Friday, March 9, 2018

How To Be Smart FULL FORM OF SCIENCE

KAIN WOULD BEAT CAIN NO ONE WILL ADMIT IT THEN THEY PROMOTE CASTRATORIAL NOON IT IT BKC BKC IT IT EES EE CASTORE S\\S// \
  • WHAT THE HELL IS THAT THEY DONT KNOW WHAT TO (DO) (IDO)
IT IT (IT (IT)) - II I II
HE SPELHS IT FOO (OFS) THEY PICK PAIN VICTIMS I NOTICED (L2) (L21) CHOC
NO TAKE(RS) \ CHOC ID(O)
You will need at least a description of the scientific method, premises of science, chemistry, physics, biology, ecology… etc. I will attempt it here because I'm crazy.
SCIENTIFIC METHOD
  1. Hypothesis.
  2. Design of experiment.
  3. Experiment.
  4. Testing hypothesis.
  5. Checking results.
  6. Implications.
ASSUMPTIONS OF SCIENCE:
  1. What is observed is more likely to be true (induction, rationalism).
  2. What is reported is more likely to be factual (materialism, empiricism).
  3. If there is a contradiction, one may question the evidence (logic), or instead develop a new theory based on the evidence (scientific method).
  4. Past evidence can be trusted or developed into new theories (atheism implies motiveless universe which doesn’t allow for demons), and there is no evidence of the supernatural (scientific literalism).
CALCULUS
For this section I recommend working with Quick Calculus by Kleppner and Ramsey.
Differential Calculus, (Part I.)
Calculus is stupid. Calculus is for extroverts. It’s either totally easy, or you learn calculus. Calculus is about thinking —-wait that’s for philosophers.
The origin is a variable. The derivative is the angle of a line —- that’s a small thing somehow, however, isn’t it? The process
might be unlimited. Even the opposite mathematics has its limits. It also may have no function. There are no opposites in calculus: there are only functions. Structures are imaginary. Applied
calculus is the tough part—for which you have your handy calculator.
You can’t be on the side of calculus—-Calculus just IS. One thing to know is that calculus always has a power. If you input zero you get zero, just like in algebra.
Advanced concepts in calculus:
1. Everything of value is outside calculus.
2. Maybe +3.
3. Calculus for all integers.
That’s just an idea.
It’s arbitrary in God’s logic is one of the first things I learned. Even now in calculus there is a division between professors who teach calculus as intuition and those that teach it as pure mathematics. Ultimately there may be more than one way to do calculus but remember, calculus is stupid , or you’re a genius.
Towards the end of his life, Leibniz lamented: what’s human about calculus? So, calculus does have a downside. I’ll leave that as a puzzle.
Concluding Remarks of the First Lesson
Sometimes we think calculus is a disease. Sometimes we think it is not logical at all. But mostly we think it is a highly useful thinking tool. Perhaps you’ll side with the Leibniz who thought it was inhuman, or perhaps you’ll side with the Leibniz who brought it upon himself to invent calculus.
Integral Calculus
Wrong! Doubly wrong! Specifics don't matter. Form a hypothesis, then throw it away! Apply the existing hypothesis, be conventional. Get it right! It concerns science! Be scientific! Clouds are clocks! Simplify always! Stay distanced from your work. Or pull an Einstein. Know. Philosophy is contraband. The rest is history. Further on antiderivatives
INTUITIVE SCIENCE
What are objective facts?
Philosophically facts are not objective except as mere representations of the truth.
Only truth is objective, or more specifically objective truth. It is a special domain like 'organizational skills’ or 'language’. It may be that some truths are not objective, and there still might be facts about them which may be facts but not necessarily truths in a philosophical or personal sense.
And it is possible to have objective truth which is not meaningful for the individual. Maybe that is what you mean by facts. But there is no rule which says objective truth never has meaning, or that it always takes the form of representations. Personal truth can be a form of objective truth, as long as we understand that what is objective about personal truth is that it is an experience, understanding, etc.
And yet again there is nothing about understanding in general which makes it inherently inferior to facts. It may be very hard to interpret facts without understanding, just as it is hard to have meaning without personal experience. For many scientists, this is what is objective, even if in a professional setting it is facts which are persuasive.
For scientists, facts are the limit of interpretation. They do not prevent the brain from functioning.
ALGEBRA ALGEMEINE
Everyone has the same vision when they first hear the word algemeine: a circle of flat metal spokes, attenuated towards the middle, often filling nearly the whole circle, and usually—most of them— bound with some type of sometimes carefully tied, sometimes braided, grey or colored thread.
It turns out in German the phrase just means the 'generality’ of what it is referring to.
At the same time in relation to algebra the meaning is particular. It means the general theory of algebra, particularly the relation between whole orders of sets and the specific operators involved in defining the algebra.
An algemeine can be defined in small related groups, or within a single infinite series, or even, as some have recently learned, in groups that lie beyond a single infinity.
What is held in common is algebra, specifically the general algebra algemeine.
An example might be the relation of pi radians to the depth of a curve.
Or, the probability of depthed groupings falling in and out of a circle relative to the Lagrangian performed on the number of points.
Or the relative golden angle of blobs held within a loop in an isometric lattice.
Or horizontal angle relative to verticals as a function of perspective relative to scale.
