Friday, August 16, 2019

Over-Unity Formula for TOEs

Quick Overview now on Quora

EQUATION

OU Formula for TOEs = =((Dimensions^Results)-(Verbs-1))

Verbs may be given as Difference + 5,

Difference + 5 = (Results - Efficiency) + 5

So,

OU Formula for TOEs = ((Dimensions^Results) - ((Results - Eff)+5 -1))

OU Formula for TOEs = ((Dimensions^Results) - ((Results - Eff)+4))

I have now revised my assessment and decided it does work to rank mechanical systems but only if used very parsimoniously.

PROOF:

This assumes that verbs is the number of set categories. In most cases it should be compatible with the Verbs formula.

It was found 2 dimensions ^ 2 results = 4, luckily verbs for the quadratic knowledge is calculated to be 4, subtracting one and then subtracting the second half we get OU for TOE’s of 1, which means 1 degree of absolute knowledge.

Calculating for science we get (3 dimensions ^ 1 result) - (0 + 5 - 1) , equals a value of - 1, which corresponds with incoherent knowledge.

Since the formula is accurate for the major categories of knowledge, this shows a high degree of accuracy overall.


RECENT NOTES:

Immortality has 5 verbs. [It was later found to be 2.5]

8 dimensions may be sufficient for godhood. [May really be 4 dimensions with 8 opposites]

These statements might be used to collapse n dimensions or results in the below formula into n / 2.

Gatekeeper Logics (…)

The OU Formula for TOE’s is now thought to be slightly outdated but still relatively reliable compared to most alternatives, although it only measures abstractions.

Please see the TOE for more accurate measurements.

Also see Telaletheian Science toward the bottom for Verb numbers.


OVER-UNITY FORMULA FOR TOE'S

D ^ results > verbs - 1

(Measured extremely conservatively).
Ultimately I figured out this was a way to count universal dimensions.

...
Also,
Qualifying equation for Over-Unity of Knowledge is Given By:

(D ^ results) - (verbs - 1) >= 1

Extent of Over-Unity in Knowledge

NOTE:
Basis of 5-d in immortal languages:

5-d for difference - 4: {Efficiency/ ((4) (Efficiency))} - 4 = > - 3 to -2.5 Over-Unity. Some functional values given by D <= 2, e.g. adjusted <= (2 - 1), yielding over-unity of exclusively -3. [-3 corresponds with immortal languages]---Ambitious Setups

...

MAIN EXAMPLES:

Prophecy of the Coherent History of Mathematics: negative 127.27 (129^1/10 > 129 - 1/10) 
(1.6257 > 128.9 = - 127.27)

0-d Reality Min: -5 (0 ^ 1 > 6 - 1)

0-d Reality Max: -5 (0 ^ 15 > 6 - 1)

1-d Reality Min: -4 (1 ^ 1 > 6 - 1)

1-d Reality Max: -4 (1 ^ 15 > 6 - 1)

2-d Reality Min: -3 (2 ^ 1 > 6 - 1)

Abstract Polyps: Negative 2.2513 (2^ 2/10 > 3.5 - 1/10 = negative 2.2513 inexact)

3-d Reality Min: -2 (3 ^ (1 to 25) > 6 - 1)

4-d Reality Min: -1 (4 ^ 1 > 6 - 1)

5-d Reality Min: 0 (5 ^ 1 > 6 - 1)

Premier science without TOE: 0 (n ^ 1 / 10 > n + 1 - 1 / 10)

Incoherent deduction: 0 (n ^ 0 > n + 1 - 1)

Formula for questions: 0 (3 ^ 0 > 2 - 1 = 1 > 1 = difference of 0)

Psychic prediction: 0 (4 ^ 1 > 5 - 1)

6-d Reality Min: 1 (6 ^ 1 > 6 - 1)

Infinite Philosophy: Ideally 1 (2^5 > 32 - 1)

Complete Theory of Human Knowledge: Ideally 1 (2^5 > 32 - 1)

The Big Equation: Ideally 1 (2^5 > 32 - 1)

Creativity: Ideally 1 (3 ^ 1 > 3 - 1)

