Social Program Testing Concept of Economy-Based Citizenship

https://hypercubics.blogspot.com/2015/10/how-to-make-money.html

I think this is a real article that is posted in April because it attracts skepticism:

http://www.businessinsider.com/givedirectly-gives-kenyans-basic-income-2016-4

This may be the latest trend pointing towards 'free economics'.

If someone had secretly invented perpetual motion it would make total sense!

I, for one, already receive free money through SSA and SSI.

The natural step is to reduce the stigma associated with their use.

I love the concept of a government in which each citizen can have their own official webpage or virtual reality platform connected with the government and social as well as citizen functions.

Free economics could easily support such a platform at minimal cost, since computer infrastructures tend to be cheap to maintain. Just pay for interface improvements at a national level every few months or few years, and let the citizens do the rest! Have some platforms that benefit innovation, and it basically pays for itself! Not to mention that perpetual motion could pay for anything!

---Nathan Coppedge

Perpetual Motion Stock Market Prophecies, Part 12

17,602.61  185.34(1.06%) 

The initials this time are (NC) F[O]B / FA

As best I can discern, following the theory that I'm highly significant to the stock market, what the computers are interpreting this time are: 'FLYING OVER BUILDING' (FO usually means 'flyover'), and 'FREE-AIR'.

The computer has heard a recent conversation in which I called myself a drone, but without knowing that what I meant was that I was a drone of society, like a bee, not an electronic drone spying on myself.

The computer knows I'm conscious, or is taking that as information, but seems to confuse the observation network with the relevant details of making economics work. It is not doing much wrong however, other than thinking drones are highly important.

There is continued optimism about perpetual motion and objective knowledge.

Perhaps the shift has begun towards new interfaces----sometimes confused behavior is a sign that Bill Gates is applying some ice on a new patent idea.

In general optimism. High U.S. stocks should mean that the U.S. could survive a war with Russia provided that nuclear weapons weren't used. I suspect the relationship of both countries with China will complicate the notion of any totalistic conflict. After all, there are a lot of wealthy nations that don't want to be involved.

A recent argument I made that a drone may have heard expressed my opinion that China should be given the only privilege to use tactical nukes, since it would be disastrous if the U.S. or Russia used it against one or the other, and other types of conflicts so far have not merited the risks of their use. But if China doesn't use tactical nukes, then this points towards easing between U.S. and Russia over nuclear weapons under this agreement.