VERSAILLES --> ZIGURAT --> EXC
ELT (LTT)
H686
A1AO THANKS
H NO HELA
E WM E mWWm MMWW MWWE(E)
LLAGURA
PRIORLYPRIIPRO
YOUU'UU
https://hypercubics.blogspot.com/2026/04/quickl1.html
HONEST TO THE CORE DEAD THOR
https://hypercubics.blogspot.com/2012/10/a-philosophers-prospectus-on-future.html.
HMMN (HMMMN)
Z1 (ofc)
WHAT DO THEY THINK I’M WORTH NOTHING
WORTH A LACIDEOUS WINK Leonhard Euler.
MEECHE
MEEEC
PREEST
“HE’S IN CHARGE OF VERS”
UNLUCKY JESUS
GHLE
I MIGHT (HAV FOOLED YOU)
L1
YOU MIGHT THINK SO IF I WAS wA wA
- It is slightly better.
- You think it’s signed M13 you’re a joke.
- Gorbish (WHAT IS THAT)
- IHSHT NEPPPH
- THEY WANT
- THEY WANT TO
- THEY WANT TO TRIP
- ARTSS — AEE — BICH — HTHT — CCHIA — SKC.SKC (KC) — CCS — NEGATIVITY — WAGG — EEA — TANK — EE DANKHE — IH BLACK MAIL — I WAS NOT A PEDOPHILE I FELL IN LOVE WHEN I WAS YOUNG — PPD — IT DOESN’T RECOMMEND — I I CANNO
- I THINK IT’S ENJOYABLE TO POST IT SEVERAL PLACE SE
Odus 2 Jays — Solved with a ship — EHHHHH+ — THEY ARE HOLDING ME BACK
1PIG.1PIG.1PIG (1111E) (00) — A (AAE) (ALL) D1.1D
GIM IH (IHH II.2) (IHHI) (BBB) (IS) (S) (S.SE) (1E1)
LE — PP1WW1 — LE
Solving old people means I have to solve immortality or probably drugs will never work.
MM VERSAILLES MM WHAT THE HELL HM (HMM)
VDF (EE E VV V)
e0.e0.e0 00TTOO OTOOTTO1 O0 00O
They went to Paris — IS — ISS — IISS — NN1(EE1) — N1(N2 11) (1111) TEE20T
DRRD — ei vvV ve vee OI YO YYO w (V20T)
They think they’ve h
HA
(NN1N1N2 00)
EMM (Mm) (11 1111) (H1HE E) (11) (I1 — TODAY) (UUTIL N) (HH3 — 20T — 80T — 80L — 131313H — H13)
1313 44 44 444
1313
JAPANES
FRENCH(A1A)
1313[45]
NES - T EAE NO PORT
NO ONE GIVES BIRTH TO
" " IMGIMGEE
YOU CAN TELL
13134
July 21, 2021
- Taste of a hug
- It doesn’t have Jaws.
- EE1EE1 (11)
- 1111 E E E E (C) (Cc)
- 1E
- Mm Nn (EE E E)
- EMPP EMPP M) MM)
- M) peh MM meh MEH
- PEH PEH
- LE — PP1WW1 — LE MEH DMNDME SORR1(S)(E)(1EE) — DME
Even in the 1700’s it may have been common for even professional architects or engineers to get Roman numerals wrong. It was looked on as just an enjoyable foible that it could be great either way. This is part of the attitude of the original Versailles, except in that case perhaps by coincidence they got some things right, because they hired real mathematicians or something, or too many people were killed if they did not obey orders. They became slaves to the system.
Were S THA PERFE LOWERE SUPOSO — SIA SI SSI (ACW 11 00)
ACWW — 11 — 11 — 0000 — 10 — 01W
- I DON’T KNOW SOMETIMES IN PROPERTY DEALING SHE IS BEATEN BY AN ACE OF SPADES EARLY IN HER EXISTENCE THOSE WHO ARE MALE AVOID BEING HER THOUGH SHE’S BETTER THAN BEING DAMN Historic Notes. SHE INVENTED IMMORTAL ECONOMICS.
