"Historical Concepts" Qua Essence

There is something to be said for the idea that coral belongs to the classical age.

The simple interpretation of this statement elicits the response, "Then why don't we live in the age of plastic?"

And the simple answer to that is that we are part of history.

But the complex response is that history is largely invented.

And the history that exists now is an accumulation of objects from previous ages.

 ----<>----

Perpetual Motion Stock Market Prophecies, Part 11

I retract my statement about 18,000s requiring perpetual motion. Technically it doesn't. Clean industries and financial resourcefulness could turn some of the following things into big industries:

*Industrial Space Mining ISM (platinum, for instance, used for expensive permanent modular adaptive computer systems, if possible, or some other elements).

*Personal Data Enhancement for Small Businesses and Citizenship Platforms (think forum-going crowd. This is an under-rated possibility, when other sectors are doing okay. The goal is to profit on those who have already made a profit).

*Highest-Interested Bidder Enhanced Existence Modules (Hi-Beem).

*Binary Economics with Inverse-Category Testing (BI-CT). This is a method for guaranteeing profits. In this method, money in one sector means the opposite thing as money in another sector. Consequently, one or another sector wins. When you have two independent axes, then if the products have exponential value, then profit can be increased indefinitely without any risk of loss. It involves either combining non-opposite types of income, or maximizing one of many sectors and then trading it at a profit for something that combines well with other factors. For example, investing in computers, and then creating a business out of automatic aesthetics programming which can be used as a form of currency. Multiple currency trading with a variable-technology component.

*Other efficient uses of data (OEUD or 'ODD' Other Data Derivatives). For example, farming general and specific categories for minor ehaanced functions that can be sold with software. This could turn into big business, particularly if it does not require a human programmer.

*General-Purpose Software-Creating Software (GPSCS or GSP General Software Platform). This might usher in a new type of 'hacker citizen' that can get unique functions easily and create unique compatibility with a lot of creative and intellectual modes. The functions wouldn't have to be very advanced to get appreciation from the average citizen user.

*Selling Fantasies. This is an idea whose age has come. With the right data capacities (Say, sometimes a USB stick might do...) you might be able to create simple movies or text output that fits within certain desire-fulfillment criteria for various personality types. This should be at least as lucrative as luxury shampoo, since shampoo uses a primitive version of the same paradigm.

And so on, you get the idea!

Get with it, it's the information age!

People need a replacement for books, and the answer is a platform that responds to what the user really wants, at a personal, consumeristic, and also spiritual level! People want luxury existence, and it's easy to understand that, fundamentally!

If people don't want one thing, they want another thing. It's a simple principle to work with. Just toggling between options might be enough to create a user-friendly design for fulfilling the deepest desires of the citizen consumer!

HIGH SCHOOL PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINES

Interactive Math Program, 2000 - 2001.

"Today we're going to study perpetual motion machines... Most perpetual motion machines come in a predictable form. What form is that? A wheel. Most wheels have one key problem: you cannot change the bearings or what have you without introducing something from the outside."

"Actually, yes, you can!" I said (perhaps mistaking his question). "You can fix the rod-member that runs through the wheel, and then attach something to that."

Jonathan: "I'm not sure what you mean."

"You can fix something inside the wheel by attaching it to the rod member."

"The fulcrum, he means." said Mr. Romao. "Does it work?"

"I don't know if it works, I just know that it works. It works for the effect, the supposed effect, that I thought you were referring to."

"So, maybe there is perpetual motion, according to Nathan Coppedge."

"So, let's devote the rest of the class to designing perpetual motion machines." Mr. Romao said.

All I could come up with is that single wheel.

"Better than we could do." Jonathan said. "We didn't invent anything. Just a variation of the Bah-Ska-Ra wheel."

Art Views (Nathan Coppedge's art on the web)

Over 96,000 views to my art on the web now, including:

6000 views on http://www.etsy.com/shop/HyperCubism to date.

The following views come from my older browsing gallery:
http://www.impossiblemachine.com/Gallery2
21,000 1st Cycle.
34,000 2nd Cycle.
13,000 Paintings.
5,000 Woodland Exhibit.
7,000 Claire's Exhibit.
6,000 Whitespace Exhibit.
4,000 Simpler Paintings.

The Day the Nobel Prize Investigators Visited Me

REWARD IN HE S1

I think this was around 2011 - 2013, at my Suite on Orange St. in New Haven.

