Last Friday I got 68 more views than Nietzsche

At Poemhunter:
Nietzsche, 93:
https://www.poemhunter.com/friedrich-nietzsche/stats/

Nathan Coppedge, 161:
https://www.poemhunter.com/nathan-coppedge/stats/

Recent Additions to History of Philosophy

The Counter-Calculus (Feb 2018)
Multi-Modularism (Feb 2018)
New Existentialism (Feb 2018)
Group Formalism (Feb 2018)
Emergent Contractualism (one of my favorite theories, Feb 2018)
Black Ideas (Feb 2018)
Integrated Progress (Feb 2018)
Alternative Systems (Feb 2018)
Non-Causal Systemology (Laws of Timeless Nature, Feb 2018)
Subtle Physics (Mar 2018)
The Dubious Process-Coherence (Mar 2018)
Proof by Machine (Mar 2018)
Minima Ontology (Mar 2018)
…

ABSTRUSIST MORALITY (1993)

What if the key to everything were nothing?

Maybe if it were good later it would be really good.

Maybe the only good cheating is cheating at cheating.

We should focus on 'savoring the last crumb' by which we appreciate everything.

THE COUNTER-CALCULUS (FEB 2018)

(Prescript: Before there were idiots it was all malarky… Know all the alternatives, climb the magic steps).

I know it will be cold tomorrow, because I'm not going to wear my coat. It happens my coat is enchanted with warm weather.

Sometimes pessimism is the best theory of optimism, because it creates awareness and raises the standard.

We progress when we think of the alternatives. How were we ever right? Well, through our degree of being concerned.

We may have moved on, but it is all necessary.

We can create necessity, for it defines proof.

A higher proof defies necessity.

Back to our roots, magical reasoning.

There is ‘something in there’, for I do not comprehend.

I may as well be an expert, to limit my options.

I should seek sacrosancts, because they have formility!

Calculus is really a forge of concepts.

Little more, that is what we are looking for!

Amalgamated feeling!

Dove-doors!

Proscilitution!

Grimacing gnomes!

Sophisocracy!

Eliadics!

Eddes!

Meaningful attractions!

Mechanical speed!

Sublimation!

Divine information!

Philosophical problemation!

Elidation!

Sophreyzation!

Composit samplification!

Exponential effication!

Significant vivification!

Conceptual animation!

…

(I reached this in Feb 2018)
...

MULTI-MODULARISM (FEB 2018)

[Coherent Systems 2.A.3.C.3.]

X = Number.

M = A module.

Number of Ms = X.

Number of Ms (X) = Coherent result R.

M(0) = Empty coherence.

MX = R1

MMX = R2

MMMX = R3

MMMMX = R4

If (R1, R2, R3, R4) is a coherent set, then MXMMXMMMXMMMMX = Coherence.

(Soul: Expecting a four).

…

NEW EXISTENTIALISM (FEB 2018)

Essentially, it adopts a new framework → uses the framework for some new notion → is useful → may be open to meta-interpretation.

Existential Coincidence

...

GROUP FORMALISM (FEB 2018)

Also called Group Formalism, as opposed to formal grouping. I do not consider this list comprehensive.

Pure Theoretics

Modal Formalism

High-Minded Formalism

Survival Formalism
...

EMERGENT CONTRACTUALISM (FEB 2018)

I think its more like this process:

1. Learn how to negotiate, or encounter a higher intelligence.
2. Negotiate, either through intelligence or interaction with higher intelligence.
3. Have an idea.
4. Contract the idea.
5. Locate a body of ideas or objects (‘setting’) as a result of the contract.

Now, we can ask whether the ‘setting’ has ‘emerged’ but it is much smarter to see the setting, from our vantage point as a contractualization of our prior ideas, and from others’ vantage points as a continued attempt at bargaining.

My general thesis is that the universe, that is, the real living universe, is far more intellectual than we think. Everything that is not intellectual tends to encounter something supernatural. That is the part we forget when we encounter the physical largesse of our own often inevitable contracts for dominion.

The supernatural aspect mostly only exists in order to ‘reproduce’ — to interact with the contractual, core-idea forming elements, and it may be predatory, but it remains blameless because there are necessities, ideas, and compensation built into the system.