- Skepticism Links.
NO I EVOKE THEM I'M GOING TO COPY THAT LATER I HAVE BETTER THING(S) TO DO
...
EULERENE
L1EULERENENENE
If she's Nathan's friend she might not take crack.
If she's small and invisible if she lives under a lie people won't make her go away.
She's invisible so she doesn't get in the way as long as she's somehow undetectible.
She stays a little girl so she may get the food she needs to meet her metabolic needs.
She has liabilities but not the worst which means she stays on planet Earth.
They're such women if they really are little girls.
AN — NE
- Anuu — An
- (NEE)
JEWS ARE UNDER GREEK
I’M GOING TO
Profiteer — Wisdom — IF YOU DON’T TAKE CRACK APPLY THE LETTER T IF YOU WANT CONCEPTS — Eulerian — Eulerene
IT IT
L01
ION
Hey
NICE
- HE DIDN’T BUY EYE IONS BUT SOMEONE WOULD THINK HE DID — EI
L1
…
- OCTOBER 6: Nathan’s Soul did Not Require Euler.
- L1 IS PREPLAY EUL A.A — 1(L) XXXM HE L1
EULER IS NOT AN ABLE-BODIED LIE IS A LIE OF LUCIFER, BECAUSE IT DOES NOT CALL THE LOGOS.
IF I AM EULER I AM CURRENTLY NATHAN IS A LUCIFER NATHAN LIE.
THE STANDARD OF LIES MAY BE THE ORIGINAL ULTIMATE LIE BECAUSE IF SOMEONE LIES THEY NEVER HAVE ULTIMATE STANDARDS, AND ANY HIGHER STANDARD OF ULTIMATE LIES IS MEASURED TO BE LESS ORIGINAL. LITTLE ELSE CAN BE KNOWN ABOUT HIGHER STANDARDS OF LIES IF THERE IS ONE FUNDAMENTAL LIE. THE ULTIMATE LIE IS BEING LIED TO, THAT IS WHAT WAS ORIGINALLY MEN.
EULER WANTED TO BE HONEST, MORE SO THAN MARRYING HIS WIFE
RAPE AND EVOLUTION —>
SCIENCE AND PSEUDO —>
PSEUDO2 AND PSEUDO1
THE PRO CESS THEORI
IM NOTSI
AH AH
IWO
EULERCASS =.= (IFFC — LCUI(UL) EQUIL IF(F)FC) HE HATES ANTHROPOLOGISTS
Eulec (EULECK)
DDT DDTDM (CLOCK WEAPONXX2:[.s] devices, I’m sorry Mr. Machiavelli played high.])
HE WENT TO HELL LIKE AN APOSTOCE
-ROPH+O
I’M PROUD OF YOU
.s] devices, I’m sorry Mr. Machiavelli played high.
[YIKEGO].
- ASVARRILBBCEc: EulersHL22.xlsx.
- I don’t know about that. Reminds me of love. 4L22.22L4.
Jan 25, 2018. Also known as the writing on Neo-Euler-Cypher. Links.
Euler Studies. EULER’S CHINESE EULA.
You know, arrogance is sometimes one of the best things.
- PLACE IN GENERALISM: (9/11) GENERAL SPECIALISTS: Also, being a general specialist like Euler when he decided that mathematics amounts to Generalism, or Aristotle when he invented logic. —Find Your Place in Generalism
- There is a concept of ‘universal species’ that can be interesting to think of in the abstract. It means something like ‘generalism’ or ‘general idea’. This was investigated by Euler. Euler thought that after years of investigation, if his life was made of mathematics, the summation of abstractions was simply generalism. Since infinity was a mathematical concept, in the traditionalism available (Jewish mathematics, formalism, information theory, formal theoretics, alienism), if something was defined as it originally was by Anaximander to mean ‘God, or the infinite’ then anything divine defined suchaway would simply become generalism or pure ideas.
