Theory of The Same Animal

Based on the earlier: Theory of The Different Animal

And, The Theory of Everything

Basically (what I mean to explain is), the theory of perpetual motion has two problem-criterion: (1) the machine is specific, and (2) the machine is externally referrant.*

To reach criteria for a theory of everything is simple: reverse both criterions for perpetual motion.

(The result must be anticipated to be found).

The result is: (1) The TOE must be sufficiently general, and (2) The TOE must not be internally referrant.*

This result shows a TOE can be derived from perpetual motion, and suggests based on the heavy and relatively exclusive overlap, that perpetual motion contains a consistent theme of producing theories of everything.

*~ Note: In this case externally referrant means over-unity, while not-internally-referrant means non-circular. In the same manner as categorical deduction and the problem and solution statement of a paradox, perpetual motion (whether true or false) and TOE (true if true) are taken to be two non-mutually contradicting magisteria, though it may be pointed out that the general and specific natures indicate different scales. Lemmas may hang on this, such as the existence of multiple TOE's suggests larger perpetual motion machines.
...

Lemmas:

• Stating a case in the opposite way as another actually produces no contradiction if multiple categories are present in both earlier and later results.
• The terms 'sufficiency' and 'referrant' have  some similarities between perpetual motion machines and TOE's.
• There are themes in common between TOE's and other general forms of knowledge.
• There is a common theme of non-contradicting magisteria in meta-descriptions of complex phenomena.
• Abstract properties can have different implied scales than material properties (working vertically).
• Abstract properties can have implications in physical law (working across by causal identification favoring general over specific).

Additional lemmas:

• If sufficiency and referrant are not contradictory for example as under a TOE if we assume at the level of a TOE a contradiction would destroy the TOE, the lack of contradiction may predict the existence (1,0) of multiple categories in proportion to generality when multiple categories are equated with non-contradiction.
• If sufficiency and referrants are taken as general themes, multiple categories could predict generality when sufficiency and referrant are used.
• Since perpetual motion uses multiple categories and as demonstrsted does not contradict a TOE, it seems to be both a specific and a general theory.
• If a specific theory can be general, since general is favored over specific, the general may also be specific, and this produces multiple theories of everything.
• If the scale of a pmm and a TOE are inverse, the existence of multiple TOEs suggests less universalism for TOE's, in turn predicting the universal scale of pmm's is > 0.
• Thus, the general theory of pmm's predicts pmm's of an intermediate scale.

NOTE:

This quote I had been reading from Hegel is on a similar theme:

"[The] concept that has come into determinate existence. It is fair to suppose... that we are referring to something familiar, that is, a commonplace of ordinary thinking. But the 'I' is in the first place purely self-referring unity... As such it is universality, a unity that is unity with itself only by virtue of its negative relating, which appears as abstraction, and because it contains all determinateness within itself is dissolved. In second place, the 'I' is just as immediately self-referring negativity, singularity, absolute determinateness..."
---Hegel, The Science of Logic (pp. 514), George Giovanni (ed, Trans.)

G.W.F. Hegel

See also:
Heuristic Organon