How Do We Know?: Ideally 1 (2^5 > 32 - 1)

'True' science: 1 (n ^ 1 > n + 1) = All the dimensions including zero

Coherent Deduction: 1 (2^2 > 4 - 1)

Solution to All Problems: 1 (2^2 > 4 - 1)

Metaphysical Symbolism: Ideally 2 (2^1 > 1 - 1)

7-d Reality Min: 2 (7 ^ 1 > 6 - 1)

8-d Reality Min: 3 (8 ^ 1 > 6 - 1)

Formula for Answering All Questions: 3 (3^1 > 1 - 1)

9-d Reality Min: 4 (9 ^ 1 > 6 - 1)

Wizard Logic: 4 (7 ^ 1 > 4 - 1)

10-d Reality Min: 5 (10 ^ 1 > 6 - 1)

11-d Reality Min: 6 (11 ^ 1 > 6 - 1)

12-d Reality Min: 7 (12 ^ 1 > 6 - 1)

13-d Reality Min: 8 (13 ^ 1 > 6 - 1)

14-d Reality Min: 9 (14 ^ 1 > 6 - 1)

Theory of Everything: 9 (11 ^ 1 > 3 - 1)

Formula for Souls of Literature: 11 (2 ^ 4 > 6 - 1)

Convening of the Gods: 18 (5 ^ 2 > 8 - 1)

Magical Healing: 26 (33 ^ 1 > 8 - 1)

(Magical healing is said to be found by the difference between 7 and 33. This is not an all-purpose spell but rather a spell for general rejuvenation. It may be found by comparing three columns of eleven with a negative four and negative three. I have found wrapping a three vs. four around a vertical column is effective against bellyaches).

Magical Purification: 27 (33 ^ 1 > 7 - 1)

Magic Mystery: 29 (33 ^ 1 > 5 - 1)

Magical Invisibility: 30 (33 ^ 1 > 4 - 1)

The Fool: 31 (33 ^ 1 > 3 - 1)

Note: here it is an advanced concept similar to how locomotives appeared in 1830 or how blockchain appeared in 2010.

Logic of Time: 57 (4 ^ 3 > 8 - 1)

A logic has been written on this that may be helpful for immortality.

Hyper Soul: 70 (3 ^ 4 > (guess min 12) - 1)

(Observation: perhaps it has some relation to a virus).

Immortal Soul: 233 (4 ^ 4 > (guess min 24) - 1)

7 Dinkos: Theoretically 337 (7 ^ 3 > 7 - 1)

(Example: Someone invents barking, it means Mbark, which means / is a reference to Barack Obama: in the lower dimensions Obama is a higher-dimensional version of barking, this makes him the most powerful leader in the world).

God-Body 5-D Soul: 578 (5 ^ 4 > (guess min 48) - 1)

2-d Reality Max: 32,763 alternately 33,554,427 (2 ^ (15 or 25) > 6 - 1)

3-d Reality Max: 14,348,902 alternately 847,488,609,438 (3 ^ (15 or 25) > 6 - 1)

4-d Reality Max: 1,073,741,819 alternately 1,125,899,906,842,619 (4 ^ (15 or 25) > 6 - 1)

5-d Reality Max: 30,517,578,120 alternately 298,023,223,876,953,145 (5 ^ (15 or 25) > 6 - 1)

6-d Reality Max: 470,184,984,571 alternately 28,430,288,029,929,699,995 (6 ^ (15 or 25) > 6 - 1)

7-d Reality Max: 4,747,561,509,938 (7 ^ (15 or) > 6 - 1)

8-d Reality Max: 35,184,372,088,827 (8 ^ (15 or) > 6 - 1)

9-d Reality Max: 205,891,132,094,644 (9 ^ (15 or) > 6 - 1)

10-d Reality Max:  999,999,999,999,995 (10 ^ (15 or) > 6 - 1)

11-d Reality Max: 4,177,248,169,415,646 (11 ^ (15 or) > 6 - 1)

12-d Reality Max: 15,407,021,574,586,363 (12 ^ (15 or) > 6 - 1)

13-d Reality Max:  51,185,893,014,090,752 (13 ^ (15 or) > 6 - 1)

