See Also My Quora Blog: The Foolish Genius: https://nathancoppedge.quora.com/
2
(2021)
Steps to Becoming a Genius Who Isn’t a Genius:
1. Have big ears.
2. Be within earshot when someone takes a childhood genius test.
3. Overhear the test.
4. Decide some questions are to be left unanswered: WISC (Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children)?
5. Become quiet ‘for Y ears’.
6. Block out all insults.
7. With an unpredictability no one else seems to master, invent something the genius doesn’t believe in.
8. Make sure the invention is great.
9. Now that you have proven yourself a genius, admit you are an idiot, but secretly say to yourself: then so too is some other great genius (pick a name).
10. Analyze until you understand the name you chose to a remarkable degree. Maybe just ‘in degrees’. This may take years, but think of it as a mastery of another person.
11. Think: An idiot understands THAT GUY.
12. With your new confidence, do something others consider greater than your first accomplishment.
13. Continue this method until you have built an invincible castle.
14. Now you can gain godlike powers. What if [Name] didn’t know enchantment? What if [Name] didn’t know telekinesis? Etc.
15. Now it is all about strategy. Pretty simple. If life is so simple, why am I not a genius? I guess because it is a paradox.
16. Since the other geniuses are such imbeciles, they seem not to have heard of a paradoxical genius before.
17. Confirm your beliefs.
18. Revel in greatness.
July 12, 2019.
Nathan Knock Outs:
- Ocean tin
Hedgehog trickster: Tricks of Notto the Genius.
GENERAL DA VINCI:
Katy: Anything.
Nathan: Katy.
Really: Katy then Nathan.
I,M'I — IM — I,M
As — Painless is a paintbrush — AST
IM JUST HUMBA, IT IS PRROB
Uttopia correctly spelled with enough Money to justify the Loggo not Logos, then add LLEL1(LLE1)
Lots of Humba Right
Oh Tracery
What Card Nigeria. Source:
#weightproblems #explanation #heartdisease #worms #health #dieting #problems Possibly anyone with a pop belly was stupid enough to eat dirt.
“A Genius Might be Stupid These Days.”
Formerly if you were a visionary you could retroactively be granted a very high IQ.
Now that scientists are objectifying more, it is less possible.
Someone like Nathan who might otherwise be a super-genius may be ignored because it is assumed Nathan probably doesn’t have an IQ, and therefore through circular reasoning he can’t be a visionary.
As a result, someone who might normally be a visionary is not even thought to be a visionary.
Consequently, it is less likely scientists will be considered visionaries either, because normally they could say, if they’re like Nathan they can have a high IQ.
Now, if they are smarter than Nathan they still might be compared to his achievements, and end up average since Nathan is thought to be average or below though he probably isn’t.
“Stupid but Not”
“Diabolical genius is a paradoxical brain.” ---NC
Paradoxical Genius (…)
General Intelligence Paradox (…) formerly labeled Paradoxical IQ.
Paradoxical IQ (…)
0
The paradoxical brain is like when innovation needs to come from someone who doesn't take crack cocaine.
1
Believe it or not, I may not have been able to complete this very clever engineering experiment without extremely high-functioning brain damage…
Another device that may be explained by abnormal brain development
2
To develop the brain may require reaching multiple stages. But important stages take time. The more significant the fundamental stage desired, the more likely normal development will be put off. Therefore, some ‘normals' may be much ahead of others, with high-functioning flawed people in the middle.
…
—Facebook.
3
Start playing him up for something you’re not my dad says to my brother.
My proofs later come up: valid-sound, valid-sound, valid-sound, valid-sound, valid-sound, valid-sound
4
Paradoxical Bone Head
Nathan is a philosopher, artist, inventor, poet. His online art gallery has over 6 million views. He has been close to selling art for $1 million on a few occasions. He has published around 200 books on Amazon, and has multiple books with an invention on nearly every page. Nathan learned to read Chinese pictograms and to think in a manner similar to calculus when he was in his 30s. Nathan has studied hundreds of subjects and contributed theories like the Theory of Everything (supposedly) and the Theory of Volitional Mechanics. Nathan Coppedge’s online publications are often the only or best intuitive information available on certain subjects. Nathan has experiments which proved that there are things more efficient than a lever, and he has abstract systems which can find properties on pretty much anything and help predict the top idea of the year and the Top 20 ideas of everyone. Nathan’s artwork helped him learn Chinese, and Nathan’s philosophy may be the first example of knowledge. Nathan has methods for moving planets at no cost and making flying machines fly on their own power. And, he has the best written formula for the soul, and the equations for nearly all clever technologies. Before Nathan it seems likely humanity was not significantly advanced. After Nathan humans could predict the entire future and perhaps even be immortal. Now, did you forget Nathan has bone behind his ears?
…
PARADOXICAL STUPIDITY:
- You are thinking about something somewhat smart, but you lose brain cells. An example: thinking of ‘grape panache’.
Stupid “Butt Knot”:
- What do you know about butt knots? I don’t know… we’ve just been introduced! … It gets guys going. Butt knots are a relationship all by themselves.
Very Tricky Stupidity / Intellectual Hominyms (often called these days ‘homonyms’):
- “Turtle animals have fun or trick you, otherwise it wouldn’t be fair.”
…
What if writing reduces complexity?
- A lot of humans are sort of one-dimensional or 2-dimensional thinkers. Even if they could observe something in more dimensions, probably the actual facts of what they care about would be more reduced, unless they become a philosopher, artist, sculptor, or if they write about complex feelings. Though some argue writing might be a mode which has reduced complexity.
…
Behavioral paradoxes:
I’m supposed to function like I have a brain even if I don’t have a brain. And I’m probably supposed to function like a genius even if I’m not a genius.
…
NOTES:
Is Human Technology Limited by Categories?
“In real reality terms the rhetorician has the most influence, unless he happens to have the wrong general theory, or if the general theories are crazy, or if the psychologist has a better theory, or if retarded people turn out to be smart.” —Nathan Coppedge's answer to If I have telepathy and the people that I talk with adopt my world views, could I know if I was controlling their minds? Or am I just persuasive?
CETRUOD
5SPLI AC DRRMMD
No comments:
Post a Comment