General Applied Theories

Prebranching is an open call in this set.

Had man [Group Examples, Formal Examples, Of Grammar] -- Contrarianishe [Politense, POLI] -- General Applied Reasoning [Book Learning, Tool Learning, Demonstration] -- Categorical Imperative [Instructive Learning [Political Education, political ISME], Behavioral Learning [Educational ISME], Illustrative Learning [Basical Symbols, entertainment as enjoyment], Psychological Education [Consequential spiritualism], Ab Origine [Symbols as basis of analysis]] -- General Applied Fielding [Classics Pre-Education, Political System, Symbolisme [spiritual symbols, creative entertainment], Creativism [sexual symbols, physical creativity], Explorativism [True Analysis, general creativity]] -- General Application Measurement [NATIVISM [political intellect], KISMATIC [mythological intellect], Computers [True Symbolism supposedly], Design [True Creativity supposedly]] -- Generalism [Mathematics, Systeme, Qualifactics, Materialismo] -- General Application ISME [General System, Special System, General Problem, Special Problem, etc. SUBJECT TO HEURISTIC ORGANIZATION]. -- Subfields [THE MAJOR DIAGRAMMATIC THEORY]

Under a 'general applied theory' we could speculate that common assumptions could be used to define magisteria (areas of study).

• (Back to the Eff + Diff equation. Efficiency is best defined as > 1.2 and <6. It can be generalized somewhat under the assumption that there is very little inconsistency. Since 1.2 to 6 applies to some material cases that are extreme, less extreme cases may mean less extreme efficiency. Even if extreme efficiency is less than 0.5 of the time, if it is around 0.5 or less, then similar to one of Boyd's laws, 1.2 to 6 may be taken to refer to the more extreme end of cases, and thus, since efficiency is generally 1 or higher in the case of energy, material cases can be delimited to 1.2 to 6 in extreme cases. If the reverse measure is abstract efficiency, measuring negative energy is an intuitive move, since in physics (if we assume a physical universe), positive and negative energy appear to be the primary axis. Then, -1.2 to -6 efficiency may apply to negative cases equivalently, unless the math is more compatible with efficiencies staying positive. So, we can apply immediately since negative efficiencies are for negative dimensions, that assuming positive dimensions, efficiencies are high at 1.2 to 6 even for abstract efficiency. This suggests linearity, indicating usually in the case of linearity optimal efficiency which has a standard equation and a standard range of options across many phenomena, for example, under energy and mechanical criteria, or similarly, in applied fields with magnetism or other phenomena applied).

The concept of an incomplete yet perfect (reconfigurable) fit could be applied to this. For example, Philosophy --> Physics --> Mechanics does not cover everything physical, but optimally it does. Since optimal is not assumed to be defined, mechanics becomes analogous under an investigative approach, as a placeholder for some more general theory. Since the approach assumes generalism, and investigation is acceptable in physics, if optimal is not defined, a general approach recommends mechanics, if mechanics is a placeholder for a general theory. The same can be used in abstract theories to refer to philosophical knowledge in which unification is preferred.