chaotic, and always has three concepts of matter, and always has three concepts of time, and always has two other things.

18-d doesn't exist, or is virtual, or is chaotic, and always has three concepts of matter, and always has three concepts of time, and sometimes has three other things.

19-d doesn't exist, or is virtual, or is chaotic, and always has three concepts of matter, and always has three concepts of time, and always has three other things.

20-d doesn't exist, or is virtual, or is chaotic, and always has three concepts of matter, and always has three concepts of time, and always has three other things, and sometimes has an additional power.

21-d doesn't exist, or is virtual, or is chaotic, and always has three concepts of matter, and always has three concepts of time, and always has three other things, and always has an additional power.

22-d doesn't exist, or is virtual, or is chaotic, and sometimes has four concepts of matter, and always has three concepts of time, and always has three other things, and always has an additional power.

23-d doesn't exist, or is virtual, or is chaotic, and always has four concepts of matter, and always has three concepts of time, and always has three other things, and always has an additional power.

24-d doesn't exist, or is virtual, or is chaotic, and always has four concepts of matter, and sometimes has four concepts of time, and always has three other things, and always has an additional power.

25-d doesn't exist, or is virtual, or is chaotic, and always has four concepts of matter, and always has four concepts of time, and always has three other things, and always has an additional power.

26-d doesn't exist, or is virtual, or is chaotic, and always has four concepts of matter, and always has four concepts of time, and sometimes has four other things, and always has an additional power.

27-d doesn't exist, or is virtual, or is chaotic, and always has four concepts of matter, and always has four concepts of time, and always has four other things, and always has an additional power.

28-d doesn't exist, or is virtual, or is chaotic, and always has four concepts of matter, and always has four concepts of time, and always has four other things, and sometimes has two additional powers.

29-d doesn't exist, or is virtual, or is chaotic, and always has four concepts of matter, and always has four concepts of time, and always has four other things, and always has two additional powers.

30-d is an illusion, or composite, or mind, and always has four concepts of matter, and always has four concepts of time, and always has four other things, and always has two additional powers.

31-d is an illusion, or composite, or mind, and sometimes has five concepts of matter, and always has four concepts of time, and always has four other things, and always has two additional powers.

32-d is an illusion, or composite, or mind, and always has five concepts of matter, and always has four concepts of time, and always has four other things, and always has two additional powers.

33-d is an illusion, or composite, or mind, and always has five concepts of matter, and sometimes has five concepts of time, and always has four other things, and always has two additional powers.

34-d is an illusion, or composite, or mind, and always has five concepts of matter, and always has five concepts of time, and sometimes has five other things, and always has two additional powers.

35-d is an illusion, or composite, or mind, and always has five concepts of matter, and always has five concepts of time, and always has five other things, and always has two additional powers.

36-d is an illusion, or composite, or mind, and always has five concepts of matter, and always has five concepts of time, and always has five other things, and sometimes has three additional powers.

37-d is an illusion, or composite, or mind, and always has five concepts of matter. and always has five concepts of time, and always has five other things, and always has three additional powers.

38-d is an illusion, or composite, or mind, and sometimes has six concepts of matter. and always has five concepts of time, and always has five other things, and always has three additional powers.

39-d is an illusion, or composite, or mind, and always has six concepts of matter, and always has five concepts of time, and always has five other things, and always has three additional powers.

40-d is an illusion, or composite, or mind, and always has six concepts of matter, and sometimes has six concepts of time, and always has five other things, and always has three additional powers.

41-d is an illusion, or composite, or mind, and always has six concepts of matter, and always has six concepts of time, and always has five other things, and always has three additional powers.

42-d is an illusion, or composite, or mind, and always has six concepts of matter, and always has six concepts of time, and sometimes has six other things, and always has three additional powers.

43-d is an illusion, or composite, or mind, and always has six concepts of matter, and always has six concepts of time, and always has six other things, and always has three additional powers.

44-d is an illusion, or composite, or mind, and always has six concepts of matter, and always has six concepts of time, and always has six other things, and sometimes has four additional powers.

45-d is an illusion, or composite, or mind, and always has six concepts of matter, and always has six concepts of time, and always has six other things, and always has four additional powers.

46-d is relative, and broken, and magical, and always has six concepts of matter, and always has six concepts of time, and always has six other things, and always has four additional powers.

