Thursday, March 24, 2016

VARIATION OF THE TORTOISE AND ACHILLES WITH THE INVENTOR OF PERPETUAL MOTION


Let's say the inventor is supposed to receive a patent for perpetual motion at some point.

But it is argued that time is infinitely divisible.

Therefore, so long as time remains, an infinite amount of time remains!

Apparently, the inventor will never receive the patent!

The only way to become a millionaire is to sell chunks of infinite time!

Whoever can do something with the time probably has to buy it!

What a waste!

Instead, we could grant the patent immediately and have free energy, and free money!

THE PRINCIPLE OF UNIVERSAL CAUSATION

--VIA QUORA---

In Feb 2016 I summarized what I called The Principle of Universal Causation: "It is the universal nature to create nature (design interface); after creation, nature has variation (dimensional nature)."

In other words, what is not dimensionally collapsed and efficient or causal / essential is simply originality.

Therefore, essential cause first exists as creativity, then it exists as cause, then it exists as sheer potential.

Although I have had doubts at times, the rule of three seems to follow from the reductive insight that the universe is either original or unoriginal, and if it is original it has an original element, but what we know is a product of that element. 

Everything else is either sheer potential, such as energy and mass, or a structural component like time and space. If originality is seen to be perfection and little else (since there is no better basis for originality than perfection), all other results seem to develop through complexity, which means that dimensionality is the only result of causality.

Thus, the chain of originality ---> causality ---> dimensionality seems to hold, when we superimpose the corresponding elements of (perfection), (essence: cause and effect), (complexity: energy and mass and time and space).

Source:

---Nathan Coppedge
philosopher, artist, inventor, poet

Wednesday, March 23, 2016

Interface Euphoria 15.0

--- 'EMPHASIS ADDED' ---

Aesthetics have logic functions.

Most basic aesthetic is 'diffuse' aesthetic, which is the non-logically structured version of the aesthetic, which can serve as a waiting room or 'loading program' or restaurant (not all loading programs are violent).

It can be seen as a place for examining objects and observing natural wonders through the mists of time.

Back to logical aesthetics examples:

Chinese logic: the logic of enchanted objects such as containers, weather collectors, and origami.
   Chinese logic is like origami propped up with sticks, explosions that burn paper, and magic scrolls,
    plus the sorts of landscapes that appear on Chinese scrolls.
     Chinese logic can be used as a transition to modernism, such as modern houses and analytic
philosophy.
Meta paradigms include transition to anything advanced, while symbols may be related to alchemy and ancient magic.

Missile logic: this aesthetic is all about causal connections made from straight or curvy lines.
    the lines can glisten, contain information, explode quickly or slowly, etc.
    like its name suggests, it is fairly miscellaneous, providing a minimalist bridge between other aesthetics.

THE STUPID GENIUS: A PERPETUAL MOTION STORY

0
THIS IS WHAT WE THOUGHT AND THIS IS WHAT HAPPEN(E)[D].

1
I have come under singularly bizarre influences due to the fact that I come from
a highly intelligent family, and yet have, or have had, large protruding ears...

On one occasion in high school someome remarked on my high forehead and large ears, 
saying:

"He has to be stupid, and he has to be a genius!"

On another occasion, a person with a  similar mind said:

"If you don't do something really bizarre and really innovative, then you've sold 
your soul!"

Then someone put in: "My guess is he starts a toy company, either that, or sits around
playing computer games!"

Then another said: "I know! He should build a perpetual motion machine!"

Then the first one said to me: "I guess since you said nothing you sold your soul!"

Then the second said: "But your soul was stupid, oops!"

In short, it's moments like this that make you want to invent a perpetual motion machine.