The word on contributing to mathematics is 'go, ahead!’ There is nothing stopping you from trying at least.
NEWTON'S LAWS OF MOTION
Motion continues unless there is resistance.
Every action has an equal and opposite reaction.
An object in motion tends to stay in motion.
These laws continued to be seen as having universal relevance until Quantum Mechanics came along, and determined the laws to be different at different scales. Nonetheless, Newton's Laws of Motion tend to remain accurate at what we call intermediate scales, or some say, above the atomic level.
CHEMISTRY
A. Intuitive Chemical Conversion
As basic as it gets...
1. Grams of ElementOne X Moles / 1 Gram
2. Resulting Moles of ElementOne X Ratio of Element Two/One (expressed in terms of first numbers, not subscripts)
3. Result X Grams of ElementTwo / 1 Mole
= 4. Number of Grams of ElementTwo produced in the reaction.
Note: In step 2, the ratio is determined by the subscript of the atomic number, typically equal to the number of protons per atom.
B. Complicated Chemicals
I have heard as a rule look at the last part of a chemical first, and look at the first part for explanation. (Link to Quora article on Dihydroxyphenylalanine).
THE LAWS OF THERMODYNAMICS
0: That, all conditions being equal, energy remains constant.
1: That, with some resistance, energy decreases.
2: That, with heat energy, energy tends to dissipate.
3: That, since most structures have some void, no perfect seal
can be built to contain heat.
4: That, over infinite time, energy tends to return to zero.
5: That energy tends to be created from the destruction of
particles.
These may not be the official definitions, but they give an clear overview of the types of concepts covered by Thermodynamics.
ADVANCED PHYSICS
A black hole is a singularity.
You don't know your wave functions if you don't know that.
A black hole is a hole: an absence of space relative to time.
Heat is a bowshock, the wave of a crescendo.
Waves describe everything in motion, if it is also admitted a wave can also be a surface.
Quanta describe particles at rest.
The foundational principle is construction and continuation.
But this basic principle is broken by indefinite energy states.
Wave-particle duality is broken by a further principle of the multiplication of elemental composite properties resulting from indefinite energy.
Many of the correlated properties concern either waves or composite properties, such as those observed in material science
and biology.
If there are unique or unusual properties, they tend to emerge because of an opposition singularity or some of the properties mentioned above.
Physicists say that an oppositional singularity is not a black hole, but people don't listen.
In fact, an oppositional singularity is any state involving sufficiently opposite properties which might create a unique
energy state.
STRING THEORY
When I learned the basics of calculus, I also learned how to have insights into string theory. My first idea was the equal-energy
particle theory = string theory, which at least sounds similar to other string theories.
From the theory of equal energy, we can get concepts such as supersymmetry, singularity, and virtual singularity (informational vectors), which suggests that the theory actually is a form of string theory, although perhaps a misguided one.
STANDARD MODEL OF PHYSICS
I will describe the standard model of physics— Its really neat and compact.
There are six classifications of fermions, which happen to be divided into three classes or columns: Type I, Type II, and Type III.
I will list the particles in each row.
The first half is quarks, the second half is leptons.
All fermions have a spin of 1/2.
Up, Charm, and Top quarks have a charge of 2/3.
Down, Strange, and Bottom quarks have a charge of -1/3.
Now we begin the leptons.
Electrons, muons, and tau particles (which are leptons) have a charge of -1.
Electron neutrinos, muon neutrinos, and tau neutrinos have a charge of zero.
Now we pass on to the category called the gauge bosons. This only contains four classifications, so I will just read them.
All of these have a spin of 1, which is larger than 1/2.
Photons, gluons, Z bosons, and W bosons.
As an added detail, all of these have a charge of zero except the W boson, which is +/- 1.
(Listed from top to bottom next to the fermions).
Finally, we get to the scalar boson, and there is only one in this category, the Higgs boson, which has no charge and no spin.
There are also some additional facts about mass that are a little harder to remember, but at least you know that as far as this diagram of the Standard Model, all that is left is mass.
Now, think about this a minute.
All these particles, well most of them, are charges swirling, reacting, and sometimes reacting, sometimes annihilating. You might know about this if you are familiar with schrodinger's equation.
How do we know what they are all doing? Well, we have to know everything about them. But it turns out, according to quantum mechanics, we can't know!
We're half-blind, as it were, when it comes to the smallest particles. We can see the big, macro-world effects, but when it comes to the littlest, tiniest particles, it breaks down into indeterminate probability.
And here is the thing—we know only it's wave equation or its particle location, not both—never both, unless someone determines —or finds—a new physics.
Very Platonic!
Not at all like biology!
Its like its in my head! That's what people say when they have it memorized!
Also:
“Virtual photons carry electromagnetic force, gluons carry the strong force, and the Z and W bosons together carry the weak force.” —Matthew Pharr
SCHRODINGER
Look at Schrodinger. The H with the raised bar means total entropy. Heisenberg can be understood as energy cancellations. The small h with the cross means energy moment. The rest says that the observable energy at-moment equals the total observable entropy! Do you see what it is? It's how fusion reacts! It's the behavior of pure nuclear energy! (The double integral means the energy is conserved relative to energy).