47-d is absolute, and undifferentiated, and universal, and always has six concepts of matter, and always has six concepts of time, and always has six other things, and always has four additional powers.

48-d is absolute, and undifferentiated, and universal, and sometimes has seven concepts of matter, and always has six concepts of time, and always has six other things, and always has four additional powers.

49-d is absolute, and undifferentiated, and universal, and always has seven concepts of matter, and always has six concepts of time, and always has six other things, and always has four additional powers.

50-d is absolute, and undifferentiated, and universal, and always has seven concepts of matter, and sometimes has seven concepts of time, and always has six other things, and always has four additional powers.

51-d is absolute, and undifferentiated, and universal, and always has seven concepts of matter, and always has seven concepts of time, and always has six other things, and always has four additional powers.

52-d is absolute, and undifferentiated, and universal, and always has seven concepts of matter, and always has seven concepts of time, and sometimes has seven other things, and always has four additional powers.

53-d is absolute, and undifferentiated, and universal, and always has seven concepts of matter, and always has seven concepts of time, and always has seven other things, and always has four additional powers.

54-d is absolute, and undifferentiated, and universal, and always has seven concepts of matter, and always has seven concepts of time, and always has seven other things, and sometimes has five additional powers.

55-d is absolute, and undifferentiated, and universal, and always has seven concepts of matter, and always has seven concepts of time, and always has seven other things, and always has five additional powers.

56-d is absolute, and undifferentiated, and universal, and sometimes has eight concepts of matter, and always has seven concepts of time, and always has seven other things, and always has five additional powers.

57-d is absolute, and undifferentiated, and universal, and always has eight concepts of matter, and always has seven concepts of time, and always has seven other things, and always has five additional powers.

58-d is absolute, and undifferentiated, and universal, and always has eight concepts of matter, and sometimes has eight concepts of time, and always has seven other things, and always has five additional powers.

59-d is absolute, and undifferentiated, and universal, and always has eight concepts of matter, and always has eight concepts of time, and always has seven other things, and always has five additional powers.

60-d is absolute, and undifferentiated, and universal, and always has eight concepts of matter, and always has eight concepts of time, and sometimes has eight other things, and always has five additional powers.

61-d is absolute, and undifferentiated, and universal, and always has eight concepts of matter, and always has eight concepts of time, and always has eight other things, and always has five additional powers.

62-d is absolute, and undifferentiated, and universal, and always has eight concepts of matter, and always has eight concepts of time, and always has eight other things, and sometimes has six additional powers.

62-d is absolute, and undifferentiated, and universal, and always has eight concepts of matter, and always has eight concepts of time and always has eight other things, and always has six additional powers.

63-d is impermanent or finite or fatal, and always has eight concepts of matter, and always has eight concepts of time, and always has eight other things, and always has six additional powers.

64-d is permanent, infinite, and eternal, and always has eight concepts of matter, and always has eight concepts of time, and always has eight other things, and always has six additional powers.

65-d is permanent, infinite, and eternal, and sometimes has nine concepts of matter, and always has eight concepts of time, and always has eight other things, and always has six additional powers.

66-d is permanent, infinite, and eternal, and always has nine concepts of matter, and always has eight concepts of time, and always has eight other things, and always has six additional powers.

67-d is permanent, infinite, and eternal, and always has nine concepts of matter. and sometimes has nine concepts of time, and always has eight other things, and always has six additional powers.

68-d is permanent, infinite, and eternal, and always has nine concepts of matter, and always has nine concepts of time, and always has eight other things, and always has six additional powers.

69-d is permanent, infinite, and eternal, and always has nine concepts of matter, and always has nine concepts of time, and sometimes has nine other things, and always has six additional powers.

70-d is permanent, infinite, and eternal, and always has nine concepts of matter, and always has nine concepts of time, and always has nine other things, and always has six additional powers.

71-d is permanent, infinite, and eternal, and always has nine concepts of matter, and always has nine concepts of time, and always has nine other things, and sometimes has seven additional powers.

72-d is permanent, infinite, and eternal, and always has nine concepts of matter, and always has nine concepts of time, and always has nine other things, and always has seven additional powers.

73-d is permanent, infinite, and eternal, and sometimes has ten concepts of matter, and always has nine concepts of time, and always has nine other things, and always has seven additional powers.

