Proof of the Existence of Polar Opposites

Sept 24, 2017.

PART 1:

PERFECT AXIOMS OF PHILOSOPHY:
{Note: Included models: Perfect Modal Logic 1 - 15, Assumptions of Categorical Deduction 16 - 29, Proof of Paroxysm 30 - 37, Universal Proof of Natural Deduction 38 - 47, Infinite Philosophy 48 - 56}…

1. Everything that is, is.
2. Everything that is not, is not.
3. What is is not what is not.
4. What isn’t not is more like is than is not.
5. What is not false is sometimes true.
6. What is not true is sometimes false.
7. What is always sometimes true is at least a little bit true.
8. What is always sometimes false is at least a little bit false.
9. What is always false can only be true by contradiction.
10. What is always true can only be false by contradiction.
11. To contradict a contradiction is what is meant by what is true.
12. To contradict what is true is what is meant by what is false.
13. What is false always contradicts its opposite.
14. What is true always contradicts its opposite.
15. True and false are opposites when it is not a contradiction.
16. And so on just as above for other opposites.
17. True opposites have oppositeness.

—Perfect Axiomatic Reasoning Model

PART 2:

From two-section proof regarding commutation, final result was:

"Universal := Substance := Universal Substance"

If necessary conditional is empty, by formal implication, any number of categories will always consist formally in ‘v’ with one half using ‘~’. Otherwise formal implication is incorrect. This suggests that formally everything in logic is opposites, whether we properly measure them or not. A further exception to this is some type of Monism. --https://emporium.quora.com/The-Dimensional-Reduction

...

Programmable Heuristics

Coherent Proof Theory

Objective Knowledge

The Sophists