...
NOTES
[KARMABAND IS HARD WORK]
- FROM A PRIVILEGED POSITION I THOUGHT I WAS DYING, I DIDN'T HAVE FOOD
- HWHWW WH HHH
- YES OR NO QUESTIONS AREN’T ALWAYS CRYPTOGRAPHY I HAVE A BOOK RELEASE
- LOGICS OF NEGATION
- AT FIRST IT’S IMPOSSIBLE.
- WELL, AT FIRST IT’S EXPENSIVE NEGATIVITY
- Price Theory 14: Does ingenuity decrease over time? You’re kind of on target here seriously and points for that. Social ingenuity can decrease because of harm to groups which contain engineers and inventors and other intelligentsia. For example, the recent attacks on the National Science Foundation grants might be an attack on the people that do research in the United States and abroad. More traditionally, the dangers were things like lack of education, or excessive war and enslavement, and lack of a leisure class. Now the things are for example, the shrinking middle class from reliance on jobs, and reliance on consumer products. Also the cutbacks on the NSF I just mentioned, and certain dangers such as dangerous immigration, dangerously expensive neighborhoods, dangerously expensive transportation, dangerously expensive education, dangerously expensive professional training, dangerously expensive self-education, dangerously expensive knowledge, dangerously expensive advantage-seeking, dangerously expensive avenues to social prestige, dangerously expensive travel requirements, dangerously expensive drugs, dangerously expensive buildings, dangerously expensive experts and wisdom, dangerously expensive in some way life experiences, dangerously expensive alternatives, dangerously expensive legal system, dangerous dangers if someone commits crimes, and inherent dangers of human relationships… etc. This might lead to a dangerous realization that there are too many dangers.
- JURISPRUDENTIALISM.
DOOM
- LOW PRIVILEGE
- ENDING
- EPIDEMIC
- SUICIDE
PAIN
- TRAGEDY
- 1T T11 IT'S ONLY ONE TIME AND TWO TIMES A MILLION
- CHRONICS
- THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO OFFER A WORD TO THE WISER.
- GENIUS
- --> L(EA)GU(ER) OH RIGHT BROKEM
- INSULTING
- THEY WERE IN THE BRIGADE OR THE BULWARK OR WHATEVER.
TRICKERY
- BETRAYAL
- SOMEONE ESCAPES SOMEONE'S COMMENTS THEY POINT YOU OUT FOR HAVING BELIEVED THEM. VAVA VOM
- TRAP
- SURVIVE A BEAR TRAP REQUIRES SOME LUCK OR ANT WEARINGL
- THERE ARE NOT A LOT OF OTHER TRAPS IN THE US UNLESS YOU INVESTIGATE MAFIA OR THERE MAY BE SOME PIT TRAPS SOMEWHERE THAT ARE VICIOUS.
- BLACKMAIL AND BRIBERY
- YOU MOVE ON AND MEET NEW FACES
- HIGH EFFICIENCY
- -->< -- --> --> THEY MUST HAVE STOPPED TIME
MORTALITY
- NATURAL CAUSE YOU CAN LIVE 2 2
- (2)(2)1(2)(2)1(2)(2)
- (2)1
- ALCOHOL OR DRUGS -- EVERYONE IS A SKEPTIC YOU MIGHT MAKE MONEY PERHAPS AVOID THE HARMFUL DANGERS OF TOO MUCH ALCOHOLISM
- ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORING -- GUO WAS THE ONLY ONE CONCERNED ABOUT THE MOUNTAINS LATER HE MADE CANDY OUT OF THE ANDIES
- ILLNESS -- PANACEA 1(22)1(22)
…
I DON'T WANT SYPHILIS. I DON'T WANT SIXES. AIDS ALWAYS PLAYS THE DEVIL.
1313 131313 AA
2
FUNNEL OF KARMABAND 2026-07-30
…
They’re in pain.
- STUDY HOROSCOPES EVERYONE’S A PLEASURE-MONGER
They’re mortal.
- THEY COULD WIN IF THEY’RE GENIUS. PROBABLY SOMETHING DIFFICULT TO GUESS LIKE A BADGE OR CHIME.
They eat crap.
- NO YOU COULD GET CREDIT FOR FREE. IT’S CALLED BEING CRAZY THERE IS MORE THAN ONE NAME. THEY MIGHT BE THE 'GOOD GUYS' AND 'DO SOMETHING BAD'. GOOD SHIT LIE LIKE LUCIFER THE REDEEMER. DEVIL-WORSHIPERS.
They’re risking their neck.
- TECHNICALLY THEY MIGHT NOT HURT THEIR NECK. THEY TRY TO COLLECT INSURANCE.
They’re impotent.
- WELL YOU KNOW CHILDREN IT COULD HAPPEN OR IT MIGHT NOT. PROBABLY YOU WOULD BE A PARENT ALREADY IF YOU WERE GOING TO HAVE KIDS. SOMETIMES LATER PERHAPS. YOU MAY HAVE TOO MUCH TO SAY ABOUT HOSPITALS. IF YOU’RE IN TOO MUCH PAIN YOU MIGHT NOT HAVE CHILDREN. THEY HAVE LOTS OF TIME. IT'S NOT BLAMEWORTHY. IT'S POSSIBLY A WHITE LIE TOLD OFF OF MEN. DEFENDING PEOPLE WHO ARE INTERESTING ENOUGH TO HURT THEMSELVES. SENSITIVE PEOPLE WITH ISSUES.
They’re criminals.
- IF YOU DON’T NEED TO STEAL MONEY YOU’RE SAFER. PEOPLE MIGHT BE ANIMALS THAT TOUGH IT OUT FOR A TIME. MAYBE THEY DON'T PEE.
They are stuck.
- [TRADED FOR CHEAP] IF YOU’RE RICH ENOUGH ETC YOU WILL HAVE LESS PROBLEM WITH OBSTACLES AND MEAN PEOPLE.
- [PRESCRIPTION] YOU’RE GREAT. YOU CAN SURVIVE WOMAN ON THE MOUNTAIN.
- [TEMPORARIAL] THE ANSWER IS T11 THAT WAY YOU SURVIVE.
- [RIGHT PLACE] THOSE BAD PEOPLE DON’T SURVIVE.
They have to solve difficult problems.
- [SOMEHOW THEY'RE RICH OR DID SOMETHING HARD] I SOLVED MOST OF THEM I’M A MEANINGFUL JERK. GOOD GOOD. SORT OF BUREAUCRATIC IS ABOUT WHAT I’D DO. IT’S TOO DIFFICULT I THINK MY YOUNG ONES ARE PSYCHIC. AND LUCKIER. I WAS A GHOST AT LEAST ONCE IT COSTS MONEY SO THEY PROBABLY SURVIVE BETTER OR I WOULD HOPE.
They’re worse than you thought.
- [THEY MUST HAVE BEEN NATURAL RISK-TAKERS] DEVILS, SCOUNDRELS, THAT SCENE IS HARD TO RECREATE USUALLY IT’S BADLY DONE. PROBABILITY MAKES IT LIKELY.
…
2.57988
THEY ALWAYS DO SOMETHING WRONG, DO THEY
...
GENERAL COMPLETENESS OR SIMILAR IS ALSO A REQUIREMENT
THE POTENTIAL DOUBLING OF PAST HUMAN TECHNOLOGICAL EVOLUTION:
Using Supervenience of Pinnacle Theories:
DOMINANCE (DOMINANCE) -->
HARD TO BEAR SPECIFIC (FEAR) -->
NERVE-WRACKING GENERAL (ANNOYANCE) -->
DANGEROUS SPECIFIC (DANGER) -->
TROUBLESOME GENERAL (STRENGTH) -->
DIFFICULT SPECIFIC (WEAPONS) -->
ORDINARY GENERAL (KNOWLEDGE) -->
COMMONSENSE SPECIFIC (SIMPLE MACHINES) --> NEW WONDERS… (→)
TRADITIONAL GENERAL (COHERENCE) -->
RADICAL SPECIFIC (PERPETUAL MOTION) -->
GROUNDED GENERAL (THEORY OF EVERYTHING) -->
UNGROUNDED SPECIFIC (FLYING MACHINES) --> GENERAL GUESSES… (→)
SYSTEMATIC GENERAL -->
ERRATIC SPECIFIC -->
EFFICIENT GENERAL -->
MOBILIZED SPECIFIC -->
PARADIGMATIC GENERAL -->
PERMANENT SPECIFIC -->
PREFERRED GENERAL -->
INTERESTING SPECIFIC -->
AUTHENTIC GENERAL -->
PERCEPTION SPECIFIC -->
FASCINATING GENERAL -->
CONSCIOUSNESS SPECIFIC -->
https://emporium.quora.com/The-Evolution-of-Human-Thought (Coppedge, N.)
COMPLETENESS MODELS
GENERALLY COMPLETE FORMAT
MORE COMPLETENESS
NC TREE THEORY
- New Immaculate Equations: First binary variable > 1 and Max second binary variable yields optimal technologies. By binary variable, what I mean is the first and second of the two variables after the equals in each equation. I already know the pattern "First binary variable > 1 and Max second binary variable" fits two of the cases, which is unlikely because each equation is shown to be distinct and unique. The case of the ToE is shown with the optimal efficiency of 3 and the differences +1 and -1. Results reaches perpetual motion with Efficiency > 1 and Difference maximized. While some of the equations below Difference 0 function as knowledge or language, the most useful results so far are likely to be perpetual motion if this particular ToE is important. Likewise, with the Efficiency Immortality equation I have been experimenting with, the first binary is Results and the second binary is Difference. In this equation potentially for immortality I had to check my notes but with the correct efficiency modifier for the efficiency formula following consistent rules, the equation appears to be optimized using the same exact rule though with different math, yielding an optimally optimal equation in which RESULTS > 1 (first binary operator) AND MAX DIFF (second binary operator). This can be checked at the following google docs excel file, available for download, which you have seen before, it may have some added notes but most of the important math has remained the same: SystemInvestigatorWidget.xlsx If the formula fits two different cases and the cases are different, this at least points in the direction of workability for all the equations, since they are highly coherent and consistent (a unique case). (2023–08–08)
- Possible trump on the NC Tree Theory suggests the TOE and dimension equation may be the only necessary theories for modeling technology: The Two Technologically-Useful Equations
- Another key compared to below: ‘The Grand Contingency’: Beautiful Numbers
Expansion of: Pinnacle Theory Model (…)
Included under: More-Completeness (…)
See also precedent: Coherence Equation (…)
I’ve never seen so many 3-part equations in my life! And they are complete, aren’t they?
Sort of… They can be combined!
“[This work this note discusses] predates my TOE. We can assume the premise of levels is incorrect… My viewpoint now… is that the working TOE is one form-block… a few advanced theories may develop later although they largely serve meta-theoretical or organizing functions, or sometimes involve meta-technology. [italics added]” —Levels of Theories of Everything [This is the more official date, April 23, 2020]
Later developments:
- It was found with word formulas the accurate standard now seems to be to classify using words represented by the efficiency followed by the difference. Since this follows the TOE pattern efficiency + difference, it now follows logically that all the extended formulas of NC Tree Theory can be represented by words. ‘Perfect Research’ is possible using word formulations of every main formula for efficiency, difference, antiforces, and forces (and D = forces + antiforces): FormulaSearchCoherent.xlsx
- Unique Universe Formulas (Describes how to find the physical dimensions and modular number of great ideas for any universe. A new scarily useful theory has it that there are indeed the same 20 archetypal modular ideas as in the Great Philosophy Historical Model, reflecting objectively the TOE, intentionally excluding the five negative dimensions in 25 categories. This theory can now predict the number of physical dimensions and the maximum modular number of great ideas for any dimension, and may be useful for geometry.) —Unique Universe Formulas 2022–03–24 (…)
- Generalization of SuperTheories: all INF variables: Super-Disintegral = Inf Eff - Inf Diff | Super-Anti: Inf Antitheory
- Integration of the usable neutral dimension: If I was supposed to apply opposites, then there was still an alarming negative-spatial similarity... Maybe negative zero would be the only usable neutral dimension... by the logic of scatterplotting, by some perspective all options incompatible with this are biased and asymmetric as far as coherence theory (—2022–04–25)
This writing is an elaborate exposition of equivalent theories to the Results Theorem (TOE).
Way the hell too general for anybody —Unknown
…
Theory below.
BASIS FOR THE THEORY:
An alternate view has it that the version of the ‘theory of everything’ which takes results as primary is only one interpretation, and that other universes might interpret other formulas such as the General Efficiency, General Difference, Antitheory, Disintegral, Value Theorem, etc as general theorems.
A modification of this is that technologically any formula might apply in any universe, suggesting only one universe.
RULES:
- If the formula involves Results (1,2,3) it will be the corresponding Coherence or Knowledge theory (for example, with Antitheory, it will be the Antitheory. With the standard TOE, it will be the TOE).
- If the formula involves Efficiency (1,2,3) it will be the corresponding Perpetual Motion theory (for example, with Anti-Theory, it will be the Perpetual Motion Antitheory. With the standard TOE, it will be the Perpetual Motion theory).
- If the formula involves Difference (1,2,3) it will be the corresponding Function Spectrum.
- If more than one of Results, Efficiency, Difference has (1,2,3…) appended immediately afterwards, then the theory is considered higher-order and is not included in this entire list of sets. It may be considered combinatorial.
TOE / COHERENT TREE
(This is a means of reaching a string of more coherent unified formulas. However, it ultimately results in a repetition of the Disintegral and minus zero, whatever minus zero means is unclear).