74-d is permanent, infinite, and eternal, and always has ten concepts of matter, and always has nine concepts of time, and always has nine other things, and always has seven additional powers.

75-d is permanent, infinite, and eternal, and always has ten concepts of matter, and sometimes has ten concepts of time, and always has nine other things, and always has seven additional powers.

76-d is permanent, infinite, and eternal, and always has ten concepts of matter, and always has ten concepts of time, and always has nine other things, and always has seven additional powers.

77-d is permanent, infinite, and eternal, and always has ten concepts of matter, and always has ten concepts of time, and sometimes has ten other things, and always has seven additional powers.

78-d is permanent, infinite, and eternal, and always has ten concepts of matter, and always has ten concepts of time, and always has ten other things, and always has seven additional powers.

79-d is permanent, infinite, and eternal, and always has ten concepts of matter, and always has ten concepts of time, and always has ten other things, and sometimes has eight additional powers.

80-d is permanent, infinite, and eternal, and always has ten concepts of matter, and always has ten concepts of time and always has ten other things, and always has eight additional powers.

81-d is destruction, art, and purpose, and always has ten concepts of matter, and always has ten concepts of time, and always has ten other things, and always has eight additional powers.

82-d is time, jest, and transformation, and always has ten concepts of matter, and always has ten concepts of time, and always has ten other things, and always has eight additional powers.

83-d is time, jest, and transformation, and sometimes has eleven concepts of matter, and always has ten concepts of time, and always has ten other things, and always has eight additional powers.

84-d is time, jest, and transformation, and always has eleven concepts of matter, and always has ten concepts of time, and always has ten other things, and always has eight additional powers.

85-d is time, jest, and transformation, and always has eleven concepts of matter, and sometimes has eleven concepts of time, and always has ten other things, and always has eight additional powers.

86-d is time, jest, and transformation, and always has eleven concepts of matter, and always has eleven concepts of time, and always has ten other things, and always has eight additional powers.

87-d is time, jest, and transformation, and always has eleven concepts of matter, and always has eleven concepts of time, and sometimes has eleven other things, and always has eight additional powers.

88-d is time, jest, and transformation, and always has eleven concepts of matter, and always has eleven concepts of time, and always has eleven other things, and always has eight additional powers.

89-d is time, jest, and transformation, and always has eleven concepts of matter, and always has eleven concepts of time, and always has eleven other things, and sometimes has nine additional powers.

90-d is time, jest, and transformation, and always has eleven concepts of matter, and always has eleven concepts of time, and always has eleven other things, and always has nine additional powers.

91-d is time, jest, and transformation, and sometimes has twelve concepts of matter, and always has eleven concepts of time, and always has eleven other things, and always has nine additional powers.

92-d is time, jest, and transformation, and always has twelve concepts of matter, and always has eleven concepts of time, and always has eleven other things, and always has nine additional powers.

93-d is time, jest, and transformation, and always has twelve concepts of matter, and sometimes has twelve concepts of time, and always has eleven other things, and always has nine additional powers.

94-d is time, jest, and transformation, and always has twelve concepts of matter, and always has twelve concepts of time, and sometimes has twelve other things, and always has nine additional powers.

95-d is time, jest, and transformation, and always has twelve concepts of matter, and always has twelve concepts of time, and always has twelve other things, and always has nine additional powers.

96-d is time, jest, and transformation, and always has twelve concepts of matter, and always has twelve concepts of time, and always has twelve other things, and sometimes has ten additional powers.

97-d is time, jest, and transformation, and always has twelve concepts of matter, and always has twelve concepts of time, and always has twelve other things, and always has ten additional powers

98-d is time, jest, and transformation, and sometimes has thirteen concepts of matter, and always has twelve concepts of time, and always has twelve other things, and always has ten additional powers.

99-d is time, jest, and transformation, and always has thirteen concepts of matter, and always has twelve concepts of time, and always has twelve other things, and always has ten additional powers.

100-d is time, jest, and transformation, and always has thirteen concepts of matter, and sometimes has thirteen concepts of time, and always has twelve other things, and always has ten additional powers.


Etc.