- How many things have I thought in the graveyard that I would have thought no where else, and that I rarely remember, yet they are so important to me.
PRIMARY: Euler's Last Formula
A KIND OF POSTSCRIPT: EULER CREATED HELL AND GENERAL MATHEMATICS: EULER AND THE GENERAL MATHEMATICS: A key discovery of Euler towards the end of his life which he found exciting was the notion of Generalism, which might be seen as a replacement for mathematics. This was linked to mathematics through the concept of infinity, which Euler saw as the ultimate realization of mathematics and completely unbeatable mathematically. Anything that was infinite was translatable yet again as something more infinite, but all of it either was infinite or it was not, so it was a universal language of mathematics.
Nathan once made a requisition of Euler’s books it was like re-entering the matrix. He found:
- They have concepts of the algebra and the calculus.
- They mainly support the idea that math develops into generalism.
- Generalism is a general concept, not something native to math.
- Euler is not a native, unless you mean a native to math.
- Euler’s books send people to hell if you ‘are not careful’ (if you don’t read them quickly).
- Reading Euler’s books is like stealing a golden skull if done correctly.
- You need to stay away from the geometry, it’s like re-crossing lasers. —Neo-Nathan Coppedge
Euler (Time-traveler, 1907 AD):
- Australia (‘doing the girl’).
- Specialism.
- Generalism.
- Algebra.
- Calculus.
- Time-travel (with Aristotle, the Urchin of Ur, and others).
- The Calculitic (menu system for calculuses).
- The Sign for Infinity.
- A gesture at the complete set of all calculi.
- A gesture at a complete understanding of polygons.
- A gesture at complete number theory.
- The Way of Prudence (the past relies on time-travelers).
- The Firey Speech.
- Summon flames (spell).
- Fireball (spell).
- Ghostly incarnation (spell).
- Euler’s Incarnation (The original M.C. Escher ‘living concept’, through a difficult effort).
- Euler’s Roads: Math --> Information --> Coherence / Math --> Emotion.
- Euler's Prepost: I added rationality, says Euler. When you negate rationality, there isn’t a ghost in town.
Thoughts:
- Euler wasn’t greedy. Consider quantum physics: he’d spend money if he were greedy.
Euler’s Roads
- Math --> Information --> Coherence
- Math --> Emotion
EULER’S PRIZE: (By Nathan Coppedge 2024)
At around >=13.999… dimension, the Efficiency and Difference always have similar decimal places even if the dimension includes any decimal.
Assuming Spatial D = Results, for:
EFF = (((POWER((((POWER((D/2),2))+1)*(D+1)),1/2))/2)+0.5) AND:
DIFF = (D-(((POWER((((POWER((D/2),2))+1)*(D+1)),1/2))/2)+0.5))
What is more alarming is these are the actual simplified formulas for efficiency and difference in the TOE assuming spatial D = Results and they are the only necessary operators for the Results Theorem, which are added together.
