Souls of Physics

EULERAEULER

https://hypercubics.blogspot.com/2026/03/spii-ipp-2025.html.

“The laws of physics are only ideal at being themselves.” —Unknown

“Physicists need to learn about tie-die.” —A Thought Interpretted from my Mother

“Unless you do physics, all you can think of is a crusty cookie.” —Unknown

“Motion continues unless there is resistance. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. An object in motion tends to stay in motion.” —Paraphrase of Newton's Laws

“0: That, all conditions being equal, energy remains constant. 1: That, with some resistance, energy decreases. 2: That, with heat energy, energy tends to dissipate. 3: That, since most structures have some void, no perfect seal can be built to contain heat. 4: That, over infinite time, energy tends to return to zero. 5: That energy tends to be created from the destruction of particles.” —Laws of Thermodynamics

“A black hole is a singularity. You don't know your wave functions if you don't know that. A black hole is a hole: an absence of space relative to time. Heat is a bowshock, the wave of a crescendo. Waves describe everything in motion, if it is also admitted a wave can also be a surface. Quanta describe particles at rest. The foundational principle is construction and continuation. But this basic principle is broken by indefinite energy states. Wave-particle duality is broken by a further principle of the multiplication of elemental composite properties resulting from indefinite energy. Many of the correlated properties concern either waves or composite properties, such as those observed in material science and biology. If there are unique or unusual properties, they tend to emerge because of an opposition singularity or some of the properties mentioned above. Physicists say that an oppositional singularity is not a black hole, but people don't listen. In fact, an oppositional singularity is any state involving sufficiently opposite properties which might create a unique energy state.” —Advanced Physics

When we see the facts for what they are, we can do whatever we want.

Progress on Academia!

Finally in the Top 1% for Philosophy at Academia.edu: ACADEMIC PAPERS BY NATHAN COPPEDGE

A quick way to remember the page is just to link from: http://www.objectivephilosopher.com

Coherent Laws of Physics

This has been posted on my primary blog at Quora for awhile. Anyway, I thought I'd post it here, since it has not been getting as much traction as I would like... Remember you can find links to both blogs, as well as many other materials by simply searching Google for 'nathancoppedge . com'

COHERENT LAWS OF PHYSICS

Relative absoluteness.

There are many functional objects, but some functions are TOTALS.

What is not a law, or chaos, or desired, or explained, is nothing.

Motion has a choice between choice and purpose. Motion without purpose is immortal.

Computation has a choice between conflict and universalism. The realization of computation is completeness.

What is absolutely neutral must be universal.

Zero is universal computation.

Exceptions define hierarchies.

Where exceptions apply, absolute complexity is defined by a law of non-existence.

Relativity of zero creates reality. Everything that can't not be relative creates reality.

Knowledge really IS structural, but only in a post-historical way.

When knowledge does not serve as a universal, does not have relevance, or does not serve as an explanation, it is false knowledge.

Coincidentally, #42

Is this obscene?

Current (global?) status on Quora for those topics (Nathan Coppedge). See: https://www.quora.com/profile/Nathan-Coppedge/highlights to view all rankings.

View my papers at: http://www.southernct.academia.edu/NathanCoppedge

Too early to call, perhaps...

But I may have a new supporter for my philosophy of physics:

https://www.quora.com/Do-physicists-value-their-philosopher-counterparts/answer/Blake-Andrews-7

Must read!

Another explanation for collapsed dimensions: https://nathancoppedge.quora.com/Another-Possible-Explanation-of-Collapsed-Dimensions

HOW TO BUILD A 100-DIMENSIONAL UNIVERSE

NOTE: I cannot answer in mathematical terms, but I can venture a physical and philosophical answer. The fifth dimension involves extension into and beyond 4-d. Thus, it involves not just the possibility, but the guarantee of two time dimensions. A general way to extend dimensions is to think first of possibility, and then in the next dimension as reality.

For example,

1-d sometimes exists.

2-d is virtual but always exists.

3-d exists and is never virtual and is not fully aware of time.

4-d exists and is never virtual and controls time.

5-d exists and is never virtual and controls time and potentially has two fundamental types of matter.

6-d exists and is never virtual and controls time and always has two fundamental types of matter.

7-d exists and is never virtual and controls time and always has two fundamental types of matter, and potentially has two concepts of time.