AFTERWORD
It is possible to conceive of other typological systems, however, in which these typological dimensions are not reached, or in which one characteristic, such as material complexity, time complexity, or sheer complexity develops quickly while other characteristics do not.
My conclusion for the fifth dimension based on the study of characteristic dimensions is that it objectively involves the most advanced conceivable concept of five properties (one for each dimension): (1) nature, (2) materials, (3) structure, (4) properties / culture, and (5) evolution. These are sort of the Qubits of 5-d space. And it can be added that 5-d may be a different spatial or metaphysical dimension, with the assumption that simpler experiences are analogous to Flatland, and that more advanced experiences can be approximated.



The above is also available as an academic article HERE: https://www.academia.edu/22558908/How_to_Build_a_100-Dimensional_Universe

Wednesday, February 24, 2016

TWO INTERPRETATIONS OF REASON

I don't know if it's worth winter so i don't know if it's worth a coca cola
I CROSSED THAT WAY AND THIS WAY UNTIL I MET A MAN

AcademicRoom (as opposed to Academia.edu) is not functioning today. So, to vent my frustration I am posting my recent paper here instead.


TWO INTERPRETATIONS OF REASON

I will begin with a description of what I mean by the development of reason. In this process, I will develop four categories, and relate how the descriptions imply two interpretations: one forwards, and another backwards. I will then explain the apparent paradox involved in this reason, and finally suggest a general method used in arriving at this useful double-comparison.

(1) Deux Interpretationes

What we know as reason is potentially just one stage of reason. I arrived at this idea by considering the question of: ‘What measures reason?’ And I thought, from a coherent perspective, the only thing that could measure reason was something outside of reason. And there could be nothing outside of reason except madness. But this raised a further question of ‘What is outside of madness?’And I thought this too could be solvable. The most obvious answer I could find was ‘Sanity’. Thus far three categories. Now, to round it out I attempted to add a fourth, responding to madness just as sanity responded to reason. And my answer for the fourth category was ‘Creativity’.

In this way, creativity became the ultimate bound of madness, just as sanity became the ultimate bound of reason.

The Four Categories are:

(1) Reason
(2) Madness
(3) Sanity
(4) Creativity

Now, developmentally, there are two interpretations (‘Deux Interpretationes’). One is that reason progresses into creativity. The other is the reverse: that creativity develops into reason. The distinction is important, because the difference developmentally seems to imply a priority for one or the other concept, or a reliance on either sanity or madness as a secondary runner-up concept.

So, now we have a second interpretation:

(1) Creativity
(2) Sanity
(3) Madness
(4) Reason

The second interpretation seems to put the emphasis on reason, but begins with creativity. The first interpretation puts the emphasis on creativity, but begins with reason.


(2) Paradox

Now, it may be further noted that reason appears to express the ‘ultimate’ embodiment of this set of data. In other words, all of the types are in some sense attempts at reason. Or, at least, reason is the simplest definition to use in place of any of the four, interpreted as I have interpreted them as translations of reason originally. However, in a similar way, creativity may be called an ‘empirical’ embodiment of the set of data.

Therefore, there is a conflict between the ultimate and the empirical, which amounts to a paradox. For, although the two concepts appear similar, the context places them separately as opposite alternatives. The choice appears to be between the two, even though they are the same.

If we are to prefer the empirical, we are left with creativity and abstract reason. If we choose the ultimate, we are left with nominalism, and end up groping for creativity to solve its significance.


(3) A General Method Derived from the Investigation

What may be called the ING Method may be derived most simply from the consideration of a set which reverses order, in which a double-horned dilemma emerges. The solution is always a choice between ultimates, and the ultimates are further made ambiguous by the ambiguous size of the set. Thus, there is a kind of criss-crossing between degrees of each extreme, and its relation to the central interpretation (a paradox).

ING may stand for ‘Inverse Negative Grouping’.

Up to Top 4% on Academia!


55 Followers | 121 Following | 4,835 Total Views | top 4%


http://www.southernct.academia.edu/NathanCoppedge



R RT RR ORIGINA

Saturday, January 2, 2016

PROGRESSIVE VIEW OF METAPHYSICAL DISEASES

A kind of pyramid is possible, in which the second and third disease cannot be had without curing the first, and the 4th, 5th, and 6th cannot be had without meta-curing the 2nd and 3rd, and so on, in successive levels, each including one additional component. The iteration of the method of altering previous levels suggests that by terms of the current reality, the path is somewhat infinite. Yet, with dimensional potential, the path my be gained more quickly, and the lessons learned.

