Coherent Systems now available as Academia articles

I laboriously transferred the first 64 Coherent Systems to appropriate categories within my academia articles: http://www.southernct.academia.edu/NathanCoppedge

THE METHODOLOGY OF SYSTEMS

Make art. Realize your imaginative possibilities. Look for symbols.

Develop a menu of symbolic modalities. Organize them. Discover their meaning.

Extend the best logic ad nauseam. Form a universal system where possible.

Generate all itera of existing methods. Exaggerate where necessary. Technicalize where necessary. Elaborate where necessary. However crude, the existing system is the basis for all derivatives.

Focus on a detail. Take part of the detail suitable for stylistic representation, and select it for use as a system.

Repeat, form other systems. “Bring to bear all things in one watcher”.

Form sigil-motifs to summarize and streamline existing symbols and systems. Use these as call-expressions for common logics.

Eke the best method. Form new works. Elaborate. Simplify.

Focus on only the best work. The soul of the system.

Explore major alternatives. Piece together intermediate areas.

Cheat: leap to this point and invent something new to extend the life of the system. For example, relativity, or perpetual motion. Work within existing conventions, and break them.

Work on prediction and limits. Improve intelligence. Find intuitive methods. Go back to the beginning.

Also present on my other blog: https://nathancoppedge.quora.com/The-Methodology-of-Systems

Decimille: Systematic Extension of the Decimal System

BASIC TERMINOLOGY

Pars: means a particular irrational number chosen to represent an aspect of decimille.

Systems Fragment: is a length of an irrational number which lies between the first digit and the second repetition of the number four in quadratic systems, five in pentallic systems, etc.

EXAMPLES OF APPLICATIONS OF DECIMILLE FOR SYSTEMOLOGY

Typical Example: Pi

3 = Macro-importance of exceptions (represented by the number '3').

1 = Micro-importance of unity / geometry (represented by the number '1').

4 = Micro-importance of quadratics (represented by the number '4').

1 = Un-parsability of quadratics (repetition of unity over quadratics, represented by the number '1').

5 = Micro-importance of dimensions beyond 4, e.g. to parse the number '4'.

9 = Micro-importance of the decimal parsal of '1' via the decimal limit of '1'.

2 = Micro-importance of set-theory represented by the number '2'.

6 = Micro-importance of dimensions greater than '5' e.g. to explain the 5th dimension.

5 = Un-parsability of pentallics (represented by the repetition of the number '5').

4 = Exceptional un-parsability or arbitrary semantics of quadratics, represented by the second repetition of the number '4'.

Less Typical: e

2 = Macro-importance of set-theory.

7 = Micro-importance of unsolvability.

1 = Micro-importance of geometry for unsolvability.

8 = Micro-importance of the 8th dimension for solvability.

2 = Un-parsability of set-theory.


So, the string 3141592654 is a decimille system derived from pi, shown above.

The string 27182 is a decimille system derived from e, shown above.

Basically, these are numbers which appear in matrixes which signify mathematical relations to proof theory and its limits.

Forthcoming book, Analytic Possibilism

ANALYTIC POSSIBILISM

By Nathan Coppedge

BOOK DESCRIPTION

An optimistic philosophy granting powers to the critical faculty...Thoughts can have the properties of nature as a way of tasting nature...Metaphysical possibility exists in at least two senses...The view held roughly by Elias Canetti, Novalis, Lichtenberg, Alexius Meinong, Quentin Meillassoux, and Nathan Coppedge.

Systems According to 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Order Questions

SYSTEMS ACCORDING TO 1ST, 2ND, AND 3RD ORDER QUESTIONS


The first (most basic) system is coherent math, and the last (most advanced) is coherent philosophy.


QUESTIONS

First-order questions: Rationality or Irrationality?

Second-order questions: Perfect and Complex!:
value or absoluteness or aesthetics or relativism
Half of relativism is absolute through relative-relativism.
Aesthetics is just a privileged value system.
Now it is between values and absolutes.
Absoluteness is one form of value.
Suggestion: absolute value or aesthetic value.

Imperfection is a return to graphic value failure.

Simplicity is a return to the non-linguistic.

Simplicity cannot be technical, and imperfection is informal.

Therefore, with formal systems, absolute value or aesthetic value.

Third-order questions: Exceptional or Coherent?

[Coherency is always the shortcut sometimes.
But it requires a standard].

A matter of perspective. A perfect system can be exceptional.

An exceptional system can be coherent.

If exceptions are defined as incoherent, they extend the system.

Unexceptional coherence is not coherence.

‘Exceptional’ must be used in a technical way, where it is
the unresolved coherency


SYSTEMS


Rational Only, Perfect Only, Coherent Only
Coherent math.

Rational Only, Perfect Only, Exceptional Only
Incoherent math.

Rational Only, Perfect Only, Coherent Exceptions
Paradoxical math.

Rational Only, Complex Only, Coherent Only
Coherent semantics.

Rational Only, Complex Only, Exceptional Only
Paradoxical semantics.

Rational Only, Complex Only, Coherent Exceptions
Purely theoretical coherence.

Rational Only, Complex and Perfect, Coherent Only
Formal coherence.

Rational Only, Complex and Perfect, Exceptional Only
Symbolic methodology.

Rational Only, Complex and Perfect, Coherent Exceptions
Archetypal philosophy.



Irrational Only, Perfect Only, Coherent Only
Affirmativism.

Irrational Only, Perfect Only, Exceptional Only
Ersatzism.

Irrational Only, Perfect Only, Coherent Exceptions
Monism.

Irrational Only, Complex Only, Coherent Only
Romanticism.

Irrational Only, Complex Only, Exceptional Only
Transcendentalism.

Irrational Only, Complex Only, Coherent Exceptions
Irrationalism.

Irrational Only, Complex & Perfect, Coherent Only
Fantacism.

Irrational Only, Complex & Perfect, Exceptional Only
Science fiction.

Irrational Only, Complex & Perfect, Coherent Exceptions
Philosophical constructivism.



Rat & Irrat., Perfect Only, Coherent Only
Coherent idealism.

Rat & Irrat., Perfect Only, Exceptional Only
Exceptionism.

Rat & Irrat., Perfect Only, Coherent Exceptions
Universal systems.

Rat & Irrat., Complex Only, Coherent Only
Typological semantics.

Rat & Irrat., Complex Only, Exceptional Only
Empiricism.

Rat & Irrat., Complex Only, Coherent Exceptions
Empirical idealism.

Rat & Irrat., Perfect & Complex, Coherent Only
Coherent games.

Rat & Irrat., Perfect & Complex, Exceptional Only
Ideal semantics.

Rat & Irrat., Perfect & Complex, Coherent Exceptions
Coherent systems, categorical deduction.

Systems Theory released in book form!

(It is still available on the webpage for those that prefer that format. The website is updated first, but the book may be more citable and more of a treasure.)

BOOK DESCRIPTION

This is the printed edition of Nathan Coppedge's highly original webpage of extensive systems, including: Formal / logical, psychological, applied, ethical, metaphysical, magical, religious, and many other categories, organized in as straightforward a manner as possible. Unique features of the volume are concise descriptions of coherent systems, gestalt, and many more. The total length is 402 pages.


http://www.amazon.com/Systems-Theory-Formal--applied--rubric-/dp/153316858X/

Dimensional Exceptionist's Toolkit

BOOK DESCRIPTION

Nathan Coppedge virtually invented the discipline of logical exceptionalism known as exceptionism or typological exceptionism. This text is an intellectual triumph. As the seventh volume of the Dimensional Encyclopedia, it archetypally explores the concepts of coherence vs. incoherence and many related fields, while extending previously introduced concepts such as Coppedge’s method of categorical deduction and the generation of logic sentences. It also introduces a spattering of insights about proto- (and proto-proto) mathematics, and other areas which affect the tools and methodology of philosophers and scientists. More than just a run-of-the-mill manifesto, this is an imaginative and subtle work written in a lucid style. However, since it's subject is incoherence primarily, it will necessarily lack the cohesiveness found in artificially and systematically coherent works. Instead of offering a unified theory, it offers eclectic insights about many types of exceptions.


Like the cover? The book is available now from Amazon HERE: http://www.amazon.com/Dimensional-Exceptionists-Toolkit-Philosophical-Encyclopedia/dp/1530978637/

RULES OF ARCHETYPAL AESTHETICS

Literary views on the work of Picasso famous artist.

Musicians: Lucky Chinese but it's not Chinese.

Work modified to adhere better to anti-plagiarism policy.

[Grey Work: A work by Picasso is apparently controlled by museums possibly the Woodmere or Slate].

What can be incidentally beautiful can be conceptual.

What can be conceptualized can compose a logic.

What can be formalized as by logic can be improved into archetype.

What is archetypal may be compared to ultimate beauty.


More official location: http://www.nathancoppedge.com/archetypalaesthetics.html

The Book of Paradoxes: Including Problems Encountered in Nathan Coppedge's Philosophy

BOOK DESCRIPTION

This author has authored numerous philosophical books. In this brief treatise, questions of knowledge are broached through the lens of twenty-four compound paradoxes. The fields covered by these writings are broad: theory, metaphysics, ethics, and systemology. Coppedge’s thesis is that all problems reduce to essentialism and causality. Solutions are proposed to a line of paradoxes which lead to the paradox of essence and cause. Finally, a kind of solution to essence and cause is provided. Also included in this book is a valuable list of problems discovered by the author in investigating the realm of philosophy, even beyond paradoxy.

The book may be found on Amazon HERE.

Update: up to 19th from 28th in a search for 'book of paradoxes' on Amazon books.

Also 363 for "paradoxes". Oh well.