Proof Method of Categorical Exclusion

In process, based on:

Formula for Answering All Questions

The formula for answering questions says:

"The answer is formulated by saying the opposite subject of what you are concerned with in the perfect question confirms the object of the question."

This is unhelpful, as it just refers to the question formula:

Coherent Questions

The question formula says:

“The opposite of you related to something different from both your opposite and you.”

Therefore in this case the exclusion would be:

1. The main subject (Cat A).

2. The true polar opposite of main subject or subjectively what the main subject dislikes (Cat C).

3. A guess about what the concern of (1,2) are (Cat B), and if correct:

4. The true polar opposite or thing disliked by (3) = (Cat D).

...

So, since those four when complete describe the proper ultimate subject and proper ultimate context, a few notes:

* Each may be seen as sufficient because we can elaborate on them individually.
* Else, if they cannot be elaborated, it is impossible to know about them, and since we are adopting no limits on how to acquire data, that means those things that cannot be elaborated cannot wxist, as there is no conceivable way in eternity to even think of information on them.

Thus, the logic of categorically complete meaning 'exclusive' categories is:

1. There is a subject (A).

2. The subject resists something (C)., even if it is nothing.

3. There is a proper context B-D.

4. That context also includes resistance, even if it is nothing.