1. Death.
2. Immortality.
3. Genius.

4. Art.
5. Transformation.
6. Mystery.


The first level (1) is the level of struggle to understand pleasure and pain and find higher purpose. The second level (2 and 3) is about disillusionment and self-directed purpose. The goal of the second level is not to despair, and not to fall for temptations. The third level (4, 5, and 6) involves the fifth dimension, and so it is hard to interpret. What may be seen in the third level is a paradigmatic path of reality, with greater certainty and enjoyment of various wonders and superficial, mysterious, or amusing obstacles.

Friday, December 4, 2015

ARTIFICIAL REALITY, from a book of categorical knowledge by Nathan Coppedge


1. The mythological is real for someone unreal, provided there is a universal program.

2. Thus, much of life concerns seeking a universal program, or else authenticity.

Tuesday, November 17, 2015

IMPORTANT CONTRIBUTION TO METAPHYSICS


Is 'X' happening? Someone could guarantee that it is happening rather cheaply, why not?

It is a different question whether two things are separate.

Are two things happening?

Well, we can ask, does that mean one thing isn't happening, or does it just mean something more complex is happening?

Or does it in fact mean we can reduce the criteria for one thing happening, sinc it now consists of less unified complexity, one argues (like 2 is the sq. rt. of 4)?

I find this last explanation most reasonable.

Evidently, something could be less unified without being less real.

And yet, the division retains an efficiency in explaining complexity.

Apparently, reality is efficient (un-unified or un-complex), or else necessarily real, in the sense of retaining complexity.

Now we can ask, is it s a potential universe? Perhaps only if its potential can be actualized. For example, as a thought experiment, we don't know that the universe is not perception.

It is unfair to treat the universe as necessarily ONLY objective, if the non-objective is what we supposedly perceive.

But, it seems more likely that the universe has potential where it can be actualized, than that it is either non-objective or objective specifically.

For, what tells us that it is necessarily one way and not another? That is like imposing a moral paradigm.

It is more like it just IS or ISN'T.

Now we reach the ultimate idea, that THE POTENTIAL IS THE ACTUAL.

The universe itself is undergoing EVOLUTION.

Thursday, October 29, 2015

I have recently submitted papers to the Social Science Research Network

Although they are still in review, they are visible at:

"78 Binary Laws of Physics":
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2680473

"How to Build a 21-Dimensional Universe":
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2681277

And,

"(The) Metaphysical Art":
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2681284


Thursday, October 15, 2015

IMPORTANT IDEAS FROM PHILOSOPHYIDEAS.COM

[Paraphrased from the original thinkers, by the owners of philosophyideas.com].

"~The realm of necessary non-existence cannot be explored, because it is unknowable~" ---Parmenides (#445).

"~Concepts don't carve up the world, which has endless overlooked or ignored divisions~" ---Heil (#7020).

"~A thing's ontological category depends on what else exists, so it is contingent~" ---Westerhoff (#13135).



Sunday, September 20, 2015

ASCETICUREAN WRITINGS

"If I'm god, it's always possible that I'm mortal: unless I'm immortal: this leads to categoric philosophy called Omni-Science."

"I'm good, so I'm god of myself. The best thing is to get what I want. It's necessarily a compromise, because I'm not God. Any compromise pays for some type of everything. With sufficient everythings, nothing goes wrong. Even illness must be well-studied, and there is no study without the experience of existing. With the theory of existence one can begin to study existentialism: the modalities of meaning which compose life." ---Nathan Coppedge

"Pleasure as we know it is brilliant pain: real pleasure is a feeling of nothingness. The feeling of nothingness is neither rational or irrational. Thus, it is foundational for system. Out of system, form comes. When it is granted property, it can be called dimensional." ---Nathan Coppedge

Wednesday, September 9, 2015

THE MATRIX GUIDE TO DIMENSIONALISM

The Mote is just madness...

It's what you need to move beyond the basics...

What we are used to...

Is just 4 categories...

'The Quadrae'...

Or, you can call it, Omni-Science!

Notice, the basics has boundaries...

It is  a step beyond mathematics...

The exceptions pile up exponentially by the power of two...

1, 4, 16, 64, 128, 256, 512, 1024, 2048, 4096, 8192, 16384...

Every level has its own logical method...

It's own range of minimal rhetorical authority....

Each level requires exceeding perfection...

Each level has its own type of mastery...