8-d exists and is never virtual and controls time and always has two fundamental  types of matter, and always has two concepts of time, and potentially has some other thing.

9-d exists and is never virtual and controls time and always has two fundamental types of matter, and always has two concepts of time, and always has some other thing.

10-d exists and is never virtual and controls time and potentially has three concepts of matter, and always has two concepts of time, and always has some other thing.

11-d exists and is never virtual and controls time and always has three concepts of matter, and always has two concepts of time, and always has some other thing.

12-d exists, and is never virtual and controls time and always has three concepts of matter, and sometimes has three concepts of time, and always has some other thing.

13-d exists, and is never virtual, and controls time, and always has three concepts of matter, and always has three concepts of time, and always has some other thing.

14-d exists, and is never virtual, and controls time, and always has three concepts of matter, and always has three concepts of time, and sometimes has two other things.

15-d exists, and is never virtual, and controls time, and always has three concepts of matter, and always has three concepts of time, and always has two other things.

16-d might not exist, or is partly virtual, or partly chaotic, and always has three concepts of matter, and always has three concepts of time, and always has two other things.

17-d doesn't exist, or is virtual, or is chaotic, and always has three concepts of matter, and always has three concepts of time, and always has two other things.

18-d doesn't exist, or is virtual, or is chaotic, and always has three concepts of matter, and always has three concepts of time, and sometimes has three other things.

19-d doesn't exist, or is virtual, or is chaotic, and always has three concepts of matter, and always has three concepts of time, and always has three other things.

20-d doesn't exist, or is virtual, or is chaotic, and always has three concepts of matter, and always has three concepts of time, and always has three other things, and sometimes has an additional power.

21-d doesn't exist, or is virtual, or is chaotic, and always has three concepts of matter, and always has three concepts of time, and always has three other things, and always has an additional power.

22-d doesn't exist, or is virtual, or is chaotic, and sometimes has four concepts of matter, and always has three concepts of time, and always has three other things, and always has an additional power.

23-d doesn't exist, or is virtual, or is chaotic, and always has four concepts of matter, and always has three concepts of time, and always has three other things, and always has an additional power.

24-d doesn't exist, or is virtual, or is chaotic, and always has four concepts of matter, and sometimes has four concepts of time, and always has three other things, and always has an additional power.

25-d doesn't exist, or is virtual, or is chaotic, and always has four concepts of matter, and always has four concepts of time, and always has three other things, and always has an additional power.

26-d doesn't exist, or is virtual, or is chaotic, and always has four concepts of matter, and always has four concepts of time, and sometimes has four other things, and always has an additional power.

27-d doesn't exist, or is virtual, or is chaotic, and always has four concepts of matter, and always has four concepts of time, and always has four other things, and always has an additional power.

28-d doesn't exist, or is virtual, or is chaotic, and always has four concepts of matter, and always has four concepts of time, and always has four other things, and sometimes has two additional powers.

29-d doesn't exist, or is virtual, or is chaotic, and always has four concepts of matter, and always has four concepts of time, and always has four other things, and always has two additional powers.

30-d is an illusion, or composite, or mind, and always has four concepts of matter, and always has four concepts of time, and always has four other things, and always has two additional powers.

31-d is an illusion, or composite, or mind, and sometimes has five concepts of matter, and always has four concepts of time, and always has four other things, and always has two additional powers.

32-d is an illusion, or composite, or mind, and always has five concepts of matter, and always has four concepts of time, and always has four other things, and always has two additional powers.

33-d is an illusion, or composite, or mind, and always has five concepts of matter, and sometimes has five concepts of time, and always has four other things, and always has two additional powers.

34-d is an illusion, or composite, or mind, and always has five concepts of matter, and always has five concepts of time, and sometimes has five other things, and always has two additional powers.

35-d is an illusion, or composite, or mind, and always has five concepts of matter, and always has five concepts of time, and always has five other things, and always has two additional powers.

36-d is an illusion, or composite, or mind, and always has five concepts of matter, and always has five concepts of time, and always has five other things, and sometimes has three additional powers.

37-d is an illusion, or composite, or mind, and always has five concepts of matter. and always has five concepts of time, and always has five other things, and always has three additional powers.

38-d is an illusion, or composite, or mind, and sometimes has six concepts of matter. and always has five concepts of time, and always has five other things, and always has three additional powers.

39-d is an illusion, or composite, or mind, and always has six concepts of matter, and always has five concepts of time, and always has five other things, and always has three additional powers.

40-d is an illusion, or composite, or mind, and always has six concepts of matter, and sometimes has six concepts of time, and always has five other things, and always has three additional powers.

41-d is an illusion, or composite, or mind, and always has six concepts of matter, and always has six concepts of time, and always has five other things, and always has three additional powers.

42-d is an illusion, or composite, or mind, and always has six concepts of matter, and always has six concepts of time, and sometimes has six other things, and always has three additional powers.

43-d is an illusion, or composite, or mind, and always has six concepts of matter, and always has six concepts of time, and always has six other things, and always has three additional powers.

44-d is an illusion, or composite, or mind, and always has six concepts of matter, and always has six concepts of time, and always has six other things, and sometimes has four additional powers.

45-d is an illusion, or composite, or mind, and always has six concepts of matter, and always has six concepts of time, and always has six other things, and always has four additional powers.

46-d is relative, and broken, and magical, and always has six concepts of matter, and always has six concepts of time, and always has six other things, and always has four additional powers.

47-d is absolute, and undifferentiated, and universal, and always has six concepts of matter, and always has six concepts of time, and always has six other things, and always has four additional powers.

48-d is absolute, and undifferentiated, and universal, and sometimes has seven concepts of matter, and always has six concepts of time, and always has six other things, and always has four additional powers.

49-d is absolute, and undifferentiated, and universal, and always has seven concepts of matter, and always has six concepts of time, and always has six other things, and always has four additional powers.

50-d is absolute, and undifferentiated, and universal, and always has seven concepts of matter, and sometimes has seven concepts of time, and always has six other things, and always has four additional powers.

51-d is absolute, and undifferentiated, and universal, and always has seven concepts of matter, and always has seven concepts of time, and always has six other things, and always has four additional powers.

52-d is absolute, and undifferentiated, and universal, and always has seven concepts of matter, and always has seven concepts of time, and sometimes has seven other things, and always has four additional powers.

53-d is absolute, and undifferentiated, and universal, and always has seven concepts of matter, and always has seven concepts of time, and always has seven other things, and always has four additional powers.

54-d is absolute, and undifferentiated, and universal, and always has seven concepts of matter, and always has seven concepts of time, and always has seven other things, and sometimes has five additional powers.

55-d is absolute, and undifferentiated, and universal, and always has seven concepts of matter, and always has seven concepts of time, and always has seven other things, and always has five additional powers.

56-d is absolute, and undifferentiated, and universal, and sometimes has eight concepts of matter, and always has seven concepts of time, and always has seven other things, and always has five additional powers.

57-d is absolute, and undifferentiated, and universal, and always has eight concepts of matter, and always has seven concepts of time, and always has seven other things, and always has five additional powers.

58-d is absolute, and undifferentiated, and universal, and always has eight concepts of matter, and sometimes has eight concepts of time, and always has seven other things, and always has five additional powers.

59-d is absolute, and undifferentiated, and universal, and always has eight concepts of matter, and always has eight concepts of time, and always has seven other things, and always has five additional powers.

60-d is absolute, and undifferentiated, and universal, and always has eight concepts of matter, and always has eight concepts of time, and sometimes has eight other things, and always has five additional powers.

61-d is absolute, and undifferentiated, and universal, and always has eight concepts of matter, and always has eight concepts of time, and always has eight other things, and always has five additional powers.

62-d is absolute, and undifferentiated, and universal, and always has eight concepts of matter, and always has eight concepts of time, and always has eight other things, and sometimes has six additional powers.

62-d is absolute, and undifferentiated, and universal, and always has eight concepts of matter, and always has eight concepts of time and always has eight other things, and always has six additional powers.

63-d is impermanent or finite or fatal, and always has eight concepts of matter, and always has eight concepts of time, and always has eight other things, and always has six additional powers.

64-d is permanent, infinite, and eternal, and always has eight concepts of matter, and always has eight concepts of time, and always has eight other things, and always has six additional powers.

65-d is permanent, infinite, and eternal, and sometimes has nine concepts of matter, and always has eight concepts of time, and always has eight other things, and always has six additional powers.