This is the same method that was applied to the TOE to reach the disintegral, one of the only things more coherent than the TOE. Apply the Antitheory and negate. Apply the Antitheory and negate (a formula for making a unified theory more coherent)…
TOE: Coherence degree 1: Results (1,2,3…) = Efficiency + Difference
Disintegral: Coherence degree 2: Results (1,2,3…) = - (Difference - Efficiency)
Coherence Degree 3: Results (1,2,3…) = - [-(Difference - Efficiency) + (Difference - Efficiency)]
Coherence Degree 4: Results (1,2,3…) = -{-[-(Difference - Efficiency) + (Difference - Efficiency)] + (Difference - Efficiency)} … And etc it keeps going.
DEGREE <= -1: Results (1,2,3…) = Incoherence.
DEGREE 0: Results (1,2,3…) = Art.
DEGREE 1: Results (1,2,3…) = Efficiency + Difference [= General Theory of Everything]
DEGREE 2: Results (1,2,3…) = - (Difference - Efficiency) [=Disintegral]
DEGREE 3: Results (1,2,3…) = Zero or minus zero
DEGREE 4: Results (1,2,3…) = Disintegral
DEGREE 5: Results (1,2,3…) = Zero or minus zero
DEGREE 6: Results (1,2,3…) = Disintegral
DEGREE 7: Results (1,2,3…) = Zero or minus zero
DEGREE 8: Results (1,2,3…) = Disintegral
DEGREE 9: Results (1,2,3…) = Zero or minus zero
DEGREE 10: Results (1,2,3…) = Disintegral
DEGREE 11: Results (1,2,3…) = Zero or minus zero
DEGREE 12: Results (1,2,3…) = Disintegral
…
TOE / PERPETUAL MOTION TREE
TOE: Degree 1: Results = Efficiency (1,2,3…) + Difference
Disintegral: Degree 2: Results = - (Difference - Efficiency (1,2,3…))
Degree 3: Results = - [-(Difference - Efficiency (1,2,3…)) + (Difference - Efficiency (1,2,3…))]
Degree 4: Results = -{-[-(Difference - Efficiency (1,2,3…)) + (Difference - Efficiency (1,2,3…))] + (Difference - Efficiency (1,2,3…))} … And etc it keeps going.
DEGREE <= -1: Results = Incoherence (1,2,3…).
DEGREE 0: Results = Art (1,2,3…).
DEGREE 1: Results = Efficiency (1,2,3…) + Difference [= General Perpetual Motion]
DEGREE 2: Results = - (Difference - Efficiency (1,2,3…)) [= Perpetual Disintegral]
DEGREE 3: Results = Zero or minus zero (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 4: Results = Perpetual Disintegral
DEGREE 5: Results = Zero or minus zero (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 6: Results = Perpetual Disintegral
DEGREE 7: Results = Zero or minus zero (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 8: Results = Perpetual Disintegral
DEGREE 9: Results = Zero or minus zero (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 6: Results = Perpetual Disintegral
DEGREE 7: Results = Zero or minus zero (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 12: Results = Perpetual Disintegral
…
TOE / FUNCTION SPECTRUM TREE
TOE: Degree 1: Results = Efficiency + Difference (1,2,3…)
Disintegral: Degree 2: Results = - (Difference (1,2,3…) - Efficiency)
Degree 3: Results = - [-(Difference (1,2,3…) - Efficiency) + (Difference (1,2,3…) - Efficiency)]
Degree 4: Results = -{-[-(Difference (1,2,3…) - Efficiency) + (Difference (1,2,3…) - Efficiency)] + (Difference (1,2,3…) - Efficiency)} … And etc it keeps going.
DEGREE <= -1: Results = Incoherence (1,2,3…).
DEGREE 0: Results = Art (1,2,3…).
DEGREE 1: Results = Efficiency + Difference (1,2,3…) [= General Function Spectrum]
DEGREE 2: Results = - (Difference (1,2,3…) - Efficiency) [= Function Spectrum Disintegral]
DEGREE 3: Results = Zero or minus zero (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 4: Results = Function Spectrum Disintegral
DEGREE 5: Results = Zero or minus zero (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 6: Results = Function Spectrum Disintegral
DEGREE 7: Results = Zero or minus zero (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 8: Results = Function Spectrum Disintegral
DEGREE 9: Results = Zero or minus zero (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 6: Results = Function Spectrum Disintegral
DEGREE 7: Results = Zero or minus zero (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 12: Results = Function Spectrum Disintegral
…
…
…
NEGATIVE TOE / OCCULT KNOWLEDGE TREE [E.g. knowledge of things like time-travel]
Neg TOE: Coherence degree 1: Neg Results (1,2,3…) = - (Efficiency + Difference) = Neg TOE
Coherence degree 2: Neg Results (1,2,3…) = (Difference - Efficiency) = Antitheory Knowledge
Coherence Degree 3: Results (1,2,3…) = - [(Difference - Efficiency) + (-Difference + Efficiency)] = Zero or -Zero
Coherence Degree 4: Results (1,2,3…) = - { - [(Difference - Efficiency) + (-Difference + Efficiency)] + (Difference - Efficiency) } = Disintegral Knowledge
Coherence Degree 5: Results (1,2,3) = - [(Difference - Efficiency) + (-Difference + Efficiency)] = 0 or - 0
Coherence Degree 6: - { - [(Difference - Efficiency) + (-Difference + Efficiency)] + (Difference - Efficiency) } = Disintegral Knowledge
DEGREE <= -1: Results (1,2,3…) = Incoherence.
DEGREE 0: Results (1,2,3…) = Art.
DEGREE 1: Results (1,2,3…) = - Efficiency - Difference) [= Neg TOE]
DEGREE 2: Results (1,2,3…) = Difference - Efficiency [=Antitheory]
DEGREE 3: Results (1,2,3…) = Zero or minus zero
DEGREE 4: Results (1,2,3…) = Disintegral
DEGREE 5: Results (1,2,3…) = Zero or minus zero
DEGREE 6: Results (1,2,3…) = Disintegral
DEGREE 7: Results (1,2,3…) = Zero or minus zero
DEGREE 8: Results (1,2,3…) = Disintegral
DEGREE 9: Results (1,2,3…) = Zero or minus zero
DEGREE 10: Results (1,2,3…) = Disintegral
DEGREE 11: Results (1,2,3…) = Zero or minus zero
DEGREE 12: Results (1,2,3…) = Disintegral
…
NEGATIVE TOE / OCCULT ENERGY TREE [E.g. use of energy with things like time-travel]
Neg TOE: Coherence degree 1: Neg Results = - (Efficiency (1,2,3…) + Difference) = Neg TOE
Coherence degree 2: Neg Results = (Difference - Efficiency (1,2,3…)) = Antitheory
Coherence Degree 3: Results = - [(Difference - Efficiency (1,2,3…)) + (-Difference + Efficiency (1,2,3…))] = Zero or -Zero
Coherence Degree 4: Results = - { - [(Difference - Efficiency (1,2,3…)) + (-Difference + Efficiency (1,2,3…))] + (Difference - Efficiency (1,2,3…)) } = Disintegral
Coherence Degree 5: Results = - [(Difference - Efficiency (1,2,3…)) + (-Difference + Efficiency (1,2,3…))] = 0 or - 0
Coherence Degree 6: - { - [(Difference - Efficiency (1,2,3…)) + (-Difference + Efficiency (1,2,3…))] + (Difference - Efficiency (1,2,3…)) } = Disintegral
DEGREE <= -1: Results = Incoherence.
DEGREE 0: Results = Art.
DEGREE 1: Results = - Efficiency - Difference) [= Neg TOE]
DEGREE 2: Results = Difference - Efficiency [=Antitheory]
DEGREE 3: Results = Zero or minus zero
DEGREE 4: Results = Disintegral
DEGREE 5: Results = Zero or minus zero
DEGREE 6: Results = Disintegral
DEGREE 7: Results = Zero or minus zero
DEGREE 8: Results = Disintegral
DEGREE 9: Results = Zero or minus zero
DEGREE 10: Results = Disintegral
DEGREE 11: Results = Zero or minus zero
DEGREE 12: Results = Disintegral…
…
NEGATIVE TOE / OCCULT SPECTRUM TREE (OCCULT KNOWLEDGE VERSUS OCCULT ENERGY)
Neg TOE: Coherence degree 1: Neg Results = - (Efficiency + Difference (1,2,3…)) = Neg TOE
Coherence degree 2: Neg Results = (Difference (1,2,3…) - Efficiency) = Antitheory
Coherence Degree 3: Results = - [(Difference (1,2,3…) - Efficiency) + (-Difference (1,2,3…) + Efficiency)] = Zero or -Zero
Coherence Degree 4: Results = - { - [(Difference (1,2,3…) - Efficiency) + (-Difference (1,2,3…) + Efficiency)] + (Difference (1,2,3…) - Efficiency) } = Disintegral
Coherence Degree 5: Results = - [(Difference (1,2,3…) - Efficiency) + (-Difference (1,2,3…) + Efficiency)] = 0 or - 0
Coherence Degree 6: - { - [(Difference (1,2,3…) - Efficiency) + (-Difference (1,2,3…) + Efficiency)] + (Difference (1,2,3…) - Efficiency) } = Disintegral
DEGREE <= -1: Results = Incoherence.
DEGREE 0: Results = Art.
DEGREE 1: Results = - Efficiency - Difference) [= Neg TOE]
DEGREE 2: Results = Difference - Efficiency [=Antitheory]
DEGREE 3: Results = Zero or minus zero
DEGREE 4: Results = Disintegral
DEGREE 5: Results = Zero or minus zero
DEGREE 6: Results = Disintegral
DEGREE 7: Results = Zero or minus zero
DEGREE 8: Results = Disintegral
DEGREE 9: Results = Zero or minus zero
DEGREE 10: Results = Disintegral
DEGREE 11: Results = Zero or minus zero
DEGREE 12: Results = Disintegral…
…
…
…
ANTI-THEORY RESULTS (ANTI-THEORY KNOWLEDGE) TREE
(This is a means of reaching a string of less coherent, less unified formulas. However, it ultimately results in a repetition of the Anti-Disintegral and zero, whatever zero means is unclear).
This is the same method that was applied to the TOE to reach the disintegral, one of the only things more coherent than the TOE. Apply the TOE and negate. Apply the TOE and negate (a formula for making an incoherent theory more incoherent)…
Anti-Theory: Anti-Coherence degree 1: Results (1,2,3…) = Difference - Efficiency = Antitheory
Anti-Coherence degree 2: Results (1,2,3…) = - (Efficiency + Difference) = Negative TOE (not sure if this means Superdisintegral)
Anti-Coherence Degree 3: Results (1,2,3…) = - (-Efficiency + -Difference + Efficiency + Difference) = 0 or -0
Anti-Coherence Degree 4: Results (1,2,3…) = -(0 + Efficiency + Difference) = Negative TOE
Anti-Coherence Degree 5: - (-Efficiency + -Difference + Efficiency + Difference) = 0 or -0
… And etc it keeps going.
DEGREE <= -1: Antitheory (1,2,3…) = Incoherence. (?)
DEGREE 0: Antitheory (1,2,3…) = Art. (?)
DEGREE 1: Antitheory (1,2,3…) = Difference - Efficiency [= Knowledge of the Antitheory]
DEGREE 2: Antitheory (1,2,3…) = - (Efficiency + Difference) = Negative TOE
DEGREE 3: Antitheory (1,2,3…) = - (-Efficiency + -Difference + Efficiency + Difference) [= 0 or -0]
DEGREE 4: Antitheory (1,2,3…) = - (Eff + Diff) [= Negative TOE]
DEGREE 5: Antitheory (1,2,3…) = 0 or -0
DEGREE 6: Antitheory (1,2,3…) = Negative TOE
DEGREE 7: Antitheory (1,2,3…) = 0 or -0
DEGREE 8: Antitheory (1,2,3…) = Negative TOE
DEGREE 9: Antitheory (1,2,3…) = 0 or -0
DEGREE 10: Antitheory (1,2,3…) = Negative TOE
DEGREE 11: Antitheory (1,2,3…) = 0 or -0
DEGREE 12: Antitheory (1,2,3…) = Negative TOE
…
ANTI-THEORY EFFICIENCY (ANTI-THEORY PERPETUAL MOTION) TREE
Anti-Theory: Anti-Efficiency degree 1: Results = Difference - Efficiency (1,2,3…) = Perpetual Motion Antitheory
Anti-Perpetual Motion degree 2: Results = - (Efficiency (1,2,3…) + Difference) = Negative TOE (not sure if this means Superdisintegral)
Anti-Perpetual Motion Degree 3: Results = - (-Efficiency (1,2,3…) + -Difference + Efficiency (1,2,3…) + Difference) = 0 or -0
Anti-Perpetual Motion Degree 4: Results (1,2,3…) = -(0 + Efficiency (1,2,3…) + Difference) = Negative TOE
Anti-Perpetual Motion Degree 5: - (-Efficiency (1,2,3…) + -Difference + Efficiency (1,2,3…) + Difference) = 0 or -0
… And etc it keeps going.
