Wednesday, August 14, 2019

Materials Pre-Post Theory of Everything

E.g. post-coherence theory and eclectics

At one time there were questions like this: Is the theory of relativity the theory of everything?

This (type of) writing is trying to move past that...

Itemized Systems of Understanding


New Notes:

Pan-Function Spectrums (October 17, 2021):
  • An idea of the moment: what if the Function Spectrum is not a unique theory. It might be that there are abstractions which are not knowledge, and energy which is not perpetual motion. Human knowledge might grow by eight times or more.

Disintegral (May 19, 2017):
  • Advantages on Unified Theory of Quantum Plasma Physics: Title: “Unified Theory of Quantum Plasma Physics” Soul: If you [are coherent enough], [objective enough, cold enough, and abstract enough] you will discover the disintegral [is not mathematical enough] This refers to a specific insight I had that the mathematical description of nature called Pursuing the Disintegral is not quite as good as a Theory of Everything. A Theory of Everything is still required. —How could someone debunk the unified theory of cosmic plasma physics?

Quotes:

"Math defines categories before they become rules." ---Windows Chategory

An old general problem: “Completion might require advancement. [There might be a common language between unity modules and logical over-unity expressed in the quantity of sub-modules].” —Unity and Over-Unity with Submodules

...
1

THE BOOK OF HARDNESS

Possible.Origin of the Theory of Everything.

"Infinite efficiency portends.

A layer of difference fills the gap."

---The Book of Hardness

2

(Galileo → Newton → Cannonball theory) → Relativity → Loop quantum gravity → Antimatter → String Theory →Singularity (→String theoretical defense of relativity) →Unified quantum electrodynamics →Mass energy theory→ No energy information theory → Information event theory →Complexity-Creativity theory → Physical Constructor theory… (—The History of Gravity by Nathan Coppedge …)

HAWKINGESQUE:

A topic can be a special thing.

We select a preferred set.

Does it surprise us thst this relates with the calculus?

What items did we miss?

Was it physics?

Did it do anything rare?

Here we are now!

Time!

A bold manifestation!

--Hawkingesque by Nathan Coppedge

3

I guess you could say the souls of logic are:

Efficiency A = BCAD or DCAB.

Efficiency B = CDBA or ADBC

Difference C = DACB or BACD

Difference D = ABDC or CBDA


SO, TOE HAS ONLY SO MANY COMBINATIONS:

BCAD or DCAB AND (CDBA or ADBC) AND DACB or BACD AND (ABDC or CBDA)

BCAD or DCAB AND (ABDC or CBDA) AND DACB or BACD AND (CDBA or ADBC)

...

This may help:

Main scores as in diagram assuming Correctly Eff +/- 1, Diff +/- 1 or 0

Reactive Mechanisms (Eff + Eff + Eff + Eff + Eff + Diff) Max 6, Min 5

Antiforce Mechanisms (Eff + Eff + Eff + Eff + Diff) Max 5, Min 4

Supported Flying Machines (Eff + Eff + Eff + Diff) Max 4, Min 3

Self-Powered Flying Machines (Eff + Eff + Diff) Max 3, Min 2

Perpetual Motion (Eff + Diff) Max 2, Min 1

Zero (Eff)

Human Knowledge (Eff + Diff) Max 0, Min -1

Languages (Eff + Eff + Diff) Max -1, Min -2

Immortal Languages (Eff + Eff + Eff + Diff) Max -2, Min -3

Draconian Networks (Eff + Eff + Eff + Eff + Diff) Max -3, Min -4

Archaic Networks (Eff + Eff + Eff + Eff + Eff + Diff) Max -4, Min -5

...

...

Preferred Limits

The Theory of Everything

Meta-Theory of Everything

The Epistemological Theory of Everything

OU Formula for TOEs
Absolute Dimensions

Selective Perpetual Motion Applications

Specialized Heuristic Combinations

History of Philosophy
Philosophical Statistics

"[The] concept that has come into determinate existence. It is fair to suppose... that we are referring to something familiar, that is, a commonplace of ordinary thinking. But the 'I' is in the first place purely self-referring unity... As such it is universality, a unity that is unity with itself only by virtue of its negative relating, which appears as abstraction, and because it contains all determinateness within itself is dissolved. In second place, the 'I' is just as immediately self-referring negativity, singularity, absolute determinateness..."
---Hegel, The Science of Logic (pp. 514), George Giovanni (ed, Trans.) (Incipient mini-translation: Hegel's Logic)

 "Similarly, on the other hand, when his performance [an abstract element that emerges with the TOE] and his inner possibility [efficiency + difference], capacity or intention [relative difference or sub-efficiency] are contrasted, it is the former alone which is to be regarded as his true actuality [in the TOE], even if he deceives himself on this point, and turning away from his action into himself [having the wrong concept of TOE], fancies that in this inner self he is something else than what he is in this deed [e.g. other than a derivator or  individuator of a TOE]. Individuality [E.g. universal]..." ---Hegel, Phenomenology of Spirit (AV Miller trans), p. 194. Translation added in brackets by N. Coppedge.

