The Dialectich of Intriqui

An exercise in semantics perhaps.

I think everyone is innocent --Paul.

Knowledge is the highest standard for mortals.

Only God is infinite.

If mortals are innocent and held to the highest standard, God may love them, so in that way God is innocent.

Since all are innocent, knowledge is held to an absolute standard.

Since knowledge is held to such a high standard, all are innocent.

It turns out the question of how to prove knowledge is rather ambitious. By this point we can conclude ambition is a similar term to knowledge. Some excess of apparent knowledge is necesssry to schieve ambition, which itself comes before actual knowledge. Thus, a vast appearance of knowledge precedes actual knowledge.

This explains how all are innocent, for God cannot have knowledge of innocence while having absolute knowledge, so mortals are said to premise, as God is not absolutely innocent to a mortal.

Now what is contained within ambition must be experience with appearances, and so ambition must be generated out of that or what came before. So, ambition is merely superficial desire of some extreme kind which we may call superficial wisdom.

Thus, out of superficial wisdom comes ambition, which is the means to adequate appearances which are a prerequisite for knowledge.

What makes superficial wisdom must be some kind of resemblance. Thus, a law of similarity is an underlying principle.

Thus, things arise out of similarity, they become superficially wise by situations which require wisdom, then led to excess they become ambitious, and if they are great in appearance they are called knowledgeable. Yet, above all this, only God is infinite.