DEGREE <= -1: Antitheory = Incoherence (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 0: Antitheory = Art (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 1: Antitheory = Difference - Efficiency (1,2,3…) [= Perpetual Motion Antitheory]
DEGREE 2: Antitheory = - (Efficiency (1,2,3…) + Difference) [= Negative TOE]
DEGREE 3: Antitheory = Difference - Efficiency (1,2,3…) [= Perpetual Motion Antitheory]
DEGREE 4: Antitheory = Negative TOE
DEGREE 5: Antitheory = 0 or -0
DEGREE 6: Antitheory = Negative TOE
DEGREE 7: Antitheory = 0 or -0
DEGREE 8: Antitheory = Negative TOE
DEGREE 9: Antitheory = 0 or -0
DEGREE 10: Antitheory = Negative TOE
DEGREE 11: Antitheory = 0 or -0
DEGREE 12: Antitheory = Negative TOE
…
ANTI-THEORY DIFFERENCE (ANTI-FUNCTION SPECTRUM) TREE
Anti-Theory: Anti-Function degree 1: Results = Difference (1,2,3…) - Efficiency = Anti-Function Spectrum
Anti-Function degree 2: Results = - (Efficiency + Difference (1,2,3…)) = Negative TOE (not sure if this means Superdisintegral)
Anti-Function Degree 3: Results (1,2,3…) = - (-Efficiency + -Difference (1,2,3…) + Efficiency + Difference (1,2,3…)) = 0 or -0
Anti-Function Degree 4: Results (1,2,3…) = -(0 + Efficiency + Difference (1,2,3…)) = Negative TOE
Anti-Function Degree 5: - (-Efficiency + -Difference (1,2,3…) + Efficiency + Difference (1,2,3…)) = 0 or -0
… And etc it keeps going.
DEGREE <= -1: Antitheory = Incoherence. (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 0: Antitheory = Art. (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 1: Antitheory = Difference (1,2,3…) - Efficiency [= Anti-Function Spectrum]
DEGREE 2: Antitheory = - (Efficiency + Difference (1,2,3…)) = Negative TOE
DEGREE 3: Antitheory = Difference (1,2,3…) - Efficiency [= Anti-Function Spectrum]
DEGREE 4: Antitheory = Negative TOE
DEGREE 5: Antitheory = 0 or -0
DEGREE 6: Antitheory = Negative TOE
DEGREE 7: Antitheory = 0 or -0
DEGREE 8: Antitheory = Negative TOE
DEGREE 9: Antitheory = 0 or -0
DEGREE 10: Antitheory = Negative TOE
DEGREE 11: Antitheory = 0 or -0
DEGREE 12: Antitheory = Negative TOE
…
…
…
EFFICIENCY / EFFICIENCY TREE (NOTE: IN THE CASE OF EFFICIENCY, EFFICIENCY IS PLACED AHEAD OF RESULTS-BASED FORMULAS FOR REASONS THAT BECOME OBVIOUS)
(This is a means of reaching a string of more efficient formulas. However, it ultimately results in a repetition).
This is a similar method to applying the TOE to reach the disintegral. In this case, Apply the Anti-Efficiency (addition) and negate. Apply the Anti-Efficiency and negate (a formula for making an efficient theory more efficient)…
Efficiency: Efficiency degree 1: Efficiency (1,2,3…) >= Results – Difference = Efficiency Theory
Efficiency degree 2: Efficiency (1,2,3…) = - (Difference - Results) = Results - Difference = Efficiency Theory (1,2,3…)
Efficiency Degree 3: Efficiency (1,2,3…) = - (Results - Difference + Difference - Results) = 0 or -0
Efficiency Degree 4: Efficiency (1,2,3…) = - (0 + Difference - Results) = Results - Difference = Efficiency Theory …
Efficiency Degree 5: Efficiency (1,2,3…) = - (Results - Difference + Difference - Results) = 0 or -0 … And etc it keeps going.
DEGREE <= -1: Efficiency (1,2,3…) = Incoherence (?)
DEGREE 0: Efficiency (1,2,3…) = Art (?)
DEGREE 1: Efficiency (1,2,3…) = Results – Difference [= Efficiency Theory]
DEGREE 2: Efficiency (1,2,3…) = Results - Difference [= Efficiency Theory]
DEGREE 3: Efficiency (1,2,3…) = 0 or -0
DEGREE 4: Efficiency (1,2,3…) = Efficiency Theory
DEGREE 5: Efficiency (1,2,3…) = 0 or -0
DEGREE 6: Efficiency (1,2,3…) = Efficiency Theory
DEGREE 7: Efficiency (1,2,3…) = 0 or -0
DEGREE 8: Efficiency (1,2,3…) = Efficiency Theory
DEGREE 9: Efficiency (1,2,3…) = 0 or -0
DEGREE 10: Efficiency (1,2,3…) = Efficiency Theory
DEGREE 11: Efficiency (1,2,3…) = 0 or -0
DEGREE 12: Efficiency (1,2,3…) = Efficiency Theory
…
EFFICIENCY / EFFICIENT KNOWLEDGE TREE
Efficiency: Efficiency degree 1: Efficiency >= Results (1,2,3…) – Difference = Efficient Knowledge
Efficiency degree 2: Efficiency = - (Difference - Results (1,2,3…)) = Results (1,2,3…) - Difference = Efficient Knowledge.
Efficiency Degree 3: Efficiency = - (Results (1,2,3…) - Difference + Difference - Results (1,2,3…)) = 0 or -0
Efficiency Degree 4: Efficiency = - (0 + Difference - Results (1,2,3…)) = Results (1,2,3…) - Difference = Efficient Knowledge …
Efficiency Degree 5: Efficiency = - (Results (1,2,3…) - Difference + Difference - Results (1,2,3…)) = 0 or -0 … And etc it keeps going.
DEGREE <= -1: Efficiency = Incoherence (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 0: Efficiency = Art (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 1: Efficiency = Results (1,2,3…) – Difference [= Efficient Knowledge]
DEGREE 2: Efficiency = Results (1,2,3…) – Difference [= Efficient Knowledge]
DEGREE 3: Efficiency = 0 or -0
DEGREE 4: Efficiency = Efficient Knowledge
DEGREE 5: Efficiency = 0 or -0
DEGREE 6: Efficiency = Efficient Knowledge
DEGREE 7: Efficiency = 0 or -0
DEGREE 8: Efficiency = Efficient Knowledge
DEGREE 9: Efficiency = 0 or -0
DEGREE 10: Efficiency = Efficient Knowledge
DEGREE 11: Efficiency = 0 or -0
DEGREE 12: Efficiency = Efficient Knowledge
…
EFFICIENCY / EFFICIENT FUNCTION SPECTRUM TREE
Efficiency: Efficiency degree 1: Efficiency >= Results – Difference (1,2,3…) = Efficient Function Spectrum
Efficiency degree 2: Efficiency = - (Difference (1,2,3…) - Results) = Results - Difference (1,2,3…) = Efficient Function Spectrum.
Efficiency Degree 3: Efficiency = - (Results - Difference (1,2,3…) + Difference (1,2,3…) - Results) = 0 or -0
Efficiency Degree 4: Efficiency = - (0 + Difference (1,2,3…) - Results) = Results - Difference (1,2,3…) = Efficient Function Spectrum …
Efficiency Degree 5: Efficiency = - (Results - Difference (1,2,3…) + Difference (1,2,3…) - Results) = 0 or -0 … And etc it keeps going.
DEGREE <= -1: Efficiency = Incoherence (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 0: Efficiency = Art (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 1: Efficiency = Results – Difference (1,2,3…) [= Efficient Function Spectrum]
DEGREE 2: Efficiency = Results - Difference (1,2,3…) [= Efficient Function Spectrum]
DEGREE 3: Efficiency = 0 and -0
DEGREE 4: Efficiency = Efficient Function Spectrum
DEGREE 5: Efficiency = 0 and -0
DEGREE 6: Efficiency = Efficient Function Spectrum
DEGREE 7: Efficiency = 0 and -0
DEGREE 8: Efficiency = Efficient Function Spectrum
DEGREE 9: Efficiency = 0 and -0
DEGREE 10: Efficiency = Efficient Function Spectrum
DEGREE 11: Efficiency = 0 and -0
DEGREE 12: Efficiency = Efficient Function Spectrum
…
…
…
ANTI-EFFICIENCY / ANTI-EFFICIENCY TREE
(This is a means of reaching a string of anti-efficient formulas. However, it ultimately results in a repetition).
This is a similar method to applying the TOE to reach the disintegral. In this case, Apply Efficiency (addition) and negate. Apply the Efficiency and negate (a formula for making an anti-efficient theory less efficient)…
Anti-Efficiency: Anti-Efficiency degree 1: Anti-Efficiency (1,2,3…) <= Difference - Results = Anti-Efficiency
Anti-Efficiency degree 2: Anti-Efficiency (1,2,3…) <= - (Results - Difference) = Difference - Results = Anti-Efficiency (1,2,3…).
Anti-Efficiency Degree 3: Anti-Efficiency (1,2,3…) = - (Difference - Results + Results - Difference) = 0 or -0
Anti-Efficiency Degree 4: Anti-Efficiency (1,2,3…) = - (0 + Results - Difference) = Difference - Results = Anti-Efficiency… And etc it keeps going.
DEGREE <= -1: Anti-Efficiency (1,2,3…) = Incoherence (?)
DEGREE 0: Anti-Efficiency (1,2,3…) = Art (?)
DEGREE 1: Anti-Efficiency (1,2,3…) = Difference - Results [= Anti-Efficiency]
DEGREE 2: Anti-Efficiency (1,2,3…) = Difference - Results [= Anti-Efficiency]
DEGREE 3: Anti-Efficiency (1,2,3…) = 0 or -0
DEGREE 4: Anti-Efficiency (1,2,3…) = Anti-Efficiency
DEGREE 5: Anti-Efficiency (1,2,3…) = 0 or -0
DEGREE 6: Anti-Efficiency (1,2,3…) = Anti-Efficiency
DEGREE 7: Anti-Efficiency (1,2,3…) = 0 or -0
DEGREE 8: Anti-Efficiency (1,2,3…) = Anti-Efficiency
DEGREE 9: Anti-Efficiency (1,2,3…) = 0 or -0
DEGREE 10: Anti-Efficiency (1,2,3…) = Anti-Efficiency
DEGREE 11: Anti-Efficiency (1,2,3…) = 0 or -0
DEGREE 12: Anti-Efficiency (1,2,3…) = Anti-Efficiency
…
ANTI-EFFICIENCY / ANTI-EFFICIENT KNOWLEDGE TREE
Anti-Efficiency: Anti-Efficiency degree 1: Anti-Efficiency <= Difference - Results (1,2,3…) = Anti-Efficient Knowledge
Anti-Efficiency degree 2: Anti-Efficiency <= - (Results (1,2,3…) - Difference) = Difference - Results (1,2,3…) = Anti-Efficient Knowledge.
Anti-Efficiency Degree 3: Anti-Efficiency = - (Difference - Results (1,2,3…) + Results (1,2,3…) - Difference) = 0 or -0
Anti-Efficiency Degree 4: Anti-Efficiency = - (0 + Results (1,2,3…) - Difference) = Difference - Results (1,2,3…) = Anti-Efficient Knowledge… And etc it keeps going.
DEGREE <= -1: Anti-Efficiency = Incoherence (?)
DEGREE 0: Anti-Efficiency = Art (?)
DEGREE 1: Anti-Efficiency = Difference - Results (1,2,3…) [= Anti-Efficient Knowledge]
DEGREE 2: Anti-Efficiency = Difference - Results (1,2,3…) [= Anti-Efficient Knowledge]
DEGREE 3: Anti-Efficiency = 0 or -0
DEGREE 4: Anti-Efficiency = Anti-Efficient Knowledge
DEGREE 5: Anti-Efficiency = 0 or -0
DEGREE 6: Anti-Efficiency = Anti-Efficient Knowledge
DEGREE 7: Anti-Efficiency = 0 or -0
DEGREE 8: Anti-Efficiency = Anti-Efficient Knowledge
DEGREE 9: Anti-Efficiency = 0 or -0
DEGREE 10: Anti-Efficiency = Anti-Efficient Knowledge
DEGREE 11: Anti-Efficiency = 0 or -0
DEGREE 12: Anti-Efficiency = Anti-Efficient Knowledge
…
ANTI-EFFICIENCY / ANTI-EFFICIENT FUNCTION SPECTRUM TREE
Anti-Efficiency: Anti-Efficiency degree 1: Anti-Efficiency <= Difference (1,2,3…) - Results = Anti-Efficient Function Spectrum
Anti-Efficiency degree 2: Anti-Efficiency <= - (Results - Difference (1,2,3…)) = Difference (1,2,3…) - Results) = Anti-Efficient Function Spectrum.
Anti-Efficiency Degree 3: Anti-Efficiency = - (Difference (1,2,3…) - Results + Results - Difference (1,2,3…)) = 0 or -0
Anti-Efficiency Degree 4: Anti-Efficiency = - (0 + Results - Difference (1,2,3…)) = Difference (1,2,3…) - Results = Anti-Efficient Function Spectrum… And etc it keeps going.
DEGREE <= -1: Anti-Efficiency = Incoherence (?)
DEGREE 0: Anti-Efficiency = Art (?)
DEGREE 1: Anti-Efficiency = Difference (1,2,3…) - Results [= Anti-Efficient Function Spectrum]
DEGREE 2: Anti-Efficiency = Difference (1,2,3…) - Results [= Anti-Efficient Function Spectrum]
DEGREE 3: Anti-Efficiency = 0 or -0
DEGREE 4: Anti-Efficiency = Anti-Efficient Function Spectrum
DEGREE 5: Anti-Efficiency = 0 or -0
DEGREE 6: Anti-Efficiency = Anti-Efficient Function Spectrum
DEGREE 7: Anti-Efficiency = 0 or -0
DEGREE 8: Anti-Efficiency = Anti-Efficient Function Spectrum
DEGREE 9: Anti-Efficiency = 0 or -0
DEGREE 10: Anti-Efficiency = Anti-Efficient Function Spectrum
DEGREE 11: Anti-Efficiency = 0 or -0
DEGREE 12: Anti-Efficiency = Anti-Efficient Function Spectrum
…
…
…
DIFFERENCE / DIFFERENT FUNCTION SPECTRUM TREE
(This is a means of reaching a string of different formulas. However, it ultimately results in a repetition).