66-d is permanent, infinite, and eternal, and always has nine concepts of matter, and always has eight concepts of time, and always has eight other things, and always has six additional powers.

67-d is permanent, infinite, and eternal, and always has nine concepts of matter. and sometimes has nine concepts of time, and always has eight other things, and always has six additional powers.

68-d is permanent, infinite, and eternal, and always has nine concepts of matter, and always has nine concepts of time, and always has eight other things, and always has six additional powers.

69-d is permanent, infinite, and eternal, and always has nine concepts of matter, and always has nine concepts of time, and sometimes has nine other things, and always has six additional powers.

70-d is permanent, infinite, and eternal, and always has nine concepts of matter, and always has nine concepts of time, and always has nine other things, and always has six additional powers.

71-d is permanent, infinite, and eternal, and always has nine concepts of matter, and always has nine concepts of time, and always has nine other things, and sometimes has seven additional powers.

72-d is permanent, infinite, and eternal, and always has nine concepts of matter, and always has nine concepts of time, and always has nine other things, and always has seven additional powers.

73-d is permanent, infinite, and eternal, and sometimes has ten concepts of matter, and always has nine concepts of time, and always has nine other things, and always has seven additional powers.

74-d is permanent, infinite, and eternal, and always has ten concepts of matter, and always has nine concepts of time, and always has nine other things, and always has seven additional powers.

75-d is permanent, infinite, and eternal, and always has ten concepts of matter, and sometimes has ten concepts of time, and always has nine other things, and always has seven additional powers.

76-d is permanent, infinite, and eternal, and always has ten concepts of matter, and always has ten concepts of time, and always has nine other things, and always has seven additional powers.

77-d is permanent, infinite, and eternal, and always has ten concepts of matter, and always has ten concepts of time, and sometimes has ten other things, and always has seven additional powers.

78-d is permanent, infinite, and eternal, and always has ten concepts of matter, and always has ten concepts of time, and always has ten other things, and always has seven additional powers.

79-d is permanent, infinite, and eternal, and always has ten concepts of matter, and always has ten concepts of time, and always has ten other things, and sometimes has eight additional powers.

80-d is permanent, infinite, and eternal, and always has ten concepts of matter, and always has ten concepts of time and always has ten other things, and always has eight additional powers.

81-d is destruction, art, and purpose, and always has ten concepts of matter, and always has ten concepts of time, and always has ten other things, and always has eight additional powers.

82-d is time, jest, and transformation, and always has ten concepts of matter, and always has ten concepts of time, and always has ten other things, and always has eight additional powers.

83-d is time, jest, and transformation, and sometimes has eleven concepts of matter, and always has ten concepts of time, and always has ten other things, and always has eight additional powers.

84-d is time, jest, and transformation, and always has eleven concepts of matter, and always has ten concepts of time, and always has ten other things, and always has eight additional powers.

85-d is time, jest, and transformation, and always has eleven concepts of matter, and sometimes has eleven concepts of time, and always has ten other things, and always has eight additional powers.

86-d is time, jest, and transformation, and always has eleven concepts of matter, and always has eleven concepts of time, and always has ten other things, and always has eight additional powers.

87-d is time, jest, and transformation, and always has eleven concepts of matter, and always has eleven concepts of time, and sometimes has eleven other things, and always has eight additional powers.

88-d is time, jest, and transformation, and always has eleven concepts of matter, and always has eleven concepts of time, and always has eleven other things, and always has eight additional powers.

89-d is time, jest, and transformation, and always has eleven concepts of matter, and always has eleven concepts of time, and always has eleven other things, and sometimes has nine additional powers.

90-d is time, jest, and transformation, and always has eleven concepts of matter, and always has eleven concepts of time, and always has eleven other things, and always has nine additional powers.

91-d is time, jest, and transformation, and sometimes has twelve concepts of matter, and always has eleven concepts of time, and always has eleven other things, and always has nine additional powers.

92-d is time, jest, and transformation, and always has twelve concepts of matter, and always has eleven concepts of time, and always has eleven other things, and always has nine additional powers.

93-d is time, jest, and transformation, and always has twelve concepts of matter, and sometimes has twelve concepts of time, and always has eleven other things, and always has nine additional powers.

94-d is time, jest, and transformation, and always has twelve concepts of matter, and always has twelve concepts of time, and sometimes has twelve other things, and always has nine additional powers.

95-d is time, jest, and transformation, and always has twelve concepts of matter, and always has twelve concepts of time, and always has twelve other things, and always has nine additional powers.

96-d is time, jest, and transformation, and always has twelve concepts of matter, and always has twelve concepts of time, and always has twelve other things, and sometimes has ten additional powers.

97-d is time, jest, and transformation, and always has twelve concepts of matter, and always has twelve concepts of time, and always has twelve other things, and always has ten additional powers

98-d is time, jest, and transformation, and sometimes has thirteen concepts of matter, and always has twelve concepts of time, and always has twelve other things, and always has ten additional powers.

99-d is time, jest, and transformation, and always has thirteen concepts of matter, and always has twelve concepts of time, and always has twelve other things, and always has ten additional powers.

100-d is time, jest, and transformation, and always has thirteen concepts of matter, and sometimes has thirteen concepts of time, and always has twelve other things, and always has ten additional powers.


Etc.


AFTERWORD
It is possible to conceive of other typological systems, however, in which these typological dimensions are not reached, or in which one characteristic, such as material complexity, time complexity, or sheer complexity develops quickly while other characteristics do not.
My conclusion for the fifth dimension based on the study of characteristic dimensions is that it objectively involves the most advanced conceivable concept of five properties (one for each dimension): (1) nature, (2) materials, (3) structure, (4) properties / culture, and (5) evolution. These are sort of the Qubits of 5-d space. And it can be added that 5-d may be a different spatial or metaphysical dimension, with the assumption that simpler experiences are analogous to Flatland, and that more advanced experiences can be approximated.



The above is also available as an academic article HERE: https://www.academia.edu/22558908/How_to_Build_a_100-Dimensional_Universe

THE METAPHYSICAL CRITIQUE (Hyper-Criticism)

AcademicRoom (unlike Academia.edu) is once again down for technical maintenance. So, here is another significant paper that may not be available on your favorite site.

THE METAPHYSICAL CRITIQUE


Analyzing specific details, it is possible to reach the idea that an entire context is compromised.

What if, for example, fourth-dimensional firefighters are the only intellectuals in that world?

Surprising though this assumption seems, it seems to follow from these further details:

*A wider variety of phenomena exist in the 4-d world.

*Many of these phenomena exist in isometric space (condensed information).

*The properties that are harmful for these objects and persons would be more various.

*The 'firefighters' would have to know about isometric space.

*The firefighters would be the only ones who would need to be experts in isometric space.

*The firefighters would also serve the role of therapists and whores, because of their expertise, and the wide array of phenomena they deal with.

Additionally, what might be said about the connection between the 3-d and 4-d is that the difference, the key difference in dimensions is not just time, but the presence or absence of isometric space.

This follows from the idea that more phenomena exist in the 4th dimension, which requires an isometric lattice to support condensed information.

Thus, in an advanced interpretation, the biggest critique of 3-d physics is that Einstein's relativity is in fact an idea of 4-d isometric space in which within the 3-d various forms of information are failing.

For example, string theory may be attempting to 'put out' the sun.

Black holes may represent Aristotle's anger, amounting to a lack of categorical representation in physics, i.e. the idea that nothing can be contained by matter, because matter does not contain categories.

Gravity waves, which were recently discovered, may be an attempt to develop a lattice between failed information (black holes) and relevant information (the life of the observer and the institution of physics, and by extension isometry).

It significantly happens that the new discipline of Omni-Science called categorical deduction is largely isometric.

On Consciousness Physics

PRESCHOOLINGE

YOU NEEDH

ELE(EE)A

MIDDLE ARTS(E)

TAXES - MURDER MATURA E

RIGHT YOU'RE

REETING (76 -)

H6 EVIL GENIUS MADE

AWAY

ORACUL(AR)A

I MIGHT

HE WAS THE DEVIL YOU DON'T HAVE TO SAY IT

IT WASN'T CHE GAVA PAVI IT WAS

KIND OF

THEORIES YOU WILL LOVE: ON THE EMERGING FIELD OF CONSCIOUSNESS PHYSICS

Originally a response to an article at MEDIUM.COM, titled: “Why Physicists Are Saying Consciousness Is A State Of Matter, Like a Solid, A Liquid Or A Gas” from The Physics ArXiv Blog.

One approach is to treat consciousness as a kind of abstract form of matter, a kind of virtual semantics. This has the advantage of explaining how some brains are dysfunctional, whereas others (e.g. through correct sensory information), are not dysfunctional. This method also has the advantage that it could ‘take’ variables like a computer program. These could be factors as various as the perceived environment, the person’s mode of learning, and conceptual tools which have been developed in the context of the individual and/ or society. Criteria could be developed for the properties of consciousness vis. a desert, or vis. dessert. A simple way to determine this would be to treat sensory input as either an expressed characteristic, or an unexpressed characteristic. With the senses in an unexpressed form, consciousness is likely to depend on global concepts, concepts which become stressed when the senses are deprived for a long time. Alertness can also be used as a factor to determine at what point consciousness becomes stressed —- in today’s society, caffeine may be a major factor in consciousness, even involving its own type. An obvious route in a chemical model is that chemistry exists in an expected form, and also in a controlling form. These forms depend on other factors for their exact expression, but may often involve common characteristics that are shared between multiple people (how to determine that is another question, that has plagued philosophy). One option is to adopt a concretist view of consciousness, in which visual input or other alternate models predominate, a view in which life is a concept of matter. Some people may have a spiritual view of matter, however. One factor to slot in is the importance placed on differing material objects. This may simply be selfish and metaphorical. For example, a philosopher may see objects as philosophical, or may borrow someone else’s theory. Another option is to adopt a functionalist or utilitarian view which places the functions of consciousness above its concept of materialism. Still other models would have to embrace other exceptions, however many there were. Some of these exceptions may be chemical, whereas others may be environmental, or about the modality of the person. Perhaps the question of whether consciousness is virtual or abstract need not be resolved. The more defined the system is, the more likely that the boundary between the abstract and material is meaningless. Seriously, questions can be asked, such as: does a person think they have a meaningful brain? (I suspect many people would lie about this). The result is to assess how far from the optimal path of the continuum people have strayed, and thus, how far from paradigmatic consciousness observed consciousness is. This becomes important for developing a difference between taken-for-granted forms of consciousness, and consciousness which parses itself as a problem. Perhaps the biggest feature may be the division between problematic and non-problematic consciousness, which may be expressed in terms of time and stress. When stress does not weigh in, one may begin to assume that there is a valuable intangible which is compensating for the stress. In some cases, as often happens, the intangible may in fact be material. That is, certain stress conditions have not ever been met (talking absoluteness). In other cases, a sophisticated preference has been met which ameliorates the negative value of the damage. In still other cases, say, ambiguous cases or arbitrary cases, the cause of stress goes un-assessed, and the person begins to respond negatively, critically, or in some more evolved way (say, an interpretation of negativity or crticism) to sensory input. A third tactic besides virtual abstractions and embracing the connection between the abstract and material is adopting a specific interpretation. Perhaps a schema could even be developed to show how interpretation is primary for consciousness. In that mode, consciousness would become a kind of ‘evolved contingency’, which either satisfies itself, or attempts to test or impose rules. Theories of psychology could weigh in by assessing at what point people cease to learn, or cease to develop (if ever?). Roles could then be developed for the role of sensory information, global concepts, and tools, as mentioned above (vis. environment). Overall, one solution is that each person is expressing a conscious specialization (a contingency or function of stress), whereas another is that people are basically satisfied. Clearly, the role of the difference between stress and non-stress is something that must be clarified for the overall theory to develop. However, at that point, there is a risk of over-emphasizing an anthropocentric model. Nor is it preferable to become overly bogged down in variables. Scientists shouldn’t want to reject a simple view in favor of a complex model which doesn’t explain the interesting parts. There is a potential for conjunction with phenomenological research, in that consciousness may depend on an understanding of the best and worst situations for people. But if not, if it is something universal that does not fluctuate, then the clear answer may be that it concerns a ‘pure essence’ like love or reason. Understanding that in scientific terms may involve dealing with concepts of potentiality in a way that is directed towards the kinetics of motivation. Ultimately, it may be simpler simply to express the rules in terms of observables (of the subject person), global conditions, and tools. One of the major factors may be the idea of contradiction as a function of stress.

Also available as an academic paper HERE, and situated within a context of other major news stories, HERE.