OTHER PERPETUAL MOTION STORIES
Nathan Coppedge meets the cleverest man:
Nathan Coppedge invents the Tilt Motor:
The day the Nobel Prize investigators visited me:


See Also My Quora Blog: The Foolish Genius: https://nathancoppedge.quora.com/





2



PARADOXICAL GENIUS

(2021)

Steps to Becoming a Genius Who Isn’t a Genius:

1. Have big ears.

2. Be within earshot when someone takes a childhood genius test.

3. Overhear the test.

4. Decide some questions are to be left unanswered: WISC (Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children)?

5. Become quiet ‘for Y ears’.

6. Block out all insults.

7. With an unpredictability no one else seems to master, invent something the genius doesn’t believe in.

8. Make sure the invention is great.

9. Now that you have proven yourself a genius, admit you are an idiot, but secretly say to yourself: then so too is some other great genius (pick a name).

10. Analyze until you understand the name you chose to a remarkable degree. Maybe just ‘in degrees’. This may take years, but think of it as a mastery of another person.

11. Think: An idiot understands THAT GUY.

12. With your new confidence, do something others consider greater than your first accomplishment.

13. Continue this method until you have built an invincible castle.

14. Now you can gain godlike powers. What if [Name] didn’t know enchantment? What if [Name] didn’t know telekinesis? Etc.

15. Now it is all about strategy. Pretty simple. If life is so simple, why am I not a genius? I guess because it is a paradox.

16. Since the other geniuses are such imbeciles, they seem not to have heard of a paradoxical genius before.

17. Confirm your beliefs.

18. Revel in greatness.



THE PARADOXICAL BRAIN

July 12, 2019.

Nathan Knock Outs:

  • Ocean tin

Hedgehog trickster: Tricks of Notto the Genius.

GENERAL DA VINCI:

Katy: Anything.

Nathan: Katy.

Really: Katy then Nathan.

I,M'I — IM — I,M

As — Painless is a paintbrush — AST

IM JUST HUMBA, IT IS PRROB

Uttopia correctly spelled with enough Money to justify the Loggo not Logos, then add LLEL1(LLE1)

Lots of Humba Right

Oh Tracery

What Card Nigeria. Source:

Google Image Result for https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0086/6048/4132/files/Whot_playing_card_600x600.png?v=1699720973.

#weightproblems #explanation #heartdisease #worms #health #dieting #problems Possibly anyone with a pop belly was stupid enough to eat dirt.

“A Genius Might be Stupid These Days.”

Formerly if you were a visionary you could retroactively be granted a very high IQ.

Now that scientists are objectifying more, it is less possible.

Someone like Nathan who might otherwise be a super-genius may be ignored because it is assumed Nathan probably doesn’t have an IQ, and therefore through circular reasoning he can’t be a visionary.

As a result, someone who might normally be a visionary is not even thought to be a visionary.

Consequently, it is less likely scientists will be considered visionaries either, because normally they could say, if they’re like Nathan they can have a high IQ.

Now, if they are smarter than Nathan they still might be compared to his achievements, and end up average since Nathan is thought to be average or below though he probably isn’t.

“Stupid but Not”

“Diabolical genius is a paradoxical brain.” ---NC

Paradoxical Genius (…)

Technology Paradoxes (…)

General Intelligence Paradox (…) formerly labeled Paradoxical IQ.

Paradoxical IQ (…)

0

The paradoxical brain is like when innovation needs to come from someone who doesn't take crack cocaine.

1

Believe it or not, I may not have been able to complete this very clever engineering experiment without extremely high-functioning brain damage…

Another device that may be explained by abnormal brain development

2

To develop the brain may require reaching multiple stages. But important stages take time. The more significant the fundamental stage desired, the more likely normal development will be put off. Therefore, some ‘normals' may be much ahead of others, with high-functioning flawed people in the middle.

…

—Facebook.

3

Start playing him up for something you’re not my dad says to my brother.