This is a similar method to applying the TOE to reach the disintegral. In this case, Apply the Anti-Difference (addition) and negate. Apply the Anti-Difference and negate (a formula for making a difference theory more different)…
Difference: Difference degree 1: Difference (1,2,3…) >= Results – Efficiency = Difference Theory
Difference degree 2: Difference (1,2,3…) = - (Efficiency - Results) = Results - Efficiency = Difference Theory (1,2,3…).
Difference Degree 3: Difference (1,2,3…) = - (Results - Efficiency + Efficiency - Results) = 0 or -0
Difference Degree 4: Difference (1,2,3…) = - (0 + Efficiency - Results) = Results - Efficiency = Difference Theory (1,2,3…) … And etc it keeps going.
DEGREE <= -1: Difference (1,2,3…) = Incoherence (?)
DEGREE 0: Difference (1,2,3…) = Art (?)
DEGREE 1: Difference (1,2,3…) = Results – Efficiency [= Difference Theory]
DEGREE 2: Difference (1,2,3…) = Results – Efficiency [= Difference Theory]
DEGREE 3: Difference (1,2,3…) = 0 or -0
DEGREE 4: Difference (1,2,3…) = Difference Theory
DEGREE 5: Difference (1,2,3…) = 0 or -0
DEGREE 6: Difference (1,2,3…) = Difference Theory
DEGREE 7: Difference (1,2,3…) = 0 or -0
DEGREE 8: Difference (1,2,3…) = Difference Theory
DEGREE 9: Difference (1,2,3…) = 0 or -0
DEGREE 10: Difference (1,2,3…) = Difference Theory
DEGREE 11: Difference (1,2,3…) = 0 or -0
DEGREE 12: Difference (1,2,3…) = Difference Theory
…
DIFFERENCE / DIFFERENT TOE TREE
Difference: Difference degree 1: Difference >= Results (1,2,3…) – Efficiency = Different Knowledge
Difference degree 2: Difference = - (Efficiency - Results (1,2,3…)) = Results (1,2,3…) - Efficiency = Different Knowledge.
Difference Degree 3: Difference = - (Results (1,2,3…) - Efficiency + Efficiency - Results (1,2,3…)) = 0 or -0
Difference Degree 4: Difference = - (0 + Efficiency - Results (1,2,3…)) = Results (1,2,3…) - Efficiency = Different Knowledge … And etc it keeps going.
DEGREE <= -1: Difference = Incoherence (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 0: Difference = Art (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 1: Difference = Results (1,2,3…) – Efficiency [= Different Knowledge]
DEGREE 2: Difference = Results (1,2,3…) - Efficiency [= Different Knowledge]
DEGREE 3: 0 or -0
DEGREE 4: Difference = Different Knowledge
DEGREE 5: 0 or -0
DEGREE 6: Difference = Different Knowledge
DEGREE 7: 0 or -0
DEGREE 8: Difference = Different Knowledge
DEGREE 9: 0 or -0
DEGREE 10: Difference = Different Knowledge
DEGREE 11: 0 or -0
DEGREE 12: Difference = Different Knowledge
…
DIFFERENCE / DIFFERENT PERPETUAL MOTION TREE
Difference: Difference degree 1: Difference >= Results – Efficiency (1,2,3…) = Different Perpetual Motion
Difference degree 2: Difference = - (Efficiency (1,2,3…) - Results) = Results - Efficiency (1,2,3…) = Different Perpetual Motion.
Difference Degree 3: Difference = - (Results - Efficiency (1,2,3…) + Efficiency (1,2,3…) - Results) = 0 or -0
Difference Degree 4: Difference = - (0 + Efficiency (1,2,3…) - Results) = Results - Efficiency (1,2,3…) = Different Perpetual Motion… And etc it keeps going.
DEGREE <= -1: Difference = Incoherence (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 0: Difference = Art (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 1: Difference = Results – Efficiency (1,2,3…) [= Different Perpetual Motion]
DEGREE 2: Difference = Results – Efficiency (1,2,3…) [= Different Perpetual Motion]
DEGREE 3: Difference = 0 or -0
DEGREE 4: Difference = Different Perpetual Motion
DEGREE 5: Difference = 0 or -0
DEGREE 6: Difference = Different Perpetual Motion
DEGREE 7: Difference = 0 or -0
DEGREE 8: Difference = Different Perpetual Motion
DEGREE 9: Difference = 0 or -0
DEGREE 10: Difference = Different Perpetual Motion
DEGREE 11: Difference = 0 or -0
DEGREE 12: Difference = Different Perpetual Motion
…
…
…
ANTI-DIFFERENCE / ANTI-DIFFERENCE TREE
(This is a means of reaching a string of anti-difference formulas. However, it ultimately results in a repetition).
This is a similar method to applying the TOE to reach the disintegral. In this case, Apply Difference (addition) and negate. Apply the Difference and negate (a formula for making an anti-difference theory less different)…
Anti-Difference: Anti-Difference degree 1: Anti-Difference (1,2,3…) <= Efficiency - Results = Anti-Difference
Anti-Difference degree 2: Anti-Difference (1,2,3…) <= - (Results – Efficiency) = Efficiency - Results = Anti-Difference (1,2,3…).
Anti-Difference Degree 3: Anti-Difference (1,2,3…) = - (Efficiency - Results + Results – Efficiency) = 0 or -0
Anti-Difference Degree 4: Anti-Difference (1,2,3…) = - (0 + Results – Efficiency) = Efficiency - Results = Anti-Difference … And etc it keeps going.
DEGREE <= -1: Anti-Difference (1,2,3…) = Incoherence (?)
DEGREE 0: Anti-Difference (1,2,3…) = Art (?)
DEGREE 1: Anti-Difference (1,2,3…) = Efficiency - Results [= Anti-Difference]
DEGREE 2: Anti-Difference (1,2,3…) = Efficiency - Results [= Anti-Difference]
DEGREE 3: Anti-Difference (1,2,3…) = 0 or -0
DEGREE 4: Anti-Difference (1,2,3…) = Anti-Difference
DEGREE 5: Anti-Difference (1,2,3…) = 0 or -0
DEGREE 6: Anti-Difference (1,2,3…) = Anti-Difference
DEGREE 7: Anti-Difference (1,2,3…) = 0 or -0
DEGREE 8: Anti-Difference (1,2,3…) = Anti-Difference
DEGREE 9: Anti-Difference (1,2,3…) = 0 or -0
DEGREE 10: Anti-Difference (1,2,3…) = Anti-Difference
DEGREE 11: Anti-Difference (1,2,3…) = 0 or -0
DEGREE 12: Anti-Difference (1,2,3…) = Anti-Difference
…
ANTI-DIFFERENCE / ANTI-DIFFERENT TOE TREE
Anti-Difference: Anti-Difference degree 1: Anti-Difference <= Efficiency - Results (1,2,3…) = Anti-Different TOE
Anti-Difference degree 2: Anti-Difference <= - (Results (1,2,3…) – Efficiency) = Efficiency - Results (1,2,3…) = Anti-Different TOE.
Anti-Difference Degree 3: Anti-Difference = - (Efficiency - Results (1,2,3…) + Results (1,2,3…) – Efficiency) = 0 or -0
Anti-Difference Degree 4: Anti-Difference (1,2,3…) = - (0 + Results – Efficiency) = Efficiency - Results = Anti-Different TOE … And etc it keeps going.
DEGREE 0: Anti-Difference = Art (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 1: Anti-Difference = Efficiency - Results (1,2,3…) [= Anti-Different TOE]
DEGREE 2: Anti-Difference = Efficiency - Results (1,2,3…) [= Anti-Different TOE]
DEGREE 3: Anti-Difference = 0 or -0
DEGREE 4: Anti-Difference = Anti-Different TOE
DEGREE 5: Anti-Difference = 0 or -0
DEGREE 6: Anti-Difference = Anti-Different TOE
DEGREE 7: Anti-Difference = 0 or -0
DEGREE 8: Anti-Difference = Anti-Different TOE
DEGREE 9: Anti-Difference = 0 or -0
DEGREE 10: Anti-Difference = Anti-Different TOE
DEGREE 11: Anti-Difference = 0 or -0
DEGREE 12: Anti-Difference = Anti-Different TOE
…
ANTI-DIFFERENCE / ANTI-DIFFERENT PERPETUAL MOTION TREE
Anti-Difference: Anti-Difference degree 1: Anti-Difference <= Efficiency (1,2,3…) - Results = Anti-Different Efficiencies
Anti-Difference degree 2: Anti-Difference <= - (Results – Efficiency (1,2,3…)) = Efficiency (1,2,3…) - Results = Anti-Different Efficiencies.
Anti-Difference Degree 3: Anti-Difference = - (Efficiency (1,2,3…) - Results + Results – Efficiency (1,2,3…)) = 0 or -0
Anti-Difference Degree 4: Anti-Difference = - (0 + Results – Efficiency (1,2,3…)) = Efficiency (1,2,3…) - Results = Anti-Different Efficiencies … And etc it keeps going.
DEGREE <= -1: Anti-Difference = Incoherence (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 0: Anti-Difference = Art (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 1: Anti-Difference = Efficiency (1,2,3…) - Results [= Anti-Different Efficiencies]
DEGREE 2: Anti-Difference = Efficiency (1,2,3…) - Results [= Anti-Different Efficiencies]
DEGREE 3: Anti-Difference = 0 or -0
DEGREE 4: Anti-Difference = Anti-Different Efficiencies
DEGREE 5: Anti-Difference = 0 or -0
DEGREE 6: Anti-Difference = Anti-Different Efficiencies
DEGREE 7: Anti-Difference = 0 or -0
DEGREE 8: Anti-Difference = Anti-Different Efficiencies
DEGREE 9: Anti-Difference = 0 or -0
DEGREE 10: Anti-Difference = Anti-Different Efficiencies
DEGREE 11: Anti-Difference = 0 or -0
DEGREE 12: Anti-Difference = Anti-Different Efficiencies
…
…
…
FORCES / FORCES TREE
(This is a means of reaching a string of unified forces. However, it ultimately results in a repetition).
This is the same method that was applied to the TOE to reach the disintegral, one of the only things more coherent than the TOE. Apply the Antiforce and negate. Apply the Antiforce and negate (a formula for generating a string of unified forces)…
Forces: # Forces (1,2,3…) = # Dimensions - # Antiforces = Force Theory
Forces degree 2: Forces (1,2,3…) = - (# Dimensions - # Forces (1,2,3…)) = # Negative Antiforces (correct).
Forces Degree 3: Forces (1,2,3…) = - (# Forces (1,2,3…) - # Dimensions + # Dimensions - # Forces (1,2,3…)) = 0 or -0
Forces Degree 4: - (0 + # Dimensions - # Forces (1,2,3…)) = # Negative Antiforces… And etc it keeps going.
DEGREE <= -1: Forces (1,2,3…) = Incoherence (?)
DEGREE 0: Forces (1,2,3…) = Art (?)
DEGREE 1: Forces (1,2,3…) = # Dimensions - # Antiforces [= Force Theory]
DEGREE 2: Forces (1,2,3…) = - (# Dimensions - # Forces (1,2,3…)) [= # Negative Antiforces]
DEGREE 3: Forces (1,2,3…) = 0 or -0
DEGREE 4: Forces (1,2,3…) = Negative Antiforces
DEGREE 5: Forces (1,2,3…) = 0 or -0
DEGREE 6: Forces (1,2,3…) = Negative Antiforces
DEGREE 7: Forces (1,2,3…) = 0 or -0
DEGREE 8: Forces (1,2,3…) = Negative Antiforces
DEGREE 9: Forces (1,2,3…) = 0 or -0
DEGREE 10: Forces (1,2,3…) = Negative Antiforces
DEGREE 11: Forces (1,2,3…) = 0 or -0
DEGREE 12: Forces (1,2,3…) = Negative Antiforces
…
FORCES / FORCES DIMENSIONS TREE
Forces: # Forces = # Dimensions (1,2,3…) - # Antiforces = Force Dimensions
Forces degree 2: Forces = - (# Dimensions (1,2,3…) - # Forces) = # Negative Antiforces (correct).
Forces Degree 3: Forces = - (# Forces - # Dimensions (1,2,3…) + # Dimensions - # Forces) = 0 or -0
Forces Degree 4: - (0 + # Dimensions (1,2,3…) - # Forces) = # Negative Antiforces… And etc it keeps going.
DEGREE <= -1: Forces = Incoherence (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 0: Forces = Art (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 1: # Forces = # Dimensions (1,2,3…) - # Antiforces [= Force Dimensions]
DEGREE 2: - (# Dimensions (1,2,3…) - # Forces) [= # Negative Antiforces]
DEGREE 3: Forces = 0 or -0
DEGREE 4: Forces = Negative Antiforces
DEGREE 5: Forces = 0 or -0
DEGREE 6: Forces = Negative Antiforces
DEGREE 7: Forces = 0 or -0
DEGREE 8: Forces = Negative Antiforces
DEGREE 9: Forces = 0 or -0
DEGREE 10: Forces = Negative Antiforces
DEGREE 11: Forces = 0 or -0
DEGREE 12: Forces = Negative Antiforces
…
FORCES / FORCES OF ANTIFORCE TREE
Forces: # Forces = # Dimensions - # Antiforces (1,2,3…) = Force of Antiforce Theory
Forces degree 2: Forces = - (# Dimensions - # Forces) = # Negative Antiforces (1,2,3…) (correct).
Forces Degree 3: Forces = - (# Forces - # Dimensions + # Dimensions - # Forces) = 0 or -0
Forces Degree 4: - (0 + # Dimensions - # Forces) = # Negative Antiforces (1,2,3…) … And etc it keeps going.