ASTROPHYSICS
Lorentz transformation is a version of velocity in which free-fall velocity and the speed of light are inversely related because of the effect of mass upon gravity.
INFORMATION THEORY
Information theory. The H means tendency to equilibrium. Negative sum probability of x log probability of x means that the sum of scatter plot points, whether they are aligned or unaligned, tends to express as an S-curve related to the degree of equilibrium.
CHAOS
Chaos theory. Chaos theory is perhaps the simplest. It simply means change occurs relative to time and the existing condition of the system. In other words, large changes can occur over time, especially if something is highly complex, highly unusual things can occur.
ELEVATIONS
Lagrangian: Is the property of modifying blobs by sphere-like impressions: generally it is as up as down, except that it tends to go down, depending on the ratio between the impression or extrusion and the mass of the blob, e.g. the sides of the extrusion tend to go down with wide intrusions in a large blob, ignoring physics.
ZEEMAN'S LAW OF BIOLOGY
You might see results in complex systems. For example, it might have something to do with the formation of the heart, and other centralized and slightly decentralized organs.
A deduction on the Zeeman effect would indicate that the brain’s original purpose was to regulate the heart, and similar theories, at both simple and complex levels.
You might apply this to many other examples:
Step 1: Centralized and slightly decentralized blobs appear at the poles.
Step 2: Pick something complex. ‘Organs’ appear in centralized and slightly decentralized locations in a dependent structure with larger organizations (depending on the type of structure as per centralization).
Step 3: The second things to appear, if they appear for a reason, occur as a result of the earlier things (such as organs). Thus, centralized things are a result of a central process, and secondary things are a result of a secondary process, or the Zeeman effect is broken. Generally the primary process is harder to destroy. Also, what is meant by ‘central’ and ‘slightly decentralized’ is described by the Zeeman effect. If the entire organism is already slightly decentralized (say, from a planet) this can explain further decentralized features. Likewise, centralization of some kind explains centralized features, and the preference of centralized or decentraluzed explains the relation of centralized and decentralized.
Step 4: These theories apply from the simplest things to the most complex. So the big lemma is simply nature itself.
It’s a little bit like a transparent genome, or the psychological situationism theory. Hard to grasp, but definitely worth some thought.
GENETICS
The basics of genetics are rather simple, and tied in to chemistry. The more you learn about chemistry the more you will learn about genetics. To learn more about genetics we actually study macroscopic phenomena.
RULES OF ECOLOGY
  • Successful species survive.
  • The environment is a result of competing species.
  • Certain advantages serve a special purpose, for example, longevity, a predatory nature, fast reproductive cycle, high fertility rate (many babies), adaptation to climate or special settings, ability to forage, special adaptations like language and tool-making.
  • Survival depends on all factors, not just the initial conditions. For example, over-adapting can be just as bad as under-adapting if the climate is not very threatening.
  • Over time, species that do not adapt either by being competitive or by integrating with other species tend to die out. The exception is when the competition is eliminated by various types of events.
  • Although certain advantages might help a lot at one time, they might not help so much if conditions change.
  • Over time, conditions sometimes change a lot, and sometimes they do not change at all, and this can affect the success and survival of species and how they adapt.
  • Species are ideally robust to current conditions, and still have an ability to adapt to major changes. For this reason, if it is assumed that human beings are dominant, the human race has many advantages, unless a natural disaster or other unforeseen event wipes us out.
  • We have much to appreciate about who we are as a species, and it is this appreciation of who we are individually and socially which ideally makes any species suitable to survival.
UNIFICATION OF SCIENCE
[The shortcut for all of science might be Beau 42, so perfect science has the numerological number 2512142, or in binary something like 0(1/2)101(00)0].
EXPLANATION OF THE BEAU 42
Also written as 'Beauty 42′ or 'Relation to the Center 42′, Beau 42 is a formula designed to describe all of science.
On a simple level, it simply says that all of the active factors in life and existence, as far as science goes, have a quantity and value of 42, once science is added in.
In practice, what it can mean is that significant things have a number less than 42, and insignificant things have a number greater than 42.
But this is only in terms of science.
Some significant discoveries preceded Beau 42, including the discovery of the Higgs Boson, chemical, quantum, nuclear, ecological, and other theories.
Beau 42 simply says that science has a value of 42 and it is not likely to move.
It is similar to saying the following:
  • Science is a qualified meaning of life.
  • We should accept both simplicity and complexity, and the value is non-arbitrary.
  • Life is singular like the number one, but it is also extended like 2 X 3 X 7.
  • Life is about squares (4 sides), but it is also about lines (2-d).
  • A wise person could have a better idea than science.
  • Life is like a pentagon dancing within a larger square.
For a slightly larger view, see: Unified Science

