Although the writing "Nathan Coppedge: The Most Under-Rated Designer..." contained "special fair use" images associated with inventions by the author of the blog, these images have been removed to avoid new arriving copyright and trademark ambiguities related to the use of "AdSense". If further issues or ambiguities crop up, please refer the concern to the author and the offending content will be removed..
I am a philosopher, artist, inventor, and poet (in some capacity), and a member of the International Honor Society for Philosophers. My quotes have appeared in the Hartford Courant, Poemhunter.com, and other independent websites. A comment at The Economist cites my possible influence on the economic policy of India. One of my artworks once sold for $1 million off the street but I ended up returning the money. I have written many books on topics such as perpetual motion machines, philosophy systems, and the occult. I live in New Haven near Yale University.
3 comments:
I am thinking about what you said about "theory condensation" but I really can't wrap my mind around it.
Is it that... for all theories that they should keep all principals intact (as for those that the theory itself managed to keep within one system) while still being able to tell the theory from the principals of/for the theory itself and that there is as such a way (or could/should be a way) for one to be able to constantly determine those principals that resulted from the origin of the theory (as for those principals that drove the theory into reality as a theory) and those principals that were themselves the result of it as a correct and true theory?
What I mean by 'condensation' is the efficiency of the theory, conventionally shown as the number of allowable assumptions which precede the arguments / and or system.
Oh ok kind of like as for how many ways something can be disproven based on the ways that something can/could already exist.
That may not have come out right but I think that I know what you mean, although I find myself lost with all logic while you seem to use it to define certain things better than I do.
Post a Comment