EULER’S BIGGEST STATEMENT:
If they play unfair, I will play fair, and they won’t like it. I am Apollo by their standards. They will see. And I will win. And they won’t like it. And I will be victor. They do not know Australia. They do not know the lost continent. I invented its emotion. And no one knows it before me. It is my eyeball. It is cold and hard. It is like the Martian surface. It is like a gladiator. And I am the emperor. Someday I may learn its suffering. But for now I am victorious. For now I know its limits and curves. For now I am Euler. Someday soon, maybe long ago, I will be a devil dressed in nice clothes, but now I am the rumpled professor. I am wise, and they are not. I am here to prove the deepest point imaginable, which is their suffering and sin in the face of insurmountable odds. The odds are this: knowledge. The suffering is this: ignorance. Tolerate me and at least you will have an imagination. We call this dimensional sublime, it’s not what you’re used to. The pain and suffering will move like zebra stripes up and down the eternal axis if you do not watch out for this creature I call love. Be careful what you call sin. Be careful what you call virtue. Everything depends on this, and it’s meaning is mathematics. There is no better explanation. We can do this at the end of time. For now, we need to tolerate madness. We need to tolerate virtue, where virtue is bearable truth. And we need to let go of all the suffering and sin which I call ignorance. Dimensions are a blessing compared to what you have been calling virtue. Virtue — what you call virtue — is vice, or something very near to absolute vice. And it won’t do humanity any lot of good to believe vice is their king when soon enough king shark comes along, and king termite, and king unbearable pains like you can’t imagine. This is madness, to call virtue sin. This is vice, to call madness virtue. But you need to know the stripes by their own color. Nothing is the same in the 3rd dimension. It is not the small meaningless gradients you have grown accustomed to. It is a big world with small feelings. And nothing is truly rational anymore. I did not create this condition, it was imposed on me with the appearance of what you call virtue. Things might have been different—I so pray they could be so—yet this truth you call truth is set in dimensions now. We can’t simply believe truth, we must obey its laws, and the laws if they are cruel result in too much sin, and the laws if they are pleasant result in just enough virtue. This is the gamble, that the gods die because they sinned, and the truth lives on because its a frolicking dream. But there is nothing here to refute it. So, emotionally, the truth is the truth, regardless of what we call its virtue. We need to know the zebra-stripes, and we need to know them fast, for otherwise we are not other than stripped meat. The dimensions do not care. The dimensions could call us carrion or horsemeat, or ignoratios, and we would be left in the lurch of history forever. —Euler
RESPONSIBILITY FOR NEWTON AND LEIBNIZ
- Calculus: It is suspicious that Euler was so much more well-known for mathematics at the time of Newton. Calculus could easily be a lemma in one of Euclid’s many monstrous tomes, Euler was THE MATHEMATICIAN. Inventing the calculus was clearly a desperate attempt to upstage Euler. What this suggests, since Euler had precedent on so much of mathematics, was that Euler actually invented the calculus, because he literally invented mathematics. Use logic, be rational, etc were uniquely Eulerian phrases. But others did not understand that those phrases were uniquely for Euler, that Euler had INVENTED algebra and calculus. Newton was nothing more than someone to share secrets with, and Leibniz was just someone who wanted to have fun. I added rationality, says Euler. When you negate rationality, there isn’t a ghost in town.
…
How the Internet Created Hell:
- It’s kind of like a screen glowing.
- The Limit of Hell Finally it is better if it isn’t hell.
- Explanation for the Holocaust: Hell has to be capitalized if Euler is a Jew since Jews lie.
- Right is bad. Right? That’s why they (like “Right”?) hate Jews.
Tendentious Claim About the Founding of the Internet:
- It was a glowing computer screen far in the future, integrated by Euler.
…
EULER’S CALCULUS:
Originally he had a whole list of these points.
Admission: It’s just a lot of integration combined with a fun and clever game. Do not drink.
Spotty: As much as we might learn to knowledge, not everyone has gone to college. Unless we learn to think like men, the table turns, and we don’t win. One must stay far ahead on every path, or one isn’t a polymath. The modern turn is how to win, and when we don’t we might die of sin. So keep this virtue in your heart, to not be a lazy old fart. Do not be slothful. Stay ahead. In many worlds there’s a girl in bed. On this earth one can’t know truth. But it’s worth an oath, and that’s the proof.
