Can you ever in good taste put a cubical ice cube beneath it?
If yes, it is capable of learning.
Even if not, if it lives near you, it has similar knowledge to you.
If you cannot place an ice cube in good taste, is it a beautiful tree?
Then it has knowledge of classics.
If not, then is it thick or tall?
If it is tall, it has done lofty things. If it is thick, it knows traditions.
To compare trees, one option is to multiply the sum of characteristics of trees within one city block if it is an apartment, or on or in front of your property if it is a house, and then multiply by the floor you live on. If it is a house, divide by the money you have relative to the owner of the house. To get an original knowledge rating in any case, divide everyone's tree rating by their age.
If most of the trees are enclosed, your knowledge is rare, if most of the trees are not enclosed, most of the knowledge is common. However, if the trees are far from civilization that is a sign that it takes hard work to achieve this knowledge. If any of the trees are evergreens, some of thr knowledge will be remembered.
Although in modern times trees are more rare, it is still an objective measure. However, modern trees may compound with technical knowledge, but generally the trees measure it without referring to technology.
Cutting down a tree is a sign of prolonged ignorance or internal challenges.
Occult Links
Intention and Architecture, by Carolyn Fahey
6 years ago
2 comments:
I don't understand (not in a logical sense, but overall sense) how you propose to evaluate the knowledge-level of the resident from the appearance/quality of the trees present nearby.
Are you saying the conditions, well-being and general choice of trees around us, can tell us a lot about the 'knowledge condition' of the society and neighborhood?
Please explain.
It is on the theme of deep-end meta-theory, e.g. how to 'eke' a tree so as to find unseen mental potentials. The theme is meaning in the objective selfish sense.
Post a Comment