With the exception of the Escher Machine (because it is not currently setup to loop in its existing setup), all of these are currently setup in my apartment, sometimes on the floor. The names may not be set in stone as I have had trouble remembering the proper names for three or more of these experiments:
(1) EXPERIMENT 1: Counterweighted Double-Balance experiment using two rods, exponential efficiency, and blocking for the shorter rod at close to 45 degrees: Without much disturbance appeared close to motionless though motion has been highly inconsistent, depending on complex factors and often not depending on disturbance in the long-term.
[I rarely do this, but this one was obviously modified for static background, so the motion in this case may be exaggerated. However, it does give the feeling I was experiencing when I watched the experiment over a prolonged time. This particular moment was from a longer recording that did not show this movement very often]:
(2) EXPERIMENT 2: Double-Pendulum: Motion appeared to be possibly environmental and chaotic, though slightly above expected. It appeared to be shifted out of its optimal position but still sometimes moving with very little disturbance from the environment except air currents.
[As pictured below, it rarely moves this much, however it is thought to do so under the right conditions. Sometimes visible motions would occur seemingly with zero air disturbance]:
(3) EXPERIMENT 3: Exponentially-Efficient Reverse Pendulum using a lever which uses exponential efficiency to act against a short-distance counterweight without gaining excessive leverage: appeared to be in motion with little or no disturbance, though motion was very hard to detect as usual and extracting energy of any amount might stop the system completely. This system if it is still running may have been running for a full two months.
[Pictured below: The motions here are very slight but seemingly consistent without disturbance over approximately two months. It may help to realize the setup is not ideal, so the motion is by definition over-unity if it occurs consistently]:
(4) EXPERIMENT 4: Scissor-Back Periodic Reduced Exponentially-Efficient Leverage: This device seemed to require an adjustment of position to begin visible motions, so may have been a case where the system was disturbed out of position and hence was not operating quite as well as before. However, it can be noted that the original subtle motions from the previous weeks must have been a new phenomenon or very lucky.
[Towards the second half of the video I notice some motion by paying attention to the entire length of the scissor-back as compared to the additional counterweighted lever it is hinged to. However, it requires the eyes of someone trained in balancing skills from age nine to notice any movement at all. for this I apologize. There have been moments where it demonstrates perhaps slightly more motion. It’s something of an experiment and I have been trying to leave it running on its own though this month I did interrupt it to move the scissor-back inwards and to adjust the 45-degree angle to be more gentle. I’m expecting more modifications soon. I think it was interrupted when I walked through the area, and now I am planning to test some alternate modifications to see if they are reliable]:
(5) EXPERIMENT 5: The 45-Degree Counterweighted Wedge Pendulum: This device seemed to rely on careful balance, and began moving very slightly when moved back to its normal position after a previous disturbance which had sent the heavier short end too high above the 45-degree angle.
[Below: This is a recording which has it in the more balanced state which ends up being unbalanced, it is hard to explain]:
(6) EXPERIMENT 6: The Half-Spiral Pendulum: This device seemed to be running intermittently perhaps due to a very small environmental effect, though the motions have been noted to be inconsistent.
[Below: This system was disturbed prior to recording, however, it has been shown moving over periods of a week or more though usually not this visible at all. One could suspect environmental disturbance though there are many machines besides pendulums that will definitely stop moving if left undisturbed]:
I WONDER WHO WOULD WANT IT TO
(7) EXPERIMENT 7: The Vertical Lever Device: The setup was not ideal. It is not supposed to function on chaotic principles, but in this case chaos may have been a larger factor than it should be. In its current position [not shown] some of the effects may have been due to chaos from the environment though this sounds highly unlikely given that most V Lever setups are incapable of creating motion unless setup correctly. The motions in this case were inconsistent and close to undetectable with expert vision. In this case I would expect better however, if the chaos is optimized.
[This below is not the precise setup I have now, rather it is the intended more dramatic motion which has been shown before without consistently proven looping ability except possibly in the more chaotic version not shown]:
(8) EXPERIMENT 8: The Magic Angle: While not set up to loop, the Magic Angle similar to Harrera’s angle of 1.1025 percent degrees H X V has been recorded to have upward movement with return in constructions which can be set up in five minutes even without active use of adhesive in some cases.
[This experiment, like the others, is very real however there are many subtleties to the design that make it trickier than just how it looks to the untrained observer or whether there are forces present]:
…
PREVIOUS DEMONSTRATION OF MATH FOR EXPONENTIAL EFFICIENCY:
…
...
IT'S REAL. OF COURSE, IT'S NATHAN COPPEDGE. IT'S SUPPOSED TO BE READY FOR GOVERNMENTAL-LEVEL PERFORMANCE. "nathan larkin coppedge"
...
...
...
No comments:
Post a Comment