14-d Reality Max: 155,568,095,557,812,219  (14 ^ (15 or) > 6 - 1)

15-d Reality Max: 437,893,890,380,859,370 (15 ^ (15 or) > 6 - 1)

16-d Reality Max: 1,152,921,504,606,846,971 (16 ^ (15 or) > 6 - 1)

17-d Reality Max: 2,862,423,051,509,815,788 (17 ^ (15 or) > 6 - 1)

18-d Reality Max: 6,746,640,616,477,458,427 (18 ^ (15 or) > 6 - 1)

19-d Reality Max: 15,181,127,029,874,798,294 (19 ^ (15 or) > 6 - 1)

20-d Reality Max: 32,767,999,999,999,999,995 (20 ^ (15 or) > 6 - 1)

...

NOTE: The ^25 notation is only used so far with maximum dimensions of absolute knowledge for whole dimensions. It is based on the TOE Conjectures metaphysical system, which is itself grounded on the major categories of the Theory of Everything. This is pending revision, it may be a simplification. However, the TOE has been shown to express accurate results on any topic including math, turtles, invisibility, etc so it is quite possible the widest available measure of alternate fully substantiated entities. Remaining possibilities are likely to result only from combinations or alternate TOE's, and the TOE used is thought to be the best and only true TOE ever proposed. Alternate more exhaustive measures would use 25 factorial, but for the moment such results appear unhelpful. The maximum values given are designed to be an instructive ultimate minimum providing fundamental evidence for all possible maximum values with sufficient calculation, and are therefore instructive and fundamental.

Although because of the absolute nature of this calculating rubric the values are likely in reality to be much higher, and so, the ^25 values involving whole dimensions are to be taken as absolute minimum values, potentially expressing a non-exponential group of genera analogous to expressing the soul as number 11, and anything higher as something more significant, at least to someone, and always for good reason taken broadly, yet even in knowledge, with high qualification. Nonetheless, it may be for unforeseen reasons some entries are not 'real' within the evaluation, in which case one suggestion is to try ^19 or worse ^19! which does not include impossibility, or simply use the relevant dimension raised to the one, which seems to always simply output the whole dimension,

---The Dimensional Reduction
...

SPECIAL RESULTS:

D / results = Special Useful Multiplier

Special science number = 1/4

List of multipliers:

Science: 10 n (science magnifies by 10 times)

Incoherence: +/- Infinity (incoherence does not tell us anything)

Questions: Infinity (in principle there are infinite questions that may be asked)

Prophecy of mathematics: D (we can only know as much math as the number of dimensions we know)

Infinite philosophy: 2/5 (philosophy is 2/5 of all knowledge)

Complete theory: 2/5 (only 1/2.5 of knowledge is ever grasped by any one person)

The big equation: 2/5 (the theory of everything has a 1/2.5 probability of working)

How do we know?: 2/5 (1/2.5 knowledges is meaningful)

Coherent Deduction: 1 (coherent)

Solution to Problems: 1 (one problem)

Formula for Answering Questions: 3 (three great questions)

Wizard Logic: 5 (Power)

Theory of Everything: 9

Formula for Souls: 1

Convening of the Gods: 2.5

...
NOTE: A later more general measure of energy which is the primary means of making the above equation compatible with the TOE after much effort is given by:

General Over-Unity = { ( Efficiency / ((D - 1) (Efficiency)) } + Difference, where efficiency is stated as Results = (Efficiency * + Difference), and efficiency sums to < 1 if topic is acted on, and efficiency sums to > 1 if topic is acting. And difference is usually assumed to be one, but for now is assumed to be given as minus one for knowledge applications due to it’s suitability in defining knowledge rankings.

Note that the efficiency is represented by the results of the actual TOE, stated as Results = (Efficiency * + Difference) and the details about efficiency. When in doubt trust the given values in Coppedge's recommended sources.

---General Over-Unity Equation


TOE Conjectures

The Educational TOE

Philosophical Statistics

Links to Systems Fitting Formula for Meaning (5/32)

Over-Unity Formula for 2nd ToE 

Selective Perpetual Motion Applications

Superhumanism

No comments: