I ask myself now and then, partly unconsciously in the back of my mind, what if any program I "integrate with", hypothesizing that there is some compatibility between computers and so-called "brain cicuitry", is itself the character of my mind; The question I ask myself, a question I would ask or suggest other bloggers to consider themselves, is the question: "What are my brain programs" / "What is my knowledgeable advice"?
In my case, as a minimal modalist who values emotional realities, the following answers come to mind:
"DISQUES":
*Nihilism: integrates with meaning and processing
*Modularity: integrates with architecture and politics, by implication society and technology
*Classics Through History: cheap transcriptive knowledge-at-leisure, by the standards of the universe
*Memetic Hints: provides some insight into social situations
*Stealthy Parametrics: A "cheap" but sophisticated program for gauging conflictive engagements
*Pique d' Eloquiant: A creative language program, ostensibly with volition or preferences
CORRUPT PROGRAMS:
*Empathic Regulator: empathy was not compatible with regulation, or perhaps technology; may still exist in an irrational form
*Field Combatant: intellectual fields were confused for combat willingness
*Heraldry: was creatively modified to be a newspaper generator e.g. American Herald; was judged to not be highly economical, used as an argument for autonomous control of the program
*D'lle Arte: failure to identify critical qualifiers, modification failed to turn the program into system for diabolical knowledge and superpowers; still used as a language reference index; Others may be using it to gauge progress in the art world, a process that seems mundane by comparison / a sleeper program
Intention and Architecture, by Carolyn Fahey
6 years ago
No comments:
Post a Comment