My proofs later come up: valid-sound, valid-sound, valid-sound, valid-sound, valid-sound, valid-sound

4

Paradoxical Bone Head

Nathan is a philosopher, artist, inventor, poet. His online art gallery has over 6 million views. He has been close to selling art for $1 million on a few occasions. He has published around 200 books on Amazon, and has multiple books with an invention on nearly every page. Nathan learned to read Chinese pictograms and to think in a manner similar to calculus when he was in his 30s. Nathan has studied hundreds of subjects and contributed theories like the Theory of Everything (supposedly) and the Theory of Volitional Mechanics. Nathan Coppedge’s online publications are often the only or best intuitive information available on certain subjects. Nathan has experiments which proved that there are things more efficient than a lever, and he has abstract systems which can find properties on pretty much anything and help predict the top idea of the year and the Top 20 ideas of everyone. Nathan’s artwork helped him learn Chinese, and Nathan’s philosophy may be the first example of knowledge. Nathan has methods for moving planets at no cost and making flying machines fly on their own power. And, he has the best written formula for the soul, and the equations for nearly all clever technologies. Before Nathan it seems likely humanity was not significantly advanced. After Nathan humans could predict the entire future and perhaps even be immortal. Now, did you forget Nathan has bone behind his ears?

…

PARADOXICAL STUPIDITY:

  • You are thinking about something somewhat smart, but you lose brain cells. An example: thinking of ‘grape panache’.

Stupid “Butt Knot”:

  • What do you know about butt knots? I don’t know… we’ve just been introduced! … It gets guys going. Butt knots are a relationship all by themselves.

Very Tricky Stupidity / Intellectual Hominyms (often called these days ‘homonyms’):

  • “Turtle animals have fun or trick you, otherwise it wouldn’t be fair.”

…

What if writing reduces complexity?

  • A lot of humans are sort of one-dimensional or 2-dimensional thinkers. Even if they could observe something in more dimensions, probably the actual facts of what they care about would be more reduced, unless they become a philosopher, artist, sculptor, or if they write about complex feelings. Though some argue writing might be a mode which has reduced complexity.

…

Behavioral paradoxes:

I’m supposed to function like I have a brain even if I don’t have a brain. And I’m probably supposed to function like a genius even if I’m not a genius.

…

NOTES:

Is Human Technology Limited by Categories?

“In real reality terms the rhetorician has the most influence, unless he happens to have the wrong general theory, or if the general theories are crazy, or if the psychologist has a better theory, or if retarded people turn out to be smart.” —Nathan Coppedge's answer to If I have telepathy and the people that I talk with adopt my world views, could I know if I was controlling their minds? Or am I just persuasive?




CETRUOD

5SPLI AC DRRMMD





Errata of the Mechanists #8

ERRATA OF THE MECHANISTS, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS THE ANNALS OF VOLITIONAL MECHANICS...

Maybe someday computer upgrades will be available at corner stores!

It will be made possible by perpetual motion.

Nuclear power will be remembered only as 'nuclear fuel'.

Nuclear fuel is energy generated by destroying the universe!

Sometimes nature progresses, and it involves simple steps like:

Selling computers at your corner store,

Which requires energy.

Real machines. Not cooking a bunch of nuclear waste.

On Infinite Things

The thing I notice about infinite anything is that it affects everything else, until the total quantity of things reaches infinity, at which point it becomes less pronounced.

So, for example, if there are infinite things, but only one of them is infinite in value, then there is an appearance of ignoring that infinite thing, but really the infinite thing is almost everything there is in that world.

However, if everything in the world is infinite, then it will be very hard to find the influence of just one of those infinite things.

However, it is easier to find the influence of infinite things than the influence of things that are not infinite, even if everything is infinite.

---Nathan Coppedge, Via Quora (2016 / 03 / 23).

Tuesday, March 22, 2016

Major Status Update

CURRENTLY THEORETICALLY 4th, 5th, 7th, 11th, 12th for "PERPETUAL MOTION EXPERIMENT" ON YOUTUBE



Today someone was labeled psychotic for thinking I was lucipher...

This shows the dangers of attempting to boost popularity with ideas about divinity and demonhood.