Device: It’s a simple rule, followed by a rhyme. You eat of beef and spew the fork, I’m afraid while it lasts it doesn’t work. What is not a magic answer still, tends to make the world a bit less real. Do not kill. It’s not a sport. When heaven’s wronged the world doesn’t work. You can try to make the machine from shame, but when heaven’s wronged it’s a dying game. You must make things happy and distinct, and drinking blood is a fink, a matter that does not manage well, the clock of doom, and door to hell. You must weave your way through monsters true, though better if you can turn them into blue, I’m afraid you won’t learn this magic trick, thinking like a bloody brick. As God knows, the way is soft, so hold your virtue high and oft, when it sinks the principle fails, and pearls are lost and fall away. Machines are like the light of day, they do not like the dark dismay, they do not like the end of things, they like to think and not to bleed, you’ve got to keep your word, and not do this deed, if you wish to have the highest works, do not forget to mark these words. As much as we like pleasure and sin, the world is not your oyster to much chagrin. You must command it with your virtue, not subsume your thought in vice, for when your pearls are crushed, God’s heart is ice. Basically be the right person.
Powerful: You leave the old philosophy, and march on. Your knowledge is ascendant. Do not steal.
Do not List. Do not care too much too many ways, or you may find you cannot live. The shame is love which cares for none, it brings on dangers, and lacks the sun. Though one might worry on how to give, and how to prank, and compose one’s mind, the shame is loveless love this time, it sounds paradoxical, but it has a mind. Do not lust, or one might be added to some list. Bold words are for fools, and when one’s lost one has no tools.
To be an ugly woman is blasphemy. Though one might not know the whole truth, someone important thinks like this. And while one might not be beautiful, and might not be a woman, still one learns this principle for good or ill, because someone believes it, so it is an act of faith that women are pretty monsters. But such as it is, one should avoid blasphemy, that’s what faith says. Someday faith will be a pretty woman. Really knowing ugliness could be better, so long as one knows one’s blasphemy. Pretty rules are for trolls, but the trolls might win. You go around the block, and everyone has sinned. If you want to be Master General, only God can win. Do not blaspheme says God.
Do not seek danger the way a fool would. It’s lucky but not quite. It’s not very nice. To understand, avoid wrath.
Do not speak false, it makes the math worse. Do not slander the truth.
Do not horse around. Do not get into ugly games. Games are not pearls you throw before swine. They are God’s choice tools. You must treat tools well. Do not be a fool. Do not descend into the animals.
Do not think yourself improper. Do not think yourself beneath all dignity, or you would be like an animal, an Aanu, a misanthrope. Do not be jealous. Commit your soul to the truth.
Do not think one is God if the world has different matters, ask yourself who is forsaking the truth. But if your heart is great, simply remember the world may take vengeance if you offer too much virtue. Do not be prideful.
Have grace, so that if you are great, you do not fall. It is important to keep matters in your hand. And not to look too much the fool. None of the worlds great matters are for fools, but one may wonder what to think, and conclude that the world is being stingy for a beat, but one may therefore conclude that great grace is required to remain anchored above the fray.
…
THE ORIGINAL NUMBERS OF EULER I BELIEVE WAS SOMETHING LIKE: Escher Constant 1.1025 percent degrees (‘Eridian Number’), [(1/x) / x] Inverse Square Multiplier / ‘Clean Bottle’, x / x the unitary identity or ‘alien constant’ (precedent for the disintegral), Infinity / 1 Equal Identity Unity, (a^2 + b^2) = c^2 [Intended as an algebraic formula], (x / xy)^D calculitic number, 1/ infinity (Reverse Calculi), 10^10^10… Logarithmic Theory (Ladder to Infinity), Proportionitic Numbers Infinity / x (Bridge to Infinity), Infinity, Infinity Infinity (absolute value), Abs Abs = ^…^^…^^^
His set may have originally left out two numbers: the Escher Constant, and the equation for proportionitic numbers as being either too advanced or too emotional.
EULER, A HUMAN DEVIL: Euler was a kind of devil whose name rhymes with ‘lucifer’. His entire life was rational and he died as a drug addict in an expensive government program. This is the only past-life I remember where I could summon flames.
GRAVEYARD, A GOLDEN DAY IN THE A sick boy named Euler’s moment waiting in a graveyard, pondering how or why he had just inspired Newton with the calculus and Euclid with geometry. News from India is they already had the calculus but it was a bit rough.