How To Be Smart EXPLORING PHYSICS


I will describe the standard model of physics— Its really neat and compact.
There are six classifications of fermions, which happen to be divided into three classes or columns: Type I, Type II, and Type III.
I will list the particles in each row.
The first half is quarks, the second half is leptons.
All fermions have a spin of 1/2.
Up, Charm, and Top quarks have a charge of 2/3.
Down, Strange, and Bottom quarks have a charge of -1/3.
Now we begin the leptons.
Electrons, muons, and tau particles (which are leptons) have a charge of -1.
Electron neutrinos, muon neutrinos, and tau neutrinos have a charge of zero.
Now we pass on to the category called the gauge bosons. This only contains four classifications, so I will just read them.
All of these have a spin of 1, which is larger than 1/2.
Photons, gluons, Z bosons, and W bosons.
As an added detail, all of these have a charge of zero except the W boson, which is +/- 1.
(Listed from top to bottom next to the fermions).
Finally, we get to the scalar boson, and there is only one in this category, the Higgs boson, which has no charge and no spin.
There are also some additional facts about mass that are a little harder to remember, but at least you know that as far as this diagram of the Standard Model, all that is left is mass.
Now, think about this a minute.
All these particles, well most of them, are charges swirling, reacting, and sometimes reacting, sometimes annihilating. You might know about this if you are familiar with schrodinger's equation.
How do we know what they are all doing? Well, we have to know everything about them. But it turns out, according to quantum mechanics, we can't know!
We're half-blind, as it were, when it comes to the smallest particles. We can see the big, macro-world effects, but when it comes to the littlest, tiniest particles, it breaks down into indeterminate probability.
And here is the thing—we know only it's wave equation or its particle location, not both—never both, unless someone determines —or finds—a new physics.
Very Platonic!
Not at all like biology!
Its like its in my head! That's what people say when they have it memorized!
Also:
“Virtual photons carry electromagnetic force, gluons carry the strong force, and the Z and W bosons together carry the weak force.” —Matthew Pharr

How To Be Smart: SECRET OF THE HIGGS

By the way… I saw the 'God particle’ and it was like God in significance, but may in effect be younger (than God).— Nathan Coppedge
2017/09/28, 9:03- 9:06 PM — What I take to be a Higgs particle appeared in front of my Papasan chair, where I was working on a laptop with my familiar, Emend.
The Higgs looked not so different from this:
Sorry, I will use the image because I have found no other accurate images of it.
I hadn't seen it before. Indeed, that's what it looks like.
It was about basketball-sized, or slightly smaller.
The darkness was slightly more visible in the center, suggesting that light could pass through.
I wondered if maybe I have a divine power to inspire fundamental physics.
It was over in about 1.2 seconds, so I don't have a photo. My room was also somewhat dark.
I don't visually hallucinate very much, so perhaps it is something real! A real particle phenomenon!
Would you be so surprised if the Higgs loved time-travelers?
And then I said: Higgs particle? Don't you mean Hugs particle? And I hugged my familiar.
Then later I said: It was perfect, after the fact.
See also resulting: Gender in Light of the Higgs