I do have a number of quotes in which I argue that I'm a devil, but I have thought about deleting them, and they are by far not the majority of my quotations.

I reassure you that I am a paranoid schizophrenic living in New Haven, CT. Because of my illness, I've had similar problems with police and EMT's, and I hope that if you're reading this you will forgive me for holding extreme and bizarre ideas years after having an experience like yours.

In some ways I think the shit in the open shower drain at Yale Adolescent Psychiatric was just as bad as calling myself a devil. It's a weird world we live in, and sometimes words are only words.

Here is a link about my experience with schizophrenia:

https://www.quora.com/Have-you-ever-experienced-madness-How-does-it-feel-like/answer/Nathan-Coppedge

USPTO Supposedly (and Quietly) Ends Official Obstructions to Perpetual Motion Machines

In an article reported at Ars Technica in March 2015 (History-making?):

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/03/uspto-ends-program-for-patents-that-could-create-unwanted-media-coverage/

The former policies may have extended microsoft's influence over Omni-Science products, and some of those policies may still be in place.

Sunday, March 20, 2016

'Trillion-Dollar' Discovery!



Mostly proven by this experiment, an object can return to the same altitude with momentum! My previous experiment with over-unity (successful over-unity experiment 1) was a partial example of the same thing that did not prove it this clearly.

How To Write Aphorisms currently has a bestseller rank on Amazon!

In spite of a pathetic 1-star review!

  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,700,267 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
    • #502 in Kindle Store > Kindle eBooks > Reference > Words, Language & Grammar > Reference
    • #2442 in Books > Reference > Words, Language & Grammar > Reference


My edition of the Golden Notebook currently has a bestseller rank!

  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #193,761 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
    • #47 in Kindle Store > Kindle Short Reads > 15 minutes (1-11 pages) > Education & Reference
    • #70 in Kindle Store > Kindle eBooks > Reference > Quotations
    • #209 in Books > Reference > Quotations


CATEGORICAL DEDUCTION-RELATED WRITINGS


Rational Engineering Deductions (REDs)
x: Shape (function) combined with Opposite shape (function)
y: () z: ()...
= maintains potential closed system (function)

example:

lever (function) vs. cyclical track (function)
supported (function) vs. (unsupported) function
short-distance pressure vs. long-distance lift
extended motion (function) vs. contained cycle (function)
momentum (function) vs. momentary activation (function)
stored energy (function) vs. no batteries (function)
= maintains potential closed system (perpetual motion)


Arbitrary / Paroxysmal Deduction ('Just' Deduction):
1-d:
A then D
D then A
(A and D are opposites)
2-d:
'AB' is 'CD'
'BC' is 'DA'
'CD' is 'AB'
'DA' is 'BC'
Basically two deductions.
A and C are opposite, B and D are opposite.
similar to categorical deduction or
two-part paroxysm.
3-d:
'ABC' is 'DEF'
'BCD' is 'EFA'
'CDE' is 'FAB'
'DEF' is 'ABC'
'EFA' is 'BCD'
'FAB' is 'CDE'
Basically three deductions.
A and D are opposite.
B and E are opposite.
C and F aare opposite.
4-d:
'A conj B boolean* C conj D' OR
'A conj D boolean* C conj B'
the statement is justice of / just as:
'opp A conj opp B Opp boolean** opp C conj opp D' OR
'opp A conj opp D Opp boolean** opp C conj  opp B'
Basically four deductions.
(The opposites can be nouns or adjective forms.
C must be the opposite of A,
and D must be the opposite of B).
*(for example, 'and' / 'or' / 'always' / 'never'
'rarely' / 'usually')
*(for example, 'or' / 'and' / 'never' / 'always' /
'usually' / 'rarely')
Opp Boolean must be opposite of Boolean in this case,
so the Boolean operators cannot be neutral.


