Back up to the Top 2% on Academia

Actually the Top 1.8% of researchers in any field in that site!

View my profile / papers at : http://www.southernct.academia.edu/NathanCoppedge

Systems According to 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Order Questions

SYSTEMS ACCORDING TO 1ST, 2ND, AND 3RD ORDER QUESTIONS


The first (most basic) system is coherent math, and the last (most advanced) is coherent philosophy.


QUESTIONS

First-order questions: Rationality or Irrationality?

Second-order questions: Perfect and Complex!:
value or absoluteness or aesthetics or relativism
Half of relativism is absolute through relative-relativism.
Aesthetics is just a privileged value system.
Now it is between values and absolutes.
Absoluteness is one form of value.
Suggestion: absolute value or aesthetic value.

Imperfection is a return to graphic value failure.

Simplicity is a return to the non-linguistic.

Simplicity cannot be technical, and imperfection is informal.

Therefore, with formal systems, absolute value or aesthetic value.

Third-order questions: Exceptional or Coherent?

[Coherency is always the shortcut sometimes.
But it requires a standard].

A matter of perspective. A perfect system can be exceptional.

An exceptional system can be coherent.

If exceptions are defined as incoherent, they extend the system.

Unexceptional coherence is not coherence.

‘Exceptional’ must be used in a technical way, where it is
the unresolved coherency


SYSTEMS


Rational Only, Perfect Only, Coherent Only
Coherent math.

Rational Only, Perfect Only, Exceptional Only
Incoherent math.

Rational Only, Perfect Only, Coherent Exceptions
Paradoxical math.

Rational Only, Complex Only, Coherent Only
Coherent semantics.

Rational Only, Complex Only, Exceptional Only
Paradoxical semantics.

Rational Only, Complex Only, Coherent Exceptions
Purely theoretical coherence.

Rational Only, Complex and Perfect, Coherent Only
Formal coherence.

Rational Only, Complex and Perfect, Exceptional Only
Symbolic methodology.

Rational Only, Complex and Perfect, Coherent Exceptions
Archetypal philosophy.



Irrational Only, Perfect Only, Coherent Only
Affirmativism.

Irrational Only, Perfect Only, Exceptional Only
Ersatzism.

Irrational Only, Perfect Only, Coherent Exceptions
Monism.

Irrational Only, Complex Only, Coherent Only
Romanticism.

Irrational Only, Complex Only, Exceptional Only
Transcendentalism.

Irrational Only, Complex Only, Coherent Exceptions
Irrationalism.

Irrational Only, Complex & Perfect, Coherent Only
Fantacism.

Irrational Only, Complex & Perfect, Exceptional Only
Science fiction.

Irrational Only, Complex & Perfect, Coherent Exceptions
Philosophical constructivism.



Rat & Irrat., Perfect Only, Coherent Only
Coherent idealism.

Rat & Irrat., Perfect Only, Exceptional Only
Exceptionism.

Rat & Irrat., Perfect Only, Coherent Exceptions
Universal systems.

Rat & Irrat., Complex Only, Coherent Only
Typological semantics.

Rat & Irrat., Complex Only, Exceptional Only
Empiricism.

Rat & Irrat., Complex Only, Coherent Exceptions
Empirical idealism.

Rat & Irrat., Perfect & Complex, Coherent Only
Coherent games.

Rat & Irrat., Perfect & Complex, Exceptional Only
Ideal semantics.

Rat & Irrat., Perfect & Complex, Coherent Exceptions
Coherent systems, categorical deduction.

HOW TO MAKE A COHERENT VERSION OF AN APPLICATION

1. Review the entire pre-existing application.

2. Try to single-out the equal and exclusive functions of the application.

3. If not, single-out the exclusive but not always equal range of solutions for the application.

4. If not, single-out the exclusive operators of the application in terms of equivalence.

5. If not, try replacing symbols for fineness, process, decoherence, and coherence with symbols that represent these things within the old system. Use new symbols as necessary.

6. The general operation of the system can now be seen to have two major operations, assuming there are four exclusive operators: relation of A-B to C-D, and relation A-D to C-B (the dashes represent logical conjunction such as 'is the function of' or 'X quality of Y state / Y quality of X state').

7. The general system now involves selecting within the four operators to determine the operator that has most primacy. The diagram can now be rotated to select what category of system is operating, and determine the related correlations.

8. By now, you probably have an idea that some of the original data was being ignored in the operation of the original system.

9. Hopefully also, you now have an idea of how to generalize your application for the purposes of coherent philosophy!

Note: Some operations, such as a linear equation or linear parsing are not likely to have allegories within this system. Instead, they represent singular or binary relations of categories which simply scale to complexity, rather than being exponential or efficient.