Once we have a contract (with the universe), we can say whether we are being wise or foolish, or if we are just not getting what we want.
...

BLACK IDEAS (FEB 2018)

For awhile things don’t seem to get better, they seem to stagnate.

Then you are sure that you’ve evolved a little bit…

You have a black idea, something to add to your other ideas, until things seem to get a little bit better.

Now we cannot prove that we are not evolved.

Such is the influence of the idea.

And from then on, you decide you are allied to the ‘blackest ideas’ — that is, the ones that are most evolved.

Even so, it is a delicate balance, and it is possible—although difficult even—to imagine another approach or technique going equally far.

The black ideas are one of many methods—although not the worst, to prevent civilization from crumbling.

How high the day, how good the honey—when you can afford more than one!

Things will surely change for the better. How funny it was to think you were being blackmailed!—

It looks the same, but it is different, such is the nature of the best ideas!

One must therefore concern oneself with this mythological thing, this elephant in the room—which is merely one’s ability to comprehend with some completeness the importance of any one of these true ideas.

It is a bit like gambling, but with more reassurance, and within a few measures great things come to pass.

Therefore, acknowledge greatness, and stand in the shadow—civilization is non pareill.

...

INTEGRATED PROGRESS (FEB 2018)

It is much like how a mouse-brain thinks, as exaggerated by the human mind. Potentially advanced, in a smallish form.

“When the present integrates the thoughts of the future, then progress is integrated. Thus, progress is the past of the future, so progress is now. Thought integrated with the present is integrated progress when the present integrates the future. Thoughts of the present are the future of integration.”

The method is the following:

1. Look back from the future.
2. Think about what remains of the present.
3. Act with future knowledge.
4. Gradually resolve the presence of the future.
5. See the present as an element of the future.
6. Calibrate ideas by their arbitrary distance to the future.
7. Guess future ideas.
8. Plan history coherently.
9. Refine timeless models.
10. Adopt relevant paradines (paradigmatic paradigms).
11. Use standardized or better metaphysics.

ALTERNATIVE SYSTEMS (FEB 2018)

[Coherent Systems 2.A.3.C.4.]

Proof is Proof (if it exists as such, or to the extent that its considered proof).

What is a proof?

Okay, what we have just stated as the definition of proof is indeed proof as such or considered as such.

…

Implications:

• There are many, many variations of proof.
• Each is a true proof by its own standard, if it has a standard.
• Everything has its own kind of proof.
• Everything is proven to the extent that it has a standard.
• We should seek the best standard.
• The standard of standards is the standard of proof.
• There is no proof without standards.
• The proof of proof is the proof of standards.
• Proving standards are standard proofs.
• The standard of proof proves a similar standard of standards, such as universal.
• The proof, for example, of the universal, is proven by the proof of standards regarding the universal.
• Universal proof is a universal standard.
• The proof varies with the standard.
• The universal proof varies with the universal standard.
• If the universal standard constitutes the laws of absolute logic, then if such logic is absolute, the universal proof depends on it.
• Then where the universal standard is absolute logic, the universal proof derives from it, and similarly for other logics.
• What constitutes the universal standard will be the ultimate basis of proof.
• Therefore the ultimate basis of proof has a universal standard.

...

NON-CAUSAL SYSTEMOLOGY (FEB 2018)

Otherwise known as The Laws of Timeless Nature.

[Coherent Systems 2.A.3.D.2.]

SUCCESSFUL TYPES:

VERTICAL IMPOSITION

A translation with the same meaning.

(—crude analogies)

COHERENT CYCLE

ABCD and ADCB using polar opposites in diagonally opposite positions.

(—categorical deduction method)

TIMELESS REGRESS

Proof is proof. What is proof? Okay.

(—Alternative Systems )

ETERNAL ORDER

The such (universe) works because it is such (complete), by infinite mastery or sufficient coincidence.

(—Scientific or theological approach)

PARTIALLY FAILED TYPES:

IMPOSED COHERENCE

Venn Diagrams.

VERTICAL CYCLE

Gödel's defense of mathematical vitality and objectivity with Completeness and Incompleteness.

TIMELESS IMPOSITION

Incoherent Coherentism.