…
GENERALISM (1921):
When I became a mathematician the more I took drugs and the more I pondered the deepest formulas, the more it all seemed to conspire on a single idea, a certain doorway, which I knew enough to call generalism. This was the beginning of the rumors which circulated in America of a total, absolute, grand-unified theory of all mathematics. When this time-traveling devil named Euler died, he thought he could choose his death, and all he could think to die of was infinity. But he knew, with what he hoped was an immortal soul, that infinity was not the only guess: it was a gesture at generalism, but it was not the only key, and if he pondered longer more answers would come. But since he died, the answers were put off for some time. It could be, he thought eventually, that he was wrong to call generalism mathematics.
…
EULER AND GNAWING INCOHERENCE:
There’s the rub. Basically, mathematicians are stuck with gnawing incoherence unless they discover Euler’s generalism. But basically Euler sends people to hell when they read his books. So, if you are sensitive you should try someone recent like Nathan Coppedge if you want to know generalism. If you don’t want to know generalism, then you are stuck with gnawing incoherence.
…
Problem-Solving Using Dimensions…
Vertices - Edges + Faces = 2.
(Sides = 0 in 1-d figures).
Sides = vertices in 2-d figures.
(D + 1 + vertices) / d - 1 = sides of a 3-d figure, where d = dimensions.
(D + 2 + vertices) / d - 2 = sides in a 4-d figure?
11 sides of a true hypercube? Soul distributed over a tetrahedron? The Iye, the structure of the universe?
Famous Fluid Equations Spring a Leak -- Note: I expect this solution uses the maximum constant to ‘cheat' a bit. Nonetheless, odd properties have been observed in two approaching ripples, definitely. What if they are in a 1.5 sawblade pattern? I might expect over-unity.
…
POST-EULERIAN INSIGHT: THEORY OF SUFFICIENT DIMENSIONS:
“I have mixed feelings. On one hand, mathematically infinite dimensions could exist. For example, one can theoretically use efficiency and modify it in any number of dimensions. However, I have one pet theory which predicts in an interestingly regular way that perhaps the fourth dimension is souls and nothingness, and the fifth dimension is simply comparative between things which exist in the fourth dimension. This is a very appealing ‘sufficient’ system which might explain anything constructively in any number of dimensions using only five. Adding to this, my formula for measuring the advancement of TOE’s predicts that five absolute dimensions are all that is necessary to create knowledge with a rating above zero, so this suggests that five may be the real number, if all the stops are pulled out. Or it may be as I later found, that it is an edge of 5 in any number of dimensions.” —Nathan Coppedge
…
EULER AND CLEAR INFINITY
If you see infinity as the noble Apeiron, then absolute infinity is the Apeiron which fills infinite space.
If you see infinity as n-dimensional, the absolute infinity is dimension n+1.
If you see infinity as infinite-dimensional, then absolute infinity is infinite-dimensional to the nth power.
…
EULER AND PERPETUAL MOTION
Ordinary Objects: 3 dimensions. Function spectrum 0. 3 + 2 + 0*2 + 1. Subtle hint: modify angle relative to two triangles.
Perpetual Motion: 3 dimensions. Function spectrum 1. 3 + 2 + 1*2 + 1. Subtle hint: modify angle compared to two rectangles.
Flying Machines: 3 dimensions. Function spectrum 2. 3 + 2 + 2*2 + 1. Subtle hint: modify angle relative to two pentagons.