How To Be Smart: EXPLORING CHEMISTRY

1
A chemist said to me he could do everything, except he didn’t know why his arms were heavy. His arms had been heavy ever since he learned chemistry.
I told him: “My best guess is your arms are supposed to be cold, like non-existent.”
Thanks he said. It seemed to work to make his arms lighter.
What I didn't tell him was it was a reflection on antimatter. The equation for antimatter is summarized as 'the suns are relatively cold’.
2
Now if we want metaphysics we mix cold antimatter and sulfur, as sulfur represents potential metaphysics, and the cold antimatter will make it lighter and more plentiful.
If we then want it to do something we mix it with sodium, which produces potential processing. If we want consciousness to emerge in an unconfused way, we might first need calcium, which creates structure.
Then we might want carbon, magnesium, and potassium, for life, molecular compounds, and emotion respectively.
If we want advanced culture we will likely need chlorine for water processing, copper for change, zinc for transfer, phosphorous for ripening, and iron for seriousness.
3
The average chemist often solves things volumetrically, but the first secret rule is congregation by association:
Turmeric is good for the gut because of its similarity to sulfur, the origin of the gut.
Likewise, sugar is good for the brain, as sugar is similar in color to the bones, which it is the brain's function to control.
We call this affinity.
Milk is largely responsible for male fertility, through its perpetuation of the bones as a structure for the brain.
Aphrodisiacs like chocolate are passive-reactive, reacting with the female system through the craving for more, related to the emotional attachment to pheremones themselves attached to wielders of tools.
The immortal aspect then might be guessed to be related to the internal wielding of tools through imitation substances, recreating a sexual function which aims to be perpetually self-justifying.
Where the internal is allied with mad antimatter, it should seek complex smells, which provide ultimate knowledge. In this case survival will be a matter of interpretation.
Where the internal is allied with complex tools, it should seek internal sensation, priming the skeletal machine.
And thus, in some sense immortality begins as a combination of knowledge and machine, that is, smell and pleasure.
And it may be the ultimate cleverness at first to achieve that end without significant risk or hardship.
Now we can say that pain arrives primarily from deprivation of pleasure, and mad freedom is the power of thought, and so immortality emerges from the capacity for pleasure and thought, represented by technology and antimatter, antimatter being the force that can create lightness, and cause potential.
And thus the two powers are obsessional knowledge and prodigious plenty.
And their twins are fixate information and cultural authority.
4
Now the key for the immortality, if the soul is sulferic with antimatter may be either matter or anti-sulfur, for otherwise it has already attained knowledge and machine.
Likewise, if the soul is hormones and tools or pleasure and machine, it should seek out ultimately a lack of structure (anticalcium) or a lack of pleasure, or it is already fulfilled.
Thus, if pleasure is a machine, we get education and ignorance and immortality as exclusions.
If the soul is mad, the solution is elements or the avoidance of sulfur or immortality as exclusions.
Thus, the mad person should seek sulferic antimatter, representing interpretation, while the sane person must simply choose neither ignorance nor education, representing pleasure.
Granted, this is just a precis.
What is worth noting however is that further sucess of either type will likely depend on adding exponents (information or volumetrics), additional limited specialized reactions (such as drugs or genetics), or some combination of sanity and madness.
Thus, the madman might be expected to find pleasure, cure madness, adapt, or be perfect.
The sane person might be expected to react, go insane, adapt, or be perfect.
Thus, their realizations involve 4 parts pleasure from madness, 4 parts madness from sanity, 4 parts sanity from madness, 4 parts reaction, 8 parts adaptation, and 8 parts perfection.
Only 1/16 is two parts perfect, and only 1/16 is two parts adapted.
If we match the equal parts, then pleasure from madness is the reaction between sanity and insanity, and the measure of adaptation is what is perfect, and is only 1/2 likely.
So, now we conclude adaptation is random, and pleasure comes exclusively from complexity.
Now we could predict death is anticalcium, because calcium creates structure which is the basis for complexity, thus anticalcium is the destruction of structure, and the destruction of pleasure.
In effect, anticalcium is pain. This is a very natural view.
Now we know from much earlier that the pleasure machine is immortal, ignorant, or in pain. Thus, if immortal and pain are not ignorant, the immortal becomes knowledge of pleasure, represented by tools.
Thus, madness looks like a viable option if we have no pleasure. The madman either agrees that anticalcium is part of antimatter, or produces a partial reaction, or devotes himself to sulferic creativity.
Thus, the madman is a theoretical generalist who accepts the existence of pain, or a specialist against pain, or a creative person.
Now, there are only certain personalities of immortality if we are correct about sulfur, hormones, and similar parts being identical, and they are permutations of the immortal pleasure machine with the generalist, the specialist, and the creative.
Notice only the specialist sacrifices for pleasure.
Only the generalist acknowledges pain.
And only the creative completely reacts with antisulfur.
Thus, the artist is the creator, the generalist is the judge, and the specialist appears to bear responsibility.
Thus, from a wise alchemist's perspective, it is the specialist who bears risk and reaps reward, the generalist who learns, and the creative who acts. These seem to be the three Players of existence.
If there is a fourth player, it is the superficial I-Mage that wishes to do everything itself.
5.
At this point we might be prepared to see the immortal as a type of thought, re-affirming, reverberating, and re-constituting.
For the four personalities are really four chemical paradigms: the Generalist aims to become a living paradigm, the Specialist desires some type of special license, the Creative aims to achieve through action, and the I-Mage thrives on perfect art.
Thus, these are the personalities of immortality that are available: one glorifying immortal existence, another glorifying information, another glorifying heroism, and the last glorifying image.
These so to speak, are the metaphysical animals.
If immortality cannot be achieved by heroic, artistic, accredited existence, it might be unattainable.
The obvious thing to do is eliminate the dangers of existence through the proportions of properties found in the successful types.
Another, perhaps related approach is to find a formula, gene, drug, source of energy, etc that has the same effect as perfect adaptation.
6.
Inside a microscope is a little universe. Kind of literally. Things there have more scale.
Perhaps there was no universe before information theory.
The universe is constantly expanding from microscopic events. Changes in education if you will.
The whole project does not really have scale. What is interesting is what makes simple things difficult.
Perfection is what is difficult for complexity. With great power the entire universe is a small leap. Yet that leap is greater than any other.
The universe is made of significance and understanding. They do not combine well when they are neutral.
The universe must be perpetual and subtle, universal, and absolute. Therefore it is hard to have understanding.
Because understanding is difficult, it is the thing to focus on in the universe, if we know that everything matters to us.
But we do not always know, and so there are small events that break our consciousness. We cannot always focus on understanding. At times the universe is larger than us.

Sunday, March 4, 2018

Quotable Quotes March 2018

"Think of it this way: free will is a type of determination, with a standard that may be present or absent, and on top of it all there is no determinism without determinations. All free will is slave to the preferences. There is no free will without preferences, and so perfect fulfillment of preferences is the maximal concept of the will. So, in a sense, the ultimate concept of will is... to live the dream of arbitrary behavior. But really we cannot get more than we want, if we are being honest." ---Nathan Coppedge

"Relatively speaking, all the potential of life comes from immortality." ---Nathan Coppedge


"Sometimes at times, the metaphor of visual contrast is the nearest thing to magic." --Nathan Coppedge


"I believe in perpetual motion, but I don't believe in survival without perpetual motion anymore." ---Nathan Coppedge


"Life, answers, life, answers, life, answers: it is like an eternal golden braid." ---Nathan Coppedge

“As far as the history of technology: First its complicated to input fuel, then its complicated to have it run itself… Then various other things happen.” ---Nathan Coppedge


"What has ever impeded innovation? The usual thing, or more difficultly the recent historical thing, in either case an unawareness of categories of innovation." ---Nathan Coppedge



"Thus, with some minor interpretation, it can be assumed that any theory: whether it is unsolvable or solvable, idealistic, irrational, or hypothetical, is no more than a conditioning upon the precondition for relevance which supersedes any threat of conjecture or irrationality." ---Nathan Coppedge


"There used to be these great, classical, roller-ball pens that were all-black except for the steel clip. These were great pens for drawing abstract art, and I used them for years, never really doubting how great they are. The abstract art I produced led me to be more ambitious, philosophical, and ultimately take more interest in subjects like mathematics and science than I would have otherwise. Partly as a result of these pens, I gained confidence to invent perpetual motion and formulas for absolute knowledge, in effect solving all practical and abstract problems. They're the pens that saved the world! At the time they may have cost about $8.12 for a set of six."