VERTICAL REGRESS

Specific metaphysical theories.

COHERENT REGRESS

The Infinite Trumpet.

TIMELESS CYCLE

History.

ETERNAL IMPOSITION

Legality, vanity, espousal, pretext.

VERTICAL ORDER

Replacement, elimination, simplification, objectification.

ETERNAL CYCLE

Disclosure, deanimation, nothing, unexceptionalism.

COHERENT ORDER

Labeling, assuming, exaggerating, electrifying.

ETERNAL REGRESS

Ambiguousity, greed, collapse, impossibility.

TIMELESS ORDER

Insubstantiality, hesitation, emptiness, requirement.

MORE COMPLETELY FAILED CASES

COHERENT VERTICAL

Function, equivalence, justification, awareness.

CYCLE OF IMPOSITION

Strategy or strategizing, cheating, modifying, changing.

TIMELESS VERTICAL

Discovery, singularity, solving, credit.

IMPOSED REGRESS

Destruction, non-existence, over-complexity, confusion.

CHANGELESS VERTICAL

Death spiral.

CYCLE OF REGRESS

Delay, usurpation, maxing, incidiousness.

ETERNAL VERTICAL

Discovery, singularity, solving, credit.

IMPOSED ORDER

Temporality, ugliness, dysfunction, doubtfulness.

ETERNAL COHERENCE

Transparency, exception, paranoia, example.

CYCLICAL ORDER

Imperfection, multiplicity, parity, holes.

TIMELESS AND ETERNAL

Ultimate, unsurpassable, refined, shrewd.

REVERSE ORDER

Incomplete, undone, irrational, historical.

...

SUBTLE OR SUBTIL PHYSICS (MAR 2018)

[Coherent Systems 2.A.3.D.3.]

1 SUBTLETY IN FORMULAS

In one case, an object is defined by a number of separate formulae… The formulae are collectively, so to speak, what makes the object subtle, which makes it physical. The larger the number of formulae, the more complex the object is relative to the physics, and so any subtlety which depends on more than one formula will also have a subtle physics by some definition.

2 PHYSICAL SUBTLETY

On the other hand, there are cases defined by a single law, in which case it is what is physical that is subtle, because many physical things pertain to the law, and where the number of physical things is many, the difference between physical things is subtle relative to the law, and so, the law is subtle.

3 SUBTLE LOCATIONS

On the other hand, there are things (objects) which vary not by law, nor by formulae, but rather by location, and these things are subtle because their location is subtle, for otherwise, there is nothing to distinguish locations, as the difference in locations cannot be great unless it is lesser between the majority of other locations, and so the difference represented by a location tends to be subtle, unless it is expressed as a law, or a formula, etc.

4 LOGICAL SUBTLETY

Too, there are things that may vary by logical reduction, and here it is clear that if objects do not logically reduce, the logic is subtle enough so as to be NECESSARY, which means that there is something necessarily complex about it, which implies that it is subtle, as it is hard to see why if something were already partially reduced, that it would not be reduced further. Therefore, what is not physical, or formulaic, or subtle in location, is actually subtle logically.

5 INFINITE SUBTLETY

So too, if an object is necessary but not logically subtle, this implies that it cannot be even partially reduced, in which case the object is infinite, which is again another form of subtlety which is hard to comprehend.

6 CONCLUSIONS

Therefore, all indications show that physically, in terms of formulas, in terms of locations, in terms of logic, and in terms of infinity, every thing (objects) are subtle, and therefore we may surmise that physics has a rule of subtlety.

Now we may determine that there is something special about physics:

(1) It may be partly ambiguous or random.

(2) It may be self-determinative in some way.

(3) It may be small and ingenious, and hard to comprehend.

(4) It may be composed of some type of essence or abstract substance.

(5) It may be on the whole inexplicable, because no explanation is large enough.

Therefore, unless further concepts of substantial subtlety present themselves* (*As may be the case) we may assume that physics in its subtlety takes one or more of these forms.

A corollary is that physics adopts those properties that are subtle, insofar as formulas, physics, locations, logic, and infinity are implied within the subtle.

The alternative to subtlety is then also likely to be subtle in at least one way, unless the thing is contradictory in some way.