Someone knocked on my door.

"Hi, you're Nathan Coppedge? We're investigating a Nobel Prize?"

"For me? I mean, really! For me?"

"Well, this is a very cursory thing. We're just checking to see if you 'might be' a valid candidate. It's either yes or no. If it's no, then you won't ever win the Nobel Prize."

"I would say, I'm a little immature. Too immature for this!" I said.

"You could be indicted for fraud" one of them said, helpfully.

"My experiments are honest, but incomplete" I said.

"Well, that's that!" someone said.

And, that was it.

For a long time I just assumed it was a joke arranged by my mother.

But my mother said it wasn't.

Nothing else came of it.

So, I had to assume it was real.

(Another option I'm considering is that my friend Laura Fawcett arranged it with the staff of the Peobody Museum. And another option is that it was a large group of neighbors in my building. But who knows).

Later the landlord asked me:

"Did you win the Nobel Prize?"

I said, "No, not yet."

"What about the people?"

"What people?"

"Those people who visited---"

"Oh, those people. I think they were just joking around."

He said: "That's a lot of people to joke around with."

There was a deadness in his voice, like I was joking around with the American people.

One of my books currently has a best-seller rank on Amazon

THE DIMENSIONAL TIME TRAVEL TOOLKIT

Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #352,838 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)

• #42 in Kindle Store > Kindle eBooks > Nonfiction > Science > Physics > Time
• #114 in Books > Science & Math > Experiments, Instruments & Measurement > Time
• #5853 in Books > Science & Math > Physics

here is the link: http://www.amazon.com/Dimensional-Time-Travel-Toolkit-Encyclopedia-ebook/dp/B012GRL5PS/

I currently have FIVE books above 1,000,000th rank (NOT a million copies sold, but 1,000,000 from the top or better):

A Collection of Masterful Zen and Sufi Koans #914,118 in print books

How to Write Aphorisms #652,513 in Kindle books store

The Secret Principles of Immortality #770,887 in Kindle books store

The Symbolics #959,553 in Kindle books store

Concerning the 2nd Dimension of Proportional Numbers

Proportional numbers are numbers that fall between the finite and the infinite. Here I show for the first time a concept of what it would be to have two proportional numbers acting simultaneously on the same variable.

1. Things do not do what things do (Absolute Standard).

2. Not cheating is expensive (Measurable Standard).

3. Efficiency is cheap (Easy Standard).

4. Form tends to seek variation in non-dimensions (Effective Standard).

The Laws of Physics to Qualifics /Simple Laws of Physics by Nathan Coppedge

Alternately, 'The Dimensional Laws of Physics'.

In a broad conception:

1. Things do what things do, potentially and actually (Design, Nature, Construction, etc.)

2. Cheating is expensive (Exceptions, Karmic Law, Technology, etc.)

Less important:

3. Expense is relative and may evolve (Available tools, Repetition, Standards of success, etc.)

4. Form tends to seek variation in dimensions (Mathematics, Cause and effect, Creativity, etc.)

PREMIER PHILOSOPHICAL RESEARCH PART 2

https://hypercubics.blogspot.com/2019/09/2019-projects-after-august.html.

One can picture a bounded Cartesian Coordinate System with a mote in the middle.

This becomes the basis for the form-human, with the mote raised to the head, and the axis-arms filling in the arms and legs of the human.

Now, the question is, what is another idea of a living species, for more dimensions? What is a form more perfect than the form-human?

I have some tentative answers and hints on this subject, even though I feel I have not conclusively solved the problem.

Clearly the nearest allegory to a simpler human occurs early in human gestation, with the contact between the semen and the egg. If there is no more conclusive hint about where our species is developing, then we might find clues in the semen and the egg, as to what species we become!

For example, a woman might become a planet, and a man might become a process. But, we are getting ahead of ourselves.

An initial formulation of the form-human in terms of the mote might be:

"Mote Opposite Mote Context" --- representing the head, arms, etc.

A development of the next form in the same number of dimensions might equal:

"History Infinity Immortality Form"

(Paradoxes solved by paroxysm:)

Divided world dysfunctional layers = binary self functioning inherently.

This might be a tentative ultimate boundary.

= power thrown at the world.
= causality alive.
= thinking the world.

Non-evolution of the body = evolving by death.

If we want to solve 'evolving by death' then we get 'Non-evolution of the body'. Or there is no paradox.