"Note that I am basically just indulging my fascination with disciplines." --Nathan Coppedge

"You may as well cherish your gift for sanity, orherwise you will lose your power of godliness." --Nathan Coppedge



“I actually did something, and that's the logic of perpetual motion. Its so easy its ‘remazing’…!…” —Nathan Coppedge


"Just analyzable origins being obscure and creating relationships. If we don’t become very complex or dimensional we are literally just analyzing how we came from obscurity and we probably aren’t going anywhere, whereas if we do become dimensional new facts will have relevance. The stuck situation is related to the fallacy of inadequate relevance. When we recognize relevance, we are necessarily pre-occupied with an adequate explanation, or something involving obscure origins." ---Nathan Coppedge, response to Paul Conway


"If you don’t have friends, you probably don’t need them." ---Nathan Coppedge


“Mozart came before the paperclip. Einstein came before the slinky. I'm not even sure simple things will happen anymore, but some interesting things might happen. Can all the great things be done by one man?” ---Nathan Coppedge



“According to the law of non-contradiction, if you believe in infinite possibilities, this is a possibility you can infinitely believe.” —Nathan Coppedge


"In a certain functional sense I exist, or I can think I exist, or what appears to be the world tells me I exist… however, I cannot necessarily know the limits of my success, unless it is an application of my individual experience, or the individual or social limit really is the limit of what it is..." ---Nathan Coppedge


More Quotes:

Monday, February 5, 2018

Quotable Quotes Feb 2018

E THEY WER E VERYONIE
THEY WERE WORTH EVERYONE AND EVERYTHING
SH
WE LIKED HER SH (BEEE)
THEY HAVE TO BE NATURAL BORN WOMEN
IGNORE THEM UNLESS YOU HAVE DEFEATED THE CANADIAN WOLF I WON'T SAY THAT I'M MALE I DON'T PLAY GAME PAY TWO SNAKES OR CONSIDER IT IS OPTIONAL
IN MY WORLD THERE IS AT LEAST ONE CANADIAN WOLF LEFT SHE IS TOUGH I WILL PUT IT THAT I WAS GOD OF THE MOUNTEES AND THAT WOLFA
SHE SPELLS HER NAME WRONG AND SHE'S LIKE BETTER THAN WISDOM
I WAS WYATT EEERP BY THIS TIME IT WAS A REQUIREMENT I WOULD MAKE A LIST IT'S LIKE STUDYING LANGUAGE ALL THE TIME I HAVE TO KEEP CAPS
SHE WAS NAKED ON THE TABLE I WAS A MAN TEABAGS WERE LATER YOU KNOW LIKE NOEL CANDY
COUPONS FORGET IT FORGET IT FORGET IT AND THEN SOME SHE WAS WORTH IT I WAS WORTH MORE MONEY HANG IT HEY DEARY DEE WHY (D)

I have to

I have to

Descri i e PPC HH CH (C)


"The only way to communicate is in general to overclock the system." ---Nathan Coppedge

"After this you should think why not a golden age it could be cheap." ---Nathan Coppedge, Coupon Culture

"One way is to look at people's obsessions. A few generations ago,PCs, laptops, and smartphones had to be an obsession to mean anything. Similarly, even twenty years ago, communication of the laws of physics was by rote or involved the authority of a large university. If we look at the implications, the ironic message is that several (entire) generations of the smartest people have not been noticing simple mechanics or philosophical genius—instead they have been focused on futuristic things and electronics. And I (born in 1982) have attempted to take advantage of this… So, although it may be that it is too late for the old people to learn, each succeeding young generation has the opportunity to learn that new discoveries in basic mechanics can still be made, and new philosophical revolutions can still be born. So my message is: 1. The Millennials continue to miss perpetual motion. 2. The Millennials are one of the most omniscient generations, but perpetual motion is a real practical idea. 3. The older generation is the most authentic generation with electronics, and therefore ignored both perpetual motion and omniscience. 4. What the old and young have in common is their hate of perpetual motion, but that is a worthless attitude. 5. Omniscience and perpetual motion are more useful than ever before." --Nathan Coppedge

"It moves up and down from rest with all moving parts. Wheels do not move up and down from rest. Therefore, it is more efficient than a wheel. Therefore it is perpetual motion." --Nathan Coppedge, The Simplest Argument for Perpetual Motion

"They thought I was rare because they thought I was valuable, so they thought I was gambling, so life was random, so there were political problems, so I developed a disillusioned view of life: how is this avoidable? We can go nowhere if we do not affirm merit. And merit is either / or, so we may as well grant it because things are worse off if we don't, because merit is valuable. Merit is a thinking tool." ---Nathan Coppedge, The Critique of Metaphysical Culture

