Social Science: The Counter-Calculus

(Prescript: Before there were idiots it was all malarky… Know all the alternatives, climb the magic steps).

I know it will be cold tomorrow, because I'm not going to wear my coat. It happens my coat is enchanted with warm weather.

Sometimes pessimism is the best theory of optimism, because it creates awareness and raises the standard.

We progress when we think of the alternatives. How were we ever right? Well, through our degree of being concerned.

We may have moved on, but it is all necessary.

We can create necessity, for it defines proof.

A higher proof defies necessity.

Back to our roots, magical reasoning.

There is ‘something in there’, for I do not comprehend.

I may as well be an expert, to limit my options.

I should seek sacrosancts, because they have formility!

Calculus is really a forge of concepts.

Little more, that is what we are looking for!

Amalgamated feeling!

Dove-doors!

Proscilitution!

Grimacing gnomes!

Sophisocracy!

Eliadics!

Eddes!

Meaningful attractions!

Mechanical speed!

Sublimation!

Divine information!

Philosophical problemation!

Elidation!

Sophreyzation!

Composit samplification!

Exponential effication!

Significant vivification!

Conceptual animation!

…

(I reached this in Feb 2018)

Social Science: The Semantic Criticism

There is in first an idea of what has essence, which is merely that which is real enough to impress itself on any medium…

It could be called semiology, homotype, homologic, homology, or any one of a number of names… all with the same ultimate logical potential if we ignore axioms…

What happens is also the theory of critique, the frame of reference, the divested variable, the systematic discord—it, whatever it is, is all that can have limit and measure, because it is all that happens, or at least, it is all that can be observed happenimg in a controlled environment barring some exceptional event.

{An exceptional event would in fact be, under some interpretation, either an iteration or translation of earlier events, or some new invention which changes the natural potential of events if they are corroborative of that new thing.}

It is so to speak, semantics. Now, interpret with fear. For, we must be serious. If we are to see the importance of semantics we must see every neutrality and nuance with enough contrast that each thing is slightly perceptible compared to the next.

It is, so to speak, in its own bubble or caccoon of subtly differentiated meanings. They concern everything, but they are all within one perceptive bubble. A single bubble. A bubble of fearful semantics. A technique, a techniqűe, a technic, or what have you. The bubble is the relevant thing, the communicator, the go-to for solving problems. It is a diction, and a doorway, a lucid derivative, and a reconciliation of everything known.

And yet it is semantics, a single idea. An idea-function.

What happens when this function has form?

Well, it becomes sensitive, it learns, it processes, it takes a form, and then it hardens.

And, all these stages are still semantic logic. Thus, semantics to an extent is this process, but it also consists of essence, and a group of other terms:

Corroboration, cohesion, coherence, relevance, application, and idea.

Indeed, the way semantics play out, idea is a very lofty thing, a kind of limit of all potential. Indeed, ideas may be the limits of semantic potential. Fortunately there is more than one.

Therefore, studying this, you may know how to semiologize, and you will be adapted to the notion of formal idea. You will also relax into the attitude of sophisticated formalizing.

After semantics, some type of imagination should definitely be possible. You merely require a definition, and your mind rambles looking for its natural potential.

Since we know semiotics, we know that natural potential is proven fully by the fact of existence.

Therefore, think, know! And carry on symbolically.