(THE) "FOUR GODS" OF THOUGHT IN MY MIND

The Sphinx / The Hanged Man / Two-headed Samaritan / Eulenspiegel  / The Archangel

* ‘Go one way and I win, go the other way and you lose…’
* Generally, problems that can be ignored if you’re wise.
* Ideas that only seem valuable much later.
* Lingering puzzles, entrapment.

Sophie / The Hierophant / The Sophists / The King of the Dopplegangers

* ‘If you have the key, I can show you the way out’
* Always demanding something, and then giving a conditionality.
* Seem to be figures of hell.
* Always seem to be accompanied by unnecessary luxuries.

Eucaleh Terrapin / The Inventor of Perpetual Motion / Idiot Savant / Waters of Reflection

* ‘It is a simulacra of all eternities…’
* Other archetypes.
* Blindness to the hero’s limitations.
* Impresses the hero at great distance.
* Time goes on.

Eilesenteimelstem / Confucius / Yoda / Ananzi the Spider

* ‘Power is weakness! Be quick! Time is inscrutable!’
* Giving ultimate lessons that seem to fail in the moment.
* All-knowing, and accepting of any condition.
* The hero grows wise by forgetting his limitations.

A Ghost Called God (Dimensional Universalist Theology)

(I.)
(1) God exists in each thing.
(2) But each thing exists without humanity.
(3) Likewise, it exists without God.
(4) God is a ghost who lies beyond humanity.

(II.)
(1) What exists now is God that is a ghost of the past.
(2) The future God is a ghost of the present.
(3) The past God is a ghost of reason.

(III.)
(1) With immortal reason there is an immortal God.
(2) He is a God of the past, and the ghosts of the present and future.

(IV.)
(1) Where one God can be imagined, another can easily take his place.

(V.)
(1) Sometimes angels dancing on the head of a pin are greater than God.
(2) But God has greater perspective than the angels.
(3) God is consciousness.

(VI.)
(1) God may evolve consciousness.
(2) God is both sensitive and insensitive.
(3) God may have a body.

(VII.)
(1) God may be an exaggeration.
(2) God may be imperfect.
(3) God may win.

(VIII.)
(1) God may be a superior man.
(2) God may be a spirit-man.
(3) God may be a ghost of man.

(IX.)
(1) God may arise from higher-nature, the way man arises from base-nature.
(2) God may be symptomized by pleasure.
(3) God may be an essence within nature.
(4) God as we understand him may be a token significance.

(X.)
(1) The meaning of God may be greater than God for man.
(2) God’s reason may be a ghost for man.
(3) God may symbolize higher nature.
(4) God may dwell within woman.
(5) God may be the ghost of woman.
(6) God may be the art within life.
(7) God may have the ultimate science.

(XI.)
(1) God may represent the perversities of mankind, the undeniable paradoxes overcome by ‘deus ex machina’.
(2) God may be a work of mankind.
(3) Mankind may be a product of some work of God.
(4) God may signify many things.
(5) God may be the spirit of whatever we attach to the word ‘God’.
(6) God may be the improvement of perception as much as the improvement of symbolism which leads to perception.
(7) God may be a perfect language.
(8) God may be lost to mankind.
(9) God may be the best thing that didn’t happen to local varieties.
(10) God may be a ghost of many things.
(11) God may be magic.
(12) God may be perfection.
(13) God may be complexity.

(XI.)
(1) God may be devious.
(2) God may be having a bad day.
(3) God may suffer more than mankind.
(4) God may serve no purpose.
(5) God may simply represent the best thing.
(6) God may be good. God may be an idea.

This and many other writings will appear in the not-yet-released Dimensional Religion Toolkit. Elements of similar beliefs are also present in Nathan Coppedge's The Spiritual Writings, which has also not yet been released. However, 60+ other books have been released already at http://www.amazon.com/author/nathancoppedge

THE UNDERSTANDING OF THE GODS

EULERAEULER

https://hypercubics.blogspot.com/2026/03/spii-ipp-2025.html.

One might go so far as to say that divinity is subjective...


What if, for example, I was a spinosaurus who invented cleverness in order to eat someone?

What if God had invented words---was the only inventor of words---?

And therefore, God was the only one in the world who ever took something literally?

But, then, Jesus might be the inventor of Love, and the only one who reproduces...

Zeus might have invented gods, but has a need to know the stuff of the gods...

Therefore, Zeus is mocked for his materialism.

But he has a power to return everyone to the beginning...

When there were no gods...

Therefore, there is not supposed to be a beginning----

If the powers that be are the powers that be...

If Age is timeless, then everyone changes, but that is not destruction!

Every God can live, and who is to avoid inventing one thing or another----?

Everyone is classical in their own way!

Unless the powers we have now belong to another age---!

Perhaps, in the Neo-Classical view, gods are merely those that understand!

Those that have a concept of the future....

Things that do not add up to the feeble mind....

Things that can build bridges over the wheeling masses...

Ways to divert gods into playing small games...

Games that matter for the answers of Times-----

Things regarding a clever engineer,

Or infinite contents,

Or a sacred room,

Or Sisyphus,

Or Mind....