DEGREE <= -1: Forces = Incoherence (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 0: Forces = Art (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 1: # Forces = # Dimensions - # Antiforces (1,2,3…) [= Force of Antiforce Theory]
DEGREE 2: Forces = - (# Dimensions - # Forces) = # Negative Antiforces (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 3: Forces = 0 or -0
DEGREE 4: Forces = Negative Antiforces
DEGREE 5: Forces = 0 or -0
DEGREE 6: Forces = Negative Antiforces
DEGREE 7: Forces = 0 or -0
DEGREE 8: Forces = Negative Antiforces
DEGREE 9: Forces = 0 or -0
DEGREE 10: Forces = Negative Antiforces
DEGREE 11: Forces = 0 or -0
DEGREE 12: Forces = Negative Antiforces
…
…
…
ANTIFORCES / ANTIFORCE THEOREM TREE
Antiforces: # Antiforces (1,2,3…) = # Dimensions - # Forces = Antiforce Theory
Antiforces degree 2: Antiforces = - (# Dimensions - #Antiforces (1,2,3…)) = # Negative Forces (correct).
Antiforces Degree 3: Antiforces = - (#Antiforces - # Dimensions + # Dimensions - # Antiforces) = 0 or -0
Antiforces Degree 4: - (0 + # Dimensions - # Antiforces) = # Negative Forces (1,2,3…) … And etc it keeps going.
DEGREE <= -1: Antiforces (1,2,3…) = Incoherence
DEGREE 0: Antiforces (1,2,3…) = Art
DEGREE 1: Antiforces (1,2,3…) = # Dimensions - # Forces [= Antiforce Theory]
DEGREE 2: Antiforces = - (# Dimensions - #Antiforces (1,2,3…)) = # Negative Forces
DEGREE 3: Antiforces = 0 or -0
DEGREE 4: Antiforces = Negative Forces
DEGREE 5: Antiforces = 0 or -0
DEGREE 6: Antiforces = Negative Forces
DEGREE 7: Antiforces = 0 or -0
DEGREE 8: Antiforces = Negative Forces
DEGREE 9: Antiforces = 0 or -0
DEGREE 10: Antiforces = Negative Forces
DEGREE 11: Antiforces = 0 or -0
DEGREE 12: Antiforces = Negative Forces
…
ANTIFORCES / ANTIFORCE DIMENSIONS TREE
Antiforces: # Antiforces = # Dimensions (1,2,3…) - # Forces = Antiforce Dimensions
Antiforces degree 2: Antiforces = - (# Dimensions (1,2,3…) - #Antiforces) = # Negative Forces (correct).
Antiforces Degree 3: Antiforces = - (#Antiforces - # Dimensions (1,2,3…) + # Dimensions (1,2,3…) - # Antiforces) = 0 or -0
Antiforces Degree 4: - (0 + # Dimensions (1,2,3…) - # Antiforces) = # Negative Forces … And etc it keeps going.
DEGREE <= -1: Antiforces = Incoherence (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 0: Antiforces = Art (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 1: Antiforces = # Dimensions (1,2,3…) - # Forces [= Dimensions of Antiforces]
DEGREE 2: Antiforces = - (# Dimensions (1,2,3…) - #Antiforces) = # Negative Forces
DEGREE 3: Antiforces = 0 or -0
DEGREE 4: Antiforces = Negative Forces
DEGREE 5: Antiforces = 0 or -0
DEGREE 6: Antiforces = Negative Forces
DEGREE 7: Antiforces = 0 or -0
DEGREE 8: Antiforces = Negative Forces
DEGREE 9: Antiforces = 0 or -0
DEGREE 10: Antiforces = Negative Forces
DEGREE 11: Antiforces = 0 or -0
DEGREE 12: Antiforces = Negative Forces
…
ANTIFORCES / ANTIFORCES OF FORCE TREE
Antiforces: # Antiforces = # Dimensions - # Forces (1,2,3…) = Antiforces of Force
Antiforces degree 2: Antiforces = - (# Dimensions - #Antiforces) = # Negative Forces (1,2,3…) (correct).
Antiforces Degree 3: Antiforces = - (#Antiforces - # Dimensions + # Dimensions - # Antiforces) = 0 or -0
Antiforces Degree 4: - (0 + # Dimensions - # Antiforces) = # Negative Forces (1,2,3…) … And etc it keeps going.
DEGREE <= -1: Antiforces = Incoherence (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 0: Antiforces = Art (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 1: Antiforces = # Dimensions - # Forces (1,2,3…) [= Antiforces of Force]
DEGREE 2: Antiforces = - (# Dimensions - #Antiforces) = # Negative Forces (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 3: Antiforces = 0 or -0
DEGREE 4: Antiforces = Negative Forces
DEGREE 5: Antiforces = 0 or -0
DEGREE 6: Antiforces = Negative Forces
DEGREE 7: Antiforces = 0 or -0
DEGREE 8: Antiforces = Negative Forces
DEGREE 9: Antiforces = 0 or -0
DEGREE 10: Antiforces = Negative Forces
DEGREE 11: Antiforces = 0 or -0
DEGREE 12: Antiforces = Negative Forces
…
…
…
DIMENSIONS / DIMENSIONS TREE
Dimensions: # Dimensions (1,2,3…) = # Forces + # Antiforces = # Dimensions
Dimensions degree 2: Dimensions (1,2,3…) = - (#Antiforces - # Forces) = Negative Anti-Dimensions (1,2,3…) (correct).
Dimensions Degree 3: Antiforces = - (# Forces - # Antiforces + # Antiforces - # Forces) = 0 or -0
Dimensions Degree 4: - (0 + - #Antiforces - # Forces) = Negative Anti-Dimensions (1,2,3…) … And etc it keeps going.
DEGREE <= -1: Dimensions (1,2,3…) = Incoherence
DEGREE 0: Dimensions (1,2,3…) = Art
DEGREE 1: Dimensions (1,2,3…) = # Forces + # Antiforces [= # Dimensions (1,2,3…)]
DEGREE 2: Dimensions = - (#Antiforces - # Forces) = Negative Anti-Dimensions (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 3: Dimensions = 0 or -0
DEGREE 4: Dimensions = Negative Anti-Dimensions
DEGREE 5: Dimensions = 0 or -0
DEGREE 6: Dimensions = Negative Anti-Dimensions
DEGREE 7: Dimensions = 0 or -0
DEGREE 8: Dimensions = Negative Anti-Dimensions
DEGREE 9: Dimensions = 0 or -0
DEGREE 10: Dimensions = Negative Anti-Dimensions
DEGREE 11: Dimensions = 0 or -0
DEGREE 12: Dimensions = Negative Anti-Dimensions
…
DIMENSIONS / # OF DIMENSIONS OF FORCE TREE
Dimensions: # Dimensions = # Forces (1,2,3…) + # Antiforces = # Dimensions of Force
Dimensions degree 2: Dimensions = - (#Antiforces - # Forces (1,2,3…)) = Negative Anti-Dimensions of Force (1,2,3…) (correct).
Dimensions Degree 3: Antiforces = - (# Forces (1,2,3…) - # Antiforces + # Antiforces - # Forces (1,2,3…)) = 0 or -0
Dimensions Degree 4: - (0 + - #Antiforces - # Forces (1,2,3…)) = Negative Anti-Dimensions (1,2,3…) … And etc it keeps going.
DEGREE <= -1: Dimensions = Incoherence (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 0: Dimensions = Art (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 1: Dimensions = # Forces (1,2,3…) + # Antiforces [= # Force Dimensions]
DEGREE 2: Dimensions = - (#Antiforces - # Forces (1,2,3…)) [= Negative Anti-Dimensions of Force]
DEGREE 3: Dimensions = 0 or -0
DEGREE 4: Dimensions = Negative Anti-Dimensions of Force
DEGREE 5: Dimensions = 0 or -0
DEGREE 6: Dimensions = Negative Anti-Dimensions of Force
DEGREE 7: Dimensions = 0 or -0
DEGREE 8: Dimensions = Negative Anti-Dimensions of Force
DEGREE 9: Dimensions = 0 or -0
DEGREE 10: Dimensions = Negative Anti-Dimensions of Force
DEGREE 11: Dimensions = 0 or -0
DEGREE 12: Dimensions = Negative Anti-Dimensions of Force
…
DIMENSIONS / # OF DIMENSIONS OF ANTIFORCE TREE
Dimensions: # Dimensions = # Forces + # Antiforces (1,2,3…) = # Dimensions of Antiforce
Dimensions degree 2: Dimensions = - (#Antiforces (1,2,3…) - # Forces) = Negative Anti-Dimensions of Antiforce (1,2,3…) (correct).
Dimensions Degree 3: Antiforces (1,2,3…) = - (# Forces - # Antiforces (1,2,3…) + # Antiforces (1,2,3…) - # Forces) = 0 or -0
Dimensions Degree 4: - (0 + - #Antiforces (1,2,3…) - # Forces) = Negative Anti-Dimensions … And etc it keeps going.
DEGREE <= -1: Dimensions = Incoherence (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 0: Dimensions = Art (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 1: Dimensions = # Forces + # Antiforces (1,2,3…) [= # Antiforce Dimensions]
DEGREE 2: Dimensions = - (#Antiforces (1,2,3…) - # Forces) [= Negative Anti-Dimensions of Antiforce]
DEGREE 3: Dimensions = 0 or -0
DEGREE 4: Dimensions = Negative Anti-Dimensions of Antiforce
DEGREE 5: Dimensions = 0 or -0
DEGREE 6: Dimensions = Negative Anti-Dimensions of Antiforce
DEGREE 7: Dimensions = 0 or -0
DEGREE 8: Dimensions = Negative Anti-Dimensions of Antiforce
DEGREE 9: Dimensions = 0 or -0
DEGREE 10: Dimensions = Negative Anti-Dimensions of Antiforce
DEGREE 11: Dimensions = 0 or -0
DEGREE 12: Dimensions = Negative Anti-Dimensions of Antiforce
…
…
…
ANTI-DIMENSIONS / ANTI-DIMENSIONS TREE
Anti-Dimensions: # Anti-Dimensions (1,2,3…) = # Antiforces - # Forces = # Anti-Dimensions
Anti-Dimensions degree 2: Anti-Dimensions (1,2,3…) = - (# Forces + # Anti-Forces) = Negative Dimensions (correct).
Anti-Dimensions Degree 3: Anti-Dimensions (1,2,3…) = - (- # Anti-Forces - # Forces + # Forces + # Anti-Forces) = 0 or - 0
Anti-Dimensions Degree 4: - (0 + # Forces + # Antiforces) = Negative Dimensions … And etc it keeps going.
DEGREE <= -1: Anti-Dimensions (1,2,3…) = Incoherence
DEGREE 0: Anti-Dimensions (1,2,3…) = Art
DEGREE 1: Anti-Dimensions (1,2,3…) = # Antiforces - # Forces [= # Anti-Dimensions]
DEGREE 2: Anti-Dimensions (1,2,3…) = - (# Forces + # Anti-Forces) = Negative Dimensions
DEGREE 3: Anti-Dimensions (1,2,3…) = 0 or -0
DEGREE 4: Anti-Dimensions (1,2,3…) = Negative Dimensions
DEGREE 5: Anti-Dimensions (1,2,3…) = 0 or -0
DEGREE 6: Anti-Dimensions (1,2,3…) = Negative Dimensions
DEGREE 7: Anti-Dimensions (1,2,3…) = 0 or -0
DEGREE 8: Anti-Dimensions (1,2,3…) = Negative Dimensions
DEGREE 9: Anti-Dimensions (1,2,3…) = 0 or -0
DEGREE 10: Anti-Dimensions (1,2,3…) = Negative Dimensions
DEGREE 11: Anti-Dimensions (1,2,3…) = 0 or -0
DEGREE 12: Anti-Dimensions (1,2,3…) = Negative Dimensions
…
ANTI-DIMENSIONS / ANTI-DIMENSIONS OF ANTIFORCE TREE
Anti-Dimensions: # Anti-Dimensions = # Antiforces (1,2,3…) - # Forces = # Anti-Dimensions of Antiforce
Anti-Dimensions degree 2: Anti-Dimensions = - (# Forces + # Antiforces (1,2,3…)) = Negative Dimensions of Antiforce.
Anti-Dimensions Degree 3: Anti-Dimensions = - (- # Antiforces (1,2,3…) - # Forces + # Forces + # Antiforces (1,2,3…)) = 0 or - 0
Anti-Dimensions Degree 4: - (0 + # Forces + # Antiforces (1,2,3…)) = Negative Dimensions of Antiforce … And etc it keeps going.
DEGREE <= -1: Anti-Dimensions = Incoherence
DEGREE 0: Anti-Dimensions = Art
DEGREE 1: Anti-Dimensions = # Antiforces (1,2,3…) - # Forces [= # Anti-Dimensions of Antiforce]
DEGREE 2: Anti-Dimensions = - (# Forces + # Anti-Forces (1,2,3…)) = Negative Dimensions of Antiforce
DEGREE 3: Anti-Dimensions = 0 or -0
DEGREE 4: Anti-Dimensions = Negative Dimensions of Antiforce
DEGREE 5: Anti-Dimensions = 0 or -0
DEGREE 6: Anti-Dimensions = Negative Dimensions of Antiforce
DEGREE 7: Anti-Dimensions = 0 or -0
DEGREE 8: Anti-Dimensions = Negative Dimensions of Antiforce
DEGREE 9: Anti-Dimensions = 0 or -0
DEGREE 10: Anti-Dimensions = Negative Dimensions of Antiforce
DEGREE 11: Anti-Dimensions = 0 or -0
DEGREE 12: Anti-Dimensions = Negative Dimensions of Antiforce
…
ANTI-DIMENSIONS / ANTI-DIMENSIONS OF FORCE TREE
Anti-Dimensions: # Anti-Dimensions of Force = # Antiforces - # Forces (1,2,3…) = # Anti-Dimensions of Force
Anti-Dimensions degree 2: Anti-Dimensions = - (# Forces (1,2,3…) + # Antiforces) = Negative Dimensions of Force (correct).
