Masterful Nathanian Rhetoric

1

You think it is a practical matter?

Well, what if the paradigm defines the rules about what is practical?

Couldn't I change the paradigm, and thereby change the rules?

2

Nothing is real?

Maybe there are just a lot of people who are impolite to themselves, that is why they don't think anything is real.

Truth isn't going to be absolute without qualification so as to be absolute anyway, or we may as well call it 'absolute' instead of 'true'.

3

Something is desired?

Well, do you desire it if it is not meaningful desire?

Then, how can you desire anything but meaning?

Does that mean abandon desire, or does that mean adopt meaning?

4

If something is not complex, it does not relate with everything.

But if we reduce something that is not related to everything, then it relates to even less of everything.

By the time we fully reduce it, it will relate to everything or nothing.

Everything requires relevance.

Everything relevant, if it reduces, relates with everything.

Therefore, everything efficient is complex, reduced or not: everything relevant relates with everything.

Therefore, true systems are coherent. The best technology involves philosophy.

5

Let's say something is not a parsdigm, but instead a paradine. Let's say it has a more advanced definition. How would this not change the result?

Now imagine the ideal case?

What would produce ideal results?

You see, if we believe in the ideal methods we cannot help but believe in the ideal answers.