3000 monthly views on the blog for the first time!

Yay!

New Book: Coherent Systems Theory

BOOK DESCRIPTION

96 Results of a Logical Permutation, elaborated to explain the logic of all known philosophical and mathematical systems. The product has been to find a context for other systems of equal importance to the categorical deduction, which is the only previously known method for formulating objective knowledge statements. The goal is to give each type of system equal treatment. Although typology is a major consideration in these systems, most typologies native to science are discarded as mere lists, or as lacking logical content. Such lists are encompassed in the term ‘organization’ rather than ‘system’ --- and thus do not meet the criteria. One of the goals of this text is to put certain strong logical theories on equal-footing with the mathematical tradition. Included are theories of coherence and correspondence, relativity and absoluteness, recursions, equations and conjunctions, and paradoxical, exceptional, demonstrative, and positivistic reasoning. Also included is a section on pure theory, including meaningful, ethical, methodological, and logical systems.


It may be found on Amazon here: http://www.amazon.com/Coherent-Systems-Theory-Avant-Garde-Philosopher/dp/1508928215/

The Dimensional Philosopher's Toolkit (2013, 2014, 2015) currently has a Bestseller Rank on Amazon

• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #538,010 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
• #67 in Kindle Store > Kindle eBooks > Nonfiction > Politics & Social Sciences > Philosophy > Reference

It may be found on Amazon HERE.

Paroxysm and Paroxysm

ACAUCAUC (DE BEERES)

THEY TAME

A BUG APPEARED

TRIVIAL TO PROVE IMWORTHMOREDIAA A

IN 1313 WE COULD

I KILLED THE BUG BY ACCIDENT NO AWARENES NOT EV INS

OH My God that was kind of Lucky for feinmann

STRIP (IF IT WAS WRO -- RBB) YO U

STR I PP O (TO) I

STRIP 

STRIP STRIP

THEY'RE USUALLY FAT SO

YOU COULD BE A GOD

THEN THEN

HEY

NO y

YOU'RE NOT ADDICTED TO THE SMOKY ATMOS

UNFORTUNATELY

THEY'RE ALL ALONE IF YOU KNOW

NO NO YOU KNOW YU

RIGHT GHGH

GHGHGH

"GHOULES" mm m

HE DOES EAT SOMETHING DELICIOUS

M M M  M

YES E E m THAT

"WAREHOSS HOOKER DARKLING DOO" S

SOH

SO (M)

MM M

13 H 14 14 15 1514

SHE'S WORTH

000 1000 NQ NNQ

00011000 NNQ

THAT'S ABOUT WHAT THEY'RE WORTH PICTURE I MET CARROTE DEFEATED THE VISIGOTHS ACTUALLY THE PICCTS THOUGH I WAS ON BOTH SIDES

IT HAS IT GOING WITH DIAMOND TO SPARE LET IT KEEP IT MOVIE

I

0001

IOO IO

MM m

Im HAO T TT 0

YOU WANT TO READ

Planeswalker ES e 13H -- HH 1313 H -- 131313 -- MMM13 -- HHH (1313) -- VV V1513 1513 -- ... (131313 -- MMM13) M -- MM 13VV(V V V) -- 151513 HH

Jean Baudrillard writes a number of things which appear to pre-figure my concept of the philosophical paroxysm. Even more convincingly, these statements appear in a book called (aptly enough) 'Paroxysm', however the writings have simultaneously a sense of genius and a sense of lack of achievement. He writes:

"What, then, is the obsession, the secret motive, the endless finality underlying this progression? Finding the irreducible point which gives an unimpeded view of the world." (Paroxysm, p. 113).

This prefigures my concept of the 'mote of meaning'.

However, Baudrillard's quest, unlike my own, ends in despair:

'We must not believe that the truth remains the truth when we strip it of its veil' --- thus, truth has no naked existence. We must not believe that the real remains the real when its illusion has been dispelled --- thus, the real has no objective reality. (Paroxysm, p. 116).

Although this is interesting, and has led me to develop a theory of 'applicationism', on this point I feel that Baudrillard is being contradictory. He is admitting that he has not solved the general problem of the paradox. He is also admitting --- rather than brandishing --- his lack of objective knowledge.

In points like these, I defer to my own work, where it is clear that a paradox can be solved by reaching for the opposite of the most meaningful component terms, in the same order, and that objective knowledge can be reached by finding four polar opposites (in which opposites are located along the diagonal), and combining them in a cyclical order. Statements of wisdom surely would dispell this sexual nihilism that Baudrillard proposes.

HERE IS A LINK TO BAUDRILLARD'S BOOK

HERE IS A LINK TO MY BOOK ILLUSTRATING PAROXYSMS [or search Amazon for 'paroxysms philosophy' to find both: the top two results]

HERE IS A LINK TO ANOTHER OF MY BOOKS WITH OTHER METHODS, INCLUDING A SHORTER SECTION ON PAROXYSMS

More recently I have posted the method on my blog with a full explanation, in the interest of research.

CAUSE NED