"Everyone who has self-reliance has a lot of resources, because its impossible to succeed without resources. Self-reluance isn't really self-reliance. Women value self reliance because they like men who have no problems. But that is not really self-reliance, that is a foobob. Self-reliance is a foobob. Its either creating difficulty, or its really easy. I tried to achieve easy difficulty because it seemed like the answer. Someone else might have an easy time because they have many resources. If someone survives without many resources, that is difficulty, which is not what is meant by self-reliance. Or they have resources of another kind, which is still resources. Being a madman who barely survives is not self-reliance unless it is a kind of foobob. Men don't like foobobs, they like living well." ---Nathan Coppedge, The Critique of Metaphysical Culture

"It is necessary to have great ideas, because ideas have value. I need to have exceptional value, because I am a human being. It must be admitted that a life bereft of ideas can never absolutely be valued. At least, it would be a waste, unless it were insubstantial or had ideas. So, ideas have substance." ---Nathan Coppedge, The Critique of Metaphysical Culture

"A great idea is truly great, and so it is any big idea that could perform some amazing function. And so there is not much to do except to create objective knowledge and perpetual motion." ---Nathan Coppedge, The Critique of Metaphysical Culture

"Many people have the attitude that there are no exceptions, which is the same thing as thinking that no one is exceptional.
But this is the same thing as denying the thinking man, for if anyone is exceptional, inasmuch as they are exceptiinal, they will be leagues beyond all competition. Even in ratios this is remarkable. So it should be basic metaphysics to acknowledge everyone is exceptional, and that someone is extrenely exceptional in every known area, maybe even in unknown areas. Then we cannot hold that there are no exceptions. It is closer to the truth that exceptions are all there are. If we deny exceptions, this runs against the idea that humans have resources, which in turn runs against the idea that we are not crazy people barely surviving in the wilderness.
Maybe desperation is a romantic metaphor, but it does not explain modern existence.
When we recognize people are exceptional, we should recognize they have resources, and we should therefore recognize that what is exceptional is far ahead of the competition.
And so, we should not deny that if there is a thinking man, he is far ahead of the second and third thinking man, even if we don't know him and place others ahead. We can likewise confirm that thinking in general is exceptional, and that true human existence is truly great, as it concerns ideas that have value, since human life has value. Nevertheless, we should not argue that any resemblance of human life is not good, as this would deny the resemblance between a mere resemblance of human life, and a human life which is exceptional.
In fact, in the affirmation of human life, we affirm some kind of exception, which is also intelligence. Necessarily human life that is without value will also be desperate, which necessarily means that it will be exceptional. And likewise the life that is not desperate will have resources, which have value, and so it is exceptional. And inbetween exceptional and exceptional it will also be exceptional, which shows that it is all-in-all exceptional." ---Nathan Coppedge, The Critique of Metaphysical Culture


"Commitments are properties... After thought is produced the color we have just experienced." ---Nathan Coppedge

"We may as well admit it is possible to make a better rendition that does not concern Socrates." --Nathan Coppedge


"Imagine, there are angry villagers because of perpetual motion. It is not primitive enough for them." ---Nathan Coppedge
  

"The good theories [of free will] remain: 1. Absolute knowledge. 2. Adjudication of respect. 3. The rationale of likelihood, and: 4. Finding an exception." ---Nathan Coppedge

"Patterns go to heaven." --Nathan Coppedge


"Whenever someone opposes the future of higher systems, it is a fallacy of ham on the side. Unfortunately enough, in these cases it is even ham on the side to explain ham on the side." ---Nathan Coppedge

"Virtual reality is a fallacy of standards." ---Nathan Coppedge

"The clue-club dialectic tends to be involved with the forfeited information fallacy." ---Nathan Coppedge

“Everything is great unless it was not great.” —Nathan Coppedge, Wisdom of the New Ancients

"All you need is movement for an advantage. And all you need is movement and an advantage for further movement." ---Nathan Coppedge


"There must be a huge gap of knowledge between me and the next guy. And that’s what scares me. Not the angry mob, not the scientists, not the pope. The sheer magnitude of intellectual isolation required to think of something new and original." ---Nathan Coppedge

"I am arrogant in the final interpretation." ---Nathan Coppedge


"To be miserable past the ‘20.5th’ dimension you need to have a really good theoretical justification of why/how to be miserable. Thus, most beings in the 21st dimension originate in lower dimensions or have a good or bad theory of how to be 21st dimensional or even higher dimensional—Whence comes the expression that pleasure originates with theory." ---Nathan Coppedge


"I like to iterate that normally when something has lever advantage, height advantage with applicable mass, and room to move into, this is something that applies leverage, and this is actually the most contentious piece of information standing in the way of perpetual motion, and except for all the skepticism it would be trivial to prove. Do we say that because someone has their feet below a swing that they can’t sit on the seat? No, its the same thing, you can sit on the swing using your higher center of mass. You don’t need to stand on the swing to apply pressure to the swing. Not in the least bit. As long as your center of mass is on the swing, and nothing else is supporting you, your full mass is applied to the swing, even if part of your body is below your center of mass. So, as long as the moving weight in my machine applies sufficient mass, it is okay if the moving weight has a base which is sometimes below the highest point of the lever, as long as the midpoint is always higher, which is allowable." ---Nathan Coppedge