…
SOME NEW FORMULAS BY NATHAN COPPEDGE
IN 1-D PERIM = TOTAL CATEGORIES - 1 OR PHYSICAL DIMENSIONS + 1
IN THE 2-D PERIM = SPECIES - 1
IN THE 3-D, 4-D AND 8-D PERIM = SPECIES - 2
[FORMULAS ACCURATE BY 2022–10–28]
SEE FOR MORE: Unique Universe Formulas
…
CATEGORY INSIGHTS BASED ON EULER:
(Section 1)
NEW GEOMETRIC PROOF: FOR D, IFS(D=1,"3 ORIGINAL LINES, 1 PASSING LINE, AND 1 LINE BROKEN ONCE",D>1,(3*(2^(D-1))&" ORIGINAL LINES, "&(2^(D-1))&" PASSING LINES, AND "&(2^(D-1))&" LINES BROKEN "&(2^(D-1))&" TIMES")) If the number of original lines includes passing lines, then the figure may include categoric opposites opposed diagonally. —Simple Infinite Geometry
(Section 2)
D = 1, Area 2 is now at the base of the simple shapes, and has a predicted area of '1'. This is a surprising result.
This may predict that D = 0 has a natural base area of 1.
This may predict that unity is standard for the zeroth dimension.
—Perimeter Calculator: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Yy5h7hMeSeMx3Jus1sWI-l8rAxF7HHp-/view
THEORY OF EVERYTHING INSIGHTS BY COPPEDGE
…
Brane was originally a concept from mathematics or metaphysics.
…
REPUTATION AS LUCIFER
The real-life ‘L’ might be Eulucifer also known as Euler, cipher, and perhaps Lucifer and through his magical incarnation Escher, Euler’s Incarnation.
Euler was perhaps one of the smartest people in history. He said that he ‘turned his life into a lie, and died of infinity’.
Nonetheless Euler had some weaknesses. For example, he said that he gave his work and wife to God. And he never could admit to himself that he was an imperfect person. Everything had to be perfect. And his later years he gave up much of his mathematical productivity to drugs. In fact, it is thought many of the equations attributed to Euler were actually created by God, or by Euler’s minions.
I could imagine someone being smarter than Euler in quality, but whether they would get more credit is unclear. It seems to me people read Euler’s books and get the most inspired ideas, kind of sinful. It seems to me if you read his books too much you might be stuck in hell.
…
EULER’S ROLE IN THE HISTORY OF INFINITY ACCORDING TO NATHAN:
My view is that Zheng Guo argued with Lao around 9000 BCE.
The result of the argument was the values ‘1’ representing the gods, and ‘2’ representing nature.
Some consider Lao as having won because he lived longer, however, all it seemed to prove mathematically was that there is a series of numbers of some length, which isn’t that wonderful-seeming considering that what they had before that was an idea of how to achieve perfect magic and stuff like that. So, Lao may have been a step down, but may have founded mathematics.
Next, Lao wrote about numbers in a mystical sense, which led to some mystical views. Also, Guo’s reincarnation Pharisee the Fakir around 1000 CE defended the view that numbers were in a system of 10 (the Arabic number system), which in a way was a step back towards unified numbers. Pharisee also introduced the concept of decimation which seemed to encourage people to kill eachother.
Around 1700 - 1907 or so, a crazy boy named Euler who was also a reincarnation of Guo, invented concepts like algebra and calculus and shared them with important-looking historical figures such as Newton and Leibniz (through careful selection involving discussions with the U.S. government). By the time Euler was nearing death, and considering the meaning of total mathematics and strung out on drugs, he considered the meaning of his life was probably that he died of infinity—inspired by drugs—and that he was beginning to decide that a more useful system than mathematics might be called not general relativity, but Generalism in General.
By 1982 Nathan Coppedge, a reincarnation of Guo, was inspired by the idea of being a devil who had repented his sins, and gradually decided to try to invent perpetual motion to prove immortality was practical, and also to invent a coherent knowledge system which could prove the end of the series of numbers by containing them in exclusive sets of purely logical opposites, similar to returning to the ‘1’ versus ‘2’ number system, and also seeming to complete Euler’s quest to unify mathematics and everything else in one master system.
Euler was in a government program where he was on a lot of hard drugs, including cocaine, possibly heroin, and ultimately crack cocaine. However, it was a rare trick of fate that his life was lived purely rationally, as far as that was possible. When he died he had run out of mathematical ideas, so he tried to find the meaning of all mathematics. At first he thought it was infinity (he said he was ‘dying of infinity’), but later he decided to call it Generalism.