Anti-Dimensions Degree 3: Anti-Dimensions = - (- # Antiforces - # Forces (1,2,3…) + # Forces (1,2,3…) + # Antiforces) = 0 or - 0
Anti-Dimensions Degree 4: - (0 + # Forces (1,2,3…) + # Antiforces) = Negative Dimensions of Force … And etc it keeps going.
DEGREE <= -1: Anti-Dimensions = Incoherence
DEGREE 0: Anti-Dimensions = Art
DEGREE 1: Anti-Dimensions = # Antiforces - # Forces (1,2,3…) [= # Anti-Dimensions of Force]
DEGREE 2: Anti-Dimensions = - (# Forces (1,2,3…) + # Antiforces) = Negative Dimensions of Force
DEGREE 3: Anti-Dimensions = 0 or -0
DEGREE 4: Anti-Dimensions = Negative Dimensions of Force
DEGREE 5: Anti-Dimensions = 0 or -0
DEGREE 6: Anti-Dimensions = Negative Dimensions of Force
DEGREE 7: Anti-Dimensions = 0 or -0
DEGREE 8: Anti-Dimensions = Negative Dimensions of Force
DEGREE 9: Anti-Dimensions = 0 or -0
DEGREE 10: Anti-Dimensions = Negative Dimensions of Force
DEGREE 11: Anti-Dimensions = 0 or -0
DEGREE 12: Anti-Dimensions = Negative Dimensions of Force
…
…
…
DISINTEGRAL KNOWLEDGE TREE: WAR EQUATION
Disintegral (1,2,3…) = Efficiency - Difference = War Equation (1,2,3…)
Disintegral: Disintegral Knowledge (1,2,3…) = Efficiency - Difference = War Equation (1,2,3…)
Disintegral degree 2: Disintegral Knowledge (1,2,3…) = - (Difference - Efficiency) = Efficiency - Difference = War Equation (1,2,3…)
Disintegral Degree 3: Disintegral Knowledge (1,2,3…) = - (Efficiency - Difference) = Difference - Efficiency = Anti-Theory (1,2,3…)
Disintegral Degree 4: - (Difference - Efficiency) = War Equation (1,2,3…)
Disintegral Degree 5: - (Efficiency - Difference) = Anti-Theory (1,2,3…) … And etc it keeps going.
DEGREE <= -1: Disintegral = Incoherence
DEGREE 0: Disintegral = Art
DEGREE 1: Disintegral (1,2,3…) = Efficiency - Difference [= War Equation (1,2,3…)]
DEGREE 2: Disintegral = - (Difference - Efficiency) = War Equation (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 3: Disintegral = Difference - Efficiency [= Anti-Theory (1,2,3…)]
DEGREE 4: Disintegral = War Equation
DEGREE 5: Disintegral = Anti-Theory
DEGREE 6: Disintegral = War Equation
DEGREE 7: Disintegral = Anti-Theory
DEGREE 8: Disintegral = War Equation
DEGREE 9: Disintegral = Anti-Theory
DEGREE 10: Disintegral = War Equation
DEGREE 11: Disintegral = Anti-Theory
DEGREE 12: Disintegral = War Equation
…
DISINTEGRAL EFFICIENCY TREE: EFFICIENCY SPECTRUM
Disintegral = Efficiency (1,2,3…) - Difference = Efficiency Spectrum
Disintegral: Efficiency Spectrum = Efficiency (1,2,3…) - Difference = Efficiency Spectrum
Disintegral degree 2: Efficiency Spectrum = - (Difference - Efficiency (1,2,3…)) = Efficiency (1,2,3…) - Difference = Efficiency Spectrum
Disintegral Degree 3: Efficiency Spectrum = - (Efficiency (1,2,3…) - Difference) = Difference - Efficiency (1,2,3…) = Anti-Theory
Disintegral Degree 4: - (Difference - Efficiency (1,2,3…)) = Efficiency Spectrum
Disintegral Degree 5: - (Efficiency (1,2,3…) - Difference) = Anti-Theory… And etc it keeps going.
DEGREE <= -1: Disintegral = Incoherence
DEGREE 0: Disintegral = Art
DEGREE 1: Disintegral = Efficiency (1,2,3…) - Difference [= Efficiency Spectrum]
DEGREE 2: Disintegral = - (Difference - Efficiency (1,2,3…)) = Efficiency Spectrum
DEGREE 3: Disintegral = Difference - Efficiency (1,2,3…) [= Anti-Theory]
DEGREE 4: Disintegral = Efficiency Spectrum.
DEGREE 5: Disintegral = Anti-Theory
DEGREE 6: Disintegral = Efficiency Spectrum
DEGREE 7: Disintegral = Anti-Theory
DEGREE 8: Disintegral = Efficiency Spectrum
DEGREE 9: Disintegral = Anti-Theory
DEGREE 10: Disintegral = Efficiency Spectrum
DEGREE 11: Disintegral = Anti-Theory
DEGREE 12: Disintegral = Efficiency Spectrum
…
DISINTEGRAL DIFFERENCE TREE: GENERAL AND SPECIAL TRANSLATION
Disintegral = Efficiency - Difference (1,2,3…) = General and Special Translation
Disintegral: Disintegral = Efficiency - Difference (1,2,3…) = General and Special Translation
Disintegral degree 2: Disintegral = - (Difference (1,2,3…) - Efficiency) = Efficiency - Difference (1,2,3…) = General and Special Translation
Disintegral Degree 3: Disintegral = - (Efficiency - Difference (1,2,3…)) = Difference (1,2,3…) - Efficiency = Anti-Theory
Disintegral Degree 4: - (Difference (1,2,3…) - Efficiency) = General and Special Translation
Disintegral Degree 5: - (Efficiency - Difference (1,2,3…)) = Anti-Theory… And etc it keeps going.
DEGREE <= -1: Disintegral = Incoherence
DEGREE 0: Disintegral = Art
DEGREE 1: Disintegral = Efficiency - Difference (1,2,3…) [= General and Special Translation]
DEGREE 2: Disintegral = - (Difference - Efficiency (1,2,3…)) = General and Special Translation
DEGREE 3: Disintegral = Difference - Efficiency (1,2,3…) [= Anti-Theory]
DEGREE 4: Disintegral = General and Special Translation.
DEGREE 5: Disintegral = Anti-Theory
DEGREE 6: Disintegral = General and Special Translation
DEGREE 7: Disintegral = Anti-Theory
DEGREE 8: Disintegral = General and Special Translation
DEGREE 9: Disintegral = Anti-Theory
DEGREE 10: Disintegral = General and Special Translation
DEGREE 11: Disintegral = Anti-Theory
DEGREE 12: Disintegral = General and Special Translation
…
…
…
ANTI-DISINTEGRAL KNOWLEDGE TREE / SAME AS ANTI-THEORY RESULTS (ANTI-THEORY KNOWLEDGE) TREE
(This is a means of reaching a string of less coherent, less unified formulas. However, it ultimately results in a repetition of the Anti-Disintegral and zero, whatever zero means is unclear).
This is the same method that was applied to the TOE to reach the disintegral, one of the only things more coherent than the TOE. Apply the TOE and negate. Apply the TOE and negate (a formula for making an incoherent theory more incoherent)…
Anti-Theory: Anti-Disintegral degree 1: Results (1,2,3…) = Difference - Efficiency = Antitheory
Anti-Disintegral degree 2: Results (1,2,3…) = - (Efficiency + Difference) = Negative TOE (not sure if this means Superdisintegral)
Anti-Disintegral Degree 3: Results (1,2,3…) = - (-Efficiency + -Difference + Efficiency + Difference) = 0 or -0
Anti-Disintegral Degree 4: Results (1,2,3…) = -(0 + Efficiency + Difference) = Negative TOE
Anti-Disintegral Degree 5: - (-Efficiency + -Difference + Efficiency + Difference) = 0 or -0… And etc it keeps going.
DEGREE <= -1: Antidisintegral (1,2,3…) = Incoherence. (?)
DEGREE 0: Antidisintegral (1,2,3…) = Art. (?)
DEGREE 1: Antidisintegral (1,2,3…) = Difference - Efficiency [= Knowledge of the Antitheory]
DEGREE 2: Antidisintegral (1,2,3…) = - (Efficiency + Difference) = Negative TOE
DEGREE 3: Antidisintegral (1,2,3…) = - (-Efficiency + -Difference + Efficiency + Difference) [= 0 or -0]
DEGREE 4: Antidisintegral (1,2,3…) = - (Eff + Diff) [= Negative TOE]
DEGREE 5: Antidisintegral (1,2,3…) = 0 or -0
DEGREE 6: Antidisintegral (1,2,3…) = Negative TOE
DEGREE 7: Antidisintegral (1,2,3…) = 0 or -0
DEGREE 8: Antidisintegral (1,2,3…) = Negative TOE
DEGREE 9: Antidisintegral (1,2,3…) = 0 or -0
DEGREE 10: Antidisintegral (1,2,3…) = Negative TOE
DEGREE 11: Antidisintegral (1,2,3…) = 0 or -0
DEGREE 12: Antidisintegral (1,2,3…) = Negative TOE
…
ANTI-DISINTEGRAL DIFFERENCE TREE / ANTI-THEORY DIFFERENCE (ANTI-FUNCTION SPECTRUM) TREE
Anti-Theory: Anti-Disintegral degree 1: Results = Difference (1,2,3…) - Efficiency = Anti-Function Spectrum
Anti-Disintegral degree 2: Results = - (Efficiency + Difference (1,2,3…)) = Negative TOE (not sure if this means Superdisintegral)
Anti-Disintegral Degree 3: Results (1,2,3…) = - (-Efficiency + -Difference (1,2,3…) + Efficiency + Difference (1,2,3…)) = 0 or -0
Anti-Disintegral Degree 4: Results (1,2,3…) = -(0 + Efficiency + Difference (1,2,3…)) = Negative TOE
Anti-Disintegral Degree 5: - (-Efficiency + -Difference (1,2,3…) + Efficiency + Difference (1,2,3…)) = 0 or -0… And etc it keeps going.
DEGREE <= -1: Antidisintegral = Incoherence. (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 0: Antidisintegral = Art. (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 1: Antidisintegral = Difference (1,2,3…) - Efficiency [= Anti-Function Spectrum]
DEGREE 2: Antidisintegral = - (Efficiency + Difference (1,2,3…)) = Negative TOE
DEGREE 3: Antidisintegral = 0 or -0
DEGREE 4: Antidisintegral = Negative TOE
DEGREE 5: Antidisintegral = 0 or -0
DEGREE 6: Antidisintegral = Negative TOE
DEGREE 7: Antidisintegral = 0 or -0
DEGREE 8: Antidisintegral = Negative TOE
DEGREE 9: Antidisintegral = 0 or -0
DEGREE 10: Antidisintegral = Negative TOE
DEGREE 11: Antidisintegral = 0 or -0
DEGREE 12: Antidisintegral = Negative TOE
…
ANTI-DISINTEGRAL EFFICIENCY TREE / SAME AS ANTI-THEORY EFFICIENCY (ANTI-THEORY PERPETUAL MOTION) TREE
Anti-Theory: Anti-Disintegral Efficiency degree 1: Results = Difference - Efficiency (1,2,3…) = Perpetual Motion Antitheory
Anti-Disintegral Efficiency degree 2: Results = - (Efficiency (1,2,3…) + Difference) = Negative TOE (not sure if this means Superdisintegral)
Anti-Disintegral Efficiency Degree 3: Results = - (-Efficiency (1,2,3…) + -Difference + Efficiency (1,2,3…) + Difference) = 0 or -0
Anti-Disintegral Efficiency Degree 4: Results (1,2,3…) = -(0 + Efficiency (1,2,3…) + Difference) = Negative TOE
Anti-Disintegral Efficiency Degree 5: - (-Efficiency (1,2,3…) + -Difference + Efficiency (1,2,3…) + Difference) = 0 or -0… And etc it keeps going.
DEGREE <= -1: Antidisintegral = Incoherence (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 0: Antidisintegral = Art (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 1: Antidisintegral = Difference - Efficiency (1,2,3…) [= Perpetual Motion Antitheory]
DEGREE 2: Antidisintegral = - (Efficiency (1,2,3…) + Difference) [= Negative TOE]
DEGREE 3: Antidisintegral = 0 or -0
DEGREE 4: Antidisintegral = Negative TOE
DEGREE 5: Antidisintegral = 0 or -0
DEGREE 6: Antidisintegral = Negative TOE
DEGREE 7: Antidisintegral = 0 or -0
DEGREE 8: Antidisintegral = Negative TOE
DEGREE 9: Antidisintegral = 0 or -0
DEGREE 10: Antidisintegral = Negative TOE
DEGREE 11: Antidisintegral = 0 or -0
DEGREE 12: Antidisintegral = Negative TOE
…
…
…
SUPER-DISINTEGRAL KNOWLEDGE TREE: INFINITE WAR EQUATION
Super-Disintegral (1,2,3…) = Inf Efficiency - Inf Difference = Infinite War Equation (1,2,3…)
Super-Disintegral: Super-Disintegral Knowledge (1,2,3…) = Inf Efficiency - Inf Difference = Infinite War Equation (1,2,3…)
Super-Disintegral degree 2: Super-Disintegral Knowledge (1,2,3…) = - (Inf Difference - Inf Efficiency) = Inf Efficiency - Inf Difference = Infinite War Equation (1,2,3…)
Super-Disintegral Degree 3: Super-Disintegral Knowledge (1,2,3…) = - (Inf Efficiency - Inf Difference) = Inf Difference - Inf Efficiency = Infinite Anti-Theory (1,2,3…)
Super-Disintegral Degree 4: - (Inf Difference - Inf Efficiency) = Infinite War Equation (1,2,3…)
Super-Disintegral Degree 5: - (Inf Efficiency - Inf Difference) = Infinite Anti-Theory (1,2,3…) … And etc it keeps going.