THE DUBIOUS PROCESS-COHERENCE (MAR 2018)

Not much in this category for good reason, nor can it be considered fully-coherent so far.
The Coherent Dialectic

...


PROOF BY MACHINE (MAR 2018)

Ask someone: Relatively speaking, all the potential of life comes from immortality.

If they do not agree with you, in a high-minded sense they must be a robot.

MINIMA ONTOLOGY (MAR 2018)

Everything is true in some way about everything → Law by Universalism.

Nothing is true about nothing → Illusion.

…

to be continued. My brain is not functioning this morning.

See also:
Shortlist of 'souls’ of Ancient Philosophy

Social Science: The Counter-Calculus

(Prescript: Before there were idiots it was all malarky… Know all the alternatives, climb the magic steps).

I know it will be cold tomorrow, because I'm not going to wear my coat. It happens my coat is enchanted with warm weather.

Sometimes pessimism is the best theory of optimism, because it creates awareness and raises the standard.

We progress when we think of the alternatives. How were we ever right? Well, through our degree of being concerned.

We may have moved on, but it is all necessary.

We can create necessity, for it defines proof.

A higher proof defies necessity.

Back to our roots, magical reasoning.

There is ‘something in there’, for I do not comprehend.

I may as well be an expert, to limit my options.

I should seek sacrosancts, because they have formility!

Calculus is really a forge of concepts.

Little more, that is what we are looking for!

Amalgamated feeling!

Dove-doors!

Proscilitution!

Grimacing gnomes!

Sophisocracy!

Eliadics!

Eddes!

Meaningful attractions!

Mechanical speed!

Sublimation!

Divine information!

Philosophical problemation!

Elidation!

Sophreyzation!

Composit samplification!

Exponential effication!

Significant vivification!

Conceptual animation!

…

(I reached this in Feb 2018)

Social Science: The Semantic Criticism

There is in first an idea of what has essence, which is merely that which is real enough to impress itself on any medium…

It could be called semiology, homotype, homologic, homology, or any one of a number of names… all with the same ultimate logical potential if we ignore axioms…

What happens is also the theory of critique, the frame of reference, the divested variable, the systematic discord—it, whatever it is, is all that can have limit and measure, because it is all that happens, or at least, it is all that can be observed happenimg in a controlled environment barring some exceptional event.

{An exceptional event would in fact be, under some interpretation, either an iteration or translation of earlier events, or some new invention which changes the natural potential of events if they are corroborative of that new thing.}

It is so to speak, semantics. Now, interpret with fear. For, we must be serious. If we are to see the importance of semantics we must see every neutrality and nuance with enough contrast that each thing is slightly perceptible compared to the next.

It is, so to speak, in its own bubble or caccoon of subtly differentiated meanings. They concern everything, but they are all within one perceptive bubble. A single bubble. A bubble of fearful semantics. A technique, a techniqűe, a technic, or what have you. The bubble is the relevant thing, the communicator, the go-to for solving problems. It is a diction, and a doorway, a lucid derivative, and a reconciliation of everything known.

And yet it is semantics, a single idea. An idea-function.

What happens when this function has form?

Well, it becomes sensitive, it learns, it processes, it takes a form, and then it hardens.

And, all these stages are still semantic logic. Thus, semantics to an extent is this process, but it also consists of essence, and a group of other terms:

Corroboration, cohesion, coherence, relevance, application, and idea.

Indeed, the way semantics play out, idea is a very lofty thing, a kind of limit of all potential. Indeed, ideas may be the limits of semantic potential. Fortunately there is more than one.

Therefore, studying this, you may know how to semiologize, and you will be adapted to the notion of formal idea. You will also relax into the attitude of sophisticated formalizing.

After semantics, some type of imagination should definitely be possible. You merely require a definition, and your mind rambles looking for its natural potential.

Since we know semiotics, we know that natural potential is proven fully by the fact of existence.

Therefore, think, know! And carry on symbolically.

Souls of Analytical and Gestalt Psychology

Trees are green because they have a green purpose, or as part of a process. Trees are green because it says everything, or because truth is inaccessible. Trees are green because that is what works best, unless we're wrong. Trees are green to inspire us, or because trees are that way somehow.

The heart itself has its own reason that reason itself cannot understand.