For our purposes, computers may be required beyond the level of '16'...

That is about the limit of what the average mind can grasp...

Each of these levels is a variation on the Quadrae...

Intemediate levels also exist...

But they are tougher to grasp...

Unique typologies exist for every dimension....

Even fractional dimensions, with greater precision....

Sometimes it is safe to say that one dimension is just a variation on the previous...

In an evolving system, each category must be perfect and complete to lead to the following schema...

For our purposes, perfection is suspended until groups are completed...

But, I will show you a little work that I have done...

The third dimension is the beginning of meaningful experience....

The fourth dimension is the beginning of time-travel....

The fifth dimensions is the beginning of immortality....

21 Dimensions is what you need to eclipse everything that you KNOW!

At that level, there is something called 'Quadruple Complexity'....

No need to know about that now...

Just focus on the tools you hold now...

And you will have the will  to achieve ultimate reality!....

Wednesday, July 1, 2015

MAKE MAGICAL REALISM A REALITY: DECONSTRUCTING VIOLENCE IN A FUTURE METAPHYSICS

This concerns a kind of 'Wizard Reality'.

In the next reality, no one commits violence, by virtue of metaphysics.

In the next reality, a gun is deconstructed into a small aspect of metaphysics.

(An 'Outer Reality').

Most machines are relegated to the realm of metaphysics.

Which is not to say they are the only component.

Many intellectual things live there.

On the ground there are some machines: beautiful objects.

Perpetual Motion Machines!

Objects that have purpose.

What is serious is not a gun---nothing so abstract as metaphysics!

Instead, it is change itself!

And, secondly, what comes to mind is thought itself!

But, thought is too natural to be serious!

Therefore, only change is a serious thought.

In this wizard reality.

Wednesday, May 13, 2015

METAPHYSICAL SUMMARYSM

MODULE 1:

[Classica]

Form

Idea

Purpose

Truth


MODULE 2:

[Modernism]

Metaphysical Modules

Realism

Game Theory

Artificial Meaning


MODULE 3:

[Psychology]

Symbolism

Population

Creativity

Realization


MODULE 4:

[Currently Missing]

Unessential Modules

Metaphysical Variables

Worlding

Critical History

Friday, February 13, 2015

Dimensional Mythology, Part 2: Irreconcilables

E.g. unattainable contingencies which have the potential to define everything. However, only when technical proficiency is maximized. At that point no one single tool can define everything---by the time it is scripted it is unscripted.

The irreconcilables are created when they are destroyed.

Semantics overall, is real when it is unreal---a kind of tangential unrealism, a space-filler which takes up no space, which to take multiple forms, must take one form.

However, the intelligibles are neither specifically blind, nor specifically bright----

They are like irrationals. they prefigure forms which look metaphysical, yet without definition.

Unformatted, they cease to be real...


Tuesday, February 10, 2015

A Note to My Academic Readers...

I have changed the misleading title of one of my papers.

It is now called 'The Dithered Theories of Dimensionism'.

'Grey Theories' no more!

Here is that paper, for those people who were led astray:

https://www.academia.edu/9865955/Dithered_Theories_of_Dimensionism


Dimensional World Module 1

1. Complexity is texture.

2. Texture is a kind of information in the dimensional world. See Systemo.

3. Perfection is substance.

4. Entities can levitate through isometry.

5. Subjectivity is the coincidence of perspective, granted appropriateness.

6. Entities exchange abstract properties through hyperbolics.

7. The correspondence of internalized descriptions determines aesthetic meaning.

8. Perfection is a rule of complexity, and vice versa.

9. Quests include whether perfection is subjective, and whether complexity is individual (creating leisure and purpose).

10. Meaning and enjoyment are natural---both urban and cultivated.

11. If there is a shortcoming, it is the shortcoming of virtual worlds: a way in which the original, inherent needs of occupants were ignored or overlooked.

12. Consequently, pleasure should be guaranteed, unless pleasure can be explained and justified by visual content.

13. Economics is not competitive, but meaningful and explosive like the big bang.

14. Everything is meaningful, unless it results in questions to the interface.

15. Knowledge in this world is exponential, and its only degeneration is the finitude of the coinci-stantial.

16. In essence, a meaningful world, with real values (objects, hence aesthetic rules of physics).

17. Ethics is far more material, and meaning far more evidential, in this world.