"Under the applicationist paradigm, first, categories of usefulness are useful as categories, and the material function returns a new pragmatic value. Secondly, specific objects embody paradigms by exhibiting principles and other properties, and maximizing a principle becomes a means to find 'practical objects'. Third, the properties and principles of objects serve a logical function in which the material and abstract properties are interchangeable, and in this way the material properties of specific objects become pragmatic identities through the analogy between valuable functions and general usefulness. Fourthly, objects which share in the abstract properties show a characteristic unification (ala Hegel or Leibniz)." —Nathan Coppedge, Philosophy of Instrumentalism

"Sometimes the prophet is greater than what he prophecies." ---D.P. See: Theory of The Same Animal

A Theatre Game was found using categories of application in the Premier Intellectual Dialectic (the dialectic is used for coming up with big new ideas): 'This, Obvious, Do Noun, Later, Minimal significance, Do Adj, Finish, Quantity, Theory, Necessary'. It is possible these types of classifications are specific to perpetual motion, but they may indicate a metaphorical extension for certain parts of the Dialectic for any big idea, e.g. by using these classifications to find more specific classifications in the fourth blank of the Dialectic.

Notation I was getting to is that in this Theatre Game or use of the Dialectic, later in the Dialectic where it says 'higher applications', the case where higher applications are not exclusive binaries is the only case where exclusive binaries do not fulfill the criteria for each type of application, assuming the applications are a complete list. So, if approximate exclusive binaries can be found in every case for every set of ideas, which I have seen is a pattern, then every single combination for the first three blanks will include just exactly twenty ideas if we assume the fifth blank is constant or can be ignored as it is a function of the previous four blanks as is often the case. This suggests the number of big ideas equals 20 X Genera X Species X Functions.

...

"A tentative guess based on the (last part of the) Super-Inventor writing is that meta-inventions require special group behavior under one inventor, yielding logic analogous to how one advanced field may lead consistently to another that is equally advanced, yet which may yield more useful results. That assumes binary sets of inventions. Other analogues may be appropriare for standards of three or more inventions, but one (as shown in The Few) or two (as shown in Super-Inventor) may maximize usability."
—Meta-Invention


Above: Top Diagram is by Gunther, Gotthard which inspired the Knowledge of the Theory of Everything diagram, pictured below it (surprisingly, it is mostly symmetric, yet slightly asymmetric).

"There can be no such thing as linking two elementary contextures into a compound contexture, for this would require a minimum of three contextures. One of the three would have to mediate between the other two. In other words: we would be provided with a contexture describing the phenomenon of discontexturality. This is the point where dialectic logic starts." [Note: Gunther appears to be saying that a higher logic always ascribes to the fixed metalogical quality of categories, that the only way to reach beyond 3-point logic is to use 2-point logic, which is then the only alternative to 1-point logic, if 3-point logic is the only alternative to 1-point and 2-point logic. However, this may be a broad generalization, but it bears on the Theory of Everything, as indicated in the diagram used in the original article].
Gunther, Gotthard (Joachim Paul, ed) Life as Polycontexturality, p. 15
Life as Polycontexturality (Gotthold Gunther)

“By interpreting transjunction as a logical act of rejection this type of operation acquires a specific cybernetic significance. We have already suggested, that transjunction isolates a system (by rejecting it). In doing so, it produces the distinction between a closed system and its environment. This is exactly what a two-valued logic can never do ... For this very purpose we require a value which transcends the scope of the system.” Gotthard Gunther (Bd.1, 318) http://www.thinkartlab.com/pkl/glossary/framed.htm

“We may consider the pyramid of protostructure as an ontological grid which describes the mutual positions of single contextures.” Gotthard Gunther (Bd.2, 298) http://www.thinkartlab.com/pkl/glossary/framed.htm

“First let us remember that we obtained proto-, deutero- and trito-structure by dealing only with empty places from which value occupancy has been removed.... we may reintroduce values into these configurations of empty places as their contents...The relation between place and occupying value corresponds to the distinction between form and matter.” Gotthard Gunther (Bd.2, 303) http://www.thinkartlab.com/pkl/glossary/framed.htm

“... the basic logical elements of transclassic logic... are not the values but the kenograms, i.e. empty places which merely indicate structure and which may or may not be occupied by values.” Gotthard Gunther (Bd.2, 255)  http://www.thinkartlab.com/pkl/glossary/framed.htm


...


Not to be frowned at…

DIMENSIONAL-MECHANICAL HYPOTHESIS

Main scores as in diagram assuming Correctly Eff +/- 1, Diff +/- 1 or 0

Reactive Mechanisms (Eff + Eff + Eff + Eff + Eff + Diff) Max 6, Min 5

Antiforce Mechanisms (Eff + Eff + Eff + Eff + Diff) Max 5, Min 4

Supported Flying Machines (Eff + Eff + Eff + Diff) Max 4, Min 3

Self-Powered Flying Machines (Eff + Eff + Diff) Max 3, Min 2

Perpetual Motion (Eff + Diff) Max 2, Min 1

Zero (Diff)

Human Knowledge (Eff + Diff) Max 0, Min -1

Languages (Eff + Eff + Diff) Max -1, Min -2

Immortal Languages (Eff + Eff + Eff + Diff) Max -2, Min -3

Draconian Networks (Eff + Eff + Eff + Eff + Diff) Max -3, Min -4

Archaic Networks (Eff + Eff + Eff + Eff + Eff + Diff) Max -4, Min -5

---Dimensional-Mechanical Theory (…)


Euler's Prepost:

I added rationality, says Euler. When you negate rationality, there isn’t a ghost in town.

Posted by at
Labels: , , , , ,

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)