Some objects have little or no mass.

When one visits another country, it is never authentic. Because authentic things never happen there.

A lot of belly-button lint. More and more. Endless streams. Endless belly-button lint. Disappointing belly-button lint.

First of all, if you have more extreme problems, consult a doctor, as I am not an expert and I don't want you to dislocate anything.

If it is not a zero-sum game, the results can sometimes be positive.

Things change when its no big deal.

I have thought considerably more than most about the psychological implications of a society that considers big ears—which are not even part of the brain—to be a sign of stupidity.

Because the context sucks → Because high standards were applied → Because its challenging → Because I have a soul.

The major doors that we know lead to greater simplicity.

Put to an incomplete arbitrarily complicated task, however, the brain can be very limited.

Either life is peaches, or you're doomed, or you don't understand psychology.

Souls of Mathematics

“1. The potential that existed at the beginning, or else in the ideal case. 2. The alternate imagination or the ideal that exists now. 3. The ability to predict and manifest possibilities.”

—The Triangle or Psychic Triangle by Nathan Coppedge

“Knowledge of limits.” —Isaac Newton

“The true figure of mathematics is strangely indefinite. If mathematics changes, it will require a great process. Some figures are real, and some less real: this describes the folly and potential of mathematics. If something is absolute, it is often very small, or else its potential would be unreal. There is nothing truly limiting for a real exponent. Limits, true limits, are something finite, and so the more mathematics we know, the more we go blind. The nature of mathematics, if it is beautiful, is no more than a strange blot of color in a field of blank space. The blank space is terrible, demonic, and destroys mathematics. If there is something more essential than mathematics for mathematics, it is an odd figure.”

—Paraphrase of Gödel

“Logic is in Chains.” —R. Volkman

“I. 1. Induction (guesstimation)→ 2. Abduction (Scientific hypothesis) →3. Causal inference (Syllogisms) and Axiomatics, Proof Theory, Incoherent Set Theory.→ 4. Incoherent Qualification: Qualification in Causal Inference→ 5. Major Exceptions to Coherence (irrationality, solving paradoxes, empty sets, formal incoherence). →6. Fuzzy logic, intuition, formal semantics, semiotics.→ 7. Infinitary logic, closed systems, exponential efficiency.→ 8. Non-causal inference, Coherent Set Theory→ 9. Universal Qualification→ 10. Informal Exceptions. II. 1. Ideology. → 2. Mechanics. → 3. Paradigmatics. → 4. Core Essence. → III. 1. Perfection. → 2. Complexity. IV. Divinity.”

—Narhan Coppedge

“May we predict, now you have brains?” —N. Coppedge

Souls of Physics

“The laws of physics are only ideal at being themselves.” —Unknown

“Physicists need to learn about tie-die.” —A Thought Interpretted from my Mother

“Unless you do physics, all you can think of is a crusty cookie.” —Unknown

“Motion continues unless there is resistance. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. An object in motion tends to stay in motion.” —Paraphrase of Newton's Laws

“0: That, all conditions being equal, energy remains constant. 1: That, with some resistance, energy decreases. 2: That, with heat energy, energy tends to dissipate. 3: That, since most structures have some void, no perfect seal can be built to contain heat. 4: That, over infinite time, energy tends to return to zero. 5: That energy tends to be created from the destruction of particles.” —Laws of Thermodynamics

“A black hole is a singularity. You don't know your wave functions if you don't know that. A black hole is a hole: an absence of space relative to time. Heat is a bowshock, the wave of a crescendo. Waves describe everything in motion, if it is also admitted a wave can also be a surface. Quanta describe particles at rest. The foundational principle is construction and continuation. But this basic principle is broken by indefinite energy states. Wave-particle duality is broken by a further principle of the multiplication of elemental composite properties resulting from indefinite energy. Many of the correlated properties concern either waves or composite properties, such as those observed in material science and biology. If there are unique or unusual properties, they tend to emerge because of an opposition singularity or some of the properties mentioned above. Physicists say that an oppositional singularity is not a black hole, but people don't listen. In fact, an oppositional singularity is any state involving sufficiently opposite properties which might create a unique energy state.” —Advanced Physics

When we see the facts for what they are, we can do whatever we want.