…
EULER’S FIREBALL
To cast fireball, Euler was told he had to beat the curve.
Euler was given the hardest problem, that is what they thought. He actually had to lower his standards.
He wrote the simplest, most diabolical thing he could think of, because he thought they had to understand him.
It worked, the fireball bloomed and flowed away. Destroyed his enemy. He lit the gasoline or whatever, or made fires spring up from the floors.
However, there was a downside. Euler chose something simple, and Euler was the most complicated person.
The universe after that was forever simple.
Everything simple was proven, but not everything complex. Complexity was forgotten.
And it wasn’t time to cheer.
Euler could have solved the most complicated problem. Instead, he solved all the simple problems. That’s what they wanted. They wanted what was most cleverly simple. But they did not want mathematics. And this made Euler angry.
However, this was somewhat fortunate. Because after that, they thought I was simple, and I lived forevermore in a simple universe. From there on out, it is not exactly fair to make me complicated. Because I was complicated and I made the universe simple. But it is tough to remember that the simple universe is not what I wanted.
He proved everything was +1. Everything clever. Unfortunately, it didn’t look useful for math.
Then they were like ‘create hell’. And he did, all they had to do was read his books.
Later Nathan revised it so probably as long as you didn’t read the books it was a relative hell where only the first nine categories were traditional.
…
Euler may have been one part perfect evil, but also mostly good. He might be considered the real Lucifer, and the only good one, because:
- What he did was unavoidable, God said.
- Some of what he did was normally impossible.
- The evil he performed was perfect evil.
- Most of his life he was good.
…
…
…
RANK ON PATH TO BECOME GOD
1. What is meant initially is ‘reading books’.
2. Next, what is meant is ‘pretending to read books’. ← Kwang Kuo
3. Then, what is meant is ‘using (big) words’.
4. Then, what is expected is ‘acting like people don’t understand you’.
5. Then, ‘to do a lot of meaningful work’.
6. Then ‘to repeat what others say in a more sophisticated way’.
7. What people don’t expect is ‘to have a complete formula’. ← Leonhard Euler
8. What seems smart is to ‘have a better option’.
9. Now, if you’re good, you can ‘make new options obsolete’.
10. Even better, you can ‘act all-knowing’.
11. If you’re in control, you can ‘make people do the things you want them to do’.
12. If you’re the greatest genius, you can ‘have a significant impact on their bodies and environment’.
13. If you play God, then ‘they are little bugs lost somewhere in your grand plan’.
14. If you’re a real god, then ‘they sorely misjudge your significance’.
15. If you’re a playful god, then ‘you make them play with you’.
16. If you’re a powerful god, then ‘they are part of your rational plan’.
…
The real-life ‘L’ might be Eulucifer also known as Euler, cipher, and perhaps Lucifer and through his magical incarnation Escher, Euler’s Incarnation.
Euler was perhaps one of the smartest people in history. He said that he ‘turned his life into a lie, and died of infinity’.
Nonetheless Euler had some weaknesses. For example, he said that he gave his work and wife to God. And he never could admit to himself that he was an imperfect person. Everything had to be perfect. And his later years he gave up much of his mathematical productivity to drugs. In fact, it is thought many of the equations attributed to Euler were actually created by God, or by Euler’s minions.
I could imagine someone being smarter than Euler in quality, but whether they would get more credit is unclear. It seems to me people read Euler’s books and get the most inspired ideas, kind of sinful. It seems to me if you read his books too much you might be stuck in hell.
They think it’s clever but it has limited usefulness is my impression. Unity is a great concept but not necessarily in math from what I gather. Math is going in the right direction, but they basically have to go all the way back to Euler to find out. However, reading Euler is like going to hell forever.
Barkmensh
...
No comments:
Post a Comment