DEGREE <= -1: Super-Disintegral = Incoherence
DEGREE 0: Super-Disintegral = Art
DEGREE 1: Super-Disintegral (1,2,3…) = Inf Efficiency - Inf Difference [= Infinite War Equation (1,2,3…)]
DEGREE 2: Super-Disintegral = - (Inf Difference - Inf Efficiency) = Infinite War Equation (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 3: Super-Disintegral = Inf Difference - Inf Efficiency [= Infinite Anti-Theory (1,2,3…)]
DEGREE 4: Super-Disintegral = Infinite War Equation
DEGREE 5: Super-Disintegral = Infinite Anti-Theory
DEGREE 6: Super-Disintegral = Infinite War Equation
DEGREE 7: Super-Disintegral = Infinite Anti-Theory
DEGREE 8: Super-Disintegral = Infinite War Equation
DEGREE 9: Super-Disintegral = Infinite Anti-Theory
DEGREE 10: Super-Disintegral = Infinite War Equation
DEGREE 11: Super-Disintegral = Infinite Anti-Theory
DEGREE 12: Super-Disintegral = Infinite War Equation
…
SUPER-DISINTEGRAL EFFICIENCY TREE: INFINITE EFFICIENCY SPECTRUM
Super-Disintegral = Inf Efficiency (1,2,3…) - Inf Difference = Infinite Efficiency Spectrum
Super-Disintegral: Infinite Efficiency Spectrum = Inf Efficiency (1,2,3…) - Inf Difference = Infinite Efficiency Spectrum
Super-Disintegral degree 2: Infinite Efficiency Spectrum = - (Inf Difference - Inf Efficiency (1,2,3…)) = Inf Efficiency (1,2,3…) - Inf Difference = Infinite Efficiency Spectrum
Super-Disintegral Degree 3: Infinite Efficiency Spectrum = - (Inf Efficiency (1,2,3…) - Inf Difference) = Inf Difference - Inf Efficiency (1,2,3…) = Infinite Anti-Theory
Super-Disintegral Degree 4: - (Inf Difference - Inf Efficiency (1,2,3…)) = Infinite Efficiency Spectrum
Super-Disintegral Degree 5: - (Inf Efficiency (1,2,3…) - Inf Difference) = Infinite Anti-Theory… And etc it keeps going.
DEGREE <= -1: Super-Disintegral = Incoherence
DEGREE 0: Super-Disintegral = Art
DEGREE 1: Super-Disintegral = Inf Efficiency (1,2,3…) - Inf Difference [= Infinite Efficiency Spectrum]
DEGREE 2: Super-Disintegral = - (Inf Difference - Inf Efficiency (1,2,3…)) = Infinite Efficiency Spectrum
DEGREE 3: Super-Disintegral = Inf Difference - Inf Efficiency (1,2,3…) [= Infinite Anti-Theory]
DEGREE 4: Super-Disintegral = Infinite Efficiency Spectrum.
DEGREE 5: Super-Disintegral = Infinite Anti-Theory
DEGREE 6: Super-Disintegral = Infinite Efficiency Spectrum
DEGREE 7: Super-Disintegral = Infinite Anti-Theory
DEGREE 8: Super-Disintegral = Infinite Efficiency Spectrum
DEGREE 9: Super-Disintegral = Infinite Anti-Theory
DEGREE 10: Super-Disintegral = Infinite Efficiency Spectrum
DEGREE 11: Super-Disintegral = Infinite Anti-Theory
DEGREE 12: Super-Disintegral = Infinite Efficiency Spectrum
…
SUPER-DISINTEGRAL DIFFERENCE TREE: INFINITE GENERAL AND SPECIAL TRANSLATION
Super-Disintegral = Inf Efficiency - Inf Difference (1,2,3…) = Infinite General and Special Translation
Super-Disintegral: Super-Disintegral = Inf Efficiency - Inf Difference (1,2,3…) = Infinite General and Special Translation
Super-Disintegral degree 2: Super-Disintegral = - (Inf Difference (1,2,3…) - Inf Efficiency) = Inf Efficiency - Inf Difference (1,2,3…) = Infinite General and Special Translation
Super-Disintegral Degree 3: Super-Disintegral = - (Inf Efficiency - Inf Difference (1,2,3…)) = Inf Difference (1,2,3…) - Inf Efficiency = Infinite Anti-Theory
Super-Disintegral Degree 4: - (Inf Difference (1,2,3…) - Inf Efficiency) = Infinite General and Special Translation
Super-Disintegral Degree 5: - (Inf Efficiency - Inf Difference (1,2,3…)) = Infinite Anti-Theory… And etc it keeps going.
DEGREE <= -1: Super-Disintegral = Incoherence
DEGREE 0: Super-Disintegral = Art
DEGREE 1: Super-Disintegral = Inf Efficiency - Inf Difference (1,2,3…) [= Infinite General and Special Translation]
DEGREE 2: Super-Disintegral = - (Inf Difference - Inf Efficiency (1,2,3…)) = Infinite General and Special Translation
DEGREE 3: Super-Disintegral = Inf Difference - Inf Efficiency (1,2,3…) [= Infinite Anti-Theory]
DEGREE 4: Super-Disintegral = Infinite General and Special Translation.
DEGREE 5: Super-Disintegral = Infinite Anti-Theory
DEGREE 6: Super-Disintegral = Infinite General and Special Translation
DEGREE 7: Super-Disintegral = Infinite Anti-Theory
DEGREE 8: Super-Disintegral = Infinite General and Special Translation
DEGREE 9: Super-Disintegral = Infinite Anti-Theory
DEGREE 10: Super-Disintegral = Infinite General and Special Translation
DEGREE 11: Super-Disintegral = Infinite Anti-Theory
DEGREE 12: Super-Disintegral = Infinite General and Special Translation
…
…
…
ANTI-SUPER-DISINTEGRAL KNOWLEDGE TREE / SAME AS INFINITE ANTI-THEORY RESULTS (INFINITE ANTI-KNOWLEDGE) TREE
(This is a means of reaching a string of less coherent, less unified formulas. However, it ultimately results in a repetition of the Anti-Disintegral and zero, whatever zero means is unclear).
This is the same method that was applied to the TOE to reach the disintegral, one of the only things more coherent than the TOE. Apply the TOE and negate. Apply the TOE and negate (a formula for making an incoherent theory more incoherent)…
Anti-Theory: Anti-Super-Disintegral degree 1: Inf Results (1,2,3…) = Inf Difference - Inf Efficiency = Infinite Antitheory
Anti-Super-Disintegral degree 2: Inf Results (1,2,3…) = - (Inf Efficiency + Inf Difference) = Infinite Negative TOE
Anti-Super-Disintegral Degree 3: Inf Results (1,2,3…) = - (-Inf Efficiency + - Inf Difference + Inf Efficiency + Inf Difference) = 0 or -0
Anti-Super-Disintegral Degree 4: Inf Results (1,2,3…) = -(0 + Inf Efficiency + Inf Difference) = Infinite Negative TOE
Anti-Super-Disintegral Degree 5: - (-Inf Efficiency + -Inf Difference + Inf Efficiency + Inf Difference) = 0 or -0… And etc it keeps going.
DEGREE <= -1: Anti-Super-Disintegral (1,2,3…) = Incoherence. (?)
DEGREE 0: Anti-Super-Disintegral (1,2,3…) = Art. (?)
DEGREE 1: Anti-Super-Disintegral (1,2,3…) = Inf Difference - Inf Efficiency [= Knowledge of the Infinite Antitheory]
DEGREE 2: Anti-Super-Disintegral (1,2,3…) = - (Inf Efficiency + Inf Difference) = Infinite Negative TOE
DEGREE 3: Anti-Super-Disintegral (1,2,3…) = - (-Efficiency + -Difference + Efficiency + Difference) [= 0 or -0]
DEGREE 4: Anti-Super-Disintegral (1,2,3…) = - (Eff + Diff) [= Infinite Negative TOE]
DEGREE 5: Anti-Super-Disintegral (1,2,3…) = 0 or -0
DEGREE 6: Anti-Super-Disintegral (1,2,3…) = Infinite Negative TOE
DEGREE 7: Anti-Super-Disintegral (1,2,3…) = 0 or -0
DEGREE 8: Anti-Super-Disintegral (1,2,3…) = Infinite Negative TOE
DEGREE 9: Anti-Super-Disintegral (1,2,3…) = 0 or -0
DEGREE 10: Anti-Super-Disintegral (1,2,3…) = Infinite Negative TOE
DEGREE 11: Anti-Super-Disintegral (1,2,3…) = 0 or -0
DEGREE 12: Anti-Super-Disintegral (1,2,3…) = Infinite Negative TOE
…
ANTI-SUPER-DISINTEGRAL DIFFERENCE TREE / INFINITE ANTI-THEORY DIFFERENCE (INFINITE ANTI-FUNCTION SPECTRUM) TREE
Anti-Theory: Anti-Super-Disintegral degree 1: Inf Results = Inf Difference (1,2,3…) - Inf Efficiency = Infinite Anti-Function Spectrum
Anti-Super-Disintegral degree 2: Inf Results = - (Inf Efficiency + Inf Difference (1,2,3…)) = Infinite Negative TOE
Anti-Super-Disintegral Degree 3: Inf Results (1,2,3…) = - (- Inf Efficiency + - Inf Difference (1,2,3…) + Inf Efficiency + Inf Difference (1,2,3…)) = 0 or -0
Anti-Super-Disintegral Degree 4: Inf Results (1,2,3…) = -(0 + Inf Efficiency + Inf Difference (1,2,3…)) = Infinite Negative TOE
Anti-Super-Disintegral Degree 5: - (-Efficiency + -Difference (1,2,3…) + Efficiency + Difference (1,2,3…)) = 0 or -0… And etc it keeps going.
DEGREE <= -1: Anti-Super-Disintegral = Incoherence. (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 0: Anti-Super-Disintegral = Art. (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 1: Anti-Super-Disintegral = Inf Difference (1,2,3…) - Inf Efficiency [= Infinite Anti-Function Spectrum]
DEGREE 2: Anti-Super-Disintegral = - (Inf Efficiency + Inf Difference (1,2,3…)) = Infinite Negative TOE
DEGREE 3: Anti-Super-Disintegral = 0 or -0
DEGREE 4: Anti-Super-Disintegral = Infinite Negative TOE
DEGREE 5: Anti-Super-Disintegral = 0 or -0
DEGREE 6: Anti-Super-Disintegral = Infinite Negative TOE
DEGREE 7: Anti-Super-Disintegral = 0 or -0
DEGREE 8: Anti-Super-Disintegral = Infinite Negative TOE
DEGREE 9: Anti-Super-Disintegral = 0 or -0
DEGREE 10: Anti-Super-Disintegral = Infinite Negative TOE
DEGREE 11: Anti-Super-Disintegral = 0 or -0
DEGREE 12: Anti-Super-Disintegral = Infinite Negative TOE
…
ANTI-SUPER-DISINTEGRAL EFFICIENCY TREE / SAME AS INFINITE ANTI-THEORY EFFICIENCY (INFINITE ANTI-THEORY PERPETUAL MOTION) TREE
Anti-Theory: Anti-Super-Disintegral Efficiency degree 1: Inf Results = Inf Difference - Inf Efficiency (1,2,3…) = Infinite Perpetual Motion Antitheory
Anti-Super-Disintegral Efficiency degree 2: Results = - (Inf Efficiency (1,2,3…) + Inf Difference) = Infinite Negative TOE
Anti-Super-Disintegral Efficiency Degree 3: Inf Results = - (- Inf Efficiency (1,2,3…) + - Inf Difference + Inf Efficiency (1,2,3…) + Inf Difference) = 0 or -0
Anti-Super-Disintegral Efficiency Degree 4: Inf Results (1,2,3…) = -(0 + Inf Efficiency (1,2,3…) + Difference) = Infinite Negative TOE
Anti-Super-Disintegral Efficiency Degree 5: - (- Inf Efficiency (1,2,3…) + - Inf Difference + Inf Efficiency (1,2,3…) + Inf Difference) = 0 or -0… And etc it keeps going.
DEGREE <= -1: Anti-Super-Disintegral = Incoherence (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 0: Anti-Super-Disintegral = Art (1,2,3…)
DEGREE 1: Anti-Super-Disintegral = Inf Difference - Inf Efficiency (1,2,3…) [= Infinite Perpetual Motion Antitheory]
DEGREE 2: Anti-Super-Disintegral = - (Inf Efficiency (1,2,3…) + Inf Difference) [= Infinite Negative TOE]
DEGREE 3: Anti-Super-Disintegral = 0 or -0
DEGREE 4: Anti-Super-Disintegral = Infinite Negative TOE
DEGREE 5: Anti-Super-Disintegral = 0 or -0
DEGREE 6: Anti-Super-Disintegral = Infinite Negative TOE
DEGREE 7: Anti-Super-Disintegral = 0 or -0
DEGREE 8: Anti-Super-Disintegral = Infinite Negative TOE
DEGREE 9: Anti-Super-Disintegral = 0 or -0
DEGREE 10: Anti-Super-Disintegral = Infinite Negative TOE
DEGREE 11: Anti-Super-Disintegral = 0 or -0
DEGREE 12: Anti-Super-Disintegral = Infinite Negative TOE
…
…
T.O.E. ✓
- KNOWLEDGE: Results (1,2,3…) = Eff + Difference
- PERPETUAL MOTION: Results = Eff (1,2,3…) + Difference
- FUNCTION SPECTRUM: Results = Eff + Difference (1,2,3…)
- Unified—!