Desire?
Ghosts? >Just binary principles.

Body's desire for ghosts = death desireless for the body.

Machines?
Creative license? > Just binary principles.

Conscious machine creative license = unconscious plant / reality destroying the meaningless.

Plant?
Meaningless? > Just binary principles.

Meaningful plant, or:
Binary paradox = division, no paradox.

Cleavage?
Universe? > New paradigm? (Become a woman?)

Cleavage universe un-dimensional = undivided multiverse, dimensional.

Multiverse body = universal mind.
Crude reality = refined fantasy.
Double development = divided ends.
Less motion = more dimension.

So, there may be several options:

1. Ghost vs. Desire.
2. Machine vs. Creative license.
3. Organic vs. Meaningless.
4. Cleavage vs. Universe.
5. Multiverse (woman and/ or organic and/ or machine and/ or ghost and/ or some other module)

That's about the biggest clue I have about the 4th - 7.5th dimension for now, in terms of entities.

Maybe some underlying obsession will take over.

Best candidates are logic and sex, machines and paradise.

There WAS a woman claiming 6th-dimensional perception on Quora.com!

THE CHILDHOOD SOUL OF DIMENSIONISM

"For in mathematics when I conceptually represent something to myself as possible I can also make it, construct it, in my thought: to one two I add the other two, one by one, and so myself make the number four; or from one point to another I draw in thought all kinds of lines" ---Kant, Prelegomena, p. 75

KANT, BEING BRILLIANT

"Pure mathematics is possible only because it bears on mere objects of the senses." ---Immanuel Kant, Prelegomena, p. 18

POSSIBLE PHILOSOPHICAL INSPIRATION FOR GODEL'S INCOMPLETENESS---

"Now we seem to have made the problem worse than ever, for now we have to ask: How can one intuit anything a priori? An intuition is a representation of a sort that ·ordinarily· depends directly on the presence of the object. ·There’s no problem about an intuition of an object that is present to one at the time, or of an object that has been present at an earlier time" ---Immanuel Kant, in a section about mathematics. (The Prelegomena, p. 17 / Main Transcendental Problem, Part 8),

Support your author!

16 books in the top 2,000,000 most popular books on Amazon.

Support your author!

And get a book in the bargain!

http://www.amazon.com/author/nathancoppedge

I want to be in the top 100,000 authors next year!

Premier Philosophical Research Part 1

The problem of the balding man is a traditional paradox in philosophy.

The solution to the paradox of the balding man, by paroxysm is:

"Un-ambiguous missing hair." or "Hair solves the paradox".

(The problem is ambiguous hair, or the no hair problem is un-paradoxical).

However, there are other formulations of the problem,

For example,

Someone who thinks the problem is "Thin / no hair."

They solve the problem with "Big hair."

But, if they think the only problem is thin hair,

Then their solution is something like "No big hair" or "No biggie hair."

But if someone thinks the problem is hair itself, then,

The solution is always no hair, or no hair solution, without a paradox.

So, people who think hair is a problem tend not to believe a paradox is a problem,

Or, tend to think everything is a problem so everything has a solution, because the problem is more than just big or thin hair or ambiguity or no hair.

(Dire warning about that!)

On the other hand, the simplest answer is that if the problem is being bald, the answer is hair. But then solution and problem are the same thing.

Going Beyond Literary Proofs of Perpetual Motion

PERHAPS THE BIGGEST DISPROOFS OF THERMODYNAMICS TO DATE

What is a principle of proportional advantage?

It occurs when relating two separate points. One point is moving horizontally, and the other is moving vertically. If you take the sum of their movements, they are necessarily shorter than some diagonal distance between the two dimensions of space. There, you have proportional advantage, which can be sustained through mass-mass interactions.

Theoretically, goodbye, Noether's Theorem (there is a proportional advantage, after all!)

A mass can move an equal mass the same distance, when the first moving mass is unsupported, and the second mass is supported partly on the horizontal.

Relatively, goodbye, First Law of Thermodynamics (in principle, then, heat can be created from rest).

Dominoes that don't always have to be reset.

Goodbye, Second Law of Thermodynamics! (Heat energy can emerge almost arbitrarily).

Goodbye, Universal Newtonian Laws.

Some rare systems have a variety of different properties of sustainable heat composition.

Goodbye, Third Law of Thermodynamics, I miss you!