How To Be Smart: EXPLORING CHEMISTRY

1

A chemist said to me he could do everything, except he didn’t know why his arms were heavy. His arms had been heavy ever since he learned chemistry.

I told him: “My best guess is your arms are supposed to be cold, like non-existent.”

Thanks he said. It seemed to work to make his arms lighter.

What I didn't tell him was it was a reflection on antimatter. The equation for antimatter is summarized as 'the suns are relatively cold’.

2

Now if we want metaphysics we mix cold antimatter and sulfur, as sulfur represents potential metaphysics, and the cold antimatter will make it lighter and more plentiful.

If we then want it to do something we mix it with sodium, which produces potential processing. If we want consciousness to emerge in an unconfused way, we might first need calcium, which creates structure.

Then we might want carbon, magnesium, and potassium, for life, molecular compounds, and emotion respectively.

If we want advanced culture we will likely need chlorine for water processing, copper for change, zinc for transfer, phosphorous for ripening, and iron for seriousness.

3

The average chemist often solves things volumetrically, but the first secret rule is congregation by association:

Turmeric is good for the gut because of its similarity to sulfur, the origin of the gut.

Likewise, sugar is good for the brain, as sugar is similar in color to the bones, which it is the brain's function to control.

We call this affinity.

Milk is largely responsible for male fertility, through its perpetuation of the bones as a structure for the brain.

Aphrodisiacs like chocolate are passive-reactive, reacting with the female system through the craving for more, related to the emotional attachment to pheremones themselves attached to wielders of tools.

The immortal aspect then might be guessed to be related to the internal wielding of tools through imitation substances, recreating a sexual function which aims to be perpetually self-justifying.

Where the internal is allied with mad antimatter, it should seek complex smells, which provide ultimate knowledge. In this case survival will be a matter of interpretation.

Where the internal is allied with complex tools, it should seek internal sensation, priming the skeletal machine.

And thus, in some sense immortality begins as a combination of knowledge and machine, that is, smell and pleasure.

And it may be the ultimate cleverness at first to achieve that end without significant risk or hardship.

Now we can say that pain arrives primarily from deprivation of pleasure, and mad freedom is the power of thought, and so immortality emerges from the capacity for pleasure and thought, represented by technology and antimatter, antimatter being the force that can create lightness, and cause potential.

And thus the two powers are obsessional knowledge and prodigious plenty.

And their twins are fixate information and cultural authority.

4

Now the key for the immortality, if the soul is sulferic with antimatter may be either matter or anti-sulfur, for otherwise it has already attained knowledge and machine.

Likewise, if the soul is hormones and tools or pleasure and machine, it should seek out ultimately a lack of structure (anticalcium) or a lack of pleasure, or it is already fulfilled.

Thus, if pleasure is a machine, we get education and ignorance and immortality as exclusions.

If the soul is mad, the solution is elements or the avoidance of sulfur or immortality as exclusions.

Thus, the mad person should seek sulferic antimatter, representing interpretation, while the sane person must simply choose neither ignorance nor education, representing pleasure.

Granted, this is just a precis.

What is worth noting however is that further sucess of either type will likely depend on adding exponents (information or volumetrics), additional limited specialized reactions (such as drugs or genetics), or some combination of sanity and madness.

Thus, the madman might be expected to find pleasure, cure madness, adapt, or be perfect.

The sane person might be expected to react, go insane, adapt, or be perfect.

Thus, their realizations involve 4 parts pleasure from madness, 4 parts madness from sanity, 4 parts sanity from madness, 4 parts reaction, 8 parts adaptation, and 8 parts perfection.

Only 1/16 is two parts perfect, and only 1/16 is two parts adapted.

If we match the equal parts, then pleasure from madness is the reaction between sanity and insanity, and the measure of adaptation is what is perfect, and is only 1/2 likely.

So, now we conclude adaptation is random, and pleasure comes exclusively from complexity.

Now we could predict death is anticalcium, because calcium creates structure which is the basis for complexity, thus anticalcium is the destruction of structure, and the destruction of pleasure.

In effect, anticalcium is pain. This is a very natural view.

Now we know from much earlier that the pleasure machine is immortal, ignorant, or in pain. Thus, if immortal and pain are not ignorant, the immortal becomes knowledge of pleasure, represented by tools.

Thus, madness looks like a viable option if we have no pleasure. The madman either agrees that anticalcium is part of antimatter, or produces a partial reaction, or devotes himself to sulferic creativity.

Thus, the madman is a theoretical generalist who accepts the existence of pain, or a specialist against pain, or a creative person.

Now, there are only certain personalities of immortality if we are correct about sulfur, hormones, and similar parts being identical, and they are permutations of the immortal pleasure machine with the generalist, the specialist, and the creative.

Notice only the specialist sacrifices for pleasure.

Only the generalist acknowledges pain.

And only the creative completely reacts with antisulfur.

Thus, the artist is the creator, the generalist is the judge, and the specialist appears to bear responsibility.

Thus, from a wise alchemist's perspective, it is the specialist who bears risk and reaps reward, the generalist who learns, and the creative who acts. These seem to be the three Players of existence.

If there is a fourth player, it is the superficial I-Mage that wishes to do everything itself.

5.

At this point we might be prepared to see the immortal as a type of thought, re-affirming, reverberating, and re-constituting.

For the four personalities are really four chemical paradigms: the Generalist aims to become a living paradigm, the Specialist desires some type of special license, the Creative aims to achieve through action, and the I-Mage thrives on perfect art.

Thus, these are the personalities of immortality that are available: one glorifying immortal existence, another glorifying information, another glorifying heroism, and the last glorifying image.

These so to speak, are the metaphysical animals.

If immortality cannot be achieved by heroic, artistic, accredited existence, it might be unattainable.

The obvious thing to do is eliminate the dangers of existence through the proportions of properties found in the successful types.

Another, perhaps related approach is to find a formula, gene, drug, source of energy, etc that has the same effect as perfect adaptation.

6.

Inside a microscope is a little universe. Kind of literally. Things there have more scale.

Perhaps there was no universe before information theory.

The universe is constantly expanding from microscopic events. Changes in education if you will.

The whole project does not really have scale. What is interesting is what makes simple things difficult.

Perfection is what is difficult for complexity. With great power the entire universe is a small leap. Yet that leap is greater than any other.

The universe is made of significance and understanding. They do not combine well when they are neutral.

The universe must be perpetual and subtle, universal, and absolute. Therefore it is hard to have understanding.

Because understanding is difficult, it is the thing to focus on in the universe, if we know that everything matters to us.

But we do not always know, and so there are small events that break our consciousness. We cannot always focus on understanding. At times the universe is larger than us.