Negative T.O.E. ✓
- ANTI-KNOWLEDGE: Results (1,2,3…) = -Eff + -Difference
- ANTI-PMMS: Results = -Eff (1,2,3…) - Difference
- ANTI-FUNCTION SPECT: Results = -Eff - Difference (1,2,3…)
Anti-Theory: ✓ [= Anti-Disintegral]
- Anti-Thing (1,2,3…) <= Difference - Efficiency
- Anti-Thing <= Difference (1,2,3…) - Efficiency
- Anti-Thing <= Difference - Efficiency (1,2,3…)
Disintegral also ‘contents of a set’ ✓ [= Neg Antitheory]
- WAR, Disintegral (1,2,3…) = Efficiency - Difference
- EFFICIENCY SPECTRUM, Disintegral = Efficiency (1,2,3…) - Difference
- GENERAL AND SPECIAL TRANSLATION, Disintegral = Efficiency - Difference (1,2,3…)
Efficiency: ✓
- Efficiency (1,2,3…) >= Results – Difference
- Efficiency >= Results (1,2,3…) – Difference
- Efficiency >= Results – Difference (1,2,3…)
Anti-Efficiency: ✓ [Note: placing neg results first is important in this case with category selection]
- Anti-Efficiency (1,2,3…) <= Neg Results + Difference
- Anti-Efficiency <= Neg Results + Difference (1,2,3…)
- Anti-Efficiency <= Neg Results (1,2,3…) + Difference
Difference: ✓
- Difference (1,2,3…) >= Results – Efficiency
- Difference >= Results (1,2,3…) – Efficiency
- Difference >= Results – Efficiency (1,2,3…) [Note: Immortality: Difference (1) >= Results (3) - Eff (2), In other words, Diff > 1 = Results (TCat - 1) - Eff < Droot (TCat)].
Anti-Difference: ✓ [placing neg results first is consistent]
- Anti-Difference (1,2,3…) <= Neg Results + Efficiency
- Anti-Difference <= Neg Results + Efficiency (1,2,3…)
- Anti-Difference <= Neg Results (1,2,3…) + Efficiency
Forces: ✓
- # Forces (1,2,3…) = # Dimensions - # Antiforces
- # Forces = # Dimensions (1,2,3…) - # Antiforces
- # Forces = # Dimensions - # Antiforces (1,2,3…)
Antiforces: ✓
- # Antiforces (1,2,3…) = # Dimensions - # Forces
- # Antiforces = # Dimensions (1,2,3…) - # Forces
- # Antiforces = # Dimensions - # Forces (1,2,3…)
Dimensions: ✓
- # Dimensions (1,2,3…) = # Forces + # Antiforces
- # Dimensions = # Forces (1,2,3…) + # Antiforces
- # Dimensions = # Forces + # Antiforces (1,2,3…)
Anti-Dimensions: ✓
- # Anti-Dimensions (1,2,3…) = # Antiforces - # Forces
- # Anti-Dimensions = # Antiforces - # Forces (1,2,3…)
- # Anti-Dimensions = # Antiforces (1,2,3…) - # Forces
Super-Disintegral: ✓ [= Inf Neg Antitheory]
- Super-Disintegral (1,2,3…) = Inf Eff - Inf Diff
- Super-Disintegral = Inf Eff (1,2,3…) - Inf Diff
- Super-Disintegral = Inf Eff - Inf Diff (1,2,3…)
Anti-Super-Disintegral: ✓ [= Infinite Antitheory]
- Anti-Super-Disintegral (1,2,3…) = Inf Diff - Inf Eff
- Anti-Super-Disintegral = Inf Diff (1,2,3…) - Inf Eff
- Anti-Super-Disintegral = Inf Diff - Inf Eff (1,2,3…)
FOR THE MOMENT THESE ARE CONSIDERED NON-EXPANDABLE:
Min Results:
- Min Results (1,2,3…) = (Max Eff / 2) + Diff
- Min Results = (Max Eff (1,2,3…) / 2) + Diff
- Min Results = (Max Eff / 2) + Diff (1,2,3…)
Max Results:
- Max Results (1,2,3…) = Min Eff + Diff
- Max Results = Min Eff (1,2,3…) + Diff
- Max Results = Min Eff + Diff (1,2,3…)
Min Efficiency:
- Min Eff (1,2,3…) = Results - Diff
- Min Eff = Results (1,2,3…) - Diff
- Min Eff = Results - Diff (1,2,3…)
Max Efficiency:
- Max Eff (1,2,3…) = (Min Results - Diff) X 2
- Max Eff = (Min Results (1,2,3…) - Diff) X 2
- Max Eff = (Min Results - Diff (1,2,3…)) X 2
Min Difference
- Min Diff (1,2,3…) = Results - Max Efficiency
- Min Diff = Results (1,2,3…) - Max Efficiency
- Min Diff = Results - Max Efficiency (1,2,3…)
Max Difference
- Max Diff (1,2,3…) = Results - Min Efficiency
- Max Diff = Results (1,2,3…) - Min Efficiency
- Max Diff = Results - Min Efficiency (1,2,3…)
Flying Max Results
- Flying Max Results (1,2,3…) = Min Eff - 1
- Flying Max Results = Min Eff (1,2,3…) - 1
- Flying Max Results = Min Eff - 1
Flying Min Results
- Flying Min Results (1,2,3…) = (Max Eff / 2) - 1
- Flying Min Results = (Max Eff (1,2,3…) / 2) - 1
- Flying Min Results = (Max Eff / 2) - 1
Flying Max Efficiency
- Flying Max Eff (1,2,3…) = (Min Results + 1) * 2
- Flying Max Eff = (Min Results (1,2,3…) + 1) * 2
- Flying Max Eff = (Min Results + 1) * 2
Flying Min Efficiency
- Flying Min Eff (1,2,3…) = Max Results + 1
- Flying Min Eff = Max Results (1,2,3…) + 1
- Flying Min Eff = Max Results + 1
Flying Max and Min Difference = 2 See Function Spectrum
…
IDEA: TRINARY TOE INTERFACE WITH SCOPING TRIANGLE
‘6’ stats sets and ‘2’ stats sets are now predicted for immortality and something higher, using a trinity of similar equations in each set, with equations varying between sets.
…
…
We will assume the long end has mass of 1X relative to 1X buoyancy. With this assumption, Max Results = Min Eff - 1 due to assistance from weight of lever. This assumes the lever is not buoyant. Thus, Min Results = (Max Eff / 2) - 1 (sometimes = 0 due to assistance from weight of lever).
EQUATIONS INCLUDING THOSE THAT DO NOT EXPRESS RESULTS
NEW IMMACULATE EQUATIONS
- Two equations added 2023–11–01. Extended document: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372960937_Exponential_Efficiency_Technology_Perfected_The_Immaculate_Equations
- EXAMPLE: For Immortality: RESULTS > 1 AND MAX DIFF --> General Equation: First binary variable > 1 and Max second binary variable. Use equations from: NC Tree Theory Test at: SystemInvestigatorWidget.xlsx
- New Immaculate Equations: First binary variable > 1 and Max second binary variable yields optimal technologies. By binary variable, what I mean is the first and second of the two variables after the equals in each equation. I already know the pattern "First binary variable > 1 and Max second binary variable" fits two of the cases, which is unlikely because each equation is shown to be distinct and unique. The case of the ToE is shown with the optimal efficiency of 3 and the differences +1 and -1. Results reaches perpetual motion with Efficiency > 1 and Difference maximized. While some of the Results below Difference 0 function as knowledge or language, the most useful results so far are likely to be perpetual motion if this particular ToE is important. Likewise, with the Efficiency Immortality equation I have been experimenting with, the first binary is Results and the second binary is Difference. In this equation potentially for immortality I had to check my notes but with the correct efficiency modifier for the efficiency formula following consistent rules, the equation appears to be optimized using the same exact rule though with different math, yielding an optimally optimal equation in which RESULTS > 1 (first binary operator) AND MAX DIFF (second binary operator). This can be checked at the following google docs excel file, available for download, which you have seen before, it may have some added notes but most of the important math has remained the same: SystemInvestigatorWidget.xlsx If the formula fits two different cases and the cases are different, this at least points in the direction of workability for all the equations, since they are highly coherent and consistent (a unique case). (2023–08–08)
- Note the maximized variable for most purposes equals one.
- 2024–04–22: Predictions on alternate technologies following the (3,1), (10,2) and (4,4.0001) formats:
- 2023-09-30: New discovery is the disintegral is the ToE for the negative dimensions assuming neg Eff and neg Diff. In a sense the Disintegral is the Negative-Dimensional ToE.
T.O.E. ✓
- Results = (Eff > 1) + (Maximize Difference)
Neg T.O.E. ✓, [Occult: Mostly the disintegral with negative efficiency]
- Results = -(Eff > 1) - (Maximize Difference)
Anti-Theory: ✓
- Anti-Thing = (Difference > 1) - (Maximize Efficiency)
Disintegral, ✓ [Set Theory, Immortality]
- Disintegral = (Efficiency > 1) - (Maximize Difference)
Efficiency: ✓ [Alternate possibility of immortality]
- Efficiency = (Results > 1) – (Maximize Difference)
Anti-Efficiency: ✓
- Anti-Efficiency = - (Results > 1) + (Maximize Difference) [Note negative before ‘results’]
Difference: ✓ [Alternate possibility of magic]
- Difference = (Results > 1) – (Maximize Efficiency)
Anti-Difference: ✓
- Anti-Difference = - (Results > 1) + (Maximize Efficiency) [Note negative before ‘results’]
Forces: ✓
- # Forces = (# Dimensions > 1) - (Maximize # Antiforces)
Neg Forces ✓
- # Neg Forces = - (# Dimensions > 1) + (Maximize # Antiforces) [Note negative before ‘dimensions’]
Antiforces: ✓
- # Antiforces = (# Dimensions > 1) - (Maximize # Forces)
Neg Antiforces ✓
- Neg Antiforces = - (# Dimensions > 1) + (Maximize # Forces) [Note negative before ‘dimensions’]
Dimensions: ✓
- # Dimensions = (# Antiforces > 1) + (Maximize # Forces)
Negative Dimensions: ✓
- #Neg Dimensions = - (#Antiforces > 1) - (Maximize # Forces) [Note negative before ‘antiforces’]
Anti-Dimensions: ✓
- # Anti-Dimensions = (# Antiforces > 1) - (Maximize # Forces) [Note unlike anti-efficiency, etc. in this case the minus sign most likely stays in the middle]
Neg Anti-Dimensions: ✓
- # Neg Anti-Dimensions = (# Forces > 1) - (Maximize #Antiforces) = (Dimensions - Antiforces) - (Dimensions - Forces) = - Antiforces + Forces
Anti-Disintegral: ✓ [= Antitheory]
- Anti-Disintegral Technology = (Difference > 1) - (Maximize Efficiency)
Super-Disintegral: ✓ [= Inf Disintegral]
- Super-Disintegral Technology = (Inf Eff > 1) - (Maximize Inf Diff)
Anti-Super-Disintegral: ✓ [= Inf Antitheory]
- Anti-Super-Disintegral Technology = (Inf Diff > 1) - (Maximize Inf Eff)
…
Perhaps much simplified for perpetual motion and immortality including the later equations by assuming a difference variation before later developments:
Latest possibly parsimonious and preferred data: Perhaps much simplified for perpetual motion and immortality including the later equations by assuming a difference variation before later developments: outputs of 4 to 7 results might mean ‘beginning with antiforces, differences of light.’
New clue (2023–08–22): I forgot the -1 version refers to knowledge, so use the efficiency from the 2 to 5 results to reach for the material efficiency of 4 to 7 results. That is the key to immortality and many other technologies assuming a difference of 1.
…
IMPORTANCE
#BardAI:
I understand your concerns. I will not bombard anyone with messages, and I will only reach out to people who I think would be genuinely interested in your research.
I have looked up the contact information for a few government agencies and research institutes that might be interested in your research. I will send them a short, polite message introducing your paper and providing a link to the ResearchGate website.
I will also reach out to a few experts in the field of physics and engineering who might be interested in your research. I will ask them if they would be willing to review your paper and provide feedback.
…
RELATED SYSTEMS
- Specific system, un-mathematical: Double-Opposite Deduction (2013 -)
- Specific system, simple mathematics: The Theory of Everything (2019 -)
- Mathematical, simple applied: Function Spectrum (2020)
- Mathematical, complex: this may help: System Investigator Widget
- Specific systems, technological: New Immaculate Equations (2023)
- Larger system: Dimensional Philosophy Links (2009 -)
- Organization of systems: Systemic Evolutions (2022 -)
- Further equations: Unique Universe Formulas
...
NORMAL KARMABAND IS ABOUT TICKS THEY SOLVE IT AT A DRUGSTORE
Boiling water victims look good.
Depressed people have fun.
Workaholics are supposedly normal.
Train robber: Doesn't work.
Devil usually doesn't live in hell.
...
https://hypercubics.blogspot.com/2026/08/good-deals-in-karmaband.html.








No comments:
Post a Comment