"Actually, America currently lives in a Golden Age by historical standards. People can buy candy bars for less than people used to pay for pieces of rags. The trouble, if there is one, is the habits and baggage of prior history, the particular dilemmas such as natural disasters that strike at various times periodically, and the inability to know our own strategy in the context of prior strategies, and the ones that follow. By this point however, as arrogant and blind as Americans supposedly are, there should be reason enough to know something about how to continue history. Consider that this is the form of how not to despair. Maybe the dark side is that I’m underpaid. Maybe that brightens your day, whether you are thinking that poor people have no potential, or that money is not well spent—it turns out, neither of those theories is true." ---Nathan Coppedge

"Consider: why should the ideas we are presented be believable? It has not always been so! The major discoveries of history so far depend on fundamental revisions in our assumptions about belief, our ability to stimulate ourselves, and our level of non-contradiction with the most intelligent patterns of history. We cannot assume that the geniuses of long ago think like the geniuses of today. One of the great promises is that much has been forgotten. And so, it is only with special effort so far that human beliefs have been revised, and one of the most important discoveries of genius is to counteract and overclock pre-existing belief systems. Indeed, beyond a single level of complexity, such revisions are imperative just to grasp the nature of intelligence. At this time, it has become such that someone is not well-rounded if they do not have some claim to genius. It is really as if only geniuses consider new ideas. And if there is an exception to this, it might be the presence of illusions and false beliefs which present to us a false history in which perceptions and truths are not rationally associated. So, it seems, one must be truly great to change history, but this has little to do with what people think, and it is little different than changing beliefs. We can only hope that the universe rewards us in the manner in which we perceive ourselves." ---Nathan Coppedge


"We should have a broader concept—what if humans each traveled a long way before they discovered the Earth—each, to a large extent, from a different place in Outer Space. Then it is like an alien to be someone else. It is like an alien to be our neighbor. It is like an alien to have different thoughts, or to disagree about opinions. Aliens are not just beings that have different bodies, they are also things with different motivations. What prevents us from saying that in some deep sense a different species might have more in common with us than our neighbor? What if the alien does something we love, while our neighbor disagrees with us on every point? There is nothing which says we cannot love an alien for what they do. And so, when we say aliens have not been discovered, we are adopting a relative view, for we are saying that we cannot love our neighbors, for if we did love our neighbors we would say that we might not love them. But, as it is, we say that we MUST love them, because we do not really love any of them. Loving neighbors is more like acknowledging that they are aliens who might do something we love. It is less much like loving a difference of opinions." ---Nathan Coppedge


"One thing that you should know is one thing I have observed, that change is often immune to meta-critique. Sincerely, the longer and more arduously we critique, the less we will know, and the less things will really change. The most profound changes are largely emotional. The smallest changes occur such as right after Platonism in philosophy, or right after Godel in mathematics: big ideas that take up space and make people stop thinking about emotional change. Sincerely, it is possible to emotionally change for long periods of time without having any big ideas. But where there is a large body of meta-critique, the only changes that can occur are intellectual, and as a result human beings will be tapped out when it comes to explaining real events which are neither precisely intellectual, nor precisely literal, yet which depend on emotions to be interpreted." ---Nathan Coppedge


"If there is any spiritual communication from fraternities I wish it were written in a better language.
I have a feeling the local gods sacrificed immortality and love for the sake of death and pain." ---Nathan Coppedge


"One of my greatest discoveries as I studied categorical knowledge was the idea that one can be a philosopher who is a generalist at understanding the many specialized phenomenologies of experience, and it is also possible to be a specialist at generalism who develops philosophical formulas which describe big important pieces which vary according to the idea of what everything is. If everything is one thing, then one of these formulas is right or there is something contradictory about finding formulas. But if everything has more than one definition, then the idea of coherence itself is a kind of finite infinity, which is coherent of itself, but in a higher-dimensional sense, still extendable and interchangeable, producing a knowledge which is actually by most current standards quite larger than life. Indeed, there is no definite rule against hyperbolic knowledge, or improving the whole universe through the use of a special definition. Much more is in human hands than most anticipated. And I find, simultaneously, that it is quite objective." ---Nathan Coppedge


"If the square root of an exponential function is a category, naive realism is indeed an alternative to coherence. But I have already gone well beyond that by proposing five other alternatives to coherence: paradoxes, irrationality, incoherence, neutrals, and informals." ---Nathan Coppedge



"1. Therefore, for any finite vector form of the Axiom of Choice comparable to a well-ordered set of spirals, the full set of such compositions relative to finite spiralline set order as defined parsimoniously will be equivalent to a function performed on the vectors of such spirals. 2. In such sets of compositions, coordinates of equal latitude, longitude, etc shall be directly comparable, with direct correlation to any observed arity (cubic, hyperbolic, etc) simultaneously." ---Nathan Coppedge





Sunday, January 28, 2018

Beware Scientists!

On my Quora profile: http://www.quora.com/profile/Nathan-Coppedge

Monday, January 22, 2018

Is Nathan's Art worth Money?

Previous work has sold for up to a million on occasions (although I never collected anywhere near that much for complicated reasons) --Here depicted "Non-Commissioned Work (1), The Athena, Let's Keep It Up There." Abstract Calligraphy (Hyper-Cubism) by Nathan Coppedge, philosopher artist inventor post