Standard Categorical Deduction:
'A conj B Neutral Boolean* C conj D'
'A conj D Neutral Boolean* C conj B'
Two deductions strictly in terms of A.
Preference is given to the first and second terms.
Otherwise determined.
The second terms retain the same logic regardless of preference.
A and C are opposite.
B and D are opposite.
Conjunction of terms is primary.
*(for example 'is' , 'as is' , 'just as' , 'when' , 'so' )


Paroxysm:
problem 'ABC...' --> solution 'oppA oppB oppC...'
similar to 3-part deduction, except quantity of terms is explicitly flexible.
again, accepts noun or adjective terms.
in this case, conjunction of terms is secondary.


Deduction Using Unconventional Opposites
complexity/perfection/arbitration/ambiguity A --->
perfection/complexity/ambiguity/arbitration opposite A
This is a hand-holding version of categorical deduction
in which specific less common comparisons are preferred
for half of the deduction.
E.g. A is equivalent here to B in standard deductions.
Opposite A is equivalent to D in standard deductions.
A selection is made between A and C, so B and D need
not be selected again.

Friday, March 18, 2016

Searching YouTube for 'trillion-dollar discovery'

May result in my video on the first page, hopefully!

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=trillion-dollar+discovery

It looks like a stick poking at female genitalia, but actually the latest clearest evidence of perpetual motion!


Thursday, March 17, 2016

Quotes Late March 2016

"Initially at least (at our present time), there are four kinds of soul: (1) The soul of age, (2) The soul of old wisdom, (3) The soul of youth, and (4) The soul of wise energy. Perhaps due to the absence of wise energy, we have not commonly progressed into the fourth dimension of the soul." ---Nathan Coppedge, March 2016, (Quora, included in Spiritual Writings).


“Total reality is as ridiculous as total absurdity. But total reality is inevitable and total absurdity is available.” ---Nathan Coppedge, March 2016


"The blindness of God is merely the absence of a spiritual dimension of existence, an arbitrary factor easily corrected by human pragmatism." ---Nathan Coppedge, March 2016


"My grand vision is that there is a material for every complexity. Hence, dimensions have an infinite extensibility." ---Nathan Coppedge, March 2016


"Reason is the crime and punishment of principle! Yet systems do survive that are more sublime than contrived!" ---Nathan Coppedge, March 2016


"The realization of a perception is like a pile of stones."  - -Nathan Coppedge (as Asceticurus) 


"People thirst for complexity that makes rational sense, as shown by the God concept. Some people may even realize concepts of God, but this realization is often temporary where it has a temporary use, or if it can be recorded more efficiently as 'trustworthy information'. The loyalty of information becomes the fundamental theology of the information age." ----Nathan Coppedge, March 2016


"If you want to be ethical: be innocent, be philosophical, be religious, and be happy." ---Nathan Coppedge, March 2016


"The problem of evil is its mixture of un-centered ambition and artificial conflict, mixed with interacting energy, boredom, and bad ideas." ---Nathan Coppedge, March 2016


"Assuming everything is allowed to be selfish, my conclusion is that everything is trying its best." ---Nathan Coppedge, March 2016


"Everyone tries to make significance virtuous, or lives the failure of the quest unaware." ---Nathan Coppedge, March 2016


"Pain is the only unbearable thing." ---Nathan Coppedge, March 2016


"Meaninglessness is a confusing form of pain. It is also an ambitious claim over distant, unrealized things." ---Nathan Coppedge, March 2016


"The answer I have is that everything is trying its best, assuming that it tries at all, and assuming that it is not distracted, and assuming that it is not playing a game. Assuming, in short, that there is not some competing value which seems important but actually isn't. Assuming everything is allowed to be selfish." ---Nathan Coppedge, March 2016


"Pleasure forgets the origins of functionality." ---Nathan Coppedge, Prophetic Wisdom


"Redemption is the process of regaining wisdom." ---Nathan Coppedge, Spiritual Writings



MORE QUOTES: http://www.poemhunter.com/quotations/famous.asp?people=Nathan Coppedge